Abstract
We present a theoretical and numerical study of the time evolution of the film of a soap bubble. Bubbles are assumed to remain approximately spherical with axisymmetric evolution. Inertia is neglected, and the surfactant is assumed insoluble. Applying lubrication theory, we simplify the equations governing the film thickness evolution, surfactant concentration, and tangential fluid velocity. Solving the simplified equations numerically, we examine the long-term behavior of the film and find that most features follow a power law of the form \(\alpha T^\beta \) where T is a dimensionless time parameter. We also predict the location (angle from the top) at which the film is thinnest and thus most likely to initiate bursting and present a similarity solution that predicts the decay rate of the minimum film thickness near the pinch-off location.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sha Y, Li Z, Wang Y (2011) The Marangoni convection induced by acetone desorption from the falling soap film. Heat and Mass Transf 48(5):749
Stefanus S, Steers S, Goldburg WI (2011) Direct measurement of turbulent shear. Physica D 240(23):1873–1876
Kostarev K, Viviani A, Zuev A (2006) Thermal and concentrational Marangoni convection at liquid/air bubble interface. J Appl Mech 73:66
Van Nierop EA, Scheid B, Stone HA (2008) On the thickness of soap films: an alternative to Frankel’s law. J Fluid Mech 602:119–127
Karakashev SI (2017) Hydrodynamics of foams. Exp Fluids 58:91
Bremond N, Villermaux E (2005) Bursting thin liquid films. J Fluid Mech 524:121–130
Lhuissier H, Villermaux E (2009) Soap films burst like flapping flags. Phys Rev Lett 103:054501
Müller F, Bohley C, Stannarius R (2009) Second sound in bursting freely suspended smectic-A films. Phys Rev E 79:046315
Müller F, Stannarius R (2009) Comparison of the rupture dynamics of smectic bubbles and soap bubbles. Liq Cryst 36(2):133–145
Couder Y, Basdevant C (1986) Experimental and numerical study of vortex couples in two-dimensional flows. J Fluid Mech 173:225–251
Kellay H, Wu XL, Goldberg WI (1998) Vorticity measurements in turbulent soap films. Phys Rev Lett 80:277–280
Belmonte A, Goldberg WI, Kellay H, Rutgers MA, Martin B, Wu XL (1999) Velocity fluctuations in a turbulent soap film: the third moment in two dimensions. Phys Fluids 11:1196–1200
Kellay H, Goldburg WI (2002) Two-dimensional turbulence: a review of some recent experiments. Rep Prog Phys 65(5):845
Vorobieff P, Rivera M, Ecke RE (1999) Soap film flows: statistics of two-dimensional turbulence. Phys Fluids 11(8):2167–2177
Lv W, Zhou H, Lou C, Zhu J (2012) Spatial and temporal film thickness measurement of a soap bubble based on large lateral shearing displacement interferometry. Appl Opt 51(36):8863–8872
Lv W, Zhou H, Zhu J (2012) Thickness measurement of full field soap bubble film in real time based on large lateral shearing displacement interferometry. AIP Conf Proc 1428(1):209–216
Vitry Y, Dorbolo S, Vermant J, Scheid B (2019) Controlling the lifetime of antibubbles. Adv Coll Interface Sci 270:73–86
Huang W, Iseringhausen J, Kneiphof T, Qu Z, Jiang C, Hullin MB (2020) Chemomechanical simulation of soap film flow on spherical bubbles. ACM Trans Graph 39(41):1–13
Ishida S, Synak P, Narita F, Hachisuka T, Wojtan C (2020) A model for soap film dynamics with evolving thickness. ACM Trans Graph 39(31):1–11
Reynolds O (1886) I. On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp Tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Proc R Soc Lond 40(242–245):191–203
Oron A, Davis SH, Bankoff SG (1997) Long-scale evolution of thin liquid films. Rev Mod Phys 69:931–980
Jain RK, Ruckenstein E (1976) Stability of stagnant viscous films on a solid surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 54(1):108–116
Sharma A, Ruckenstein E (1986) An analytical nonlinear theory of thin film rupture and its application to wetting films. J Colloid Interface Sci 113(2):456–479
Oron A, Rosenau P (1989) Nonlinear evolution and breaking of interfacial Rayleigh-Taylor waves. Phys Fluids A 1(7):1155–1165
Burelbach JP, Bankoff SG, Davis SH (1988) Nonlinear stability of evaporating/condensing liquid films. J Fluid Mech 195:463–494
Erneux T, Davis SH (1993) Nonlinear rupture of free films. Phys Fluids A 5(5):1117–1122
Davis SH (1987) Thermocapillary instabilities. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 19(1):403–435
Reisfeld B, Bankoff SG (1990) Nonlinear stability of a heated thin liquid film with variable viscosity. Phys Fluids A 2(11):2066–2067
Jensen OE, Grotberg JB (1993) The spreading of heat or soluble surfactant along a thin liquid film. Phys Fluids A 5(1):58–68
De Wit A, Gallez D, Christov CI (1994) Nonlinear evolution equations for thin liquid films with insoluble surfactants. Phys Fluids 6(10):3256–3266
Yarin AL, Oron A, Rosenau P (1993) Capillary instability of thin liquid film on a cylinder. Phys Fluids A 5(1):91–98
Reisfeld B, Bankoff SG (1992) Non-isothermal flow of a liquid film on a horizontal cylinder. J Fluid Mech 236:167–196
Takagi D, Huppert HE (2010) Flow and instability of thin films on a cylinder and sphere. J Fluid Mech 647:221–238
Blawzdziewicz J, Wajnryb E, Loewenberg M (1999) Hydrodynamic interactions and collision efficiencies of spherical drops covered with an incompressible surfactant film. J Fluid Mech 395:29–59
Sett S, Sinha-Ray S, Yarin AL (2013) Gravitational drainage of foam films. Langmuir 29(16):4934–4947
Leal LG (2007) Advanced transport phenomena: fluid mechanics and convective transport processes. Cambridge University Press, New York
Chang CH, Franses EI (1992) Modified Langmuir-Hinselwood kinetics for dynamic adsorption of surfactants at the air/water interface. Colloids Surf 69(2–3):189–201
Eggleton CD, Stebe KJ (1998) An adsorption-desorption-controled surfactant on a deforming droplet. J Colloid Interface Sci 208:68–80
Cristini V, Blawzdziewicz J, Loewenberg M (1998) Near-contact motion of surfactant-covered spherical drops. J Fluid Mech 366:259–287
Lyu S (2003) Block copolymers suppressing droplet coalescence through stopping film rupture. Macromolecules 36(26):10052–10055
Vannozzi C (2012) Coalescence of surfactant covered drops in extensional flows: Effects of the interfacial diffusivity. Phys Fluids 24:08
Cohen C, Darbois Texier B, Reyssat E, Snoeijer JH, Quéré D, Clanet C (2017) On the shape of giant soap bubbles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(10):2515–2519
Sett S, Sahu RP, Sinha-Ray S, Yarin AL (2014) Superspreaders versus “cousin’’ non-superspreaders: disjoining pressure in gravitational film drainage. Langmuir 30(10):2619–2631
De Gennes PG, Brochard-Wyart F, Quéré D (2002) Gouttes, bulles perles et ondes. Belin, Paris
Ungarish M (2009) An introduction to gravity currents and intrusions. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Singh G, Hirasaki GJ, Miller CA (1996) Effect of material properties on the drainage of symmetric, plane parallel, mobile foam films. J Colloid Interface Sci 184:92–105
Yeo LY, Matar OK, Perez ES, Hewitt GF (2001) The dynamics of Marangoni-driven local film drainage between two drops. J Colloid Interface Sci 241(1):233–247
Bergeron V (1999) Forces and structure in thin liquid soap films. J Phys: Condens Matter 11(19):R215–R238
Constantin P, Dupont TF, Goldstein RE, Kadanoff LP, Shelley MJ, Zhou SM (1993) Droplet breakup in a model of the Hele-Shaw cell. Phys Rev E 47(6):4169–4181
Bertozzi AL, Brenner MP, Dupont TF, Kadanoff LP (1994) Singularities and similarities in interface flows. Springer, New York, pp 155–208
Eggers J (1997) Nonlinear dynamics and breakup of free-surface flows. Rev Mod Phys 69:865–930
Vitasari D, Grassia P, Martin P (2015) Surfactant transport onto a foam film in the presence of surface viscous stress. Appl Math Model 40:10
Bhakta A, Ruckenstein E (1997) Decay of standing foams: drainage, coalescence and collapse. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 70:1–124
Burgess JM, Bizon C, McCormick WD, Swift JB, Swinney HL (1999) Instability of the Kolmogorov flow in a soap film. Phys Rev E 60(1):715–21
Wegener PP, Parlange JY (1973) Spherical-cap bubbles. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 5(1):79–100
Byakova AV, Gnyloskurenko SV, Nakamura T, Raychenko OI (2003) Influence of wetting conditions on bubble formation at orifice in an inviscid liquid: Mechanism of bubble evolution. Colloids Surf A 229(1–3):19–32
Abbena E, Salamon S, Gray A (2006) Modern differential geometry of curves and surfaces with mathematica, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Soluble surfactant
The surfactant concentration in the film, c, (in mass per volume) satisfies an advection-diffusion equation, given, in dimensional form, as
where \(k_\mathrm{c}\) is the bulk diffusivity and \({\bar{\nabla }}\) is a dimensional gradient. In the presence of sorption, Eq. (4) is supplemented with a bulk exchange term [37, 38],
where \(k_\Gamma \) is a diffusivity of surface surfactant. Combining Eq. (52) with the exchange term, we obtain a boundary condition on the bulk concentration,
where \({\mathbf {n}}\) is the outward unit normal at h. To describe the bulk exchange term, we can apply the constitutive relation [37, 38]
where \(k_{\mathrm {ad}}\) and \(k_{\mathrm {de}}\) are kinetic constants of adsorption and desorption, with units of \(\mathrm {m}/\mathrm {s}\) and \(\mathrm {s}^{-1}\), respectively.
To obtain dimensionless equations, we define \(C=c/c_0\) where \(c_0\) is the equilibrium bulk concentration. The exchange term in Eq. (55) rescales to \(J(\Gamma ,C_\mathrm{s})=j(\gamma ,C_\mathrm{s})/(\gamma _\infty u_0/r_0)\). To describe it more precisely, we write the gradient of the bulk concentration in coordinates, \((\varphi ,R)\):
so that in rescaled coordinate form, Eq. (54) becomes, on the outer film,
where L is a dimensionless surfactant depletion length \(L=\gamma _\infty /h_0c_0\). The expression on the inner film is the same but with the opposite sign of the R derivative. Rescaling, we obtain
where we have introduced a Biot number and an adsorption number
Then, if we discard higher order terms, Eqs. (52) and (53) rescale to
and
where
are Péclet numbers associated to the bulk and to the surface, respectively. Note that the factor of \(\varepsilon ^2\) in \(\mathrm {Pe}_\mathrm {c}\) ensures that \(\mathrm {Pe}_\mathrm {c}\) is likely much smaller than \(\mathrm {Pe}_\Gamma \). In general, surface diffusion, i.e., \(1/\mathrm {Pe}_\Gamma \), tends to be very small. The symmetry of the system results in the condition \(\frac{\partial C}{\partial R}\big |_{R=0}=0\) at the center of the film.
Proceeding in a manner similar to Sect. 2.5, we integrate the bulk surfactant equation, Eq. (58), across the film, using Eq. (17) and the boundary conditions (21) and (56). We obtain
Appendix B: The derivation of equations (19) and (20)
Here, we derive equations (19) and (20) from Eq. (16). In axisymmetric spherical coordinates, the components of the stress tensor are given by
In dimensionless form, the components of the stress tensor rescale as
Now we write the outward unit normal, \({\mathbf {n}}\), and the unit tangent, \({\mathbf {t}}\), in terms of \({\mathbf {r}}=r(\sin \varphi \cos \theta ,\sin \varphi \sin \theta ,\cos \varphi )\),
where \({\hat{{\mathbf {r}}}}\) is the unit vector in the radial direction and \(\hat{\varvec{\varphi }}\) is the unit vector in the angular direction. Now, we calculate the total curvature (the sum of the two principal curvatures), following [57]
We obtain
Next, we write Eq. (16) explicitly in normal and tangential components, using Eqs. (68) and (69), and keeping in mind the form of the Cauchy stress tensor,
to obtain
Substituting in Eqs. (65) and (67) and taking leading order terms, we obtain Eqs. (19) and (20).
Appendix C: Analysis of the large Marangoni number limit
For \(\mathrm {El}={\mathcal {O}}(1)\) and \(\mathrm {Mg}={\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon ^{-2})\gg 1\), we expand \(\Gamma \), \(U_\mathrm{s}\), and H in powers of \(\mathrm {Mg}^{-1}\),
Substituting this result into Eq. (28) and Taylor expanding the logarithm, we obtain
The leading order term in this equation implies that \(\Gamma _{(0)}\) is independent of \(\varphi \). In fact, surfactant conservation, combined with our assumption of insolubility, additionally implies that \(\Gamma _{(0)}\) is constant in time, so \(\Gamma _{(0)}={\bar{\Gamma }}\), where \({\bar{\Gamma }}\) is the average surfactant concentration on the film.
The \({\mathcal {O}}(\mathrm {Mg}^{-1})\) terms in Eq. (73) can be substituted into the radial derivative of Eq. (25), to obtain
Substituting Eq. (72) into Eq. (14), we find that
where \(\Sigma _{\mathrm {eq}}=1+\mathrm {El}\log (1-{\bar{\Gamma }})\) is the equilibrium surface tension of the film. Thus, we can substitute Eq. (19) into Eq. (74), to find
Then, the \({\mathcal {O}}(\mathrm {Mg}^{-1})\) terms yield the equation
By defining a new rescaled Bond number, \(\mathrm {Bo}_{\mathrm {eq}}\) (32) in terms of the equilibrium surface tension \(\Sigma _{\mathrm {eq}}\) rather than the surfactant-free surface tension, and a new timescale, \({\bar{T}}\), based on the equilibrium surface tension, we obtain an equation similar to Eq. (30). Substituting Eq. (72) into Eq. (13), and taking the leading order terms only, we obtain \(U_{\mathrm{s}(0)}=0\). Dropping the subscript (0) in \(H_{(0)}\), we have (33). Finally, although our analysis assumes \(\mathrm {Mg}={\mathcal {O}}(\varepsilon ^{-2})\), our numerical results indicate that \(U_\mathrm{s}\) is negligible even for moderate values of \(\mathrm {Mg}\) (see Fig. 10).
Appendix D: Exact root of Eq. (47)
If we define \(\xi =1+\cos \varphi _\mathrm{c}\), then Eq. (47) takes the form
This is a depressed cubic with coefficients \(24/\mathrm {Bo}\) and \(-48/\mathrm {Bo}\). The discriminant of the equation is then
For \(\mathrm {Bo}>0\), this discriminant is always negative, guaranteeing a single real root. That root then yields
Note that this is confined to the interval \((-1,1)\), and is monotonic.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, D.W., Blanchette, F. Film evolution of a spherical soap bubble. J Eng Math 137, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-022-10241-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-022-10241-8