Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Combined AHP- and TOPSIS-Based Approach in the Assessment of Desertification Disaster Risk

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods were used to determine, prioritize, and assess the most effective desertification indices. A list of 32 influential indices was identified using existing literature in Iran and around the globe through questionnaires. Criteria for evaluating indices were weighted using Shannon entropy, and then TOPSIS ranking method was applied to determine the most effective desertification assessment to deal with this issue in Kashan region, Isfahan province. Indices were weighed and prioritized by analytics hierarchy process. Finally, the Mediterranean Desertification and Land Use (MEDALUS) model was used to assess the intensity and develop a desertification risk map. The results asserted that sensitivity to minor changes with a weight of 0.341 has the highest importance, while time and cost with a weight of 0.11 has the least importance for the evaluation of indices. Among the 32 ranked indices, 20 of which were identified as the most effectual indices including annual precipitation, salinity, and vegetation, to name a few. The results also showed that the land use change index with a weight of 0.217 and annual rainfall with a weight of 0.166 have the highest priority among human and natural indices that should be prioritized in managing and controlling desertification. The average weight of quantitative desertification intensity for the whole area was 1.391 placed in critical (1) class of desertification. Among the six considered desertification criteria, the climate and the destruction of water resources were the most important criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Environmentally sensitive areas to desertification

  2. Modified Iranian Classification of Desertification

  3. Modified Iranian Classification of Desertification

  4. Iranian Model of Desertification Potential Assessment

  5. Desertification mapping

  6. Ground Water Index

  7. Management Quality Index

  8. Soil Quality Index

  9. Vegetation Quality Index

  10. Climate Quality Index

  11. Wind Erosion Index

  12. Water Erosion Index

References

  1. UNCCD. (2005). Adoption of the agenda and organization of work, ICCD/COP (7)/CST 1, 15 pp.

  2. Zehtabian, G., Khosravi, H., & Masoudi, R. (2014). Models of desertification assessment (criteria and indices). Tehran: University of Tehran Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sadeghiravesh, H., Reyahi, K., & Khosravi, H. (2012). Zoning wind erosion potential risk in central iran using modified numerical taxonomy model. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science, 12(1), 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aazarian, F., Valizadeh, S., Dehghan, P., & Khosravi, H. (2017). Assessment and mapping desertification risk in Roudab region. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 69(4), 789–804.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joachim, H., & Jacques, M. (2007). Land degradation and soil erosion mapping in a mediterranean ecosystem. In H. Joachim, M. Wolfgang, & A. Michael (Eds.), imaging spectrometry, a tool for environmental observation (pp. 237–260). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kadovic, R., Bohajar, Y., Perovic, V., Simic, S. B., Todosijevic, M., Tosic, S., Andelic, M., Mladan, D., & Dovezenski, U. (2016). Land Sensitivity analysis of degradation using MEDALUS model: case study of Deliblato Sands, Serbi. Journal of Archives of Environmental Protection, 42(4), 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lahlaoi, H., Rhinane, H., Hilali, A., Lahssini, S., & Moukrim, S. (2017). Desertification assessment using MEDALUS model in Watershed Oued El Maleh, Morocco. Journal of Geosciences, 50(7), 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tavakoli, M., Nourinejad, S., & Rostamin, S. (2018). Evaluation and comparison of ICD and ESAs models for desertification zonation in Mehran plain, Ilam. Iranian Journal Rangeland and Desert Research, 24(4), 821–830.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hosseinpour, R., Onagh, M., Komaki, B., & Gask, M. R. (2017). Hazard assessment of desertification using the MICD model: a case study of Kaji pond watershed in Nehbandan, Iran. Journal of Desert Ecosystems Engineering, 14(6), 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silakhori, E., & Vahabzadeh, G. (2017). Assessment of desertification intensity in Roudab Sabzevar area by using MICD Model. Journal of Geography, 7(2), 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamali Maskooni, E., Kamali, M. A., Amiri, I., & Zare, M. (2015). Study of desertification status using IMDPAModel with emphasis on water, soil and vegetation criteria (case study: Faryab-Kerman Province). Journal of Biological Forum, 7(1), 1149–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rafi Sharif Abad, J., Noheghar, A., Zehtabian, G., Khosravi, H., & Gholami, H. (2016). Study of desertification status based on a sub-IMDPA model for a case study in Yazd-Ardakan plain, Iran. International Journal of Forest and Erosion, 6(3), 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sadeghiravesh, M., Khosravi, H., & Ghasemian, S. (2016). Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method. Solid Earth, 7(2), 673–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pourtaheri, M. (2014). Application of multi-attribute decision-making methods in geography. Tehran: The organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Momeni, M. (2006). New topics in operations research. Tehran: University of Tehran.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aldian, A., & Taylor, M. (2005). A consistent method to determine flexible criteria weights for multicriteria transport project evaluation in developing countries. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 3948–3963.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sadeghiravesh, H., & Zehtabian, G. (2010). Assessing desertification strategies using AHP model and preferential prioritization techniques based on similarity to ideal responses (TOPSIS). Journal of Natural Sciences and Techniques, 16(56), 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sadeghiravesh, M., Zehtabian, G., & Khosravi, H. (2014). Application of AHP and ELECTERE models for assessment of de_desertification alternatives. Journal of Desert, 19(2), 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grau, J. B., Anton, J. M., Tarquis, A. M., Colombo, F., de los R’os, L., & Cisneros, J. M. (2010). An application of mathematical models to select the optimal alternative for an integral plan to desertification and erosion control (Chaco Area – Salata Province – Argentina). Biogeosciences, 7, 3421–3433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sepehr, A., & Zucca, C. (2012). Ranking desertification indices using TOPSIS algorithm. Journal of Natural Hazards., 62(3), 1137–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pishyar, S., Khosravi, H., Tavili, A., & Malekian, A. (2018). Desertification risk mapping based on water resources degradation using multi criteria decision-making, case study: Kashan Plain. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 21(4), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sabouri, R. S., Nazari Samani, A. A., & Sepehr, A. (2016). Determining the most important indices of desertification based on the concept of DPSIR and multi- criteria decision- making techniques (case study: Fayz Abad Intervention). Journal of Earth Science Researches, 4(3), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mavi, R. K., Goh, M., & Mavi, N. K. (2016). Supplier selection with Shannon entropy and fuzzy TOPSIS in the context of supply chain risk management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Filar, J. A., Ross, N. P., & Wu, M. (2003). Environmental assessment based on multiple indicators. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 54, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In, Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58–191). Heidelberg: Springer

  27. European Commission. (1999). Mediterranean desertification and landuse (MEDALUS). Landen: MEDALUS office.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sepehr, A., Hassanli, A. M., Ekhtesasi, M. R., & Jamali, J. B. (2007). Quantitative assessment of desertification in the south of Iran using MEDALUS method. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 134, 243–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadeghiravesh, M., Khosravi, H., & Ghasemian, S. (2015). Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for assessment of combating-desertification alternatives in central Iran. Natural Hazards, 75(1), 653–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vesali, S. A., Zehtabian, G., & Azarnivand, H. (2016). Determination of the most effective indices of water and irrigation criteria in desertification intensity (case study: Kashan and Aran Bidgol plains). Journal of Desert Management, 6, 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Arid and Mountainous Regions Reclamation, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    Sara Pishyar, Hassan Khosravi, Ali Tavili, Arash Malekian & Sima Sabourirad

Authors
  1. Sara Pishyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hassan Khosravi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Tavili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arash Malekian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sima Sabourirad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Khosravi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The paper is a part of the M.Sc. thesis of the first author conducted at the University of Tehran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pishyar, S., Khosravi, H., Tavili, A. et al. A Combined AHP- and TOPSIS-Based Approach in the Assessment of Desertification Disaster Risk. Environ Model Assess 25, 219–229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-019-09676-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-019-09676-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation