Skip to main content
Log in

Deriving Environmental Life Cycle Inventory Factors for Land Application of Garden Waste Products Under Northern European Conditions

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The amount of waste which is being recycled is increasing in Europe. Garden waste is increasingly composted and land applied. However, composting to full maturity requires resources in terms of space, equipment and labour. Alternatives could include a simple shredding, or composting for a shorter time. Finally, an option could be to remove trunks and large branches which are not easy to compost and incinerate them to recover energy. In order to assess these options and the associated environmental impacts, it is necessary to have good estimates of emissions and other inventory factors during the different steps of the life cycle of the compost products. Especially, the impacts occurring after land application are difficult to estimate. The objective of the current paper is to estimate environmental inventory factors for land application of four garden waste products: shredded garden waste, shredded garden waste after removal of the woody fraction, immature garden waste compost and mature garden waste compost. Soil incubations of the materials were conducted in order to assess the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) dynamics occurring after incorporation in soil. Subsequently, the results were used to calibrate the mineralisation kinetics of the materials in the agroecosystem model Daisy. Subsequently, the model was used to simulate C and N dynamics under different environmental conditions and emissions to the environment and used to derive inventory factors. Nine soil and climate combinations were included in the simulation study to cover local conditions commonly found in Northern Europe. The degradability of the garden waste products increased when the woody fraction of garden waste was removed and generally the degradability of the product was decreased by composting. All four products showed initial immobilisation of N in soil, but it was clear that removal of the woody fraction and composting reduced the length and severity of the immobilisation phase. The approach taken in the current paper using soil incubations to estimate decomposition parameters for the materials and subsequently an agroecosystem model to extrapolate the observations proved efficient at estimating inventory factors under various environmental conditions and fertilisation levels. Under low N availability conditions, the harvest factor, which estimates the fraction of N harvested in response to application of an amount of compost ranged between 0.10 and 0.18 for a sandy loam soil and medium precipitation conditions for Northern European while it ranged from negative values to 0.12 under conditions of ample N supply. These results were also clearly reflected in the emission factors for N leaching to the groundwater and losses to surface water, which were higher under high N availability than under low. The harvest factor, emission factors for ammonia, N leaching to ground water and loss to surface water proved to be very dependent on the local conditions like the soil type, precipitation regime and general fertilisation level, whereas the biochemical composition of the materials was of less importance for these factors. In contrast, the C sequestration factor was almost unaffected by the environmental conditions but depended to a large extent on the degradability of the added material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EuroStat (2016). Municipal waste generation and treatment, by type of treatment method (tsdpc240), http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/DE/tsdpc240_esmsip.htm.

  2. Carlsbaek, M., (2015). Use of compost in horticulture and landscaping. In: Christensen, T.H. (ed.), Solid Waste Technology & Management. Wiley Publishers, pp. 651–664.

  3. Martínez-Blanco, J., Lazcano, C., Christensen, T. H., Muñoz, P., Rieradevall, J., Møller, J., Antón, A., & Boldrin, A. (2013). Compost benefits for agriculture evaluated by life cycle assessment. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33, 721–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feller, C., & Bernoux, M. (2008). Historical advances in the study of global terrestrial soil organic carbon sequestration. Waste Management, 28, 734–740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Komilis, D. P. (2006). A kinetic analysis of solid waste composting at optimal conditions. Waste Management, 26, 82–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amlinger, F., Gotz, B., Dreher, P., Geszti, J., & Weissteiner, C. (2003). Nitrogen in biowaste and yard waste compost: dynamics of mobilisation and availability—a review. European Journal of Soil Biology, 39, 107–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bary, A. I., Cogger, C. G., Sullivan, D. M., & Myhre, E. A. (2005). Characterization of fresh yard trimmings for agricultural use. Bioresource Technology, 96, 1499–1504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, S., Abrahamsen, P., Petersen, C. T., & Styczen, M. (2012). Daisy: model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, 55, 1315–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. de Willigen, P. (1991). Nitrogen turnover in the soil-crop system; comparison of fourteen simulation models. Fertilizer Research, 27, 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bruun, S., Christensen, B. T., Hansen, E. M., Magid, J., & Jensen, L. S. (2003). Calibration and validation of the soil organic matter dynamics of the Daisy model with data from the Askov long-term experiments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 67–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruun, S., Hansen, T. L., Christensen, T. H., Magid, J., & Jensen, L. S. (2006). Application of processed organic municipal solid waste on agricultural land—a scenario analysis. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 11, 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruun, S., Yoshida, H., Nielsen, M. P., Jensen, L. S., Christensen, T. H., & Scheutz, C. (2016). Estimation of long-term environmental inventory factors associated with land application of sewage sludge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 440–450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshida, H., Nielsen, M. P., Scheutz, C., Jensen, L. S., Bruun, S., & Christensen, T. H. (2016). Long-term emission factors for land application of treated organic municipal waste. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 21, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Styczen, M., Hansen, S., Jensen, L.S., Svendsen, H., Abrahamsen, P., Børgesen, C.D., Thirup, C., Østergaard, H.S., (2004). Standard setup of the Daisy model. Guideline and background. DHI Institut for Vand og Miljø.

  15. Bruun, S., & Jensen, L. S. (2002). Initialisation of the soil organic matter pools of the daisy model. Ecological Modelling, 153, 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Statbank Denmark, 2012. Cultivated area (AFG07). http://www.statbank.dk/afg07.

  17. Naturerhvervsstyrelsen, 2013. Vejledning om gødsknings-og harmoniregler 2012/13. http://1.naturerhverv.fvm.dk/goedningsregnskab.aspx?ID=2268.

  18. Vinther, F. P., & Hansen, S. (2004). SimDen—a simpel model to quantification of N2O-emission and denitrification (in Danish). DJF rapport Markbrug, 104, 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Myers, R. J. K., van Noordwijk, M., & Vityakon, P. (1997). Synchrony of nutrient release and plant demand: Plant litter quality, soil environment and farmer management options. In G. Cadisch & K. E. Giller (Eds.), Driven by nature. Plant litter quality and decomposition (pp. 3–30). Wallingford: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sullivan, D. M., Nartea, T. J., Bary, A. I., Cogger, C. G., & Myhre, E. A. (2004). Nitrogen availability and decomposition of urban yard trimmings in soil. Soil Science, 169, 697–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilmour, J. (1998). Carbon and nitrogen mineralization during co-utilization of biosolids and composts. In S. Brown, J. S. Angle, & L. Jacobs (Eds.), Beneficial co-utilization of agricultural, municipal and industrial by-products (pp. 89–112). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Luxhøi, J., Bruun, S., Stenberg, B., Breland, T. A., & Jensen, L. S. (2006). Prediction of gross and net N mineralization-immobilization-turnover from respiration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 1121–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaber, F. H., Shukla, S., Stoffella, P. J., Obreza, T. A., & Hanlon, E. A. (2005). Impact of organic amendments on groundwater nitrogen concentrations for sandy and calcareous soils. Compost science & utilization, 13, 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baldi, E., Toselli, M., Marcolini, G., Quartieri, M., Cirillo, E., Innocenti, A., & Marangoni, B. (2010). Compost can successfully replace mineral fertilizers in the nutrient management of commercial peach orchard. Soil Use and Management, 26, 346–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sommer, S. G., Jensen, L. S., Clausen, S. B., & Søgaard, H. T. (2006). Ammonia volatilization from surface-applied livestock slurry as affected by slurry composition and slurry infiltration depth. Journal of Agricultural Science, 144, 229–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bary, A. I., Cogger, C. G., & Myhre, E. A. (2004). Yard trimmings as a source of nitrogen for crop production. Compost science & utilization, 12, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mamo, M., Rosen, C. J., & Halbach, T. R. (1999). Nitrogen availability and leaching front soil amended with municipal solid waste compost. Journal of Environmental Quality, 28, 1074–1082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Erhart, E., Feichtinger, F., & Hartl, W. (2007). Nitrogen leaching losses under crops fertilized with biowaste compost compared with mineral fertilization. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170, 608–614.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gerke, H. H., Arning, M., & Stöppler-Zimmer, H. (1999). Modeling long-term compost application effects on nitrate leaching. Plant and Soil, 213, 75–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen, J. K., Boldrin, A., Samuelsson, J., Christensen, T. H., & Scheutz, C. (2010). Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from windrow composting of garden waste. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 713–724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We acknowledge 3R Research School at the Technical University of Denmark, Vestforbrændingen, AffaldVarme Århus and University of Copenhagen for funding the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sander Bruun.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nielsen, M.P., Yoshida, H., Raji, S.G. et al. Deriving Environmental Life Cycle Inventory Factors for Land Application of Garden Waste Products Under Northern European Conditions. Environ Model Assess 24, 21–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9591-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9591-9

Keywords

Navigation