Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring coral size-frequency distribution using stereo video technology, a comparison with in situ measurements

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coral colony size-frequency distribution data offer valuable information about the ecological status of coral reefs. Such data are usually collected by divers in situ, but stereo video is being increasingly used for monitoring benthic marine communities and may be used to collect size information for coral colonies. This study compared the size-frequency distributions of coral colonies obtained by divers measuring colonies ‘in situ’ with digital video imagery collected using stereo video and later processed using computer software. The size-frequency distributions of the two methods were similar for corymbose colonies, although distributions were different for massive, branching and all colonies combined. The differences are mainly driven by greater abundance of colonies >50 cm and fewer colonies <10 cm recorded when using the in situ method. The stereo video method detected 93 % of marked colonies >5 cm and was able to record measurements on 87 % of the colonies detected. However, stereo video only detected 57 % of marked colonies <5 cm, suggesting that this method may be unsuitable for assessing abundance of coral recruits. Estimates of colony size made with the stereo video were smaller than the in situ technique for all growth forms, particularly for massive morphologies. Despite differences in size distributions, community assessments, which incorporated genera, growth forms and size, were similar between the two techniques. Stereo video is suitable for monitoring coral community demographics and provided data similar to in situ measure for corymbose corals, but the ability to accurately measure massive and branching coral morphologies appeared to decline with increasing colony size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarado-Chacon, E. M., & Acosta, A. (2009). Population size-structure of the reef-coral montastraea annularis in two contrasting reefs of a marine protected area in the southern caribbean sea. Bulletin of Marine Science, 85, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26, 32–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, R. P. M., & Meesters, E. H. (1998). Coral population structure: the hidden information of colony size-frequency distributions. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 162, 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bak, R. P. M., & Meesters, E. H. (1999). Population structure as a response of coral communities to global change. American Zoologist, 39, 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, A.G., Pratchett, M. S., Baird, A. H., Riegl, B., Heron, S. F., Feary, D. A., (2013). Variation in the size structure of corals is related to environmental extremes in the Persian Gulf. Marine Environmental Research, 84, 43–50.

  • Brown, E., Cox, E., Jokiel, P., & Rodgers, K. (2004). Development of benthic sampling methods for the coral reef assessment and monitoring program (CRAMP) in hawai'i. Pacific Science, 58, 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S. C., Osborne, K., Sfiligoj, B., & Sweatman, H. (2010). Can juvenile corals be surveyed effectively using digital photography?: implications for rapid assessment techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 171, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardini, U., Chiantore, M., Lasagna, R., Morri, C., & Bianchi, C. N. (2011). Size-structure patterns of juvenile hard corals in the maldives. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 92, 1335–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, J. H., & Done, T. J. (1995). Quantitative video sampling of coral reef benthos: large-scale application. Coral Reefs, 14, 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, K. E., Abrar, M., Aeby, G., Aronson, R. B., Banks, S., Bruckner, A., Chiriboga, A., Cortes, J., Delbeek, J. C., DeVantier, L., Edgar, G. A., Edwards, A. J., Fenner, D., Guzman, H. M., Hoeksema, B. W., Hodgson, G., Johan, O., Licuanan, W. J., Livingstone, S. R., Lowell, E. R., Moore, J. A., Obura, D. O., Ochavillo, D., Polidoro, B. A., Precht, W. F., Quibilan, M. C., Reboton, C., Richards, Z. T., Rogers, A. D., Sanciango, J., Sheppard, A., Sheppard, C., Smith, J., Stuart, S., Turak, E., Veron, J. E. N., Wallace, C., Weil, E., & Wood, E. (2008). One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts. Science, 321, 560–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Depczynski, M., Heyward, A., Wilson, S., Holmes, T., Case, M., Colquhoun, J., et al. (2011). WAMSI 3.1.2. final report: methods of monitoring the health of benthic communities at Ningaloo – coral & fish recruitment. Perth: Western Australian Marine Science Institution.

  • Done, T. J., DeVantier, L. M., Turak, E., Fish, D. A., Wakeford, M., & van Woesik, R. (2010). Coral growth on three reefs: development of recovery benchmarks using a space for time approach. Coral Reefs, 29, 815–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, P., Bertaud, A., Peignon, C., Léopold, M., & Pelletier, D. (2009). A “quick and clean” photographic method for the description of coral reef habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 368, 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunstan, P. K., & Johnson, C. R. (1998). Spatio-temporal variation in coral recruitment at different scales on heron reef, southern great barrier reef. Coral Reefs, 17, 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, P. J., Aronson, R. B., Swanson, D. W., Levitan, D. R., & Precht, W. F. (1998). Photographic versus visual census techniques for the quantification of juvenile corals. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62, 937–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, J. P., Smith, L. D., Heyward, A. J., Baird, A. H., & Pratchett, M. S. (2013). Recovery of an isolated coral reef system following severe disturbance. Science, 340, 69–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guzner, B., Novoplansky, A., & Chadwick, N. E. (2007). Population dynamics of the reef-building coral acropora hemprichii as an indicator of reef condition. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 333, 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, V. R., & Hughes, T. P. (1996). Reproductive strategies of modular organisms: comparative studies of reef-building corals. Ecology, 77, 950–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. R., Wilson, S. K., Graham, N. A. J., & Sheppard, C. R. C. (2014). Scleractinian coral communities of the inner Seychelles 10 years after the 1998 mortality event. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 24, 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, E. S., & Shortis, M. R. (1996). A system for stereo-video measurement of subtidal organisms. Marine Technology Society Journal, 29, 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, E., Fletcher, D., & Shortis, M. (2001). A comparison of the precision and accuracy of estimates of reef-fish lengths determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fishery Bulletin, 99, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, E., Fletcher, D., Shortis, M. R., & Kendrick, G. A. (2004). A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by scuba divers and a stereo-video system: implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance. Marine and Freshwater Research, 55, 573–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., & Wilkinson, C. (2004). Methods for ecological monitoring of coral reefs. Townsville: Australian Institute of Marine Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G., Hill, J., Kiene, W., Maun, L., Mihaly, J., Liebeler, J., Shuman, C., & Torres, R. (2006). Reef check instruction manual: A guide to reef check coral reef monitoring. California: Reef Check Foundation, Pacific Palisades.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. H., Wilson, S. K., Travers, M. J., Langlois, T. J., Evans, R. D., Moore, G., et al. (2013). A comparison of visual- and stereo-video based fish community assessment methods in tropical and temperate marine waters of Western Australia. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 11, 337–350.

  • Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Dinsdale, E. A., Moltschaniwskyj, N. A., Pratchett, M. S., Tanner, J. E., & Willis, B. L. (1999). Patterns of recruitment and abundance of corals along the great barrier reef. Nature, 397, 59–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Dinsdale, E. A., Moltschaniwskyj, N. A., Pratchett, M. S., Tanner, J. E., & Willis, B. L. (2000). Supply-side ecology works both ways: the link between benthic adults, fecundity, and larval recruits. Ecology, 81, 2241–2249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P., Graham, N. A. J., Jackson, J. B. C., Mumby, P. J., & Steneck, R. S. (2010). Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, T. J., Harvey, E. S., Fitzpatrick, B., Meeuwig, J. J., Shedrawi, G., & Watson, D. L. (2010). Cost-efficient sampling of fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects. Aquatic Biology, 9, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leujak, W., & Ormond, R. (2007). Comparative accuracy and efficiency of six coral community survey methods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 351, 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares, C., Pratchett, M. S., & Coker, D. J. (2011). Recolonisation of acropora hyacinthus following climate-induced coral bleaching on the great barrier reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 438, 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meesters, E. H., Hilterman, M., Kardinaal, E., Keetman, M., De Vries, M., & Bak, R. P. M. (2001). Colony size-frequency distributions of scleractinian coral populations: spatial land interspecific variation. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 209, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, P.J., & Harborne, A.R. (2010). Marine reserves enhance the recovery of corals on caribbean reefs. PLoS One 5(1):e8657. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008657.

  • Mundy, C. (1996). A quantitative survey of the corals of American Samoa. Report to Department of Marine and Wildlife Re- sources, American Samoa Government.

  • Ninio, R., Delean, S., Osborne, K., & Sweatman, H. (2003). Estimating cover of benthic organisms from underwater video images: variability associated with multiple observers. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 265, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozawa, Y., Tokeshi, M., & Nojima, S. (2008). Structure and dynamics of a high-latitude scleractinian coral community in amakusa, southwestern japan. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 358, 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, D., Leleu, K., Mou-Tham, G., Guillemot, N., & Chabanet, P. (2011). Comparison of visual census and high definition video transects for monitoring coral reef fish assemblages. Fisheries Research, 107, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, D., Leleu, K., Mallet, D., Mou-Tham, G., Herve, G., Boureau, M., & Guilpart, N. (2012). Remote high-definition rotating video enables fast spatial survey of marine underwater macrofauna and habitats. PLoS ONE, 7, e30536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. L., & Voss, J. D. (2005). Changes in a coral population on reefs of the northern florida keys following a coral disease epizootic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 297, 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M. S., & Knowlton, N. (2009). Distribution, abundance, and microhabitat characterization of small juvenile corals at palmyra atoll. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 376, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana-Garcon, J., Newman, S. J., & Harvey, E. S. (2014). Development and validation of a mid-water baited stereo-video technique for investigating pelagic fish assembledges. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 452, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. D., Devlin, M., Haynes, D., & Gilmour, J. P. (2005). A demographic approach to monitoring the health of coral reefs. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 51, 399–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, S., Golbuu, Y., Yukihira, H., & Van Woesik, R. (2009). Acropora size-frequency distributions reflect spatially variable conditions on coral reefs of palau. Bulletin of Marine Science, 85, 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff in the Marine Science Program of the Department of Parks and Wildlife for allowing data collection to complete this work and for providing technical assistance. This project was funded as part of the Dredging Audit and Surveillance Program by the Gorgon Joint Venture as part of the environmental offsets. The Gorgon project is a joint venture of the Australian subsidiaries of Chevron, Exxon Mobil, Shell, Osaka Gas, Tokyo Gas and Chubu Electric Power. Special thanks to those on the GMER field trip who assisted with logistics and data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study is funded by the Chevron-operated Gorgon Project’s State Environmental Offsets Program and is administered by the Department of Parks and Wildlife. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph A. Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turner, J.A., Polunin, N.V.C., Field, S.N. et al. Measuring coral size-frequency distribution using stereo video technology, a comparison with in situ measurements. Environ Monit Assess 187, 234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4431-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4431-8

Keywords

Navigation