Skip to main content
Log in

Cavity formation on the surface of a body entering water with deceleration

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The two-dimensional water entry of a rigid symmetric body with account for cavity formation on the body surface is studied. Initially the liquid is at rest and occupies the lower half plane. The rigid symmetric body touches the liquid free surface at a single point and then starts suddenly to penetrate the liquid vertically with a time-varying speed. We study the effect of the body deceleration on the pressure distribution in the flow region. It is shown that, in addition to the high pressures expected from the theory of impact, the pressure on the body surface can later decrease to sub-atmospheric levels. The creation of a cavity due to such low pressures is considered. The cavity starts at the lowest point of the body and spreads along the body surface forming a thin space between a new free surface and the body. Within the linearised hydrodynamic problem, the positions of the two turnover points at the periphery of the wetted area are determined by Wagner’s condition. The ends of the cavity’s free surface are modelled by the Brillouin–Villat condition. The pressure in the cavity is assumed to be a prescribed constant, which is a parameter of the model. The hydrodynamic problem is reduced to a system of integral and differential equations with respect to several functions of time. Results are presented for constant deceleration of two body shapes: a parabola and a wedge. The general formulation made also embraces conditions where the body is free to decelerate under the total fluid force. Contrasts are drawn between results from the present model and a simpler model in which the cavity formation is suppressed. It is shown that the expansion of the cavity can be significantly slower than the expansion of the corresponding zone of sub-atmospheric pressure in the simpler model. For forced motion and cavity pressure close to atmospheric, the cavity grows until almost complete detachment of the fluid from the body. In the problem of free motion of the body, cavitation with vapour pressure in the cavity is achievable only for extremely large impact velocities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oliver JM (2002) Water entry and related problems. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford

  2. Kaye G, Laby T (1995) Tables of physical and chemical constants. Longman, Harlow

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Faltinsen O (1997) The effect of hydroelasticity on ship slamming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 355(1724):575–591

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hicks PD, Ermanyuk EV, Gavrilov NV, Purvis R (2012) Air trapping at impact of a rigid sphere onto a liquid. J Fluid Mech 695:310–320

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Howison SD, Ockendon JR, Wilson SK (1991) Incompressible water-entry problems at small deadrise angles. J Fluid Mech 222:215–230

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith FT, Li L, Wu GX (2003) Air cushioning with a lubrication/inviscid balance. J Fluid Mech 482:291–318

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson SK (1991) A mathematical model for the initial stages of fluid impact in the presence of a cushioning fluid layer. J Eng Math 25:265–285

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Logvinovich GV, Yakimov YL (1973) Submergence of bodies in liquid with large velocities. In: Sedov LI, Stepanov GY (eds) Neustanovivshiesia Techenia Vody s Bol’shimi Skorostyami Trudy Mezhdunarodnogo Simposiuma v Leningrade. Nauka, Moscow, pp 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li L, Papadopolous DP, Smith FT, Wu GX (2002) Rapid plunging of a body partly submerged in water. J Eng Math 42:303–319

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner H (1932) Über Stoß- und Gleitvorgänge an der Oberfläche von Flüssigkeiten. ZAMM 12:193–215

  11. Korobkin AA (2003) Cavitation in liquid impact problems. In: Fifth international symposium on cavitation, Osaka, pp 1–4

  12. Moore MR, Howison SD, Ockendon JR, Oliver JM (2012) Three-dimensional oblique water-entry problems at small deadrise angles. J Fluid Mech 711:259–280

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore MR, Howison SD, Ockendon JR, Oliver JM (2013) A note on oblique water entry. J Eng Math 81(1):67–74

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Reinhard M, Korobkin A, Cooker MJ (2012) The bounce of a blunt body from a water surface at high horizontal speed. In: 27th International workshop on water waves and floating bodies. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp 153–156

  15. Howison S, Morgan J, Ockendon J (1994) Patch cavitation in flow past a rigid body. In: Bubble dynamics and interface phenomena. Springer, New York, pp 219–226

  16. Korobkin AA (1994) Low-pressure zones under a liquid–solid impact. In: Bubble dynamics and interface phenomena. Springer, New York, pp 375–381

  17. Reinhard M, Korobkin AA, Cooker MJ (2012) Elastic plate impact into water at high horizontal speed with early water detachment. In: 6th International conference on hydroelasticity in marine technology. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 1–10

  18. Korobkin AA (1996) Water impact problems in ship hydrodynamics. In: Ohkusu M (ed) Advances in marine hydrodynamics. Computational Mechanics Publications, Boston, pp 323–371

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reinhard MV (2013) Free elastic plate impact into water. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich

  20. Gakhov FD (1966) Boundary value problems. Pergamon, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Crighton DG (1985) The Kutta condition in unsteady flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 17:411–445

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Korobkin AA (2013) A linearized model of water exit. J Fluid Mech 737:368–386

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

M. R. was financially supported by the International Research Training Group 1529 “Mathematical Fluid Dynamics” at TU Darmstadt. A. K. acknowledges the support by the NICOP Research Grant “Fundamental analysis of the water exit problem” (N62909-13-1-N274). The authors thank Alan Tassin for his helpful discussions. The authors are grateful to the referees for their careful readings and comments, which helped to improve an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Reinhard.

Appendix: A solution of the MBVP

Appendix: A solution of the MBVP

In this Appendix, we present the solution of the problem (20)–(26) such that inequalities (15) and (16) are satisfied. The problem (20)–(24) can be reformulated as a Dirichlet problem for the analytic function

$$\begin{aligned} \omega _0^*(z)=(\varphi _x-\mathrm{i}\varphi _y-\mathrm{i}\ddot{h})g(z),\quad z=x+\mathrm{i}y\quad (y<0), \end{aligned}$$
(78)

where \(g(z)\) is the characteristic function defined in (27). Equations (21)–(26) imply that \(\omega _0^*(z)\) is bounded at \(z=\pm c\), has simple poles at \(z=\pm d\) and its real part is zero on the \(x\)-axis. Such a function has the form:

$$\begin{aligned} \omega _0^*(z)=\mathrm{i}\frac{Q(z)}{z^2-d^2}, \end{aligned}$$
(79)

where \(Q(z)=\sum _{k=0}^4 \alpha _k z^k\) is a polyomial with real coefficients. This polynomial is of order four since \(\omega _0^*(z)=O(z^2)\) as \(z\rightarrow \infty \). As the flow is symmetric, it can be shown that \(\omega _0^*(z)\) satisfies the symmetry condition \(\overline{\omega _0^*(z)}=-\omega _0^*(-\overline{z})\) where the bar denotes the complex conjugate of a complex number. It follows from this symmetry condition that \(\alpha _1=\alpha _3=0\). We find the following formula for the complex acceleration \(\omega _0(z)=\varphi _x-\mathrm{i}\varphi _y\) by using the definition of \(\omega _0^*(z)\) and Eq. (79):

$$\begin{aligned} \omega _0(z)=\mathrm{i}\ddot{h}\left( 1+\frac{\beta _0+\beta _1(z^2-c^2)+\beta _2(z^2-c^2)^2}{(z^2-d^2)^{3/2}\sqrt{z^2-c^2}}\right) \end{aligned}$$
(80)

with real coefficients \(\beta _i\). Since \(\omega _0(z)\) decays in the far field, we have \(\beta _2=-1\).

We investigate the pressure behaviour at the detachment point \(z=c\). The pressure gradient along the contact region \(c<x<d\), \(y=0\), is given by the real part of \(\omega _0(z)\) in (80) together with the linearised Bernoulli’s equation (4). The asymptotic behaviour of \(p_x(x,0,t)\), \(c<x<d\), at \(x=c\), \(y=0\), is

$$\begin{aligned} p_x(x,0,t)\sim -\frac{\beta _0\ddot{h}}{\sqrt{2}c(d^2-c^2)^{3/2}}(x-c)^{-1/2}\quad (x\rightarrow c). \end{aligned}$$
(81)

If \(\beta _0\ddot{h}>0\), the pressure is below the cavitation pressure \(p_\mathrm{c}\) in the vicinity of the detachment point \(c\), which is a contradiction to the inequality (16). Therefore,

$$\begin{aligned} \beta _0\ddot{h}\le 0. \end{aligned}$$
(82)

Now we analyse the free-surface elevation \(y=\eta (x,t)\) in the cavity region \(-c<x<c\) close to the separation point \(x=c\). Kutta’s condition guarantees that the fluid leaves the body tangentially (see [19]). The imaginary part of (80) together with the kinematic boundary condition (12) gives us the asymptotic behaviour of the vertical fluid acceleration on the free surface at \(x=c\):

$$\begin{aligned} \eta _{tt}(x,0,t)\sim -\frac{\beta _0\ddot{h}}{\sqrt{2}c(d^2-c^2)^{3/2}}(c-x)^{-1/2}\quad (x\rightarrow c). \end{aligned}$$
(83)

The value \(\beta _0\ddot{h}\) in (83) is responsible for whether or not the fluid intersects the body at the separation point. For a smooth body, it follows from (15), (82) and (83) that both conditions on the behaviours of the hydrodynamic pressure and the cavity thickness are satisfied only with \(\beta _0=0\).

The value of \(\beta _1\) determines the value of the acceleration potential \(\varphi (x,y,t)\) in the cavity region \(|x|<c\), \(y=0\). Equation (23) and the far-field condition (24) imply that \(\int _{-\infty }^0\varphi _{y}(0,y,t)\,\hbox {d}y=-p_\mathrm{c}/\varrho \), where \(\varphi _y\) is given by the imaginary part of \(\omega _0(z)\) in (80). Hence,

$$\begin{aligned} \beta _1=2d^2-c^2-\frac{1}{E(q)}\left( \frac{p_\mathrm{c}}{\varrho \ddot{h}}d+c^2K(q)\right) ,\quad q=\sqrt{1-\frac{c^2}{d^2}}, \end{aligned}$$
(84)

where \(K(q)\) and \(E(q)\) are the complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds, respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reinhard, M., Korobkin, A.A. & Cooker, M.J. Cavity formation on the surface of a body entering water with deceleration. J Eng Math 96, 155–174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-015-9788-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-015-9788-8

Keywords

Navigation