Abstract
This study represented the first comprehensive assessment of the physicochemical water quality status of the entire Yamuna River stretch in India. The upper zone had “excellent-to-good” water quality index (WQI) with mean 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) values of 2.1 and 2.4 mg/L during monsoon and non-monsoon, respectively. The middle region was described by “poor-to-marginal” WQI with average BOD5 values of 13.1 mg/L (monsoon) and 32.3 mg/L (non-monsoon). The low WQI observations at the midstream region were due to the negative impact of two major drains, namely Najafgarh and Shahdara, that carry partially treated effluents from industrial units. Further, BOD5 decreased to 1.9 mg/L (monsoon) and 1.8 mg/L (non-monsoon) in the lower zone, and the WQI values improved to “good” and “excellent”. The dilution and depuration effects of the Chambal, Sindh, Betwa, and Ken Rivers recovered the environmental conditions in downstream stations. The oxygen sag curve complied with the water quality status along the river stretch. Based on the principal component analysis, the Yamuna River was strongly influenced by dissolved mineral salts originating from atmospheric deposition, weathering of soils and rocks, and application of deicing chemicals and landfills. Moreover, organic and nutrient substances and biological activities resulting from the discharge of sewage, and the utilization of fertilizers in agriculture, were the second contributors to pollution. The statistical techniques employed in this work could be beneficial for decision-makers (government and stakeholders) to identify the pollution sources/factors and to determine the viability of water bodies for domestic applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APHA. (1998). Standard method of water and wastewater analysis. Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association.
APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Public Health Association.
Ayers, R., & Westcot, D. (1994). Water quality for agriculture. Rome: FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29. Rev. 1.
Bhardwaj, R., Gupta, A., & Garg, J. (2017). Evaluation of heavy metal contamination using environmetrics and indexing approach for River Yamuna, Delhi stretch, India. Water Science, 31(1), 52–66.
CCME (2001). CCME Water Quality Index 1.0. Users Manual. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.
CPCB. (1980–1981). The Ganga River—Part I—The Yamuna basin, ADSORBS/2. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
CPCB. (1982–1983). Assimilation capacity of point pollution load, CUPS/12. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
CPCB. (1999–2000). Water quality status of Yamuna River, ADSORBS/32. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
CPCB. (2003). Annual Report 2002–2003, Water Quality Status of River Yamuna in Delhi. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.
CPCB. (2006). Water quality status of Yamuna River (1999–2005), Assessment and Development of River, Basin Series: ADSORBS/41/2006-07. Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India.
Dash, M. (2009). Fundamentals of ecology 3E. Bengaluru: McGraw-Hill Education (India) Pvt Limited.
Djemai, M., Saibi, H., Mesbah, M., & Robertson, A. (2017). Spatio-temporal evolution of the physico-chemical water characteristics of the Sebaou river valley (Great Kabylia, Algeria). Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 12, 33–49.
Gholizadeh, M., Melesse, A., & Reddi, L. (2016). Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources using APCS-MLR and PMF receptor modeling techniques in three major rivers of South Florida. Science of the Total Environment, 566, 1552–567, 1567.
Gupta, S., Ansari, F., Nasr, M., Chabukdhara, M., & Bux, F. (2018). Multivariate analysis and health risk assessment of heavy metal contents in foodstuffs of Durban. South Africa. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(3), 151.
IS. (1982). Indian standard tolerance limits for inland surface, waters subject to pollution (IS: 2296-1982). New Delhi: Indian Standards Institution.
IS (1991). Indian Standard for Drinking Water - Specification (IS: 10500-1991). Bureau of Indian Standards.
Jankowska, J., Radzka, E., & Rymuza, K. (2017). Principal component analysis and cluster analysis in multivariate assessment of water quality. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 18(2), 92–96.
Kumar, V., Sharma, A., Thukral, A., & Bhardwaj, R. (2017). Water quality of river Beas, India. Current Science, 112(6), 1138–1157.
MathWorks (2017). Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox™ User’s Guide. https://www.mathworks.com/help/pdf_doc/stats/stats.pdf ed. The MathWorks, Inc.
Mutiyar, P., Gupta, S., & Mittal, A. (2018). Fate of pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) from River Yamuna, India: An ecotoxicological risk assessment approach. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 150, 297–304.
Nasr, M., & Zahran, H. (2016). Performance evaluation of agricultural drainage water using modeling and statistical approaches. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 42(2), 141–148.
Paliwal, R., Sharma, P., & Kansal, A. (2007). Water quality modelling of the river Yamuna (India) using QUAL2E-UNCAS. Journal of Environmental Management, 83, 131–144.
Parmar, K., & Bhardwaj, R. (2015). Statistical, time series, and fractal analysis of full stretch of river Yamuna (India) for water quality management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(1), 397–414.
Parmar, D., & Keshari, A. (2012). Sensitivity analysis of water quality for Delhi stretch of the River Yamuna, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(3), 1487–1508.
Sharma, D., & Kansal, A. (2011). Water quality analysis of River Yamuna using water quality index in the national capital territory, India (2000–2009). Applied Water Science, 1(3–4), 147–157.
Sharma, D., & Singh, R. (2009). DO-BOD modeling of River Yamuna for national capital territory, India using STREAM II, a 2D water quality model. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 159(1–4), 231–240.
Sharma, A., Das, M., Vass, K., & Tyagi, R. (2017a). Patterns of fish diversity, community structure and ecological integrity of River Yamuna, India. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 20(1–2), 30–42.
Sharma, D., Kansal, A., & Pelletier, G. (2017b). Water quality modeling for urban reach of Yamuna River, India (1999–2009), using QUAL2Kw. Applied Water Science, 7(3), 1535–1559.
Singh, K., Malik, A., Mohan, D., & Sinha, S. (2004). Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)--a case study. Water Research, 38(18), 3980–3992.
Singh, N., Kaur, M., & Kaur Katnoria, J. (2017). Spatial and temporal heavy metal distribution and surface water characterization of Kanjli Wetland (a Ramsar site), India using different indices. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 99(6), 735–742.
Streeter, H. W. & Phelps, E. B. (1925). A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio River. Public Health Bull. 146, U.S. Public Health Service, Washington D.C.
WHO. (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality 4 th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO).
Willet, P. (1987). Similarity and clustering in chemical information systems. New York: Research Studies Press, Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 28 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaiswal, M., Hussain, J., Gupta, S.K. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of water quality status for entire stretch of Yamuna River, India. Environ Monit Assess 191, 208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7312-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7312-8