Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using neural networks and a fuzzy inference system to evaluate the risk of wildfires and the pinpointing of firefighting stations in forests on the northern slopes of the Zagros Mountains, Iran (case study: Shimbar national wildlife preserve)

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predicting potential fire hazard zones in natural areas is one of the means of mitigating and managing fires. The current research focuses on the prioritizing of elements which contribute to the spread of fire and the special zoning of potentially dangerous areas in addition to the pinpointing of locations for the establishment of fire stations in forested areas in the Shimbar national reserve based on historical data spanning 2001 to 2018. The study utilizes elements (physiological, vegetation cover, meteorological, anthropological factors) contributing to wildfires as inputs into an artificial neural network and the development of a fuzzy inference system in order to produce fire zoning maps for the region under study. The map is divided into five sectors, i.e., minimum, low, moderate, high, and maximum risk of fire. The validation of the fire zoning map was evaluated at 0.83 and the RMSE error was 0.75. The results obtained show that 20% of the area under study is within the average risk category, 11% is within the high-risk category, and 10% is within the very high-risk category of a potential fire hazard. The most important variables were distance from a flowing source, i.e., river or stream, the land formation type, elevation, and the minimum temperature. The identification of suitable locations for firefighting stations was carried out by merging the fuzzy inference system model and Arc GIS, and the results obtained defined 16 possible locations. It was concluded that the application of hybrid models when dealing with the aforementioned variables is effective when seeking to determine locations for the establishment of firefighting stations and rural safety services; moreover, such hybrid models are highly efficacious for determining of fire hazard zones. It is proposed that hybrid models be applied on a large scale for the prevention, control, and management of fires throughout the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data generated during the study are included in the manuscript. Data are available from authors on request.

Abbreviations

FIS:

Fuzzy inference system

ANN:

Artificial neural networks

GIS:

Geographic Information System

References

  • Aali Mahmoudi Sarab S., Fiqhi, J., Jabarian Amiri, B., Danehkar, A., & Atarod, P. (2013). Assessment of climatic elements effective in the development of Zagros wildfires using regression models in the Zagros Forests of Izeh County. Journal of Natural Environment Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 66(2), 75-86. http://ijae.iut.ac.ir/article-1-188-fa.html

  • Al-Bashiti, M. K., & Naser, M. Z. (2022). Machine learning for wildfire classification: Exploring blackbox, eXplainable, symbolic, and SMOTE methods. Natural Hazards Research2(3), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2022.08.001

  • Amiri, T., Banj Shafiei, A., Erfanian, M., Hosseinzadeh, O., & Beygiheidarlou, H. (2018). Locating suitable areas for forest fire fighting stations in Sardasht NW Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest, 10(3), 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson-Bell, J., Schillaci, C., & Lipani, A. (2021). Predicting non-residential building fire risk using geospatial information and convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment21https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100470

  • Barrosa, k., Ribeiroa, C., Marcattia, G., Lorenzona, L., Castroa, N., Carvalhob, G., & Santosb, A. (2018). Markov chains and cellular automata to predict environments subject to desertification. Journal of Environmental Management, 225, 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.064

  • Bem, P. P., Júnior, O. A., Matricardi, E. A. T., Guimarães, R. F., & Gomes, R. A. T. (2018). Predicting wildfire vulnerability using logistic regression and artificial neural networks: A case study in Brazil’s Federal District. International Journal Wildland Fire, 28(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisquert, M., Caselles, E., Sánchez, J. M., & Caselles, V. (2012). Application of artificial neural networks and logistic regression to the prediction of forest fire danger in Galicia using MODIS data. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 21, 1025. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF11105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi-Jung, C., Yun-Yu, H., Hsueh-Chun, L. (2019). Fuzzy inference system for modeling the environmental risk map of air pollutants in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 808820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.038

  • Chung, C. -J., Hsieh, Y. -Y., & Lin, H. -C. (2019). Fuzzy inference system for modeling the environmental risk map of air pollutants in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management., 246, 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dian, S. P. H., Saputra, G., Arifitama, B., Yaddarab, U., Wahyu, C., & Robbi, R. (2021). Classification of bird sounds as an early warning method of wildfires using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithm. Journal of King Saud University- Computer and Information Sciences, 34(7), 4345–4357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinarvand, M., Ejtehadi, H., Farzam, M., & Andarzian, B. (2018). Evaluation of aqua crop model for two rangeland species (Hordeum murinum and Medicago polymorpha) in Shimbar protected area, Khuzestan. Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, 25(2), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.22092/IJRDR.2018.116850. (In Persian).

  • Dong, X. -M., Li, Y., Pan, Y. -L., Huang, Y. -J., & Cheng, X. -D. (2018). Study on urban fire station planning based on fire risk assessment and GIS technology. Procedia Engineering, 211, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebadinejad, A., & Bahram Abadi, B. (2016). A Site Selection of Border Military Posts and the Identification of Penetration-Prone Areas on the Borderlines through Utilizing Fuzzy Inference Systems and GIS (Case Study: Nehbandan Borderlines). Military Management Quarterly, 16(63), 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, M., D'Este, M., Ascoli, D., Giannico, V., Spano, G., Ganga, A., & Sanesi, G. (2020). Estimating the probability of wildfire occurrence in Mediterranean landscapes using Artificial Neural Networks. Environmental Impact Assessment Review85https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106474

  • Eren, O., Erbas¸ M., Tolon, M., Kabak, M., & Durgut, T. (2016). Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Computers in Industry, 76, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.12.003

  • Fausett, L. V. (2006). Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, algorithms and applications. Pearson Education India.

  • Holkar, C. R., Jadhav, A. J., Pinjari, D. V., & Pandit, A. B. (2019). Cavitationally driven transformations: A technique of process intensification. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 58(15), 5797–5819. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islami, R., Azarnoosh, M., Kialashki, A., & Kazemnejad, F. (2021). Evaluation of the probability of wildfires using Dong model. artificial neural network and the nearest neighbors in Babolrood basin of Mazandaran. Ecology of Iranian Forest, 9(17), 195–185. http://ifej.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-418-fa.html

  • Jaafari, A., Gholami, D. M., & Zenner, E. K. (2017). A Bayesian modeling of wildfire probability in the Zagros Mountains. Iranian Ecological Information, 39, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M. K., Shekhar, A., & Jenifer, M. A. (2020). Assessing groundwater quality for drinking water supply using hybrid fuzzy-GIS-based water quality index. Water Research179https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115867

  • Kalabokidis, K., Athanasis, N., Gagliardi, F., Karayiannis, F., Palaiologou, P., Parastatidis, S., & Vasilakos, C. (2013). Virtual Fire: A web-based GIS platform for forest fire control. Ecological Informatics, 16, 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, A., Thaub, D., Hudakc, A.T., Meigsd, G. W., Moskal, L. M. (2020). Quantifying fire trends in boreal forests Andrew with Landsat time series and selforganized criticality. Remote Sensing of Environment, 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111525

  • Kviesis, A., Komasilovs, V., Komasilova, O., & Zacepins, A. (2020). Application of fuzzy logic for honey bee colony state detection based on temperature data. Biosystems Engineering, 193, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P., & Zhao, W. (2020). Image fire detection algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2020.100625

  • Metlena, K. L., Skinnerb, C. N., Olsona, D. R., Nicholsc, C., & Borgiasa, D. (2018). Regional and local controls on historical fire regimes of dry forests and woodlands in the Rogue River Basin, Oregon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 430, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghipoor Borj, A. (2019). Predicting of fire occurrence using Bayesian belief network in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Rangeland13(1), 90-100. http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-719-en.html

  • Nyimbili, P. H., & Erden, T. (2020). GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria approach for optimal site selection of fire stations in Istanbul, Turkey. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences71, 100860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100860

  • Ngoc-Thach, N., Ngo, D. B. T., Xuan-Canh, P., Hong-Thi, N., Thi, B. H., NhatDuc, H., & Dieu, T. B. (2018). Spatial pattern assessment of tropical forest fire danger at Thuan Chau area (Vietnam) using GIS-based advanced machine learning algorithms: A comparative study. Ecological Informatics, 46, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouache, R., Nahiduzzaman, K. M., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2021). Performance investigation of fire protection and intervention strategies: Artificial neural network-based assessment framework. Journal of Building Engineering42https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102439

  • Pahlavani, P., Sahraian, H., & Bigdeli, B. (2018). Predicting the spread of wildfires using cellular automation and artificial neural networks. Journal of Geospatial Information Technology, 6(4), 73–96. http://jgit.kntu.ac.ir/article-1-645-fa.html

  • Pappu, S. M. J., & Gummadi, S. N. (2017). Artificial neural network and regression coupled genetic algorithm to optimize parameters for enhanced xylitol production by Debaryomyces nepalensis in bioreactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 120, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.01.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pai, M. L., Varsha, K. S., & Arya, R. (2018, December). Application of Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithm for the Prediction of Forest Fire Danger in Kerala. In International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, 935-942. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16660-1_91

  • Polinova, M., Wittenberg, L., Kutiel, H., & Brook, A. (2019). Reconstructing pre-fire vegetation condition in the wildland urban interface (WUI) using artificial neural network. Journal of Environmental Management, 238, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq, M. Y., Bugmann, G., & Easterbrook, D. J. (2001). Neural network design for engineering applications. Computer. Struct, 79(17), 1541–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045.7949(01)00039-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranade, N. V., Nagarajan, S., Sarvothaman, V., & Ranade, V. V. (2021). ANN based modelling of hydrodynamic cavitation processes: Biomass pre-treatment and wastewater treatment. Ultrasonics sonochemistry72https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105428

  • Riahi v., Azizdust A. (2017). Factors affecting the location of safety services in rural areas. International and Scientific Journal of Iranian Geography Association, 15(54), 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachdeva, S., Bhatia, T., & Verma, A. K. (2018). GIS-based evolutionary optimized Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for forest fire susceptibility mapping. Natural Hazards92(3), 1399-1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3256-5

  • Sadeghi, M., Malekian, M., & Khodakarami, L. (2017). Forest losses and gains in Kurdistan province, western Iran: Where do we stand? The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 20(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharafi, S., Sadeghirad, M., Javadinia, Z. (2020). Paleogeomorphology reconstruction of Della landslide and the formation of the Shimbar Dam Lake in Indica – Khuzestan Province. Journal of Geoghraphical sciences, 20(56), 177–192. http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3103-en.html

  • Shihabudheen, K. V., & Pillai, G. N. (2018). Recent advances in neuro-fuzzy system: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems152, 136-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.04.014

  • Tien Bui, D., Hoang, N. -D., & Samui, P. (2019). Spatial pattern analysis and prediction of forest fire using new machine learning approach of multivariate adaptive regression splines and differential flower pollination optimization: A case study at Lao Cai province (Viet Nam). Journal of Environmental Management, 237, 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien Bui, D., Hoang, N. -D., & Samui, P. (2018). GIS-based spatial prediction of tropical forest fire danger using a new hybrid machine learning method Dieu. Ecological Informatic, 48, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiruneh, G. G., Fayek, A. R., & Sumati, V. (2020). Neuro-fuzzy systems in construction engineering and management research. Automation in construction119https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103348

  • Van den Berg, P. L., Legemaate, G. A., & Van Der Mei, R. D. (2017). Increasing the responsiveness of firefighter services by relocating base stations in Amsterdam. Interfaces47(4), 352-361. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2017.0897

  • Vidamanesh, k., Adab, H., Etbati, A. (2018). Comparison of logistic regression and neural network methods in fire susceptibility of forest and rangelands, Mazandaran Province. Journal of Natural Environment (Iranian Journal of Natural Resources), 71(4), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.22059/JNE.2018.239234.1415

  • Vimal, R., Navarro, L. M., Jones, Y., Wolf, F., Le Moguédec, G., & Réjou-Méchain, M. (2021). The global distribution of protected areas management strategies and their complementarity for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation256https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109014

  • Zhang, G., Wang, M., & Liu, K. (2019). Forest fire susceptibility modeling using a convolutional neural network for Yunnan Province of China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 10, 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019-00233-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhenga, Z., Huang, W., Lid, S., & Zenga, Y. (2017). Forest fire spread simulating model using cellular automaton with extreme learning machine. Ecological Modelling, 348(24), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Nafiseh Salehi: conceptualization, methodology, validation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Soolmaz Dashti: investigation, project administration, data and curation Sina Attarroshan: investigation, writing—review and editing, and visualization. Ahad Nazarpour: investigation, software, and preparing figures. Neamatollah Jaafarzadeh: investigation and supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soolmaz Dashti.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of authors” as found in the instructions for authors and are aware that with minor exceptions, no changes can be made to authorship once the paper is submitted.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salehi, N., Dashti, S., Roshan, S.A. et al. Using neural networks and a fuzzy inference system to evaluate the risk of wildfires and the pinpointing of firefighting stations in forests on the northern slopes of the Zagros Mountains, Iran (case study: Shimbar national wildlife preserve). Environ Monit Assess 195, 294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10702-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10702-8

Keywords

Navigation