Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of spanwise canopy heterogeneity on the flow field and evaporation rates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of spanwise canopy heterogeneity on the turbulent wind flow field and associated evaporation rates was investigated by combined stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (stereo-PIV) and evaporation rate measurements on a model canopy in an atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel. The model was designed to simulate a mature corn canopy, based on a similar wall-normal distribution of the projected frontal area index. Stereo-PIV measurements were performed in wall-parallel planes across the spanwise heterogeneity at several elevations. For comparison, measurements were also performed for a homogeneous canopy layout. For the heterogeneous layout, large spanwise gradients of the mean streamwise velocity at the canopy edge were observed, resulting in high shear and high peak values of the in-plane Reynolds shear stress component. Local evaporation rates were measured directly utilizing a specially designed wicks based system. Measurements were conducted at three locations positioned in a line, perpendicular to the incoming flow, across the heterogeneity. The spanwise heterogeneity did not alter the well-accepted sweep-ejection mechanism, sweeps dominated flow was recorded at the sheltered wick positions. Evaporation rates increased with local mean streamwise velocity and power-law based correlations for the Sherwood number versus Reynolds number were derived for sheltered and exposed evaporating wicks. Turbulent flow structures, in the form of sweeps and ejections, were important both in wall-normal and transverse directions (for a heterogeneous canopy). The results indicated that in arid regions, dry air transported in the transverse direction into the canopy is likely to lead to increased evaporation rates at canopy edges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availibility

Available upon request

References

  1. Liu J, Wang Y, Yu Z, Cao X, Tian L, Sun S, Wu P (2017) A comprehensive analysis of blue water scarcity from the production, consumption, and water transfer perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 72:870–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Finnigan JJ (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32(1):519–571. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Finnigan JJ, Shaw RH, Patton EG (2009) Turbulence structure above a vegetation canopy. J. Fluid Mech. 637:387–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112009990589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Ann. Revi. Fluid Mech. 13(1):97–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yue W, Parlange MB, Meneveau C, Zhu W, Van Hout R, Katz J (2007) Large-eddy simulation of plant canopy flows using plant-scale representation. Boundary-layer Meteorol. 124(2):183–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bou-Zeid E, Anderson W, Katul GG, Mahrt L (2020) The persistent challenge of surface heterogeneity in boundary-layer meteorology: a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 177(2–3):227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00551-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Antonia RA, Luxton RE (1971) The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness Part 1. Smooth to rough. J. Fluid Mech. 48(4):721–761. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112071001824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Antonia RA, Luxton RE (1972) The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness. Part 2. Rough-to-smooth. J. Fluid Mech. 53(4):737–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211207200045X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dupont S, Brunet Y (2009) Coherent structures in canopy edge flow: a large-eddy simulation study. J. Fluid Mech. 630:93–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112009006739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garratt JR (1990) The internal boundary layer - A review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 50(1–4):171–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kröniger K, Banerjee T, De Roo F, Mauder M (2018) Flow adjustment inside homogeneous canopies after a leading edge - An analytical approach backed by LES. Agric. For. Meteorol. 255:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smits AJ, Wood DH (1985) The response of turbulent boundary layers to sudden perturbations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17(1):321–358. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.17.010185.001541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson W, Barros JM, Christensen KT, Awasthi A (2015) Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 768:316–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hinze JO (1967) Secondary currents in wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10(9):122. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1762429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinze JO (1973) Experimental investigation on secondary currents in the turbulent flow through a straight conduit. Appl. Sci. Res. 28(1):453–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Joshi P, Anderson W (2022) Surface layer response to heterogeneous tree canopy distributions: roughness regime regulates secondary flow polarity. J. Fluid Mech. 946:28. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z-Q, Cheng N-S (2006) Time-mean structure of secondary flows in open channel with longitudinal bedforms. Adv. Water Resour. 29(11):1634–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Medjnoun T, Vanderwel C, Ganapathisubramani B (2018) Characteristics of turbulent boundary layers over smooth surfaces with spanwise heterogeneities. J. Fluid Mech. 838:516–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanderwel C, Stroh A, Kriegseis J, Frohnapfel B, Ganapathisubramani B (2019) The instantaneous structure of secondary flows in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 862:845–870. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Medjnoun T, Vanderwel C, Ganapathisubramani B (2020) Effects of heterogeneous surface geometry on secondary flows in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 886:31. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zampiron A, Cameron S, Nikora V (2020) Secondary currents and very-large-scale motions in open-channel flow over streamwise ridges. J. Fluid Mech. 887:17. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang HG, Lee JH (2018) Secondary flows in turbulent boundary layers over longitudinal surface roughness. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3(1):014608. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.014608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang J, Anderson W (2018) Numerical study of turbulent channel flow over surfaces with variable spanwise heterogeneities: topographically-driven secondary flows affect outer-layer similarity of turbulent length scales. Flow Turbul. Combust. 100(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-017-9839-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mejia-Alvarez R, Christensen KT (2013) Wall-parallel stereo particle-image velocimetry measurements in the roughness sublayer of turbulent flow overlying highly irregular roughness. Phys. Fluids. 10(1063/1):4832377

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nugroho B, Hutchins N, Monty JP (2013) Large-scale spanwise periodicity in a turbulent boundary layer induced by highly ordered and directional surface roughness. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 41:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2013.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barros JM, Christensen KT (2014) Observations of turbulent secondary flows in a rough-wall boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 748:1. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanderwel C, Ganapathisubramani B (2015) Effects of spanwise spacing on large-scale secondary flows in rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 774:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stroh A, Schäfer K, Forooghi P, Frohnapfel B (2020) Secondary flow and heat transfer in turbulent flow over streamwise ridges. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 81:108518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.108518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chung D, Monty JP, Hutchins N (2018) Similarity and structure of wall turbulence with lateral wall shear stress variations. J. Fluid Mech. 847:591–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Willingham D, Anderson W, Christensen KT, Barros JM (2014) Turbulent boundary layer flow over transverse aerodynamic roughness transitions: induced mixing and flow characterization. Phys. Fluids 26(2):025111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4864105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Prueger JH, Alfieri JG, Hipps LE, Kustas WP, Chavez JL, Evett SR, Anderson MC, French AN, Neale CMU, McKee LG, Hatfield JL, Howell TA, Agam N (2012) Patch scale turbulence over dryland and irrigated surfaces in a semi-arid landscape under advective conditions during BEAREX08. Adv. Water Resour. 50:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li D, Huai W, Guo Y, Liu M (2022) Flow characteristics in partially vegetated channel with homogeneous and heterogeneous layouts. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29(25):38186–38197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18459-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nezu I, Onitsuka K (2002) PIV measurements of side-cavity open-channel flows -Wando model in rivers-. J. Visual. 5(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. White BL, Nepf HM (2008) A vortex-based model of velocity and shear stress in a partially vegetated shallow channel. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yan X-F, Wai W-HO, Li C-W (2016) Characteristics of flow structure of free-surface flow in a partly obstructed open channel with vegetation patch. Environ. Fluid Mechan. 16(4):807–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9453-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Boedhram N, Arkebauer TJ, Batchelor WD (2001) Season-long characterization of vertical distribution of leaf area in corn. Agron. J. 93(6):1235–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Todd R, Klocke N, Hergert G, Parkhurst A (1991) Evaporation from soil influenced by crop shading, crop residue, and wetting regime. Trans. ASAE 34(2):461–0466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Klocke NL, Currie RS, Aiken RM (2009) Soil water evaporation and crop residues. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 52(1):103–110

    Google Scholar 

  39. Möller M, Tanny J, Li Y, Cohen S (2004) Measuring and predicting evapotranspiration in an insect-proof screenhouse. Agric. For. Meteorol. 127(1–2):35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Howell TA, Evett SR (2007) Penman-Monteith Method. Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia 5646:806. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471743984.vse9645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Murphy CE, Knoerr KR (1977) Simultaneous determinations of the sensible and latent heat transfer coefficients for tree leaves. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 11(2):223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02166806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Defraeye T, Verboven P, Ho QT, Nicolai B (2013) Convective heat and mass exchange predictions at leaf surfaces: Applications, methods and perspectives. Comput. Electron. Agric. 96:180–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson JD, Ward DP, Thurtell GW, Kidd GE (1982) Statistics of atmospheric turbulence within and above a corn canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 24(4):495–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. van Hout R, Zhu W, Luznik L, Katz J, Kleissl J, Parlange MB (2007) PIV measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer within and above a mature corn canopy. Part I: statistics and energy flux. J. Atmos. Sci. 64(8):2805–2824. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3989.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pietri L, Petroff A, Amielh M, Anselmet F (2009) Turbulence characteristics within sparse and dense canopies. Environ. Fluid Mech. 9(3):297–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-009-9131-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu W, Van Hout R, Luznik L, Kang HS, Katz J, Meneveau C (2006) A comparison of PIV measurements of canopy turbulence performed in the field and in a wind tunnel model. Exp. Fluids 41(2):309–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0145-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Adrian RJ, Westerweel J (2011) Particle image velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  48. Raffel M, Willert CE, Scarano F, Kähler CJ, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J (2018) Particle image velocimetry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68852-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Benedict LH, Gould RD (1996) Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics. Exp. Fluids 22(2):129–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Beyhaghi, S., Pillai, K. M., Qadah, D. T., Dietz, M. L. (2010) Evaporation of a non-dilute, multi-component liquid mixture from a porous wick. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1254, pp. 149–154. American Institute of Physics

  51. Boodaghi M, Shamloo A (2020) Effects of wax boundaries in combination with evaporation on dynamics of fluid flow in paper-based devices. Surf. Interfaces 21:100684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Knutson JH, Selker JS (1994) Unsaturated hydraulic conductivities of fiberglass wicks and designing capillary wick pore-water samplers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58(3):721–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Louie MJ, Shelby PM, Smesrud JS, Gatchell LO, Selker JS (2000) Field evaluation of passive capillary samplers for estimating groundwater recharge. Water Resour. Res. 36(9):2407–2416. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Knutson, J. H. (1993) Design of capillary wick pore-water samplers and their effects on solute travel time and dispersion

  55. Alduchov OA, Eskridge RE (1996) Improved magnus form approximation of saturation vapor pressure. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 35(4):601–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tsilingiris, PT (2008) Thermophysical and transport properties of humid air at temperature range between 0 and 100 C. Energy Conver. Manage. 49(5):1098–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bolton D (1980) The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Mon. Weather Rev. 108(7):1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1046:TCOEPT>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wexler A, Greenspan L (1971) Vapor pressure equation for water in the range 0 to 100 C. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. Sect. A Phys. Chem. 75A(3):213. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.075A.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lu SS, Willmarth WW (1973) Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 60(03):481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112073000315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhu W, van Hout R, Katz J (2007) On the flow structure and turbulence during sweep and ejection events in a wind-tunnel model canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 124(2):205–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9174-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yue W, Meneveau C, Parlange MB, Zhu W, Van Hout R, Katz J (2007) A comparative quadrant analysis of turbulence in a plant canopy. Water Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhu W, Van Hout R, Katz J (2007) Piv measurements in the atmospheric boundary layer within and above a mature corn canopy part ii Quadrant-hole analysis. J. Atmos. Sci. 64(8):2825–2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Katul G, Poggi D, Cava D, Finnigan J (2006) The relative importance of ejections and sweeps to momentum transfer in the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 120(3):367–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9064-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding of this study was provided by the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation under grant number 2018615

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel

    E. Winiarska, R. Soffer & D. Liberzon

  2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel

    H. Klopfer & R. van Hout

  3. The Interdisciplinary Program for Marine Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, 3200003, Israel

    D. Liberzon

Authors
  1. E. Winiarska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Soffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Klopfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. van Hout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Liberzon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The project was conceived by RvH and DL. Experimental setup, data acquisition and data processing were done by EW, RS and HK. Flow field results were processed by EW and HK; Evaporation rate measurements were processed by RS. All authors contributed to the analysis of the results. Manuscript preparation were done by EW, RvH and DL. Acquisition of research funds was done by RvH and DL.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. van Hout.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Code availability

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winiarska, E., Soffer, R., Klopfer, H. et al. The effects of spanwise canopy heterogeneity on the flow field and evaporation rates. Environ Fluid Mech 23, 1313–1339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-023-09946-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-023-09946-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation