Abstract
This study aimed to optimize the methods for sampling and analyzing methylmercury (MeHg) concentrated within diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) and its application to different water bodies. We explored the elution solution for MeHg, comprised of 1.13 mM thiourea and 0.1M HCl, optimizing its volume to 50 mL. In addition, we found that it is necessary to analyze the entire extraction solution after adjusting its pH, to ensure completion of the ethylation reaction. The DGT samplers were deployed in two distinct aquatic environments (i.e., Okjeong Lake and Nakdong River) for up to 6 weeks, and this study demonstrated to predict the time-weighted average concentration with a diffusion coefficient of 7.65 × 10−6 cm2 s−1 for MeHg in the diffusive gel. To assess the diffusive boundary layer (DBL) effects, the DGT samplers with different agarose diffusive gel thickness were deployed. The mass of MeHg accumulated in the DGT resin at a given time decreased with increasing diffusive gel thickness, because of creating longer diffusion pathways within thicker gels. The labile MeHg concentration estimated by the DGT in Okjeong Lake and Nakdong River are found in the range of 61–111 and 55–105 pg L−1, respectively, which were found to be similar to the grab sampling data. Additionally, this study evaluated depth-dependent MeHg in Okjeong Lake. The vertical profile results showed that the concentration of MeHg at the depth of 2.3 and 15.7 m are about 1.5 and 4.6 times of the DGT installed at 0.3 m of the surface layer, respectively, suggesting potential mercury methylation in deep waters. These findings have practical implications for predicting bioavailability, assessing risks, and formulating strategies for water body management and contamination remediation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be available on reasonable request.
References
Al-Sulaiti, M. M., Soubra, L., & Al-Ghouti, M. A. (2022). The causes and effects of mercury and methylmercury contamination in the marine environment: A review. Current Pollution Reports, 8(3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40726-022-00226-7/TABLES/9
Altier, A., Jiménez-Piedrahita, M., Uribe, R., Rey-Castro, C., Galceran, J., & Puy, J. (2019). Time weighted average concentrations measured with diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT). Analytica Chimica Acta, 1060, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACA.2019.01.056
Amirbahman, A., Reid, A. L., Haines, T. A., Kahl, J. S., & Arnold, C. (2002). Association of methylmercury with dissolved humic acids. Environmental Science and Technology, 36(4), 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES011044Q
Bailon, M. X., Park, M., Choi, Y.-G., Reible, D., Hong, Y., Bailon, M. X., et al. (2020). The application of DGTs for assessing the effectiveness of in situ management of Hg and heavy metal contaminated sediment. Membrane Water Treatment, 11(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.12989/MWT.2020.11.1.011
Bajagain, R., Panthi, G., Park, J. H., Moon, J. K., Kwon, J., Kim, D. Y., et al. (2023). Enhanced migration of plasticizers from polyvinyl chloride consumer products through artificial sebum. Science of the Total Environment, 874, 162412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2023.162412
Charriau, A., Lissalde, S., Poulier, G., Mazzella, N., Buzier, R., & Guibaud, G. (2016). Overview of the Chemcatcher® for the passive sampling of various pollutants in aquatic environments Part A: Principles, calibration, preparation and analysis of the sampler. Talanta, 148, 556–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TALANTA.2015.06.064
Chaudhary, D. K., Karki, H. P., Bajagain, R., Kim, H., Rhee, T. S., Hong, J. K., Han, S., Choi, Y.-G., & Hong, Y. (2022). Mercury and other trace elements distribution and profiling of microbial community in the surface sediments of East Siberian Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 185, 114319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114319
Clarisse, O., & Hintelmann, H. (2006). Measurements of dissolved methylmercury in natural waters using diffusive gradients in thin film (DGT). Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 8(12), 1242–1247. https://doi.org/10.1039/B614560D
Clarisse, O., Foucher, D., & Hintelmann, H. (2009). Methylmercury speciation in the dissolved phase of a stratified lake using the diffusive gradient in thin film technique. Environmental Pollution, 157(3), 987–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2008.10.012
Davison, W., & Zhang, H. (2016). Introduction to DGT. In W. Davison (Ed.), Diffusive gradients in thin-films for environmental measurements (pp. 1–9). Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316442654.002
Degryse, F., & Smolders, E. (2016). DGT and bioavailability. In W. Davison (Ed.), Diffusive gradients in thin-films for environmental measurements (pp. 216–262). Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316442654.010
Devillers, D., Buzier, R., Grybos, M., Charriau, A., & Guibaud, G. (2017). Key role of the sorption process in alteration of metal and metalloid quantification by fouling development on DGT passive samplers. Environmental Pollution, 230, 523–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2017.07.005
Díez, S., & Giaggio, R. (2018). Do biofilms affect the measurement of mercury by the DGT technique? Microcosm and field tests to prevent biofilm growth. Chemosphere, 210, 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2018.07.047
Driscoll, C. T., Mason, R. P., Chan, H. M., Jacob, D. J., & Pirrone, N. (2013). Mercury as a global pollutant: Sources, pathways, and effects. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(10), 4967–4983. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES305071V
Fernández-Gómez, C., Bayona, J. M., & Díez, S. (2014). Comparison of different types of diffusive gradient in thin film samplers for measurement of dissolved methylmercury in freshwaters. Talanta, 129, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TALANTA.2014.06.025
Galceran, J., Gao, Y., Puy, J., Leermakers, M., Rey-Castro, C., Zhou, C., & Baeyens, W. (2021). Speciation of inorganic compounds in aquatic systems using diffusive gradients in thin-films: A review. Frontiers in Chemistry, 9, 624511. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCHEM.2021.624511
Gao, Y., De Craemer, S., & Baeyens, W. (2014). A novel method for the determination of dissolved methylmercury concentrations using diffusive gradients in thin films technique. Talanta, 120, 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TALANTA.2013.12.023
Garcia, S., & Looney, B. (2020). Mercury speciation via diffusive gradients thin-films technology. In Inc. WM Symposia, WM2020: 46. Annual Waste Management Conference. Phoenix, AZ (United States): U.S. Department of Energy. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/23030296. Accessed 26 Mar 2024
Gimpel, J., Zhang, H., Hutchinson, W., & Davison, W. (2001). Effect of solution composition, flow and deployment time on the measurement of trace metals by the diffusive gradient in thin films technique. Analytica Chimica Acta, 448(1–2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01323-X
Górecki, T., & Namienik, J. (2002). Passive sampling. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 21(4), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(02)00407-7
Gworek, B., Dmuchowski, W., & Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A. H. (2020). Mercury in the terrestrial environment: A review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12302-020-00401-X
Hong, Y. S., Rifkin, E., & Bouwer, E. J. (2011). Combination of diffusive gradient in a thin film probe and IC-ICP-MS for the simultaneous determination of CH 3Hg + and Hg 2+ in oxic water. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(15), 6429–6436. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES200398D
Jeremiason, J. D., Portner, J. C., Aiken, G. R., Hiranaka, A. J., Dvorak, M. T., Tran, K. T., & Latch, D. E. (2015). Photoreduction of Hg(II) and photodemethylation of methylmercury: The key role of thiol sites on dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 17(11), 1892–1903. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EM00305A
Khwaja, A. R., Bloom, P. R., & Brezonik, P. L. (2010). Binding strength of methylmercury to aquatic NOM. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(16), 6151–6156. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES101088K
Kreuzeder, A., Santner, J., Zhang, H., Prohaska, T., & Wenzel, W. W. (2015). Uncertainty evaluation of the diffusive gradients in thin films technique. Environmental Science and Technology, 49(3), 1594–1602. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES504533E
Marrugo-Madrid, S., Turull, M., Zhang, H., & Díez, S. (2021). Diffusive gradients in thin films for the measurement of labile metal species in water and soils: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 19(5), 3761–3788. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10311-021-01246-3
Namieśnik, J., Zabiegała, B., Kot-Wasik, A., Partyka, M., & Wasik, A. (2004). Passive sampling and/or extraction techniques in environmental analysis: A review. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 381(2), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00216-004-2830-8
Neal-Walthall, N., Ndu, U., Rivera, N. A., Elias, D. A., & Hsu-Kim, H. (2022). Utility of diffusive gradient in thin-film passive samplers for predicting mercury methylation potential and bioaccumulation in freshwater wetlands. Environmental Science and Technology, 56(3), 1743–1752. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.1C06796
Noh, S., Kim, Y. hee, Kim, H., Seok, K. seol, Park, M., Bailon, M. X., & Hong, Y. (2020). The performance of diffusive gradient in thin film probes for the long-term monitoring of trace level total mercury in water. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-019-7966-2
Puschenreiter, M. (2017). William Davison (Ed.): Diffusive gradients in thin-films for environmental measurements. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 409(8), 1973–1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00216-016-0178-5
Scally, S., Davison, W., & Zhang, H. (2006). Diffusion coefficients of metals and metal complexes in hydrogels used in diffusive gradients in thin films. Analytica Chimica Acta, 558(1–2), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACA.2005.11.020
Tafurt-Cardona, M., Eismann, C. E., Suárez, C. A., Menegário, A. A., Silva Luko, K., & Sargentini Junior, É. (2015). In situ selective determination of methylmercury in river water by diffusive gradient in thin films technique (DGT) using baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) immobilized in agarose gel as binding phase. Analytica Chimica Acta, 887, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.07.035
Turner, G. S. C., Mills, G. A., Bowes, M. J., Burnett, J. L., Amos, S., & Fones, G. R. (2014). Evaluation of DGT as a long-term water quality monitoring tool in natural waters; uranium as a case study. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 16(3), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EM00574G
Uher, E., Zhang, H., Santos, S., Tusseau-Vuillemin, M. H., & Gourlay-Francé, C. (2012). Impact of biofouling on diffusive gradient in thin film measurements in water. Analytical Chemistry, 84(7), 3111–3118. https://doi.org/10.1021/AC2028535
USEPA. (1998). Method 1630: Methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Washington, D.C. Accessed 15 January 2024
Warnken, K. W., Zhang, H., & Davison, W. (2006). Accuracy of the diffusive gradients in thin-films technique: Diffusive boundary layer and effective sampling area considerations. Analytical Chemistry, 78(11), 3780–3787. https://doi.org/10.1021/AC060139D
Wei, T. J., Guan, D. X., Li, X. Y., Hao, Y. L., Teng, H. H., Yang, J. F., et al. (2022). Analysis of studies on environmental measurements using diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) from 1994 to 2020. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 22(4), 1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11368-022-03168-1
Zhang, H., & Davison, W. (1995). Performance characteristics of diffusion gradients in thin films for the in situ measurement of trace metals in aqueous solution. Analytical Chemistry, 67(19), 3391–3400. https://doi.org/10.1021/AC00115A005
Zhang, C., Ding, S., Xu, D., Tang, Y., & Wong, M. H. (2014). Bioavailability assessment of phosphorus and metals in soils and sediments: A review of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(11), 7367–7378. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10661-014-3933-0/TABLES/3
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), funded by the Ministry of Environment (ME) of the Republic of Korea (NIER-2017–01-02–032, NIER-2018–01-02–024, NIER-2019–01-02–027).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Department of Environmental Engineering, Korea University Sejong Campus, 30019, Sejong, Republic of Korea. Rishikesh Bajagain, Mark Xavier Bailon, and Yongseok Hong. Chemicals Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, 22689, Incheon, Republic of Korea. Seam Noh, Young-hee Kim, Hyuk Kim, and Kwang-seol Seok. Department of Science and Technology - Philippines, Philippine Science High School - Central Luzon Campus, Lily Hill, Clark Freeport Zone, Mabalacat City, Pampanga 2010, Philippines. Mark Xavier Bailon.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Authors and affiliations
Department of Environmental Engineering, Korea University Sejong Campus, 30019, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Rishikesh Bajagain, Mark Xavier Bailon, and Yongseok Hong.
Chemicals Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, 22689, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Seam Noh, Young-hee Kim, Hyuk Kim, and Kwang-seol Seok.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bajagain, R., Noh, S., Kim, Yh. et al. Application of diffusive gradient in thin films probes to monitor trace levels of labile methylmercury in freshwaters. Environ Monit Assess 196, 404 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12564-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12564-8