Abstract
The Danish National Register of assisted reproductive technology (ART) was initially established in 1994. The register comprises complete information on all ART procedures in public and private clinics in Denmark from 2013 and onwards, including baseline information on the cause of infertility and a number of health-related patient characteristics. The register enables monitoring and research on infertility treatment and reproductive topics in single women or couples seeking assisted reproduction, and the register is thus a key component of the Danish health information system within human reproduction. We aimed to provide an updated description of the register including advantages and pitfalls when using the register for reproductive epidemiological research, and a description of the accessibility for researchers. The Danish ART register is a valuable tool for epidemiological research. However, the inherent strengths and limitations ought to be in perspective when designing studies and interpreting the study results. Reports with annually aggregated data on ART treatments, can be accessed on the Danish Health Data Authority web page and researchers may obtain access to individual pseudonomized data via secure servers at the Danish Health Data Authority and Statistics Denmark.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pinborg A. Short- and long-term outcomes in children born after assisted reproductive technology. BJOG. 2019;126(2):145–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15437.
Wilcox AJ. Fertility and pregnancy: an epidemiologic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
Pinborg A, Loft A, Romundstad LB, et al. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(1):10–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12799.
De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al. ART in Europe, 2014: results generated from European registries by ESHRE: the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1586–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey242.
European Society of Human Reproduction E. ART fact sheet. 2018. p. 3.
Blenstrup LT, Knudsen LB. Danish registers on aspects of reproduction. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):79–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811399957.
Authority TDHD. Årsrapport 2017. Assisteret reproduktion 2017. IVF-registeret - Tal og Analyse. Annual report. The Danish Health Data Authority 2019 04.11.2019.
Ældreministeriet S-o. Bekendtgørelse om assisteret reproduktion In: Ministeriet for Sundhed og Forebyggelse jn, editor.2016.
Andersen AN, Westergaard HB, Olsen J. The Danish in vitro fertilisation (IVF) register. Dan Med Bull. 1999;46(4):357–60.
Westergaard HB, Johansen AM, Erb K, Andersen AN. Danish National IVF Registry 1994 and 1995. Treatment, pregnancy outcome and complications during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79(5):384–9.
Nyboe Andersen A, Erb K. Register data on assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Europe including a detailed description of ART in Denmark. Int J Androl. 2006;29(1):12–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00577.x.
Health Mo. Lov om kunstig befrugtning i forbindelse med lægelig behandling, diagnostik og forskning m.v. . Retsinformation. 2004. https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=89009. Accessed 04 Nov 2019.
Authority TDHD. Assisteret reproduktion årsrapporter. The Danish Health Data Authority. 2019. https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/da/tal-og-analyser/analyser-og-rapporter/andre-analyser-og-rapporter/assisteret-reproduktion. Accessed 04 Nov 2019.
Glazer CH, Tottenborg SS, Giwercman A, et al. Male factor infertility and risk of multiple sclerosis: a register-based cohort study. Mult Scler (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Engl). 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517734069.
Authority TDHD. Årsrapport. Assisteret reproduktion 2018. IVF-registeret - Tal og Analyse: The Danish Health Data Authority2020 June 17, 2020.
Knudsen LB, Olsen J. The Danish Medical Birth Registry. Dan Med Bull. 1998;45(3):320–3.
Bliddal M, Broe A, Pottegard A, Olsen J, Langhoff-Roos J. The Danish Medical Birth Register. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0356-1.
Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–90. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125.
Authority TDHD. Registerdeklaration for IVF-registeret. p. 3.
Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3.
Epidemiology FL. When an entire country is a cohort. Science. 2000;287(5462):2398–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5462.2398.
Kristensen J, Langhoff-Roos J, Skovgaard LT, Kristensen FB. Validation of the Danish Birth Registration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(8):893–7.
Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):30–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482.
Glazer CH, Bonde JP, Giwercman A, et al. Risk of diabetes according to male factor infertility: a register-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1474–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex097.
Pedersen CB, Gotzsche H, Moller JO, Mortensen PB. The Danish Civil Registration System. A cohort of eight million persons. Dan Med Bull. 2006;53(4):441–9.
Authority TDHD. Fødselsregisteret (MFR), Sundhedsdatastyrelsen. Sundhedsdatastyrelsen. https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/da/registre-og-services/om-de-nationale-sundhedsregistre/graviditet-foedsler-og-boern/foedselsregisteret. Accessed 20 Nov 2019.
Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, Forman J, Loft A, Nyboe Andersen A, Pinborg A. Cumulative live birth rate prognosis based on the number of aspirated oocytes in previous ART cycles. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(1):171–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey341.
Bay B, Boie S, Kesmodel US. Risk of stillbirth in low-risk singleton term pregnancies following fertility treatment: a national cohort study. BJOG. 2019;126(2):253–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15509.
Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, Loft A, et al. The long-term prognosis for live birth in couples initiating fertility treatments. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(7):1439–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex096.
Vassard D, Schmidt L, Glazer CH, Lyng Forman J, Kamper-Jorgensen M, Pinborg A. Assisted reproductive technology treatment and risk of ovarian cancer-a nationwide population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(11):2290–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez165.
Assens M, Ebdrup NH, Pinborg A, Schmidt L, Hougaard CO, Hageman I. Assisted reproductive technology treatment in women with severe eating disorders: a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(11):1254–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12727.
Klausen T, Juul Hansen K, Munk-Jorgensen P, Mohr-Jensen C. Are assisted reproduction technologies associated with categorical or dimensional aspects of psychopathology in childhood, adolescence or early adulthood? Results from a Danish prospective nationwide cohort study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26(7):771–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-016-0937-z.
Vittrup I, Petersen GL, Kamper-Jorgensen M, Pinborg A, Schmidt L. Male and female alcohol consumption and live birth after assisted reproductive technology treatment: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(2):152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.04.006.
Plana-Ripoll O, Li J, Kesmodel US, Parner E, Olsen J, Basso O. Reproductive function in the sons of women who experienced stress due to bereavement before and during pregnancy: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):189-197 e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.016.
Pachler FR, Toft G, Bisgaard T, Laurberg S. Use and success of in vitro fertilisation following restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A nationwide 17-year cohort study. J Crohns Colitis. 2019;13(10):1283–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz055.
Norgard BM, Larsen MD, Friedman S, Knudsen T, Fedder J. Decreased chance of a live born child in women with rheumatoid arthritis after assisted reproduction treatment: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(3):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214619.
Hansen AT, Juul S, Knudsen UB, Hvas AM. Low risk of venous thromboembolism following early pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived by IVF. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(10):1968–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey271.
Broe A, Pottegard A, Hallas J, Ahern TP, Fedder J, Damkier P. Association between use of phthalate-containing medication and semen quality among men in couples referred for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(3):503–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey009.
Kettner LO, Kesmodel US, Ramlau-Hansen CH, et al. Fertility treatment and childhood epilepsy: a nationwide cohort study. Epidemiology. 2017;28(3):412–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000618.
Friedman S, Larsen PV, Fedder J, Norgard BM. The efficacy of assisted reproduction in women with inflammatory bowel disease and the impact of surgery-a nationwide cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(2):208–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000996.
Hargreave M, Kjaer SK, Jorgensen ME, Jensen A. Type 1 diabetes risk in children born to women with fertility problems: a cohort study in 1.5 million Danish children. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(12):1441–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13028.
Glavind MT, Forman A, Arendt LH, Nielsen K, Henriksen TB. Endometriosis and pregnancy complications: a Danish cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):160–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.020.
Holst S, Kjaer SK, Jorgensen ME, Damm P, Jensen A. Fertility problems and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a nationwide cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):427-434 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.040.
Norgard BM, Larsen PV, Fedder J, de Silva PS, Larsen MD, Friedman S. Live birth and adverse birth outcomes in women with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease receiving assisted reproduction: a 20-year nationwide cohort study. Gut. 2016;65(5):767–76. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311246.
Jolving LR, Larsen MD, Fedder J, Norgard BM. Live birth in women with multiple sclerosis receiving assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(5):711–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.013.
Jolving LR, Larsen MD, Fedder J, Friedman S, Norgard BM. The chance of a live birth after assisted reproduction in women with thyroid disorders. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:683–94. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S208574.
Vejen Hansen A, Ali Z, Malchau SS, Blafoss J, Pinborg A, Ulrik CS. Fertility treatment among women with asthma: a case–control study of 3689 women with live births. Eur Respir J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00597-2018.
Spangmose AL, Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, et al. Academic performance in adolescents aged 15–16 years born after frozen embryo transfer compared with fresh embryo transfer: a nationwide registry-based cohort study. BJOG. 2019;126(2):261–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15484.
Honorato T, Hoek A, Henningsen AK, et al. Low oocyte yield during IVF treatment and the risk of a trisomic pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(6):685–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.022.
Opdahl S, Henningsen AA, Bergh C, et al. Data resource profile: the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproductive Technology and Safety (CoNARTaS) cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz228.
Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Nyboe Andersen A, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr040.
Braude PR, Johnson MH. Reflections on 40 years of IVF. BJOG. 2019;126(2):135–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15513.
Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB, Gissler M, et al. Infant and maternal health monitoring using a combined Nordic database on ART and safety. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(7):683–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01145.x.
Thygesen LC, Ersboll AK. When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):551–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9873-0.
Funding
We did not receive grants for this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LRJ: idea, obtaining background information and manuscript writing. KE: idea, expert knowledge, obtaining background information and manuscript writing. BMN: idea, obtaining background information and manuscript writing. JF: idea, obtaining background information and manuscript writing. MDL: idea, obtaining background information and manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jølving, L.R., Erb, K., Nørgård, B.M. et al. The Danish National Register of assisted reproductive technology: content and research potentials. Eur J Epidemiol 36, 445–452 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00742-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00742-8