Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the environmental impacts of alternative fuel usage in cement production: a life cycle approach

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cement production is a complex process including the use of a high amount of raw materials and energy, and it causes significant emissions such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide. However, the use of alternative fuels in cement production has ecological, economic, and social benefits. In this study, the environmental impacts of alternative fuel usage in cement production process were determined by life cycle assessment (LCA) using two methods: (1) IMPACT 2002+ for determining the effects on climate change, human health, ecosystem quality, and resources and (2) Hoekstra et al. (2012) for determining the effect on water scarcity. For this purpose, firstly, LCA of cement production was conducted for the present situation (PS) in Turkey. Secondly, three scenarios (S1, S2, and S3) were built which include different substitution rates (15% and 30%) and different alternative fuels (refuse-derived fuel [RDF] and thermally dried sludge [DS]). The results indicate that the use of RDF as an alternative fuel is more environmentally friendly than the use of DS in cement production. Climate change, one of the most significant impacts derived from cement production, reduces 27% and 12% with the 30% and 15% substitution rate of fossil fuel by RDF for all cement types, respectively. On the contrary, with the use of DS (substitution rate of 15%), climate change increases about 0.5% compared with PS conspicuously. Considering results in terms of water scarcity assessment, it is concluded that electricity consumption is the most significant process contributed to water scarcity because of the production process of electricity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AA:

Aquatic acidification

AE:

Aquatic eutrophication

AEco:

Aquatic ecotoxicity

C:

Carcinogens

GW:

Global warming

IR:

Ionizing radiation

LO:

Land occupation

MEX:

Mineral extraction

NC:

Non-carcinogens

NRE:

Non-renewable energy

OD:

Ozone layer depletion

RI:

Respiratory inorganics

RO:

Respiratory organics

TAN:

Terrestrial acidification/nutrification

TE:

Terrestrial ecotoxicity

WSI:

Water scarcity indicator

References

  • Abeliotis, K., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Lasaridi, K. (2012). Life cycle assessment of the MBT plant in Ano Liossia, Athens, Greece. Waste Management, 32(1), 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Jaf, H. (2014). Life cycle assessment and analysis of heat and power production alternatives from digested sewage sludge. Master thesis, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

  • Aranda-Usón, A., Ferreira, G., López-Sabirón, A. M., Sastresa, E. L., & De Guinoa, A. S. (2012). Characterisation and environmental analysis of sewage sludge as secondary fuel for cement manufacturing. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 29, 457–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Conte, A. (2013). A streamlined LCA framework to support early decision making in vehicle development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • AzariJafari, H., Amiri, M. J. T., Ashrafian, A., Rasekh, H., Barforooshi, M. J., & Berenjian, J. (2019). Ternary blended cement: An eco-friendly alternative to improve resistivity of high-performance self-consolidating concrete against elevated temperature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 575–586.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, S. (2015). Susuzlaştırılmış çamurun ısıl olarak kurutulması (in Turkish). Turkish-German Water Partnership-Day, Konya, Turkey. Retrieved October 6–8, 2015, from https://www.germanwaterpartnership.de/fileadmin/pdfs/gwp-veranstaltungen/05_turkish-gwpday_konya/05_tgwpd_2015_ppt02_bayer_suezle_klein.pdf.5.

  • Benhelal, E., Zahedi, G., Shamsaei, E., & Bahadori, A. (2013). Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 142–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, M. E., & Hellweg, S. (2010). Identifying improvement potentials in cement production with life cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(23), 9143–9149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, M. E., Koehler, A., & Hellweg, S. (2009). Model for cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of clinker production. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(19), 7578–7583.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourtsalas, A. T., Zhang, J., Castaldi, M. J., & Themelis, N. J. (2018). Use of non-recycled plastics and paper as alternative fuel in cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, 8–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruijn, H., Duin, R., & Huijbregts, M. A. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchart-Korol, D., & Kruczek, M. (2015). Water scarcity assessment of steel production in national integrated steelmaking route. Metalurgija, 54(1), 276–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çankaya, S., & Pekey, B. (2018). Comparative life cycle assessment of clinker production with conventional and alternative fuels usage in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 9(8), 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., An, T., Lu, S., Gao, X., & Wang, Y. (2019). The water footprint of coal-fired electricity production and the virtual water flows associated with coal and electricity transportation in China. Energy Procedia, 158, 3519–3527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Hong, J., & Xu, C. (2015). Pollutants generated by cement production in China, their impacts, and the potential for environmental improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 61–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D-8 Organization for Economic Cooperation. Retrieved March 05, 2019, from http://developing8.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Profile-on-Turkish-Cement-Industry.pdf.

  • Doka, G., Hillier, W., Kaila, S., Köllner, T., Kreißig, J., Muys, B., & Wessman, H. (2002). The assessment of environmental impacts caused by land-use in the life cycle assessment of forestry and forest products. Final report of Working Group, 2.

  • ECOFYS. (2016). Market opportunities for use of alternative fuels in cement plants across the EU. Assessment of drivers and barriers for increased fossil fuel substitution in three EU member states: Greece, Poland and Germany. Retrieved February 02, 2019, from https://cembureau.eu/media/1231/ecofysreport_wastetoenergy_2016-07-08.pdf.

  • EMEP/EEA. (2016). EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • EMRA (Energy Market Regulatory Authorities). (2018). Turkey’s energy profile and strategy. Available: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energy-strategy.en.mfa. Accessed 20 Aug 2019.

  • EN, T. (2002). 197-1. Cement—Part 1: Compositions and conformity criteria for common cements. Turkish Standard Institution. TS EN 197-1.

  • Feiz, R., Ammenberg, J., Baas, L., Eklund, M., Helgstrand, A., & Marshall, R. (2015). Improving the CO2 performance of cement. Part I: Utilizing life-cycle assessment and key performance indicators to assess development within the cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 272–281.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, T., Shen, L., Shen, M., Liu, L., & Chen, F. (2016). Analysis of material flow and consumption in cement production process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 553–565.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García-Gusano, D., Garraín, D., Herrera, I., Cabal, H., & Lechón, Y. (2015a). Life cycle assessment of applying CO2 post-combustion capture to the Spanish cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Gusano, D., Herrera, I., Garraín, D., Lechón, Y., & Cabal, H. (2015b). Life cycle assessment of the Spanish cement industry: Implementation of environmental-friendly solutions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(1), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Hoekstra, A. Y., & Bosman, R. (2018). The blue and grey water footprint of construction materials: Steel, cement and glass. Water Resources and Industry, 19, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzesik, K., & Malinowski, M. (2016). Life cycle assessment of refuse-derived fuel production from mixed municipal waste. Energy Sources Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 38(21), 3150–3157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güereca, L. P., Torres, N., & Juárez-López, C. R. (2015). The co-processing of municipal waste in a cement kiln in Mexico. A life-cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 741–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürsel, A. P., Masanet, E., Horvath, A., & Stadel, A. (2014). Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review. Cement and Concrete Composites, 51, 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habert, G., De Lacaillerie, J. D. E., Lanta, E., & Roussel, N. (2010). Environmental evaluation for cement substitution with geopolymers. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies (pp. 1607–1615).

  • Habert, G., De Lacaillerie, J. D. E., & Roussel, N. (2011). An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: Reviewing current research trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1229–1238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, A. Y., Mekonnen, M. M., Chapagain, A. K., Mathews, R. E., & Richter, B. D. (2012). Global monthly water scarcity: Blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS ONE, 7(2), e32688.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Hong, J., Otaki, M., & Jolliet, O. (2009). Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan. Waste Management, 29(2), 696–703.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., & Li, X. (2011). Environmental assessment of sewage sludge as secondary raw material in cement production: A case study in China. Waste Management, 31(6), 1364–1371.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinian, S. M., & Nezamoleslami, R. (2018). Water footprint and virtual water assessment in cement industry: A case study in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2454–2463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntzinger, D. N., & Eatmon, T. D. (2009). A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: Comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(7), 668–675.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IFC (International Finance Cooperation). (2007). Environmental, health, and safety guidelines for cement and lime manufacturing (pp. 1–16). Washington: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D. L., & Hall, C. R. (2015). Life cycle assessment used to determine potential midpoint environment impact factors and water footprint of field-grown tree production inputs and processes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 140(1), 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO. (2006). 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., et al. (2003). IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(6), 324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josa, A., Aguado, A., Cardim, A., & Byars, E. (2007). Comparative analysis of the life cycle impact assessment of available cement inventories in the EU. Cement and Concrete Research, 37(5), 781–788.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jungbluth, N., Chudacoff, M., Dauriat, A., Dinkel, F., Doka, G., Faist Emmenegger, M., & Stettler, C. (2007). Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Final report ecoinvent data v2. 0, 17.

  • Kara, M., Günay, E., Tabak, Y., & Yıldız, Ş. (2009). Perspectives for pilot scale study of RDF in Istanbul, Turkey. Waste Management, 29(12), 2976–2982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Tae, S., & Kim, R. (2018). Theoretical study on the production of environment-friendly recycled cement using inorganic construction wastes as secondary materials in South Korea. Sustainability, 10(12), 4449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y., Zhang, Q., Nielsen, C., & He, K. (2011). An inventory of primary air pollutants and CO2 emissions from cement production in China, 1990–2020. Atmospheric Environment, 45(1), 147–154.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., Cui, S., Nie, Z., Gong, X., Wang, Z., & Itsubo, N. (2015). The LCA of Portland cement production in China. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(1), 117–127.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marceau, M., Nisbet, M. A., & Van Geem, M. G. (2006). Life cycle inventory of Portland cement manufacture (No. PCA R&D Serial No. 2095b). Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, B. C., Williams, R. P., Lay, J., Van Riessen, A., & Corder, G. D. (2011). Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9–10), 1080–1090.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulčić, H., Klemeš, J. J., Vujanović, M., Urbaniec, K., & Duić, N. (2016). Reducing greenhouse gasses emissions by fostering the deployment of alternative raw materials and energy sources in the cleaner cement manufacturing process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • MENR (Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Directorate General of Renewable Energy). (2017). Energy consumption notification forms. Retrieved November 16, 2019, from  http://enver.eie.gov.tr/PortalDesign/PortalControls/WebIcerikGosterim.aspx?Enc=83D5A6FF03C7B4FCCA7E7D7189AC53694913826606E7901924BFA363AE7A5FD0.

  • MoEU (Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Directorate General of Environmental Management). (2017). Entegre Çevre (EÇİ) Tabi Çimento Üretim Tesislerinin Uyum Durumlari ve Gerekliliklerin Belirlenmesi Projesi (in Turkish). Retrieved January 17, 2019, from http://cygm.csb.gov.tr/hava-yonetimi-dairesi-baskanligi-i-452. 

  • Moya, J. A., Pardo, N., & Mercier, A. (2010). Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions: Prospective scenarios for the cement industry. JRC Scientific and Technical Report No. EUR, 24592.

  • Naqi, A., & Jang, J. G. (2019). Recent progress in green cement technology utilizing low-carbon emission fuels and raw materials: A review. Sustainability, 11(2), 537.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L., Moseson, A. J., Farnam, Y., & Spatari, S. (2018). Effects of composition and transportation logistics on environmental, energy and cost metrics for the production of alternative cementitious binders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 628–645.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, C. A., Modahl, I. S., Raadal, H. L., & Hanssen, O. J. (2003). Application of LCA as a decision-making tool for waste management systems. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(6), 331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials, 23(1), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrina, C. A., Lecomte, D., Arlabosse, P., & Rudolph, V. (2006). Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the design of an innovative drying process for sewage sludge. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 84(4), 270–279.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puerto, M., & SDC-GPWI, S. C. (2013). Water scarcity footprint for cement production. Retrieved January 09, 2019, from http://www.wulca-waterlca.org/pdf/case_study/Cement_Longversion_Puerto.pdf.

  • Rahman, A., Rasul, M. G., Khan, M. M. K., & Sharma, S. (2015). Recent development on the uses of alternative fuels in cement manufacturing process. Fuel, 145, 84–99.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., et al. (2004). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 30(5), 701–720.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salas, D. A., Ramirez, A. D., Rodríguez, C. R., Petroche, D. M., Boero, A. J., & Duque-Rivera, J. (2016). Environmental impacts, life cycle assessment and potential improvement measures for cement production: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salbaş, N. (2016). Sustainable cement sector index. Postgraduate thesis, Başkent University, Institute of Science and Engineering, Turkey.

  • Schorcht, F., Kourti, I., Scalet, B. M., Roudier, S., & Sancho, L. D. (2013). Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the production of cement, lime and magnesium oxide. JRC Reference Reports, European Commission.

  • Shirkhani, A., Kouchaki-Penchah, H., & Azmoodeh-Mishamandani, A. (2018). Environmental and exergetic impacts of cement production: A case study. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 37(6), 2042–2049.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SPO (The State Planning Organization), Ministry of Development of the Republic of Turkey. (2008). Ninth development plan. Retrieved February 15, 2019, from https://www3.kalkinma.gov.tr/DocObjects/Download/3869/oik703-c2.pdf.

  • Strazza, C., Del Borghi, A., Gallo, M., & Del Borghi, M. (2011). Resource productivity enhancement as means for promoting cleaner production: Analysis of co-incineration in cement plants through a life cycle approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(14), 1615–1621.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • TCMA (Turkish Cement Manufacturers Association). (2018). Retrieved January 12, 2019, from http://www.tcma.org.tr/ENG/index.php?page=icerikgoster&cntID=27.

  • Valderrama, C., Granados, R., Cortina, J. L., Gasol, C. M., Guillem, M., & Josa, A. (2012). Implementation of best available techniques in cement manufacturing: A life-cycle assessment study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valderrama, C., Granados, R., Cortina, J. L., Gasol, C. M., Guillem, M., & Josa, A. (2013). Comparative LCA of sewage sludge valorisation as both fuel and raw material substitute in clinker production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 205–213.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Liang, K., Li, J., Zhao, C., & Qu, D. (2016). LCA as a decision support tool for evaluating cleaner production schemes in iron making industry. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 35(1), 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Kocaeli University, 41001, Kocaeli, Turkey

    Simge Çankaya

Authors
  1. Simge Çankaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simge Çankaya.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çankaya, S. Investigating the environmental impacts of alternative fuel usage in cement production: a life cycle approach. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 7495–7514 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00533-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00533-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation