Abstract
The intensification of specific land management operations (tillage, herbicide, etc.) is increasing land degradation and contributing to ecosystem pollution. Mulches can be a sustainable tool to counter these processes. This is particularly relevant for rural areas in low-income countries where agriculture is a vital sector. In this research, the environmental impact of different rates of wheat residues (no residues, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) in corn silage cultivation was evaluated using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method under conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) systems in a semi-arid region in Karaj, Iran. Results showed that in both tillage systems, marine aquatic ecotoxicity (ME) and global warming potential (GWP) had the highest levels of pollution among the environmental impact indicators. In CT systems, the minimum (17,730.70 kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene (DB) eq.) and maximum (33,683.97 kg 1,4-DB eq.) amounts of ME were related to 0 and 100% wheat residue rates, respectively. Also, in the CT system, 0 and 100% wheat residue rates resulted in minimum (176.72 kg CO2 eq.) and maximum (324.95 kg CO2 eq.) amounts of GWP, respectively. However, in the NT system, the 100% wheat residue rate showed the minimum amounts of ME (11,442.39 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (120.21 kg CO2 eq.). Also, in the NT system, maximum amounts of ME (17,174 kg 1,4-DB eq.) and GWP (175.60 kg CO2 eq.) were observed with a zero wheat residue rate. On-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizers were the two factors with the highest contribution to the degradation related to environmental parameters at all rates of wheat residues. Moreover, in the CT system, the number of environmental pollutants increased with the addition of a higher wheat residue rate, while in the NT system, increasing residue rates decreased the amount of environmental pollutants. In conclusion, this LCA demonstrates that the NT system with the full retention of wheat residues (100%) is a more environmentally sustainable practice for corn silage production. Therefore, it may be considered one of the most adequate management strategies in this region and similar semi-arid conditions. Further long-term research and considering more environmental impact categories are required to assess the real potential of crop residues and tillage management for sustainable corn silage production.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sustainable intensification of crop production is crucial for increasing global demand for food production with minimum environmental impact (Ball et al., 2005; Garnett et al., 2013; Struik & Kuyper, 2017; Xie et al., 2019). Recently, it has been demonstrated that silage crops can contribute to the achievement of production targets such as growth or weight gain of livestock and may compensate for seasonal shortfalls between feed demand and supply (Crotty et al., 2016). They can also play an important role in maintaining ground cover, preventing erosion, accumulating nitrogen in the soil, and improving the diversity and abundance of soil biota and the soil condition (Crotty et al., 2015, 2016; van Eekeren et al., 2009). Corn silage is a plant material (mainly plant leaves and stems) used in stockbreeding. In Iran, the cultivation area of silage crops was about 280,000 ha with an average yield of 70 t ha−1 (Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran, 2018). Nowadays, this country is being affected by numerous land degradation processes in cultivated areas such as erosion, soil pollution, and loss of biodiversity due to non-sustainable land management practices such as intensive tillage operations, removal and burning of crop residues, monocropping, excessive use of chemical fertilizers, and lack of using green manures/cover crops (Sadeghi et al., 2008; Nawaz et al., 2017; Minaei et al., 2018; Javidan et al., 2019; Mirzaei et al., 2021; Mohammed et al., 2022; Eskandari Dameneh et al., 2021; Rodrigo-Comino et al., 2022).
Exacerbated intensification and non-planned farming practices contribute significantly to increasing soil consumption and gas emissions to the environment (Mirzaei et al., 2022a, b; Rodrigo-Comino et al., 2020; Smith et al., 2017, 2021). However, to achieve land degradation neutrality in these areas considering the effects on carbon and nitrogen dynamics, agricultural practices such as reduced tillage and the use of crop residues could have direct (i.e., carbon sequestration, mitigation of greenhouse gases emissions, absorbing pollutants and other chemicals used in agriculture, reducing air pollutants) and indirect (i.e., reducing fuel and energy consumption) positive effects on global warming and environmental quality (Brennan et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2014; Mirzaei et al., 2022a; Ravindra et al., 2019; Sindelar et al., 2019; Yao et al., 2013).
In general, crop residues are parts of the plants that remain in the field after harvest. Around 3.5–4 × 109 megagrams (Mg) of plant residues are generated every year around the world. Approximately 75% of this amount can be attributed to cereals (Bhattacharyya & Barman, 2018). Crop residues are removed from the field after harvest in many parts of the world (Cherubin et al., 2018; Kenney et al., 2015; Mirzaei et al., 2021; Turmel et al., 2015; Wegner et al., 2015; Wilhelm et al., 2004). The removed residues are generally used for food and fiber (animal feed and bedding, biofuel production, building materials, household fuel, paper making, and mushroom cultivation), which adversely affect soil fertility, agronomic productivity, and environmental quality (Maw et al., 2019; Mirzaei et al., 2021). Moreover, post-harvest crop residue burning is performed by farmers in many parts of the world with serious health and environmental consequences (Chen et al., 2019; Mousavi-Avval et al., 2017a).
In Iran, one of the most widely performed cropping practices is the wheat–corn rotation system. Annually, a massive amount of crop residues is produced but, unfortunately, these residues are burned or removed for fodder, energy production, or other purposes (Mirzaei et al., 2021; Rasoulzadeh et al., 2019). Furthermore, extensive use of conventional tillage systems, chemical fertilizers, and lack of proper crop rotation have caused a decline in organic matter, poor soil quality, lower crop performance, emission of greenhouse gases, and environmental pollution in the region (Mirzaei et al., 2022a, b; Naseri et al., 2021). However, the implementation of conservation tillage methods and adequate management of crop residues can improve soil quality and crop production, as well as contribute to the mitigation of environmental impacts (Cerdà et al., 2016; Nunes et al., 2016; Rakkar et al., 2017; Whitbread et al., 2000). Therefore, an evaluation of the environmental sustainability of different tillage methods and crop residue management practices in specific cropping systems is necessary.
In recent years, life cycle assessment (LCA) has been applied as a standard method to assess the environmental impacts and to analyze the sustainability of the production systems from the environmental point of view (Iriarte et al., 2010; Mousavi-Avval et al., 2017b). In different parts of the world, the LCA of agricultural products has been conducted. Reviewing the literature shows that there are some studies on the LCA approach. Table S1 shows some of these studies in crop production.
Appropriate management of crop residues in cropping systems and their associated high environmental impacts is important in Iran. Therefore, detailed analyses of environmental parameters are necessary to achieve decision-making goals in agriculture. For this purpose, the main goal of this research is to assess environmental indicators for corn silage production in terms of varying wheat residue rates under conventional and no-tillage systems using the LCA approach. To achieve a supportive sustainable phase, the main goals of this research are: as follows.
-
i.
Decomposition and assessment of LCA analysis in corn silage production
-
ii.
Selection of the hotspot from inputs to increase environmental impacts in the application of corn silage production
-
iii.
Comparison of environmental impact categories attained with LCA, calculated in both conventional and no-tillage systems for corn silage production under different rates of wheat residues, and
-
iv.
The selection of more sustainable residue rates considering each tillage system
Methodology
Site characteristics and experimental design
The research was conducted in 2018 at the Agriculture Research Station of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran (35° 48ʹ 32″ N, 50° 58ʹ 06″ E, 1308 m a.s.l., mean average temperature of 13.7 °C, and mean average precipitation of 245.5 mm). Two fields with two different management systems, i.e., conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT), have been used for the study. The properties of the soil in both tillage systems before the start of the experiment are presented in Table S2. The NT system was applied 7 years before the start of the research. Both fields had a minimum of 15 years under the corn (Zea mays L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotation system. For each of the tillage management systems, the field size was 19 × 22 m. Each field was divided into 20 plots of 3 m × 4 m. The research model was based on a randomized complete block with four replications for each treatment.
Soil treatments, implementation, planting operations, and data collection
Wheat residue treatments were applied in both the NT and the CT fields following the wheat harvest from the previous year. Five different rates of wheat residues (Table S3) were applied, i.e., 100% (3.5 t ha−1), 75% (2.625 t ha−1), 50% (1.75 t ha−1), 25% (0.875 t ha−1), and no residue. The selection of wheat residue rates was based on the weight of post-harvest crop residues left on the farm. To determine the weight of post-harvest wheat residues, a wooden quadrat (1 m × 1 m) was used. The post-harvest wheat residues were sampled at several points in each farm, and the average amount of these points was considered as the amount of residue per m2 and, finally, scaled up to a 1-ha basis. In both NT and CT fields, the wheat residues were distributed uniformly over the surface of the plots. Then, corn (Zea mays L.), a cultivar of Single Cross 704, was sown in July 2018 using a row-crop planter with 75-cm spacing between the rows. In the no-tillage field, seed placement was carried out using a planter with a single colter to cut through residues and loosen the soil before the standard planter placed seeds. However, in the conventional tillage field, the soil has been cultivated to a depth of 35 cm by moldboard plowing, followed by disk harrowing and land leveling which were performed to break up clods and level the land, respectively. Then, seed placement was done using a row-crop planter. Basal NPK fertilizers were spread in the form of 50 kg urea, 70 kg potassium sulfate, and 150 kg superphosphate per ha. Additional N was top dressed at eight-leaf (80 kg urea ha−1) and ten-leaf (270 kg urea ha−1) stages. The fields were irrigated after planting and on a 7–10-day interval. Irrigation was carried out using sprinkler and furrow systems in NT and CT systems, respectively. Weeds were removed manually at four-leaf and eight-leaf stages. The climatic data during the growing season are presented in Table S4. Required information on silage corn production during the experimental period was recorded in both CT and NT systems. Input data included human labor, machinery, diesel, chemical fertilizers, electricity, water, wheat residues, and seed.
Soil and wheat residue analyses
Before the start of the experiment in July 2018, soil samples were collected from several points in each CT and NT system for 0–10 and 10–20 cm soil depths. For each soil depth, the soil samples were uniformly mixed to make one composite sample and subsequently were air-dried, sieved (2 mm), and analyzed. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured in saturated soil extracts, and Walkley and Black (1934) method was used to determine soil organic carbon (SOC). Available potassium and phosphorus were determined using ammonium acetate and NaHCO3 methods, respectively (Knudsen et al., 1982; Page et al., 1982). Total nitrogen (TN) was measured using the method described by Bremner and Mulvaney (1965). Soil bulk density was measured using stainless steel cylinders (100 cm3 volume). Soil texture was measured by the hydrometric method (Gee & Bauder, 1986).
The wheat residues were analyzed for their elemental composition. For this purpose, the residues were dried and finely powdered for analysis. Organic carbon (OC) was determined using the Walkley and Black method (1934). The potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) contents in the residues were measured on dry-ashed samples using spectrophotometric and flame photometric methods, respectively (Jones, 2001). The Kjeldahl method was used to determine the TN in wheat residues (Jones, 2001).
Yield determination
Corn silage yield was determined in October 2018. After excluding the plot margins, a 1 m × 1 m wooden quadrat was used to harvest three locations within each plot. To calculate corn silage yield, the whole plants were harvested, numbered, and weighed for each plot separately. Their mean was calculated as corn silage yield per m2 and, finally, scaled up to a 1-ha basis.
LCA approach
LCA is a standard approach for evaluating environmental aspects and analyzing the sustainability of production systems (Mousavi-Avval et al., 2017b). LCA is an analytical method usually concentrated on resource consumption and impacts on human health, as well as on the environment associated with the manufacturing of particular products and services (Ghasemi-Mobtaker et al., 2020). In agricultural systems, the main steps of LCA are (1) definition of scope (determining system boundaries, and parameters), (2) inventory analysis (identifying inputs and outputs of all processes in the life cycle), (3) impact assessment (setting assessment criteria; quantifying the environmental impact), and (4) data interpretation (analyzing and comparing all impacts and performing sensitivity analysis) (Kaab et al., 2019b; Recanati et al., 2018).
Goal and scope definition
At the stage of defining the purpose and scope of an ISO standard LCA, the aim of the evaluation is determined and decisions are made about the details of the studied product system. Before the collection of any data, the goal and scope are defined at the outset of the study (Curran, 2017). All environmental impacts were calculated for the production of 1 ton of corn silage as FU (see the list of abbreviations). The study boundaries considered for different corn silage cultivation systems in the present study are defined in Fig. 1.
Life cycle inventory
Life cycle inventory (LCI) is defined as the quantification of the inputs and outputs of a system including its material and energy flows. LCI is divided into two categories, including off-farm and on-farm emissions (ISO, 2006).
Off-farm emissions
In this research, the uses of electricity, seeds, chemical fertilizers, diesel, machinery, and wheat residues are considered the inputs of the system. The output includes corn silage. The inputs as indirect emissions were used in the life cycle of corn silage production.
On-farm emissions
Emissions to the air in corn silage production are mostly caused by agricultural machinery such as tractors and tillers used for farm practices such as fertilization and plowing. Traction was used to estimate the emissions that originated from the use of machinery and emissions of diesel combustion. Traction is calculated in megajoules (MJ) and contains all diesel consumption. In this study, the amount of different emission factors derived from data, as shown in Table 1 (Nabavi-Pelesaraei et al., 2017a).
The emissions to the air and water in corn silage production are related to the chemical fertilizers consumed and human labor used. To calculate these emissions, input amounts were multiplied by their emission factors. The equivalent coefficients of the inputs are shown in Table 2.
Emissions from the soil in corn silage production are related to the application of chemical fertilizers, which release heavy metals into the soil. These types of direct emissions were calculated by multiplying the amount of the inputs for chemical fertilizers by their emission factors. The equivalent coefficients are shown in Table 3.
Life cycle impact assessment
Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) is a method used to elucidate the severity of LCI outcomes in relation to their environmental impacts, such as climate change or human health (Yin, 2019).
In this study, the CML 2 baseline was applied. Another purpose of the assessment was the interpretation of the inputs and outputs of the corn silage production system.
The CML 2 baseline method
The CML 2 baseline is an impact assessment method that restricts quantitative modeling to the early stages of the cause–effect chain to limit uncertainties (Khanali et al., 2016). The CML 2 baseline method offers the option of analyzing the environmental burden under ten impact category areas, including abiotic depletion (AD), acidification (AC), eutrophication (EP), global warming potential (GWP), ozone layer depletion (OLD), human toxicity (HT), freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity (FE), marine aquatic ecotoxicity (ME), terrestrial ecotoxicity (TE), and photochemical oxidation (PO) (Kaab et al., 2019a, b; Milutinović et al., 2017; Romero-Gámez et al., 2014). Previous studies have also used these impact categories frequently (Ghasemi-Mobtaker et al., 2020; Kaab et al., 2019a; Kouchaki-Penchah et al., 2016; Nabavi-Pelesaraei et al., 2019). For the calculation of these impact categories, the data of LCI (Table 4) was introduced into the SimaPro software (Kaab et al., 2019a). SimaPro software is one of the widely used applications for LCA (Abeliotis et al., 2013).
Interpretation of results
Life cycle interpretation is a systematic part of the LCA method to identify, quantify, check, and assess the information derived from the results of the LCI and/or the LCIA. The results of the inventory analysis and impact evaluation are presented in the interpretation phase (Cao, 2017). The outcome of the interpretation phase is a set of conclusions and recommendations for the study. Three main options should be included for the interpretation according to ISO (ISO, 2006): (1) identification of important issues based on the results of the LCI and LCIA stages of an LCA; (2) assessment of the study by taking into account completeness, sensitivity, and compatibility studies; and (3) conclusions, limitations, and recommendations. In this study, LCA analyses are conducted using an Excel 2016 spreadsheet and SimaPro software.
LCI analysis involves creating an inventory of flows from the nature of a product system. Inventory flows include inputs of water, energy, and raw materials, which are released into the environment. In this study, the LCI is divided into two main sections, including inputs and outputs of corn silage cultivation under CT and NT systems for different rates of wheat residues and also off-farm and on-farm emissions.
Results
LCI analysis
The amounts of different inputs (including human labor, machinery, diesel, chemical fertilizer, electricity, water, wheat residues, and seed required for producing corn silage per hectare) that were used in the LCA analysis are shown in Table 4. The amount of inputs for the CT system is higher than that for the NT system. Agricultural practices, such as the addition or removal of wheat residues and land preparation after wheat harvesting, are time-consuming and, hence, require more working hours for machinery, resulting in higher fuel consumption. Table 4 also shows on-farm emissions in the process of corn silage production per hectare under different systems and different rates of wheat residues. The highest amount of CO2 released from diesel is associated with the CT system due to the high consumption of diesel from land preparation for harvest. An increase in the wheat residues will also increase the nitrate emissions from nitrogen consumption. Also, the highest levels of emissions by heavy metals from chemical fertilizers were associated with the CT system. The product yield in both systems increases with raising wheat residues. The amount of corn silage yield in the NT system was higher than that in the CT system. These results indicate that the use of wheat residues on the soil surface leads to an increase in soil organic matter, water use efficiency, and yield of crops under this study.
Environmental impact results
LCA analysis of corn silage in the CT system
The effects of wheat residue rates on different environmental impact categories under the CT system in corn silage production are displayed in Table 5. Results showed that the raising of wheat residues led to an increase in the number of environmental pollutants. ME and GWP have the highest levels of pollution among all the studied environmental impacts. The amount of ME in different rates of wheat residues, i.e., 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% wheat residues, was calculated as 17,730.7 kg, 20,167.34 kg, 21,263.32 kg, 27,497.23 kg, and 33,683.97 kg 1,4-dichlorobenzene (DB) eq., respectively. Furthermore, the amounts of GWP were calculated as 176.72 kg, 199.18 kg, 205.87 kg, 267.68 kg, and 324.95 kg CO2 eq., respectively, in identical wheat residues. The highest environmental impacts are related to the circumstance comprising 100% rate of wheat residues.
The contribution of different rates of wheat residues on the degradation rate in the CT system is presented in Fig. 2a–e. According to the results, on-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizers were the two processes with the highest contribution to the degradation rate in terms of environmental parameters at all different rates of wheat residues. The shares of on-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizer emissions to the different environmental impact categories are shown in Fig. 2a–e.
LCA analysis of corn silage in the NT system
The effects of different rates of wheat residues on different environmental impact categories under the NT system in corn silage production are presented in Table 6. The results demonstrated that keeping more wheat residues on fields decreases the overall emissions. Among all the environmental impacts studied, ME and GWP had the highest levels of pollution. The amount of ME at 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% rates of wheat residues was 17,174 kg, 14,311 kg, 12,710.56 kg, 11,746.96 kg, and 11,442.39 kg 1,4-DB eq., respectively. On the other hand, the values of GWP were 175.6 kg, 147.1 kg, 131.5 kg, 122.3 kg, and 120.2 kg CO2 eq., respectively, for the same wheat residue rates. The highest environmental impacts were reported in the scenario without wheat residues present on the field.
The influence of the different rates of wheat residues on the degradation rate for the NT system is shown in Fig. 3a–e. Our results revealed that on-farm emissions from the farm and nitrogen fertilizers were the two most important factors responsible for degradation related to the environmental impacts, irrespective of wheat residue rates. The contribution of on-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizer emissions to the different environmental impact categories is presented in Fig. 3a–e.
Selection of the most sustainable rate of wheat residue
After assessing the damage categories using the LCA method, the best rate of wheat residues for corn silage production in the CT and NT systems was selected. Results show that the 100% rate of wheat residue had the highest level of pollution in the CT system (Fig. 4). The lesser the wheat residues used, the fewer the pollutants released in the CT system. According to the results presented in Fig. 5, the highest levels of contamination in the NT system were reached in the zero-wheat residue used scenario. The higher residue present in the NT system resulted in a lesser number of pollutants.
Discussion
According to our results, the application of different wheat residue rates in the CT and NT systems showed diverse environmental impacts. On-farm emission and nitrogen fertilizer were reported to have the highest environmental impacts at all rates of wheat residues for corn silage production. Among all the environmental impacts studied, ME and GWP were found to have the highest levels of pollution. Furthermore, the amount of studied environmental impacts (AD, AC, EP, GWP, OLD, HT, FE, ME, TE, and PO) in the CT system was higher than that in the NT system. This is in concordance with several recent research studies conducted on other crops such as corn silage (Fathollahi et al., 2018), wheat (Wang & Dalal, 2015), wheat and maize (Fantin et al., 2017), or orchards such as vineyard grape (Bogunovic et al., 2020; Marques et al., 2020), olive (López-Vicente & Álvarez, 2018; Taguas et al., 2015), and citrus (Niu et al., 2021; Novara et al., 2019).
In addition, in the CT system, the level of environmental impacts raised with an increase in wheat residues was due to rapid decomposition and oxidation processes enhanced by soil disturbance. Returning crop residues on the soil affected soil greenhouse gas emissions and GWP. Crop residues provide carbon and nitrogen for soil-living microorganisms responsible for the production and emission of greenhouse gas (GHG) (Chen et al., 2015; Schmatz et al., 2020; Seiz et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2019). These microorganisms can also affect environmental factors, and their activities strongly influence the emission of GHG and, consequently, GWP (Drury et al., 2020; Schaufler et al., 2010; Wegner et al., 2018).
Using the LCA study, Mdhluli and Harding (2021) reported higher environmental impacts of wheat and maize residues which are in concordance with our findings. Besides, Gabrielle and Gagnaire (2008) reported that environmental emissions are not strongly influenced by the removal of cereal straw in the field. This is in agreement with our findings in no-residue treatment. In contrast to our findings, Parajuli et al. (2017) reported the lowest environmental impact for winter wheat straw. Zhang et al. (2014) investigated the effects of incorporating rapeseed residues into the soil on GWP and noticed that residue-incorporated treatments significantly decreased net GWP by 33–71% over no-residue treatment.
In the NT system, the significance of environmental effects decreased with the increase of wheat residues. Crop residues in the NT system were not incorporated into the soil; therefore, the residues decompose slowly and the amount of emissions released decreases. In addition, the retention of plant residues in this system can improve soil structure and, as a result, reduce soil erosion. Furthermore, residues absorb pollutants and other chemicals used in agriculture and also, consequently, reduce pollutant sources, runoff, and environmental contamination (Mirzaei et al., 2021; Singh & Kaur, 2012; Turmel et al., 2015).
Farm operations are the main cause of the rapid rise of on-farm emissions for both tillage systems. The amount of these emissions in the CT system was higher compared to that in the NT system. The reason is that, in the CT system, many factors, such as machinery, human labor, and fuel, were involved in yield production. On the other side, in the NT system, reduction in consumption of electricity, chemical fertilizers, irrigation water, and less use of farm machinery were important ways of efficient management to mitigate environmental pollutants in the production of silage corn in the studied area.
Previous research had also reported that the use of diesel for agricultural machinery, irrigation, and the use of material inputs are the factors responsible for the environmental impacts of field preparation, cultivation, and harvest (Mdhluli & Harding, 2021). Pishgar-Komleh et al. (2011) studied energy consumption for Iranian corn silage production at different levels of farm areas. They found that total CO2 emissions in the production of corn silage amounted to 2.79 million tons, of which 75% is derived from machinery, 21% from diesel, and 4% from chemical fertilizers. In a comparative LCA study of winter wheat and summer maize in China, the results showed that the impacts of AD and EP in maize production systems resulted in the most environmental pollution (Wang et al., 2007). In this study, the main environmental effects in wheat production systems were AD and AC. A study by Wang and Dalal (2015) on wheat production reported that the emissions related to diesel consumption were higher under CT than under NT. Wang et al. (2016) estimated that GHG emissions per ton of dry matter from the processing of corn silage amounted to 155 kg CO2 eq.
The majority of Iranian agricultural soils are deficient in terms of organic matter presence and nutrient availability which severely affect crop production (Ayoubi et al., 2018; Mirzaei et al., 2021). Therefore, to achieve the optimal yield, more nitrogen fertilizers are used, resulting in increased GHG emissions and other contaminations (Mirzaei et al., 2022b; Yazdanbakhsh et al., 2020). In addition, the use of poor agronomic practices (i.e., lack of crop rotation, improper methods of fertilizer application and irrigation) reduces nitrogen use efficiency and increases dependence on chemical fertilizers. These are the possible reasons for the increase in nitrogen fertilizer emissions in this study.
The implementation of best management practices such as the inclusion of leguminous plants in crop rotation, retention of post-harvest crop residues, use of cover crops, manure, urease inhibitors, drip irrigation, and fertigation has a significant potential to improve nitrogen use efficiency, increase carbon sequestration, and mitigate GWP and environmental pollution (Cha-un et al., 2017; Guardia et al., 2016; Sanz-Cobena et al., 2016; Tellez-Rio et al., 2015). In line with our results, the results of the LCA study by Iriarte et al. (2010) revealed that the highest environmental impact for both sunflower and rapeseed crops was related to chemical fertilizers.
One of the basic objectives of sustainable agriculture is to ensure that production systems are clean, energy-efficient, and economically profitable. Sustainable agriculture production is facing several challenges including the rapid growth of world population, land degradation, increasing GHG emissions, rapid climate change, limited arable land, loss of biodiversity, single ecosystem service, land use change, increasing industrialization, and low food security (Hanson et al., 2008; Tian et al., 2021). Using new techniques such as conservation agriculture rather than conventional plowing operations, and also driving tractors with maximum efficiency, can significantly reduce fuel consumption and overcome many challenges (Mirzaei et al., 2021, 2022a; Safa et al., 2010). However, the worldwide implementation of the above may be complex due to cultural traditions, lack of knowledge, and difficulties in land preparation in areas with steep slopes or calcareous soils (Bayu, 2020; Rodrigo-Comino et al., 2021; Sastre et al., 2016).
Appropriate management of post-harvest crop residues and tillage improves soil quality and enhances water productivity, crop yield, and soil carbon sequestration while mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and GWP (Brennan et al., 2014; Wegner et al., 2018). Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of conservative tillage as a popular management method due to its ability to protect soil, improve soil fertility, and reduce both fossil fuel consumption and production costs (Margenot et al., 2017; Powlson et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018). Improper management of crop residues (e.g., removing and burning residues) can accelerate soil erosion, reduce soil fertility, pollute the environment, contaminate surface as well as underground water, and increase emissions of dust, greenhouse gases, and volatile hydrocarbons (Gupta Choudhury et al., 2014; Mu et al., 2016). However, the use of crop residues in the right way leads to nutrient recycling, soil fertility, soil structure improvement, carbon sequestration, and mitigation of GHG emissions, as well as GW (Meena et al., 2015; Mu et al., 2016).
Conclusion and final recommendations
To achieve sustainability in the agricultural sector, a full and meaningful analysis of different procedures should be carried out. In Iran, the agricultural sector is suffering from land degradation, climate change, pollution, and many other environmental issues. Annually, a massive amount of crop residues is produced, but these residues are burned or used for other purposes, where one of the most widely performed cropping practices in Iran is the wheat–corn rotation system. Thus, we investigate the environmental impacts of corn silage production in terms of varying wheat residue rates under conventional and no-tillage systems using the LCA approach. The output of this research can be summarized as follows:
-
1.
The inputs for the CT system are higher than those for the NT system. The highest amount of CO2 released from diesel is associated with the CT system due to the high consumption of diesel for land preparation, cultivation, and harvesting operations.
-
2.
In both tillage systems, on-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizers were the two important factors with the highest contribution to degradation in terms of environmental parameters at all different rates of wheat residues.
-
3.
ME and GWP had the highest levels of pollution among all the environmental impacts studied.
-
4.
In the NT system, keeping more wheat residues on fields decreases the overall emissions.
-
5.
This research reported a contradictory impact of wheat residues. Hence, the 100% rate of wheat residues has the highest levels of contamination in CT. In contrast, the highest levels of contamination in the NT system were reached in the zero-wheat residue scenario.
All in all, to improve the environmental performance of the biomass energy sector, improvements in agricultural practices should be implemented, including further research on fertilization, water use, agricultural practices, land transformation, biomass conversion technologies, and transportation. However, the output of this research will support decision-makers and researchers in adopting the best agricultural practices to minimize land degradation and GHG emissions.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, (A. C. C.), upon reasonable request.
Change history
03 February 2023
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.
Abbreviations
- AC:
-
Acidification
- AD:
-
Abiotic depletion
- CC:
-
Complete coverage
- CT:
-
Conventional tillage
- DB:
-
Dichlorobenzene
- EP:
-
Eutrophication
- FE:
-
Freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity
- FU:
-
Functional unit
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gas
- GW:
-
Global warming
- GWP:
-
Global warming potential
- HC:
-
Hydrocarbons
- HT:
-
Human toxicity
- ME:
-
Marine aquatic ecotoxicity
- NMVOC:
-
Non-methane volatile organic compound
- OLD:
-
Ozone layer depletion
- PAH:
-
Polycyclic hydrocarbons
- PC:
-
Partial coverage
- PM:
-
Particulate matter
- PO:
-
Photochemical oxidation
- TE:
-
Terrestrial ecotoxicity
References
Abeliotis, K., Detsis, V., & Pappia, C. (2013). Life cycle assessment of bean production in the Prespa National Park, Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 89–96.
Ayoubi, S., Mokhtari, J., Mosaddeghi, M. R., & Zeraatpisheh, M. (2018). Erodibility of calcareous soils as influenced by land use and intrinsic soil properties in a semiarid region of Central Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6557-y
Ball, B. C., Bingham, I., Rees, R. M., Watson, C. A., & Litterick, A. (2005). The role of crop rotations in determining soil structure and crop growth conditions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 85(5), 557–577.
Bayu, E. K. (2020). Determinant variables for women’s participation in soil and water conservation practices in north western Ethiopia: The case of Shebel Berenta District (Woreda), East Gojjam Zone, Amhara National Regional State. Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1178622120942199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120942199
Bhattacharyya, P., Barman, D. (2018). Crop residue management and greenhouse gases emissions in tropical rice lands. Soil Management Climate Change,323–335.
Bogunovic, I., Telak, L. J., & Pereira, P. (2020). Experimental comparison of runoff generation and initial soil erosion between vineyards and croplands of eastern Croatia: A case study. Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1178622120928323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120928323
Bremner, J. M., & Mulvaney, C. S. (1965). Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Agronomy, 9, 1179–1237.
Brennan, J., Hackett, R., McCabe, T., Grant, J., Fortune, R. A., & Forristal, P. D. (2014). The effect of tillage system and residue management on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat in a cool Atlantic climate. European Journal of Agronomy, 54, 61–69.
Cao, C. (2017). Sustainability and life assessment of high strength natural fibre composites in construction. Advances High Strength Nature Fibre Compose Constructure, 529–544.
Cerdà, A., González-Pelayo, Ó, Giménez-Morera, A., Jordán, A., Pereira, P., Novara, A., Brevik, E. C., Prosdocimi, M., Mahmoodabadi, M., & Keesstra, S. (2016). Use of barley straw residues to avoid high erosion and runoff rates on persimmon plantations in eastern Spain under low frequency–high magnitude simulated rainfall events. Soil Research, 54, 154–165.
Cha-un, N., Chidthaisong, A., Yagi, K., Sudo, S., & Towprayoon, S. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration and crop yields in a rain-fed rice field with crop rotation management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 237, 109–120.
Chen, S., Wang, Y., Hu, Z., & Gao, H. (2015). CO2 emissions from a forest soil as influenced by amendments of different crop straws: Implications for priming effects. Catena, 131, 56–63.
Chen, J., Gong, Y., Wang, S., Guan, B., Balkovic, J., & Kraxner, F. (2019). To burn or retain crop residue on croplands? An integrated analysis of crop residue management in China. Science of the Total Environment, 662, 141–150.
Cherubin, M. R., Oliveira, D. M. D. S., Feigl, B. J., Pimentel, L. G., Lisboa, I. P., Gmach, M. R., & Cerri, C. C. (2018). Crop residue harvest for bioenergy production and its implications on soil functioning and plant growth: A review. Scientia Agricola, 75, 255–272.
Crotty, F. V., Fychan, R., Sanderson, R., Rhymes, J. R., Bourdin, F., Scullion, J., & Marley, C. L. (2016). Understanding the legacy effect of previous forage crop and tillage management on soil biology, after conversion to an arable crop rotation. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 103, 241–252.
Crotty, F. V., Fychan, R., Scullion, J., Sanderson, R., & Marley, C. L. (2015). Assessing the impact of agricultural forage crops on soil biodiversity and abundance. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 91, 119–126.
Curran, M. A. (2017). Overview of goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment (pp. 1–62). Springer.
Drury, C. F., Woodley, A. L., Reynolds, W. D., Yang, X. M., Phillips, L. A., Rehmann, L., & Calder, W. (2020). Impacts of corn stover removal on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions. Soil Science Society of America Journal.
Durlinger, B., Koukouna, E., Broekema, R., & van Paassen, M. (2015). Agri-footprint 3.0. Blonk Consultans, Gouda, The Netherlands.
Eskandari Dameneh, H., Gholami, H., Telfer, M. W., Comino, J. R., Collins, A. L., & Jansen, J. D. (2021). Desertification of Iran in the early twenty-first century: Assessment using climate and vegetation indices. Science and Reports, 11, 20548. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99636-8
Fantin, V., Righi, S., Rondini, I., & Masoni, P. (2017). Environmental assessment of wheat and maize production in an Italian farmers’ cooperative. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 631–643.
Fathollahi, H., Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Akram, A., & Rafiee, S. (2018). Comparative energy, economic and environmental analyses of forage production systems for dairy farming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 852–862.
Gabrielle, B., & Gagnaire, N. (2008). Life-cycle assessment of straw use in bio-ethanol production: A case study based on biophysical modelling. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(5), 431–441.
Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., & Godfray, H. C. J. (2013). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science, 341(6141), 33–34.
Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Partical-size analysis. pp. 383–411. In: Klute A (ed.). Methods of soil analysis: Physical and mineralogical methods. Part 1, 2nd (ed.) Soil Sience Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Kaab, A., Rafiee, S. (2020). Application of life cycle analysis to assess environmental sustainability of wheat cultivation in the west of Iran. Energy, 193.
Guardia, G., Tellez-Rio, A., García-Marco, S., Martin-Lammerding, D., Tenorio, J. L., Ibáñez, M. Á, & Vallejo, A. (2016). Effect of tillage and crop (cereal versus legume) on greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential in a non-irrigated Mediterranean field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 221, 187–197.
Gupta Choudhury, S., Srivastava, S., Singh, R., Chaudhari, S. K., Sharma, D. K., Singh, S. K., & Sarkar, D. (2014). Tillage and residue management effects on soil aggregation, organic carbon dynamics and yield attribute in rice–wheat cropping system under reclaimed sodic soil. Soil Tillage Research, 136, 76–83.
Hanson, J. D., Hendrickson, J., & Archer, D. (2008). Challenges for maintaining sustainable agricultural systems in the United States. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 23(4), 325–334.
IPCC. (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2. Institute of Global Environment Strategy Hayama, Japan.
Iriarte, A., Rieradevall, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2010). Life cycle assessment of sunflower and rapeseed as energy crops under Chilean conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(4), 336–345.
ISO. (2006). 14040 International standard. Environmental management–life cycle assessment–Principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Javidan, N., Kavian, A., Pourghasemi, H. R., Conoscenti, C., & Jafarian, Z. (2019). Gully erosion susceptibility mapping using multivariate adaptive regression splines—Replications and sample size scenarios. Water, 11, 2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112319
Jones, J. B. (2001). Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis (No. CRC Press.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production. Science of the Total Environment, 664, 1005–1019.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., & Chau, K. (2019). Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy, 181, 1298–1320.
Kenney, I., Blanco-Canqui, H., Presley, D. R., Rice, C. W., Janssen, K., & Olson, B. (2015). Soil and crop response to stover removal from rainfed and irrigated corn. GCB Bioenergy, 7(2), 219–230.
Knudsen, D., Peterson, G., Pratt, P. (1982). Methods of soil analysis. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society Agricultural, 229–230.
Khanali, M., Movahedi, M., Yousefi, M., Jahangiri, S., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2016). Investigating energy balance and carbon footprint in saffron cultivation-A case study in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 162–171.
Kouchaki-Penchah, H., Sharifi, M., Mousazadeh, H., Zarea-Hosseinabadi, H., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2016). Gate to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard production in Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 343–350.
Liu, C., Lu, M., Cui, J., Li, B., & Fang, C. (2014). Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 20, 1366–1381.
López-Vicente, M., & Álvarez, S. (2018). Stability and patterns of topsoil water content in rainfed vineyards, olive groves, and cereal fields under different soil and tillage conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 201, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.004
Mdhluli, F. T., & Harding, K. G. (2021). Comparative life-cycle assessment of maize cobs, maize stover and wheat stalks for the production of electricity through gasification vs traditional coal power electricity in South Africa. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 3,
Margenot, A. J., Paul, B. K., Sommer, R. R., Pulleman, M. M., Parikh, S. J., Jackson, L. E., & Fonte, S. J. (2017). Can conservation agriculture improve phosphorus (P) availability in weathered soils? Effects of tillage and residue management on soil P status after 9 years in a Kenyan Oxisol. Soil Tillage Research, 166, 157–166.
Marques, M., Ruiz-Colmenero, M., Bienes, R., García-Díaz, A., & Sastre, B. (2020). Effects of a permanent soil cover on water dynamics and wine characteristics in a steep vineyard in the Central Spain. Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1178622120948069. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120948069
Maw, M., Goyne, K., & Journal, F.F.-A. (2019). Soil carbon changes following conversion to annual biofuel feedstocks on marginal lands. Agronomy Journal, 111(1), 4–13.
Meena, J. R., Behera, U. K., Chakraborty, D., & Sharma, A. R. (2015). Tillage and residue management effect on soil properties, crop performance and energy relations in greengram (Vigna radiata L.) under maize-based cropping systems. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 3, 261–272.
Milutinović, B., Stefanović, G., Đekić, P. S., Mijailović, I., & Tomić, M. (2017). Environmental assessment of waste management scenarios with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis. Energy, 137, 917–926.
Minaei, M., Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., & Tayyebi, A. (2018). Spatiotemporal nexus between the pattern of land degradation and land cover dynamics in Iran. Land Degradation and Development, 29, 2854–2863. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3007
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran. (2018). Annual agricultural statistics. www.maj.ir (in Persian).
Mirzaei, M., Anari, M. G., Razavy-Toosi, E., Zaman, M., Saronjic, N., Zamir, S. M., & Caballero-Calvo, A. (2022). Crop residues in corn-wheat rotation in a semi-arid region increase CO2 efflux under conventional tillage but not in a no-tillage system. Pedobiologia, 93,
Mirzaei, M., Gorji Anari, M., Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Zaman, M., Saronjic, N., Mohammed, S., Szabo, S., & Caballero-Calvo, A. (2022). Soil nitrous oxide emissions following crop residues management in corn-wheat rotation under conventional and no-tillage systems. Air, Soil and Water Research, 15, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786221221128789
Mirzaei, M., Gorji Anari, M., Razavy-Toosi, E., Asadi, H., Moghiseh, E., Saronjic, N., & Rodrigo-Comino, J. (2021). Preliminary effects of crop residue management on soil quality and crop production under different soil management regimes in corn-wheat rotation systems. Agronomy, 11(2), 302.
Mohammed, S., Mirzaei, M., Pappné Törő, Á., Anari, M. G., Moghiseh, E., Asadi, H., & Harsányi, E. (2022). Soil carbon dioxide emissions from maize (Zea mays L.) fields as influenced by tillage management and climate. Irrigation and Drainage, 71(1), 228–240.
Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Rafiee, S., Sharifi, M., Hosseinpour, S., Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., & Khanali, M. (2017). Use of LCA indicators to assess Iranian rapeseed production systems with different residue management practices. Ecological Indicators, 80, 31–39.
Mousavi-Avval, S. H., Rafiee, S., Sharifi, M., Hosseinpour, S., Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., & Renzulli, P. A. (2017). Application of multi-objective genetic algorithms for optimization of energy, economics and environmental life cycle assessment in oilseed production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 804–815.
Mu, X., Zhao, Y., Liu, K., Ji, B., Guo, H., Xue, Z., & Li, C. (2016). Responses of soil properties, root growth and crop yield to tillage and crop residue management in a wheat–maize cropping system on the North China Plain. European Journal of Agronomy, 78, 32–43.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau, K. W. (2019). Assessment of optimized pattern in milling factories of rice production based on energy, environmental and economic objectives. Energy, 169, 1259–1273.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau, K. W. (2017). Energy consumption enhancement and environmental life cycle assessment in paddy production using optimization techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 571–586.
Naseri, H., Parashkoohi, M. G., Ranjbar, I., & Zamani, D. M. (2021). Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems. Energy, 217,
Nawaz, A., Lal, R., Shrestha, R. K., & Farooq, M. (2017). Mulching affects soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions under long-term no-till and plough-till systems in Alfisol of Central Ohio. Land Degradation & Development, 28(2), 673–681.
Niu, Y. H., Wang, L., Wan, X. G., Peng, Q. Z., Huang, Q., & Shi, Z. H. (2021). A systematic review of soil erosion in citrus orchards worldwide. Catena, 206,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105558
Novara, A., Pulido, M., Rodrigo-Comino, J., Prima, S. D., Smith, P., Gristina, L., Gimenez-Morera, A., Terol, E., Salesa, D., Keesstra, S. (2019). Long-term organic farming on a citrus plantation results in soil organic carbon recovery. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica 45, 271–286. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.3794
Nunes, F. A., Seferin, M., Maciel, V. G., Flôres, S. H., & Ayub, M. A. Z. (2016). Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from rice production systems in Brazil: A comparison between minimal tillage and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 799–809.
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., & Keeney, D. R. (1982). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties., 2, 643–698.
Parajuli, R., Kristensen, I. S., Knudsen, M. T., Mogensen, L., Corona, A., Birkved, M., & Dalgaard, T. (2017). Environmental life cycle assessments of producing maize, grass-clover, ryegrass and winter wheat straw for biorefinery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3859–3871.
Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., Keyhani, A., Rafiee, S. H., & Sefeedpary, P. (2011). Energy use and economic analysis of corn silage production under three cultivated area levels in Tehran Province of Iran. Energy, 36, 3335–3341.
Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Thierfelder, C., White, R. P., & Jat, M. L. (2016). Does conservation agriculture deliver climate change mitigation through soil carbon sequestration in tropical agro-ecosystems? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 220, 164–174.
Rakkar, M. K., Blanco-Canqui, H., Drijber, R. A., Drewnoski, M. E., MacDonald, J. C., & Klopfenstein, T. (2017). Impacts of cattle grazing of corn residues on soil properties after 16 years. Soil Science Society of America Journal. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2016.07.0227
Rasoulzadeh, A., Azartaj, E., Asghari, A., & Ghavidel, A. (2019). Effects of plant residue management on soil properties, surface runoff, and soil loss under rainfall simulation in a semi-arid region in Iran. Arid Land Research and Management, 33(2), 200–211.
Ravindra, K., Singh, T., & Mor, S. (2019). Emissions of air pollutants from primary crop residue burning in India and their mitigation strategies for cleaner emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 261–273.
Recanati, F., Arrigoni, A., Scaccabarozzi, G., Marveggio, D., Melià, P., & Dotelli, G. (2018). LCA towards sustainable agriculture: The case study of Cupuaçu jam from agroforestry. Procedia CIRP, 69, 557–561.
Rodrigo-Comino, J., López-Vicente, M., Kumar, V., Rodríguez-Seijo, A., Valkó, O., Rojas, C., Pourghasemi, H. R., Salvati, L., Bakr, N., Vaudour, E., Brevik, E. C., Radziemska, M., Pulido, M., Di Prima, S., Dondini, M., de Vries, W., Santos, E. S., de Mendonça-Santos, M., & L., Yu, Y., Panagos, P.,. (2020). Soil science challenges in a new era: A transdisciplinary overview of relevant topics. Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1178622120977491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622120977491
Rodrigo-Comino, J., Senciales-González, J. M., Yu, Y., Salvati, L., Giménez-Morera, A., & Cerdà, A. (2021). Long-term changes in rainfed olive production, rainfall and farmer’s income in Bailén (Jaén, Spain). Euro-Mediterr J Environ Integr, 6, 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-021-00268-1
Rodrigo-Comino, J., Caballero-Calvo, A., Salvati, L., & Senciales-González, J. M. (2022). Sostenibilidad de los cultivos subtropicales: Claves para el manejo del suelo, el uso agrícola y la Ordenación del Territorio. Cuadernos Geográficos, 61(1), 150–167.
Romero-Gámez, M., Audsley, E., & Suárez-Rey, E. M. (2014). Life cycle assessment of cultivating lettuce and escarole in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, 193–203.
Sadeghi, S. H. R., Azari, M., & GhaderiVangah, B. (2008). Field evaluation of the hillslope erosion model (HEM) in Iran. Biosystems Engineering, 99, 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.10.001
Safa, M., Samarasinghe, S., & Mohssen, M. (2010). Determination of fuel consumption and indirect factors affecting it in wheat production in Canterbury, New Zealand. Energy, 35, 5400–5405.
Sanz-Cobena, A., Abalos, D., Meijide, A., Sanchez-Martin, L., & Vallejo, A. (2016). Soil moisture determines the effectiveness of two urease inhibitors to decrease N2O emission. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(7), 1131–1144.
Sastre, B., Barbero-Sierra, C., Bienes, R., Marques, M. J., & García-Díaz, A. (2016). Soil loss in an olive grove in Central Spain under cover crops and tillage treatments, and farmer perceptions. Journal of Soils and Sediments. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1589-9
Schaufler, G., Kitzler, B., Schindlbacher, A., Skiba, U., Sutton, M. A., & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions from European soils under different land use: Effects of soil moisture and temperature. European Journal of Soil Science, 61(5), 683–696.
Schmatz, R., Recous, S., Weiler, D. A., Pilecco, G. E., Schu, A. L., Giovelli, R. L., & Giacomini, S. J. (2020). How the mass and quality of wheat and vetch mulches affect drivers of soil N2O emissions. Geoderma, 372,
Seiz, P., Guzman-Bustamante, I., Schulz, R., Müller, T., & Ruser, R. (2019). Effect of crop residue removal and straw addition on nitrous oxide emissions from a horticulturally used soil in South Germany. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 83(5), 1399–1409.
Sindelar, M., Blanco-Canqui, H., Jin, V. L., & Ferguson, R. (2019). Cover crops and corn residue removal: Impacts on soil hydraulic properties and their relationships with carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 83(1), 221–231.
Singh, A., & Kaur, J. (2012). Impact of conservation tillage on soil properties in rice-wheat cropping system. Agricultural Science Research Journal, 2, 30–41.
Smith, L., Inman, A., Lai, X., Zhang, H., Fanqiao, M., Jianbin, Z., Burke, S., Rahn, C., Siciliano, G., Haygarth, P. M., Bellarby, J., & Surridge, B. (2017). Mitigation of diffuse water pollution from agriculture in England and China, and the scope for policy transfer. Land Use Policy, 61, 208–219.
Smith, P., Keesstra, S. D., Silver, W. L., & Adhya, T. K. (2021). The role of soils in delivering nature’s contributions to people. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376, 20200169. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0169
Struik, P. C., & Kuyper, T. W. (2017). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: The richer shade of green. A Review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37(5), 1–15.
Syp, A., Faber, A., Borzęcka-Walker, M., & Osuch, D. (2015). Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in winter wheat farms using data envelopment analysis approach. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24(5).
Taguas, E. V., Guzmán, E., Guzmán, G., Vanwalleghem, T., Gómez, J. A. (2015). Characteristics and importance of rill and gully erosion: A case study in a small catchment of a marginal olive grove. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica 41, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.18172/cig.2644
Tellez-Rio, A., García-Marco, S., Navas, M., López-Solanilla, E., Rees, R. M., Tenorio, J. L., & Vallejo, A. (2015). Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from a vetch cropping season are changed by long-term tillage practices in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51(1), 77–88.
Tian, Z., Wang, J. W., Li, J., & Han, B. (2021). Designing future crops: Challenges and strategies for sustainable agriculture. The Plant Journal, 105(5), 1165–1178.
Turmel, M.-S., Speratti, A., Baudron, F., Verhulst, N., & Govaerts, B. (2015). Crop residue management and soil health: A systems analysis. Agricultural Systems, 134, 6–16.
Van Eekeren, N., van Liere, D., de Vries, F., Rutgers, M., de Goede, R., & Brussaard, L. (2009). A mixture of grass and clover combines the positive effects of both plant species on selected soil biota. Applied Soil Ecology, 42(3), 254–263.
Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38.
Wang, W., Akhtar, K., Ren, G., Yang, G., Feng, Y., & Yuan, L. (2019). Impact of straw management on seasonal soil carbon dioxide emissions, soil water content, and temperature in a semi-arid region of China. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 471–482.
Wang, M., Wu, W., Liu, W., & Bao, Y. (2007). Life cycle assessment of the winter wheat-summer maize production system on the North China Plain. International of Journal Sustainable Development World Ecology, 14, 400–407.
Wang, W., & Dalal, R. C. (2015). Nitrogen management is the key for low-emission wheat production in Australia: A life cycle perspective. European Journal of Agronomy, 66, 74–82.
Wang, X., Kristensen, T., Mogensen, L., Knudsen, M. T., & Wang, X. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions and land use from confinement dairy farms in the Guanzhong plain of China – Using a life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 577–586.
Wegner, B. R., Chalise, K. S., Singh, S., Lai, L., Abagandura, G. O., Kumar, S., & Jagadamma, S. (2018). Response of soil surface greenhouse gas fluxes to crop residue removal and cover crops under a corn–soybean rotation. Journal of Environmental Quality, 47(5), 1146–1154.
Wegner, B. R., Kumar, S., Osborne, S. L., Schumacher, T. E., Vahyala, I. E., & Eynard, A. (2015). Soil response to corn residue removal and cover crops in eastern South Dakota. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79(4), 1179–1187.
Wilhelm, W. W., Johnson, J. M., Hatfield, J. L., Voorhees, W. B., & Linden, D. R. (2004). Crop and soil productivity response to corn residue removal: A literature review. Agronomy Journal, 96(1), 1–17.
Whitbread, A. M., Blair, G. J., & Lefroy, R. D. (2000). Managing legume leys, residues and fertilisers to enhance the sustainability of wheat cropping systems in Australia: 2. Soil physical fertility and carbon. Soil and Tillage Research, 54, 77–89.
Xie, H., Huang, Y., Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., & Wu, Q. (2019). Prospects for agricultural sustainable intensification: A review of research. Land, 8(11), 157.
Yao, Z., Zheng, X., Wang, R., Xie, B., Butterbach-Bahl, K., & Zhu, J. (2013). Nitrous oxide and methane fluxes from a rice–wheat crop rotation under wheat residue incorporation and no-tillage practices. Atmospheric Environment, 79, 641–649.
Yazdanbakhsh, A., Alavi, S. N., Valadabadi, S. A., Karimi, F., & Karimi, Z. (2020). Heavy metals uptake of salty soils by ornamental sunflower, using cow manure and biosolids: A case study in Alborz City. Iran. Air, Soil and Water Research, 13, 1178622119898460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622119898460
Yin, S. (2019). Sustainability of using recycled plastic fiber in concrete. Use Recycle Plastic Eco-efficient Concrete, 441–460.
Zhang, X., Zhu, A., Xin, X., Yang, W., Zhang, J., & Ding, S. (2018). Tillage and residue management for long-term wheat-maize cropping in the North China Plain: I. Crop yield and integrated soil fertility index. Field Crops Research, 221, 157–165.
Zhang, Z., Lu, W. X., Zhao, Y., & Song, W. B. (2014). Development tendency analysis and evaluation of the water ecological carrying capacity in the Siping area of Jilin Province in China based on system dynamics and analytic hierarchy process. Ecology Modelling, 275, 9–21.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by Iran National Science Foundation (INSF). Funding for open access charge: Universidad de Granada / CBUA.
Funding
Funding for open access publishing: Universidad de Granada/CBUA. This study received financial support provided by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Environmental impacts of different wheat residue rates were evaluated using life cycle assessment.
• On-farm emissions and nitrogen fertilizer are hotspots in corn silage production.
• No-tillage with 100% wheat residue is the best option for reducing environmental impacts.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mirzaei, M., Gorji Anari, M., Saronjic, N. et al. Environmental impacts of corn silage production: influence of wheat residues under contrasting tillage management types. Environ Monit Assess 195, 171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10675-8