Abstract
An eco-hydraulic survey of the highly regulated Adda River (northern Italy) was carried out to highlight the ecological implications of the current water management, including minimum flows (MFs) set as environmental protection measures. Macroinvertebrates, flows, and other main physico-chemical parameters were monitored from 2010 to 2012 at seven sites located in two river reaches characterized by different water abstraction schemes. In the upper part of the river, water is mainly diverted for hydro-power, and, in water-depleted reaches, discharges equalled MF for more than 100 days y−1, mainly during winter. In the downstream river reach, where irrigation use prevails, discharges were on average three times higher than in the upper part of the river, and flow values similar to MF were detected only for short periods during summer. The two resulting streamflow patterns seem to have shaped different benthic communities, superimposing to the natural downstream variation. The upper reach is characterized by univoltine taxa, while the lower reach by multivoltine taxa adapted to a more disturbed environment. Chironomidae, a well-known tolerant benthic family, dominated at a site affected by point-source pollution, which turned out to be another determinant of macroinvertebrate community. Despite these differences among sites in the benthic community structure, the current water management seems to allow, for all of the investigated river sites, the achievement of the good ecological status as defined by the local law set in accomplishment of the Water Framework Directive.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acreman, M. C., & Dunbar, M. J. (2004). Defining environmental river flow requirements? A review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 8(5), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-8-861-2004.
Acreman, M. C., & Ferguson, A. J. D. (2010). Environmental flows and the European water framework directive. Freshwater Biology, 55(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x.
Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Poff, N. L., & Naiman, R. J. (2006). The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 16(4), 1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO;2.
Bobbi, C. J., Warfe, D. M., & Hardie, S. A. (2013). Implementing environmental flows in semi-regulated and unregulated rivers using a flexible framework: case studies from Tasmania, Australia. River Research and Applications, 30(5), 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2661.
Bonada, N., Rieradevall, M., & Prat, N. (2007). Macroinvertebrate community structure and biological traits related to flow permanence in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia, 589(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0723-5.
Booker, D. J., Snelder, T. H., Greenwood, M. J., & Crow, S. K. (2015). Relationships between invertebrate communities and both hydrological regime and other environmental factors across New Zealand’s rivers. Ecohydrology, 8(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1481.
Buffagni, A., & Erba, S. (2007) Macroinvertebrati acquatici e direttiva 2000/60/EC (WFD) - Parte A. Metodo di campionamento per i fiumi guadabili. [Aquatic macroinvertebrates and 2000/60/EC Directive (WFD) – Part A. Sampling method for unwadable rivers]. IRSA-CNR Notiziario dei metodi analitici, 1, 2–27.
Bunn, S. E., & Arthington, A. H. (2002). Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management, 30(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0.
Camargo, J. A., Alonso, A., & De La Puente, M. (2003). Multimetric assessment of nutrient enrichment in impounded rivers based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 96(1), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000031730.78630.75.
Carlisle, D. M., Falcone, J., Wolock, D. M., & Norris, R. H. (2010). Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams. River Research and Applications, 26(2), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1247.
Carlisle, D. M., Nelson, S. M., & Eng, K. (2014). Macroinvertebrate community condition associated with the severity of streamflow alteration. River Research and Applications, 30(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2626.
Death, R. G., & Winterbourn, M. J. (1995). Diversity patterns in stream benthic invertebrate communities: the influence of habitat stability. Ecology, 76(5), 1446–1460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938147.
Delconte, C. A., Sacchi, E., Racchetti, E., Bartoli, M., Mas-Pla, J., & Re, V. (2014). Nitrogen inputs to a river course in a heavily impacted watershed: a combined hydrochemical and isotopic evaluation (Oglio River Basin, N Italy). Science of the Total Environment, 466-467, 924–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.092.
Demars, B. O., Potts, J. M., Tremolieres, M., Thiebaut, G., Gougelin, N., & Nordmann, V. (2012). River macrophyte indices: not the holy grail! Freshwater Biology, 57(8), 1745–1759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02834.x.
Dodds, W. K., Jones, J. R., & Welch, E. B. (1998). Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Research, 32(5), 1455–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00370-9.
Espa, P., Crosa, G., Gentili, G., Quadroni, S., & Petts, G. (2015). Downstream ecological impacts of controlled sediment flushing in an Alpine valley river: a case study. River Research and Applications, 31(8), 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2788.
Guareschi, S., Laini, A., Racchetti, E., Bo, T., Fenoglio, S., & Bartoli, M. (2012). How hydromorphological constraints and regulated flows govern macroinvertebrate communities along an entire lowland river? Ecohydrology, 7(2), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1354.
Hering, D., Borja, A., Carstensen, J., Carvalho, L., Elliott, M., Feld, C. K., Heiskanen, A. S., Johnson, R. K., Moe, J., Pont, D., Solheim, A. L., & de Bund, W. V. (2010). The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment, 408(19), 4007–4019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031.
King, A. J., Gawne, B., Beesley, L., Koehn, J. D., Nielsen, D. L., & Price, A. (2015). Improving ecological response monitoring of environmental flows. Environmental Management, 55(5), 991–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6.
Lamouroux, N., Gore, J. A., Lepori, F., & Statzner, B. (2015). The ecological restoration of large rivers needs science-based, predictive tools meeting public expectations: an overview of the Rhône project. Freshwater Biology, 60(6), 1069–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12553.
Merigoux, S., Lamouroux, N., Olivier, J. M., & Doledec, S. (2009). Invertebrate hydraulic preferences and predicted impacts of changes in discharge in a large river. Freshwater Biology, 54(6), 1343–1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02160.x.
Miracle, M. R., Moss, B., Vicente, E., Romo, S., Rueda, J., Bécares, E., Fernández-Aláez, C., Fernández-Aláez, M., Hietala, J., Kairesalo, T., et al. (2006). Response of macroinvertebrates to experimental nutrient and fish additions in European localities at different latitudes. Limnetica, 25(1–2), 585–612.
Moss, B. (2008). The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise? Science of the Total Environment, 400(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.029.
Naiman, R. J., Bunn, S. E., Nilsson, C., Petts, G. E., Pinay, G., & Thompson, L. C. (2002). Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview. Environmental Management, 30(4), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2734-3.
Poff, N. L., & Zimmerman, J. K. (2010). Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology, 55(1), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x.
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., & Stromberg, J. C. (1997). The natural flow regime. Bioscience, 47(11), 769–784. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313099.
Poff, N. L., Richter, B. D., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Naiman, R. J., Kendy, E., Acreman, M., Apse, C., Bledsoe, B. P., Freeman, M. C., et al. (2010). The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology, 55(1), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x.
Poikane, S., Kelly, M., & Cantonati, M. (2016). Benthic algal assessment of ecological status in European lakes and rivers: challenges and opportunities. Science of the Total Environment, 568, 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.027.
Quadroni, S., Brignoli, M. L., Crosa, G., Gentili, G., Salmaso, F., Zaccara, S., & Espa, P. (2016). Effects of sediment flushing from a small Alpine reservoir on downstream aquatic fauna. Ecohydrology, 9(7), 1276–1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1725.
Quadroni, S., Crosa, G., Gentili, G., & Espa, P. (2017). Response of benthic macroinvertebrates to water scarcity induced by hydropower diversion in the central Italian Alps. Science of the Total Environment, 609, 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.099.
Reinfelds, I. V., Walsh, C. T., Van Der Meulen, D. E., Growns, I. O., & Gray, C. A. (2013). Magnitude, frequency and duration of instream flows to stimulate and facilitate catadromous fish migrations: Australian bass (Macquaria novemaculeata Perciformes, Percichthyidae). River Research and Applications, 29(4), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1611.
Rheinheimer, D. E., Yarnell, S. M., & Viers, J. H. (2013). Hydropower costs of environmental flows and climate warming in California’s upper Yuba River watershed. River Research and Applications, 29(10), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2612.
Richter, B. D. (2010). Re-thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries. River Research and Applications, 26(8), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1320.
Schröder, M., Kiesel, J., Schattmann, A., Jähnig, S. C., Lorenz, A. W., Kramm, S., Keizer-Vlek, H., Rolaufs, P., Leitner, P., & Hering, D. (2013). Substratum associations of benthic invertebrates in lowland and mountain streams. Ecological Indicators, 30, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.012.
Snelder, T. H., & Lamouroux, N. (2010). Co-variation of fish assemblages, flow regimes and other habitat factors in French rivers. Freshwater Biology, 55(4), 881–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02320.x.
Tharme, R. E. (2003). A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications, 19(5–6), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.736.
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980). The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37(1), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017.
Warner, R. F. (2013). Environmental flows in two highly regulated rivers: the Hawkesbury Nepean in Australia and the Durance in France. Water and Environment Journal, 28(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12045.
Yin, X. A., Yang, Z. F., & Petts, G. E. (2012). Optimizing environmental flows below dams. River Research and Applications, 28(6), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1477.
Acknowledgements
This study is part of the project “Experimental Minimum Flows Proposal for Environmental Quality and River Biocenosis Protection in the Adda River”, undertaken by the Adda Consortium. We especially thank Dr. Luigi Bertoli for his help in the definition of the hydrological framework of the Adda River, and Mattia Cordì for the field and lab work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salmaso, F., Crosa, G., Espa, P. et al. Benthic macroinvertebrates response to water management in a lowland river: effects of hydro-power vs irrigation off-stream diversions. Environ Monit Assess 190, 33 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6390-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6390-8