Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous high-frequency monitoring of estuarine water quality as a decision support tool: a Dublin Port case study

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-frequency, continuous monitoring using in situ sensors offers a comprehensive and improved insight into the temporal and spatial variability of any water body. In this paper, we describe a 7-month exploratory monitoring programme in Dublin Port, demonstrating the value of high-frequency data in enhancing knowledge of processes, informing discrete sampling, and ultimately increasing the efficiency of port and environmental management. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to show that shipping operating in Dublin Port has a small–medium effect on turbidity readings collected by in situ sensors. Turbidity events are largely related to vessel activity in Dublin Port, caused by re-suspension of sediments by vessel propulsion systems. The magnitudes of such events are strongly related to water level and tidal state at vessel arrival times. Crucially, measurements of Escherichia coli and enterococci contamination from discrete samples taken at key periods related to detected turbidity events were up to nine times higher after vessel arrival than prior to disturbance. Daily in situ turbidity patterns revealed time-dependent water quality “hot spots” during a 24-h period. We demonstrate conclusively that if representative environmental assessment of water quality is to be performed at such sites, sampling times, informed by continous monitoring data, should take into account these daily variations. This work outlines the potential of sensor technologies and continuous monitoring, to act as a decision support tool in both environmental and port management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA-AWWA-WEF (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (18th ed.). Washington DC: American Public Health Association, America Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation.

  • Bedri, Z., Bruen, M., Dowley, A., & Masterson, B. (2011). A three-dimensional hydro-environmental model of Dublin Bay. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 16, 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedri, Z., Bruen, M., Dowley, A., & Masterson, B. (2013). Environmental consequences of a power plant shut-down: a three-dimensional water quality model of Dublin Bay. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 71, 117–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, G., & Langston, W. (1992). Bioavailability, accumulation and effects of heavy metals in sediments with special reference to United Kingdom estuaries: a review. Environmental Pollution, 75, 89–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byappanahalli, M., Fowler, M., Shively, D., & Whitman, R. (2003). Ubiquity and persistence of Escherichia coli in a midwestern coastal stream. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4549–4555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choiseul, V., Wilson, J., & Nixon, E. (1998). The distribution of hydrocarbons on the east and south-west Irish coasts and in the Liffey Estuary. Biology and Environment, 98B2, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCC (2006). Dublin waste to energy project environmental impact statement. Dublin City Council, Chapter 12, p. 48. http://www.dublinwastetoenergy.ie/uploads/archive/files/july-2006/technical_summary/Chapter_12_Water.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2014.

  • DPW (2012). Dublin Port Website. http://www.dublinport.ie/about-dublin-port/factsand-figures/. Accessed 22 June 2012.

  • Elliott, M., & McLusky, D. S. (2002). The need for definitions in understanding estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55, 815–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESF Marine Board (2002). Integrating marine science in Europe. European Science Foundation Marine Board Position Paper 5, p. 148. http://www.eurocean.org/np4/file/129/IMS_PP_final.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2014.

  • EU (2006). Directive 2006/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 February 2006 concerning the management of bathing water quality. Official Journal of the European Union, 64, 37–51.

  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrad, P., & Hey, R. (1987). Boat traffic, sediment resuspension and turbidity in a broadland river. Journal of Hydrology, 95, 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, H. B., Burkholder, J. M., Reed, R. E., Lewitus, A. J., & Kleinman, J. E. (2004). Real-time remote monitoring of water quality: a review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing technologies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 300, 409–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. K., & Martinez, K. (2006). Environmental Sensor Networks: a revolution in the earth system science? Earth-Science Reviews, 78, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, E., & Landis, W. (2004). Regional ecological risk assessment of a near shore marine environment: Cherry Point, WA. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10, 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, J. F. (2011). Statistics: A tool for social research. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, W., Patterson, M., Neves, R., & Lemly, A. D. (2000). Effects of sedimentation and turbidity on lotic food webs: a concise review for natural resource managers. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 8, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., Xu, L., Zhang, L., Chen, J., Wong, Y., & Wan, T. (1995). Special guest paper: environmental fate and chemistry of organic pollutants in the sediment of Xiamen and Victoria Harbours. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 31, 229–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horsburgh, J. S., Spackman Jones, A., Stevens, D. K., Tarboton, D. G., & Mesner, N. O. (2010). A sensor network for high frequency estimation of water quality constituent fluxes using surrogates. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25, 1031–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jannasch, H. W., Coletti, L. J., Johnson, K. S., Fitzwater, S. E., Needoba, J. A., & Plant, J. N. (2008). The Land/Ocean Biogeochemical Observatory: a robust networked mooring system for continuously monitoring complex biogeochemical cycles in estuaries. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 6, 263–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. S., Needoba, J. A., Riser, S. C., & Showers, W. J. (2007). Chemical sensor networks for the aquatic environment. Chemical Reviews, 107, 623–640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, A. R., Korsmeyer, F., Kerwin, J., Wu, H., & Hynes, B. (1995). The hydrodynamic effects of large vessels on right whales. Final report to the National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, MA. Contract no. 40EANFF400534. http://nefsc.noaa.gov/publications/reports/40EANFF400534.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2014.

  • Lawlor, A., Torres, J., O’Flynn, B., Wallace, J., & Regan, F. (2012). DEPLOY: a long term deployment of a water quality sensor monitoring system. Sensor Review, 2, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, V., Barrette, C., Kingsley, M., & Sjare, B. (1999). The effect of vessel noise on the vocal behavior of belugas in the St. Lawrence River Estuary, Canada. Marine Mammal Science, 15, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm, T., Svartström, M., Spoof, L., & Meriluoto, J. (2001). Effects of ship traffic on archipelago waters off the Långnäs harbour in Åland, SW Finland. Hydrobiologia, 444, 217–225. doi:10.1023/A:1017518131889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mastran, T. A., Dietrich, A. M., Gallagher, D. L., & Grizzard, T. J. (1994). Distribution of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in the water column and sediments of a drinking water reservoir with respect to boating activity. Water Research, 28, 2353–2366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, C. P., & MacDonald, D. D. (1991). Effects of suspended sediments on aquatic ecosystems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 11, 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohrel, R. L., & Register, K. M. (2006). Volunteer estuary monitoring: A methods manual. Washington, DC: Ocean Conservancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky, Y., & Shelton, D. (2011). Escherichia coli and fecal coliforms in freshwater and estuarine sediments. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 1067–1110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perelo, L. W. (2010). Review: in situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177, 81–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettibone, G. W., Irvine, K. N., & Monahan, K. M. (1996). Impact of a ship passage on bacteria levels and suspended sediment characteristics in the Buffalo River, New York. Water Research, 30, 2517–2521.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, D., Protopapas, P., & Brodley, C. (2009). Event discovery in time seriesIn. Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 2009, 61–72.

  • Regan, F., Lawlor, A., Flynn, B. O., Torres, J., Martinez-Catala, R., O’Mathuna, C., et al. (2009). A demonstration of wireless sensing for long term monitoring of water quality. Zurich: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roslev, P., Bastholm, S., & Iversen, N. (2008). Relationship between fecal indicators in sediment and recreational waters in a Danish estuary. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 194, 13–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., & Wilson, J. G. (1998). Functional analysis by trophic guilds of macrobenthic community structure in Dublin Bay, Ireland. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 222, 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoellhamer, D. H. (1993). Resuspension of bottom sediments, sedimentation, and tributary storm discharge Bayboro Harbor and the Port of St. Petersburg, Florida. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoellhamer, D. H. (1996). Anthropogenic sediment resuspension mechanisms in a shallow microtidal estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 43, 533–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soomere, T. (2005). Fast ferry traffic as a qualitatively new forcing factor of environmental processes in non-tidal sea areas: a case study in Tallinn Bay, Baltic Sea. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 5, 293–323. doi:10.1007/s10652-005-5226-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steets, B., & Holden, P. (2003). A mechanistic model of runoff-associated fecal coliform fate and transport through a coastal lagoon. Water Research, 37, 589–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verney, R., Deloffre, J., Brun-Cottan, J., & Lafite, R. (2007). The effect of wave-induced turbulence on intertidal mudflats: impact of boat traffic and wind. Continental Shelf Research, 27, 594–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. J. (2006). Guidelines and Standard Procedures for Continuous Water-Quality Monitors: Station Operation, Record Computation, and Data Reporting. Reston: US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2002). Productivity, fisheries and aquaculture in temperate estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55, 953–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, Y. A. (1974). Assessing effects on water quality by boating activity. Cincinnati: National Environmental Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, Y. A., McLellon, W. M., & Zebuth, H. H. (1980). Changes in phosphorus concentrations due to mixing by motorboats in shallow lakes. Water Research, 14, 841–852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was performed as part of the EU Framework 7 project “ATWARM” (Marie Curie ITN, No. 238273) and as part of The Beaufort Marine Research Award which is carried out under the Sea Change Strategy and the Strategy for Science Technology and Innovation (2006–2013) with the support of the Marine Institute funded under the Marine Research Sub-Programme of the National Development Plan 2007–2013. The authors also wish to thank the staff at Poolbeg Marina for permission, assistance and access to the deployment location and marina facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Regan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briciu-Burghina, C., Sullivan, T., Chapman, J. et al. Continuous high-frequency monitoring of estuarine water quality as a decision support tool: a Dublin Port case study. Environ Monit Assess 186, 5561–5580 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3803-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3803-9

Keywords

Navigation