Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How many years of acoustic monitoring are needed to accommodate for anuran species turnover and detection?

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anuran species are threatened by a range of anthropogenically induced disturbances, highlighting the need for robust and reliable monitoring programs to detect trends in species occupancy. Anuran species experience not only differences in seasonal distributions of breeding activity, but also interannual variations in habitat occupancy which are dependent on stochastic environmental processes. Acoustic calling surveys are a widely used and reportedly reliable technique for detecting a range of anuran species in Southern Ontario. Short-term applications of this technique may be challenged to detect species which are temporarily absent from suitable habitats due to natural extirpation processes. In this paper, I analyzed anuran occupancy data from 67 long-term acoustic monitoring sites across Southern Ontario to determine the relationship between accumulated species occupancy and number of monitoring years. Data was taken from Birds Canada’s Marsh Monitoring Protocol database for amphibians and filtered to extract sites which were monitored for at least 8 years and recorded at least 4 anuran species. Species accumulation curves were created using EstimateS. Results suggest that there may be detectability issues for some species such as the pickerel frog, wood frog, and western chorus frog. Interannual detection rates and species accumulation curves point to the need for long-term (> 5 years) monitoring programs to reliably detect on average more than 90% of anuran species occupying a monitoring site. They also reflect well-documented reports of high species turnover in anuran metapopulations, suggesting that extirpation-recolonization processes are widespread and frequent. Monitoring programs should address this issue by lengthening monitoring programs, particularly those that aim to document changes to species occupancy before and after major habitat disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Available upon request from Naturecounts.ca.

References

  • Arntzen, J. W., Abrahams, C., Meilink, W. R., Iosif, R., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2017). Amphibian decline, pond loss and reduced population connectivity under agricultural intensification over a 38-year period. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(6), 1411–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebee, T. J. (2013). Effects of road mortality and mitigation measures on amphibian populations. Conservation Biology, 27(4), 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird Studies Canada. (2008). Marsh monitoring program participant’s handbook for surveying marsh birds. 2008 Edition. Published by Bird Studies Canada in cooperation with Environment Canada and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 17 pp.

  • Bird Studies Canada. (2018). Marsh monitoring program—Amphibian surveys. Data accessed from NatureCounts, a node of the Avian Knowledge Network, Bird Studies Canada. Available: http://www.naturecounts.ca/. Accessed: 14 Jan 2020.

  • Bridges, A. S., & Dorcas, M. E. (2000). Temporal variation in anuran calling behavior: Implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia, 2000(2), 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. J., & Russell, R. W. (2009). Toxicity of road salt to Nova Scotia amphibians. Environmental Pollution, 157(1), 320–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K. (2013). EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9.1.0. User’s Guide published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates/

  • Corn, P. S., Muths, E., & Iko, W. M. (2000). A comparison in Colorado of three methods to monitor breeding amphibians. Northwestern Naturalist, 22–30.

  • Crouch, W. B., & Paton, P. W. (2002). Assessing the use of call surveys to monitor breeding anurans in Rhode Island. Journal of Herpetology, 36(2), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, S. A. (2006). Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus. Biological Conservation, 128(2), 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Solla, S. R., Shirose, L. J., Fernie, K. J., Barrett, G. C., Brousseau, C. S., & Bishop, C. A. (2005). Effect of sampling effort and species detectability on volunteer-based anuran monitoring programs. Biological Conservation, 121(4), 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Solla, S. R., Fernie, K. J., Barrett, G. C., & Bishop, C. A. (2006). Population trends and calling phenology of anuran populations surveyed in Ontario estimated using acoustic surveys. In Marine, Freshwater, and Wetlands Biodiversity Conservation, 113–129. Springer, Dordrecht.

  • Fahrig, L., & Rytwinski, T. (2009). Effects of roads on animal abundance: An empirical review and synthesis. Ecology and society, 14(1).

  • Genet, K. S., & Sargent, L. G. (2003). Evaluation of methods and data quality from a volunteer-based amphibian call survey. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 703–714.

  • Gibbs, J. P., Whiteleather, K. K., & Schueler, F. W. (2005). Changes in frog and toad populations over 30 years in New York State. Ecological Applications, 15(4), 1148–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. L., Berrill, M., & Wilson, P. J. (2005). Five amphibian mortality events associated with ranavirus infection in south central Ontario. Canada. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 67(1–2), 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, A. J., & McDonnell, M. J. (2008). Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: A review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2432–2449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecnar, S. J., & M’Closkey, R. T. (1996). Regional dynamics and the status of amphibians. Ecology, 77(7), 2091–2097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karraker, N. E., Gibbs, J. P., & Vonesh, J. R. (2008). Impacts of road deicing salt on the demography of vernal pool-breeding amphibians. Ecological Applications, 18(3), 724–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen, R. M., Galatowitsch, S. M., & Tester, J. R. (1999). Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands, 19(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepage, M., Courois, R., & Daigle, C. (1997). Surveying calling anurans in Quebec using volunteers. Society for the Study of Amphibians and ReptilesIn D. M. Green (Ed.), Amphibians in decline: Canadian studies of a global problem, herpetological conservation (Vol. 1, pp. 128–140). St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longcore, J. R., Longcore, J. E., Pessier, A. P., & Halteman, W. A. (2007). Chytridiomycosis widespread in anurans of northeastern United States. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 71(2), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. M., & Trenham, P. C. (2001). Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology, 15(1), 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paszkowski, C. A., Scrimgeour, G., Gingras, B. A., & Kendall, S. (2002). A comparison of techniques for assessing amphibian assemblages on streams in the western boreal forest. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 116, 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellet, J., & Schmidt, B. R. (2005). Monitoring distributions using call surveys: Estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biological Conservation, 123(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, B. A., & Gutzwiller, K. J. (2004). Auditory sampling of frogs: Detection efficiency in relation to survey duration. Journal of Herpetology, 38(4), 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. J., Howe, R. W., Hanowski, J. M., Regal, R. R., Niemi, G. J., & Smith, C. R. (2007). Are anurans of Great Lakes coastal wetlands reliable indicators of ecological condition? Journal of Great Lakes Research, 33, 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D., & Bodie, J. R. (1998). Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conservation Biology, 12(5), 1129–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. (2008). Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72(1), 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirose, L. J., Bishop, C. A., Green, D. M., MacDonald, C. J., Brooks, R. J., & Helferty, N. J. (1997). Validation tests of an amphibian call count survey technique in Ontario, Canada. Herpetologica, 312–320.

  • Sinsch, U. (2014). Movement ecology of amphibians: From individual migratory behaviour to spatially structured populations in heterogeneous landscapes. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 92(6), 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, H. N., & da Silva, F. R. (2019). Species turnover drives the spatial distribution of frog beta diversity in farmland ponds. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 35(4), 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenham, P. C., Koenig, W. D., Mossman, M. J., Stark, S. L., & Jagger, L. A. (2003). Regional dynamics of wetland-breeding frogs and toads: Turnover and synchrony. Ecological Applications, 13(6), 1522–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E. E., Yurewicz, K. L., Skelly, D. K., & Relyea, R. A. (2007). Turnover in an amphibian metacommunity: The role of local and regional factors. Oikos, 116(10), 1713–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Single author, not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorian Pomezanski.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pomezanski, D. How many years of acoustic monitoring are needed to accommodate for anuran species turnover and detection?. Environ Monit Assess 193, 553 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09343-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09343-0

Keywords

Navigation