Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of online video highlights on TV audience ratings

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Short video excerpts from TV shows are a tool that producers/broadcasters use to promote their programs. This study examines how video highlights that are presented online for free viewing, which can be analogous to product samples for entertainment goods, affect TV audience ratings. We investigate whether a displacement effect exists, i.e., the substitution of goods due to the availability of other similar goods. We find that positive viewer response, measured by the number of likes and views generated for the highlights, positively affects ratings, and the square of the number of likes negatively affects ratings. Our findings suggest that if viewers are overly satisfied with the highlights, some may be satisfied with merely viewing them and refrain from watching the actual show; such a response may potentially decrease TV viewership. This is the first study to examine the role of online video highlights as a promotional tool for TV shows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Video highlights are frequently used in sports broadcasting, but sports highlights have a somewhat different purpose, and thus this study does not include the sports broadcasting context.

  2. Sometimes, broadcasters upload entire episodes of TV shows to their websites, but we do not consider these to be highlights, and thus have not included them in this study.

  3. We excluded a review of structural factors because they are less relevant to this study. For example, country was excluded because we only examined TV programs broadcast in South Korea, and channel was excluded because the channels were highly concentrated in a small number of stations.

  4. We also used the Davidson and MacKinnon [11] and Cribari–Neto [8] estimators, and obtained qualitatively consistent results.

References

  1. Baek, B. (2017). Can Naver and Kakao TV go over YouTube? Zdnet. Retrieved July 15, 2019, from https://www.zdnet.co.kr/news/news_view.asp?artice_id=20170220173724.

  2. Bawa, K., & Shoemaker, R. (2004). The effects of free sample promotions on incremental brand sales. Marketing Science, 23(3), 345–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boksem, M. A., & Smidts, A. (2015). Brain responses to movie trailers predict individual preferences for movies and their population-wide commercial success. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 482–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cadario, R. (2015). The impact of online word-of-mouth on television show viewership: An inverted U-shaped temporal dynamic. Marketing Letters, 26(4), 411–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheikh-Ammar, M., & Barki, H. (2014). “Like” is more than just a thumbs up: The role of feedback and sociability in SNS usage. In Proceedings of the 20th Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) (pp. 7–10).

  6. Chen, H., Duan, W., & Zhou, W. (2017). The interplay between free sampling and word of mouth in the online software market. Decision Support Systems, 95, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, Y. H., Wu, C. M., Ku, T., & Chen, G. D. (2013). A predicting model of TV audience rating based on the Facebook. In 2013 international conference on social computing (pp. 1034–1037). IEEE.

  8. Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Asymptotic inference under heteroscedasticity of unknown form. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 45, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Danaher, P., & Dagger, T. (2012). Using a nested logit model to forecast television ratings. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(3), 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Danaher, P. J., Dagger, T. S., & Smith, M. S. (2011). Forecasting television ratings. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(4), 1215–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dewan, S., & Ramaprasad, J. (2014). Social media, traditional media, and music sales. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ding, C., Cheng, H. K., Duan, Y., & Jin, Y. (2017). The power of the ‘like’ button: The impact of social media on box office. Decision Support Systems, 94, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feddersen, A., & Rott, A. (2011). Determinants of demand for televised live football: Features of the German national football team. Journal of Sports Economics, 12(3), 352–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Forrest, D., Simmons, R., & Buraimo, B. (2005). Outcome uncertainty and the couch potato audience. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(4), 641–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukushima, Y., Yamasaki, T., & Aizawa, K. (2016). Audience ratings prediction of tv dramas based on the cast and their popularity. In 2016 IEEE 2nd international conference on multimedia big data (BigMM) (pp. 279–286). IEEE.

  18. Gazley, A., Clark, G., & Sinha, A. (2011). Understanding preferences for motion pictures. Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 854–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, N., Liu, L., Bose, I., & Shen, J. (2010). Does sampling influence customers in online retailing of digital music? Information Systems and E-Business Management, 8(4), 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jain, D., Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. (1995). An approach for determining optimal product sampling for the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(2), 124–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Joshi, A. M., & Hanssens, D. M. (2009). Movie advertising and the stock market valuation of studios: A case of ‘great expectations?’. Marketing Science, 28(2), 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, N., & Kim, Y. (2012). Predicting TV audience of international sporting events in Korea. Journal of Economic Research, 17(1), 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers’ cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39(3), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lang, A., Newhagen, J., & Reeves, B. (1996). Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40(4), 460–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, K. S., Lee, A., Yang, Y. H., Lee, C. T., & Chen, H. H. (2013). Automatic highlights extraction for drama video using music emotion and human face features. Neurocomputing, 119, 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marks, L. J., & Kamins, M. A. (1988). The use of product sampling and advertising: Effects of sequence of exposure and degree of advertising claim exaggeration on consumers’ belief strength, belief confidence, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(3), 266–281.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer, D., & Hyndman, R. J. (2005). The accuracy of television network rating forecasts: The effects of data aggregation and alternative models. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 1(3), 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Napoli, P. M. (2001). The unpredictable audience: An exploratory analysis of forecasting error for new prime-time network television programs. Journal of Advertising, 30(2), 53–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nguyen, C. (2019). Search engine market share in APAC 2019 update. Chandler Nguyen. Retrieved July 15, 2019, from https://www.chandlernguyen.com/blog/2019/03/11/search-engine-market-share-in-apac-2019-update/.

  33. Nikolopoulos, K., Goodwin, P., Patelis, A., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2007). Forecasting with cue information: A comparison of multiple regression with alternative forecasting approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(1), 354–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Patelis, A., Metaxiotis, K., Nikolopoulos, K., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2003). FORTV: Decision support system for forecasting television viewership. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(4), 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Why the music industry may gain from free downloading—The role of sampling. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 907–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stephen, A. T., & Galak, J. (2012). The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of a microlending marketplace. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 624–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun, Y., Liu, D., Shen, X. L., Zhang, X., & Wang, N. (2016). Understanding the factors affecting users' like intentions in social network services: A multi-dimensional value perspective. In 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 2286–2295). IEEE.

  38. Van Reeth, D. (2019). Forecasting Tour de France TV audiences: A multi-country analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 35(2), 810–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Weber, R. (2002). Methods to forecast television viewing patterns for target audiences. In A. Schorr, B. Campbell, & M. Schenk (Eds.), Communication research in Europe and abroad—Challenges of the first decade. Berlin: DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yao, X., Lu, X., Phang, C. W., & Ba, S. (2017). Dynamic sales impacts of online physical product sampling. Information and Management, 54(5), 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yeh, C. C. (2015). Online word-of-mouth as a predictor of television rating. Online Information Review, 39(6), 831–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yoo, C. Y., & Kim, H. G. (2002). An analysis of prediction error for new prime-time television programmes: a comparative study between the USA and Korea. International Journal of Advertising, 21(4), 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hye-jin Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bae, G., Kim, Hj. The impact of online video highlights on TV audience ratings. Electron Commer Res 22, 405–425 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09421-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09421-4

Keywords

Navigation