Skip to main content
Log in

Multitemporal time series analysis using machine learning models for ground deformation in the Erhai region, China

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 16 July 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Ground deformation (GD) has been widely reported as a global issue and is now an ongoing problem that will profoundly endanger the public safety. GD is a complex and dynamic problem with many contributing factors that occur over time. In the literature, there are only a few methods that can effectively monitor GD. Microwave remote sensing data such as interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) are mostly adopted to assess GD. These data can reveal the surface deforming areas with great precision, mapping GD results at a large scale. In this study, the effects of GD and the influencing factors, such as the building area, the water level, the cumulative precipitation, and the cumulative temperature, are modeled in the Erhai region with small baseline subset interferometric SAR (SBAS-InSAR) data that are applied using machine learning (ML) methods. The ML methods, namely, multiple linear regression (MLR), multilayer perceptron backpropagation (MLP-BP), least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-LSSVM, are used to predict GD, and the results are compared. Particularly, the PSO-LSSVM method has obtained the least root mean square error (RMSE) and mean relative error (MRE) of 11.448 and 0.112, respectively. Therefore, the results have proven that the proposed PSO-LSSVM is very efficient in analyzing GD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 16 July 2020

    Unfortunately, the name of the corresponding author (Wenxiang Wu) was missing in the author group section of the published paper.

References

  • Aburas, M. M., Ahamad, M. S. S., & Omar, N. Q. (2019). Spatio-temporal simulation and prediction of land-use change using conventional and machine learning models: a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(4), 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi, M.-A., & Bahadori, A. (2015). A LSSVM approach for determining well placement and conning phenomena in horizontal wells. Fuel, 153, 276–283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asmau, A., Olga, D., Yahya, Z., & Mike, S. (2017). Hybrid spectral unmixing: using artificial neural networks for linear/non-linear switching. Remote Sensing, 9(8), 775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijan, R., Hamid, A., Mahyar, Y., & Oliver, K. (2019). Particle swarm optimization algorithm for Neuro-fuzzy prospectivity analysis using continuously weighted spatial exploration data. Natural Resources Research, 28(2), 309–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahabir, C., Hicks, F. E., Robichaud, C., & Robinson Fayek, A. (2006). Forecasting breakup water levels at Fort McMurray, Alberta, using multiple linear regression. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(9), 1227–1238(1212).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Tan, K., Yan, S., Zhang, K., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Li, H., & Sun, Y. (2019). Monitoring land surface displacement over Xuzhou (China) in 2015–2018 through PCA-based correction applied to SAR interferometry. Remote Sensing, 11(12), 1494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Soldato, M., Solari, L., Poggi, F., Raspini, F., Tomás, R., Fanti, R., & Casagli, N. (2019). Landslide-induced damage probability estimation coupling InSAR and field survey data by fragility curves. Remote Sensing, 11(12), 1486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deo, R. C., & Şahin, M. (2016). An extreme learning machine model for the simulation of monthly mean streamflow water level in eastern Queensland. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(2), 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, L., Shuo, S., Jian, Y., Jia, S., & Wei, G. (2016). Using different regression methods to estimate leaf nitrogen content in rice by fusing Hyperspectral LiDAR data and laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence data. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. A. (2002). New optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Mhs95 Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine & Human Science.

  • Eberly, L. E. (2007). Multiple linear regression. Methods in Molecular Biology, 404(2), 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioribello, S., & Giribone, P. G. (2019). Design of an artificial neural network battery for an optimal recognition of patterns in financial time series. International Journal of Financial Engineering.

  • Forman, B. A., & Reichle, R. H. (2017). Using a support vector machine and a land surface model to estimate large-scale passive microwave brightness temperatures over snow-covered land in North America. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations & Remote Sensing, 8(9), 4431–4441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, A. S., D'Souza, S., & Arjun, N. B. (2018). Prediction of daily sea surface temperature using artificial neural networks., 39(12).

  • Gao, M., Gong, H., Li, X., Chen, B., Zhou, C., Shi, M., Guo, L., Chen, Z., Ni, Z., & Duan, G. (2019). Land subsidence and ground fissures in Beijing capital international airport (BCIA): Evidence from quasi-PS InSAR analysis. Remote Sensing, 11(12), 1466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaemi, Z., Alimohammadi, A., & Farnaghi, M. (2018). LaSVM-based big data learning system for dynamic prediction of air pollution in Tehran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(5), 300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarinen, C., & Smith, J. B. (2006). Climate change scenarios. Chapters, Climate Change Scenarios.

  • Hsu, K. L., Gupta, H. V., & Sorooshian, S. (1995). Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resources Research, 31(31), 2517–2530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishaque, K., Salam, Z., Amjad, M., & Mekhilef, S. (2012). An improved particle swarm optimization (PSO)–based MPPT for PV with reduced steady-state oscillation. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 27(8), 3627–3638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Bai, L., Zhao, Y., Cao, G., Wang, H., & Sun, Q. (2018). Combining InSAR and hydraulic head measurements to estimate aquifer parameters and storage variations of confined aquifer system in Cangzhou, North China plain. Water Resources Research, 54(10), 8234–8252. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017wr022126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kai, J., Jiang, W., Jing, L., & Tang, Z. (2018). Spectral matching based on discrete particle swarm optimization: a new method for terrestrial water body extraction using multi-temporal Landsat 8 images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 209, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. W., Lu, Z., Jia, Y., & Shum, C. K. (2015). Ground subsidence in Tucson, Arizona, monitored by time-series analysis using multi-sensor InSAR datasets from 1993 to 2011. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 107, 126–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. Z. (2009). Convergence analysis of standard particle swarm optimization algorithm. Science Technology & Engineering, 24(1), 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Su, H., & Bo, Z. (2018). Hyperspectral multiple features optimization using improved firefly algorithm. Remote Sensing Technology & Application, 33(1).

  • Liu, Q., Yang, M., Lei, J., Jin, H., Gao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2012). Modeling and optimizing parabolic trough solar collector systems using the least squares support vector machine method. Solar Energy, 86(7), 1973–1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, N., Wang, W., Zhang, Q., Li, D., Yao, X., Tian, Y., Zhu, Y., Cao, W., Baret, F., Liu, S., & Cheng, T. (2019). Estimation of nitrogen nutrition status in winter wheat from unmanned aerial vehicle based multi-angular multispectral imagery. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01601.

  • Ma, G., Zhao, Q., Wang, Q., & Liu, M. (2018). On the effects of InSAR temporal decorrelation and its implications for land cover classification: the case of the ocean-reclaimed lands of the Shanghai megacity. Sensors, 18(9), 2939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghibi, S. A., Pourghasemi, H. R., & Dixon, B. (2016). GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(1), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikos, S., Ioannis, P., Constantinos, L., Paraskevas, T., Anastasia, K., & Charalambos, K. (2016). Land subsidence rebound detected via multi-temporal InSAR and ground truth data in Kalochori and Sindos regions, northern Greece. Engineering Geology, 209, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puliyalil, H., Cvelbar, U., Filipi, G., Petri, A. D., Zaplotnik, R., Recek, N., Mozeti, M., & Thomas, S. (2015). Plasma as a tool for enhancing insulation properties of polymer composites. RSC Advances, 5(47), 37853–37858.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwieder, M., Leitao, P. J., Süß, S., Senf, C., & Hostert, P. (2014). Estimating fractional shrub cover using simulated EnMAP data: a comparison of three machine learning regression techniques. Remote Sensing, 6(4), 3427–3445.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOMA, A. S., KUBOTA, T., & MIZUNO, H. (2019). Optimization of causative factors using logistic regression and artificial neural network models for landslide susceptibility assessment in Ujung Loe watershed, South Sulawesi Indonesia. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(02), 144–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suykens, J. A. K., & Vandewalle, J. (1999). Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters, 9(3), 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szantoi, Z., Escobedo, F. J., Abd-Elrahman, A., Pearlstine, L., Dewitt, B., & Smith, S. (2015). Classifying spatially heterogeneous wetland communities using machine learning algorithms and spectral and textural features. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(5), 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory.

  • Wang, H., Wright, T. J., Yu, Y., Lin, H., Jiang, L., Li, C., & Qiu, G. (2012). InSAR reveals coastal subsidence in the Pearl River Delta, China. Geophysical Journal International, 191(3), 1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05687.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Liu, D., Wang, Q., & Ying, W. (2013). Spectral unmixing model based on least squares support vector machine with unmixing residue constraints. IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters, 10(6), 1592–1596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Tian, J. W., & Gao, C. Q. (2009). Infrared small target detection using directional highpass filters based on LS-SVM. Electronics Letters, 45(3), 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Guo, Y., Hu, S., Li, Y., Wang, J., Liu, X., & Wang, L. (2019). Ground deformation analysis using InSAR and backpropagation prediction with influencing factors in Erhai region, China. Sustainability, 11(10), 2853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Lary, D. J., Zewdie, G. K., & Liu, X. (2019). Using machine learning to understand the temporal morphology of the PM 2.5 annual cycle in East Asia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(2), 272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M., Liangpei, Z., Bo, D., Lefei, Z., Yanguo, F., & Dongmei, S. (2017). A mutation operator accelerated quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm for Hyperspectral Endmember extraction. Remote Sensing, 9(3), 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Feng, Q., Liang, T., Liu, B., Zhang, W., & Xie, H. (2017). Modeling grassland above-ground biomass based on artificial neural network and remote sensing in the Three-River headwaters region. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204.

  • Yang, Z. P., Lu, W. X., Long, Y. Q., & Li, P. (2009). Application and comparison of two prediction models for groundwater levels: a case study in Western Jilin Province, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 73(4), 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashar, R., & Farshid, F. A. (2018). Application of InSAR in measuring Earth’s surface deformation caused by groundwater extraction and modeling its behavior using time series analysis by artificial neural networks. Acta Geophysica, 66(5), 1171–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zewdie, G. K., Lary, D. J., Liu, X., Wu, D., & Levetin, E. (2019). Estimating the daily pollen concentration in the atmosphere using machine learning and NEXRAD weather radar data. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(7), 418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, R., Z-w, L., G-c, F., & Wang Q-j, H. J. (2016). Monitoring surface deformation over permafrost with an improved SBAS-InSAR algorithm: with emphasis on climatic factors modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 184, 276–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C., Gong, H., Zhang, Y., Warner, T. A., & Wang, C. (2018). Spatiotemporal evolution of land subsidence in the Beijing plain 2003–2015 using persistent Scatterer interferometry (PSI) with multi-source SAR data. Remote Sensing, 10(4), 552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, B., Li, J., Chu, Z., Tang, W., Wang, B., & Li, D. (2016). A robust and multi-weighted approach to estimating topographically correlated tropospheric delays in radar interferograms. Sensors, 16(7), 1078.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA19040101, XDA19040304).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “conceptualization, YH.G.; methodology, YH.G., J.S., WX.W.; software, SQ.H., WX.W.; validation, YH.G.; formal analysis, YH.G.; investigation, YH.G., WX.W.; resources, YH.G.; data curation, YH.G.; writing—original draft preparation, YH.G.; writing—review and editing, YH.G., J.S; visualization, YH.G.; supervision, YH.G.; funding acquisition, YH.G., YY.W., please turn to the CRediT taxonomy for the term explanation. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenxiang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Hu, S., Wu, W. et al. Multitemporal time series analysis using machine learning models for ground deformation in the Erhai region, China. Environ Monit Assess 192, 464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08426-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08426-8

Keywords

Navigation