Skip to main content
Log in

Water quality degradation in the sources of drinking water: an assessment based on 18 years of data from 441 water supply systems

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Degradation of source water quality complicates water treatment processes, resulting in additional treatment cost and tap water quality deterioration. In this study, source water quality was investigated for 441 water supply systems (WSSs) during the period of 18 years (1999–2016). The investigation was performed on 21 water quality parameters (WQPs) for groundwater (GWS) and surface water (SWS) sources. The averages of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), color, and Kjeldahl nitrogen (N) were much higher in SWS than GWS while other 18 WQPs (e.g., alkalinity, conductivity, and pH) were higher in GWS. In SWS, averages of DOC during 2000–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2015 were 6.08, 6.74, and 6.78 mg/L, respectively. In these periods, pH were 6.39, 6.62, and 6.77, respectively. In GWS, averages of DOC in these periods were 1.43, 1.36, and 1.81 mg/L, respectively, while pH were 7.50, 7.69, and 7.89, respectively. The DOC in SWS and GWS were increasing at the rates of 0.0722 and 0.0491 mg/L/year, respectively, while pH were increasing at the rates of 0.0375 and 0.0441 units/year, respectively. Trihalomethanes showed increasing trends in drinking water from SWS and GWS while haloacetic acids showed no trend. In SWS, DOC and its rate of increase were higher while in GWS, pH and its rate of increase were higher. The higher DOC and pH, and their increasing rates could increase disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in drinking water. Many DBPs are known as possible or probable human carcinogens and some DBPs are regulated. The other WQP and their increasing patterns can also impart new challenges, which are likely to increase the treatment cost and/or deteriorate drinking water quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bricker, O. P., & Jones, B. F. (1995). Main parameters affecting the composition of natural waters. In B. Salbu & E. Steinnes (Eds.), Trace elements in natural waters (pp. 1–5). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998). Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 83, 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. (2013). Impact of source waters, disinfectants, seasons and treatment approaches on trihalomethanes in drinking water: a comparison based on the size of municipal systems. Water Environment Journal, 27, 197–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. (2018). Occurrences and changes of disinfection byproducts in small water supply systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190, 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6410-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S., & Zahrani, M. (2014). Water quality change in dam reservoir and shallow aquifer: analysis on trend, seasonal variability and data reduction. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 6127–6143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S., Champagne, P., & Husain, T. (2007). Fuzzy risk-based decision-making approach for selection of drinking water disinfectants. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA, 56, 75–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S., Champagne, P., & McLellan, P. J. (2008). Factors influencing formation of trihalomethanes in drinking water: results from multivariate statistical investigation of the Ontario Drinking Water Surveillance Program database. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 43(2/3), 189–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. M., Adams, J. Q., Sethi, V., & Sivaganesan, M. (1998). Control of microbial contaminants and disinfection byproducts for drinking water in the US: cost and performance. Journal of Water SRT, 47, 255–265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delpla, I., Jung, A. V., Baures, E., Clement, M., & Thomas, O. (2009). Impacts of climate change on surface water quality in relation to drinking water production. Environment International, 35, 1225–1233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engerholm, B. A., & Amy, G. L. (1983). A predictive model for chloroform formation from humic acid. Journal of American Water Works Association, 75, 418–423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. D., Monteith, D. T., & Cooper, D. M. (2005). Long-term increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon: observations, possible causes and environmental impacts. Environmental Pollution, 137, 55–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (2012). Guidelines for Canadian drinking water quality. Prepared by the Federal–Provincial–Territorial Committee on Health and the Environment: March, Ottawa, Canada

  • Jarvie, H. P., Whitton, B. A., & Neal, C. (1998). Nitrogen and phosphorus in east-coast British rivers: speciation, sources and biological significance. Science of the Total Environment, 210/211, 79–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. W., Weinberg, H. S., Richardson, S. D., Pastor, S. J., Chinn, R., Sclimenti, M. J., Onstad, G. D., & Thruston Jr., A. D. (2006). Occurrences of a new generation of disinfection byproducts. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 7175–7185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, H. B. (1945). Non-parametric test against trend. Econometrica, 13, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab Inc. (2016). The statistical software package. Available at: http://www.minitab.com/en-us/.

  • MOE (Ministry of the Environment) (2007). Drinking Water Surveillance Program (DWSP) summary report for 2000–2004. Personal communication with Dave Fellowes, Ministry of the Environment, Ontario, Canada.

  • Monteith, D.T., Stoddard, J.L., Evans, C.D., deWit, H.A., Forsius, M., Høgasen, T., Wilander, A., Skjelkvale, B.L., Jeffries. D.S., Vuorenmaa, J., Keller, B., Jiri Kopacek, J., Vesely, J. (2007). Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Vol 450|22 November 2007|. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06316.

  • NL-DOE (Department of Environment and Climate Change) (2016). Newfoundland and labrador water resources portal. http://maps.gov.nl.ca/water/.

  • Prathumratana, L., Sthiannopkao, S., & Kim, K. W. (2008). The relationship of climatic and hydrological parameters to surface water quality in the lower Mekong River. Environment International, 34, 860–866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir, A., Malik, R. N., & Husain, S. Z. (2007). Spatio-temporal variations in water quality of Nullah Aik-tributary of the river Chenab, Pakistan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 140, 43–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Inc. (2016). Statistical discovery software. SAS Institute Inc. (http://www.jmp.com/), NC, USA.

  • Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2007). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji River basin, Japan. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22, 464–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonov, P., Simeonov, V., & Andreev, G. (2003). Environmetric analysis of the Struma River water quality. Central European Journal of Chemistry, 2, 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. P., Malik, A., Mohan, D., & Sinha, S. (2004). Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India): a case study. Water Research, 38, 3980–3992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2016). The Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) online database; USEPA. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/index.html, Washington D.C., USA.

  • Varol, M., & Şen, B. (2009). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of Behrimaz Stream, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 159, 543–553.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varol, M., Gökot, B., Bekleyen, A., & Şen, B. (2012). Spatial and temporal variations in surface water quality of the dam reservoirs in the Tigris River basin, Turkey. Catena, 92, 11–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, M., Pardo, R., Barrado, E., & Deban, L. (1998). Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water by exploratory data analysis. Water Research, 32, 3581–3592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2011). Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th eds. Vol. 1, Recommendations, Geneva.

  • Wunderlin, D. A., Diaz, M. P., Ame, M. V., Pesce, S. F., Hued, A. C., & Bistoni, M. A. (2001). Pattern recognition techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality. A case study: Suquia River basin (Cordoba, Argentina). Water Research, 35, 2881–2894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shakhawat Chowdhury.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8 Data summary for different types of SWS in NL, Canada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chowdhury, S. Water quality degradation in the sources of drinking water: an assessment based on 18 years of data from 441 water supply systems. Environ Monit Assess 190, 379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6772-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6772-6

Keywords

Navigation