Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between stock prices and exchange rates for the ASEAN5 plus the Big3. While previous studies have assumed a symmetric relationship between stock prices and exchange rates, this paper introduces nonlinearity in the relationship between the two variables. The empirical model used is the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model, which introduces nonlinearity by differentiating between the increases and decreases in the independent variable. The results show that although both the linear ARDL model and the NARDL model suggest that the relationship between the variables is mainly short-term, the NARDL model produces relatively more evidence supporting asymmetric long-run relationship between stock prices and exchange rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In a study by Klitgaard (1999), looking at U.S imports from Japan during the 1990s, found that when the dollar depreciated by 10%, the price of Japanese imports rose by only 6%. This suggests that Japanese exporters take a 4% offsetting change in their profit margin on exports.
From July 1997 to December 1997, the currencies of Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand had depreciated against the U.S dollar by nearly 44%, 9%, 47%, 32%, 28%, 12%, and 32%, respectively. During the same time period, stock markets in these countries dropped by about 44%, 25%, 48%, 41%, 29%, 22%, and 44%, respectively. China is the exception during this period of time as the renminbi appreciated against the U.S dollar by 0.12%, and the stock market rose by about 0.36%. Source: authors’ own calculations.
Source: the World Bank Development Indicators Database, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
Source: the Bank for International Settlements, https://stats.bis.org/statx/srs/table/d11.3.
The U.S came in the first place accounting for 24.42 percent. Source: World Bank Data, https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf.
Shin et al. (2013) argue that due to the dependence structure between the partial sums $${e}_{t}^{+}$$ and $${e}_{t}^{-}$$, the exact value of the number of lags $$(k)$$ is not clear. However, they argue that $${e}_{t}^{+}$$ and $${e}_{t}^{-}$$ should be treated as one variable.s.
Differences between our results and those of previous studies could be due to a number of reasons. (1) Model specification (for example, linear versus nonlinear model): using different models is likely to produce different results. (2) Sample size and data frequency: using different sample sizes and/or data frequency (annual versus quarterly versus monthly data) can produce different results. (3) Lag selection method: using different information criteria (e.g., AIC versus SIC) to select the optimal number of lags can lead to different results when testing for unit root, cointegration, or estimating a VAR model. Thus, using different models, different sample size, or different information criteria to select the number lags, can lead to differences in results.
References
Aggarwal R (1981) Exchange rates and stock prices: a study of the U.S. capital markets under floating exchange rates. Akron Bus Econ Rev 12:7–12
Alagidede P, Panagiotidis T, Zhang X (2014) Causal relationship between stock prices and exchange rates. J Int Trade Econ Dev 20(1):67–86
Andriansyah A, Messinis G (2019) Stock prices, exchange rates and portfolio equity flows: a Toda–Yamamoto panel causality test. J Econ Stud 46(2):399–421
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Fariditavana H (2015) Nonlinear ARDL approach, asymmetric effects and the J-curve. J Econ Stud 42(3):519–530
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Fariditavana H (2016) Nonlinear ARDL approach and the J-curve phenomenon. Open Econ Rev 27(1):51–70
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Mohammadian A (2018) Asymmetric effects of exchange rate changes on domestic output in emerging countries. Emerg Mark Finance Trade 54(6):1442–1459
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Saha M (2015) On the relation between stock prices and exchange rates. J Econ Stud 42(4):707–732
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Saha S (2016) Do exchange rates have symmetric or asymmetric effects on stock prices? Glob Finance J 31:57–72
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Saha S (2018) On the relation between exchange rates and stock prices: a nonlinear ARDL approach and asymmetry analysis. J Econ Finance 42:112–137
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Sohrabian A (1992) Stock prices and the effective exchange rate of the dollar. Appl Econ 24(4):459–464
Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes. Econometrica 66(1):47–78
Bai J, Perron P (2003) Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. J Appl Econom 18(1):1–22
Balke N, Fomby T (1997) Threshold cointegration. Int Econ Rev 38(3):627–645
Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283
Branson W (1983) Macroeconomic determinants of real exchange risk. In: Herring RJ (ed) Managing foreign exchange risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Chen S-W, Chen T-C (2012) Untangling the non-linear causal nexus between exchange rates and stock prices: new evidence from the OECD countries. J Econ Stud 39(2):231–259
Chkili W, Neguyen D (2014) Exchange rate movements and stock market returns in a regime-switching environment: evidence for BRICS countries. Res Int Bus Finance 31:46–56
Chow E, Lee W, Solt M (1997) The exchange rate risk exposure of asset returns. J Bus 70(1):105–123
Corsetti G, Pesenti P, Roubini N (1999) What caused the Asian currency and financial crisis? Jpn World Econ 11:305–373
Cuestas J, Tang B (2020) A Markov switching SVAR analysis on the relationship between exchange rate changes and stock returns in China. Int J Emerg Mark. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2019-0463
Dickey D, Fuller W (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427–431
Dornbusch R, Fisher S (1980) Exchange rates and the current account. Am Econ Rev 70(5):960–971
Engle R, Granger C (1987) Co-Integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276
Frankel J (1983) Monetary and portfolio-balance models of exchange rate determination. In: Bhandari JS, Putnam BH (eds) Economic interdependence and flexible exchange rates. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 84–115
Granger C (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438
Granger C, Huangb B-N, Yangc C-W (2000) A bivariate causality between stock prices and exchange rates: evidence from recent Asian flu. Q Rev Econ Finance 40:337–354
Homma T, Tsutsui Y, Benzoin U (2005) Exchange rate and stock prices in Japan. Appl Financ Econ 15(7):469–478
Ismail M, Isa Z (2009) Modeling the interactions of stock price and exchange rate in Malaysia. Singap Econ Rev 54(4):605–619
Jang H, Sul W (2002) The Asian financial crisis and co-movement of Asian stock markets. J Asian Econ 13:94–104
Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254
Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52(2):169–210
Klitgaard T (1999) Exchange rates and profit margins: the case of Japanese exporters. FRBNY Econ Policy Rev 5:41–52
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips P, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econom 54(1–3):159–178
Laakkonen H, Lanne M (2008) Asymmetric news effects on volatility: good vs. bad news in good vs. bad times. Discussion paper No. 207, Helsinki Center of Economic Research. ISSN 1795–0562
Lau W-Y, Go Y-H (2018) Dynamic causality between stock return and exchange rate: is stock-oriented more relevant in Malaysia? Asia-Pac Finan Mark 25:137–157
Lean H, Narayan P, Smyth R (2011) Exchange rate and stock prices interaction in major Asian markets: evidence for individual countries and panels allowing for structural breaks. Singap Econ Rev 56(2):255–277
Lee C, Doong S, Chou P (2011) Dynamic correlation between stock prices and exchange rates. Appl Financ Econ 21(11):789–800
Liang C-C, Lin J-B, Hsu H-C (2013) Reexamining the relationships between stock prices and exchange rates in ASEAN-5 using panel Granger causality approach. Econ Model 32:560–563
Liang C-C, Chen M-Y, Yang C-H (2015) The interactions of stock prices and exchange rates in the ASEAN-5 countries: new evidence using a bootstrap panel granger causality approach. Glob Econ Rev 44(3):324–334
Lin C-H (2012) The comovement between exchange rates and stock prices in the Asian emerging markets. Int Rev Econ Finance 22:161–172
Liu L, Wan J (2012) The relationships between Shanghai stock market and CNY/USD exchange rate: new evidence based on cross-correlation analysis, structural cointegration and nonlinear causality test. Physica A 391:6051–6059
Narayan P, Devpura N, Wang H (2020) Japanese currency and stock market—what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic? Econ Anal Policy 68:191–198
Nieh C, Lee C (2001) Dynamic relationship between stock prices and exchange rates for G-7 countries. Q Rev Econ Finance 41(4):477–490
Pan M-S, Fok R, Liu Y (2007) Dynamic linkages between exchange rates and stock prices: evidence from East Asian markets. Int Rev Econ Finance 16(4):503–520
Park Y, Binh K, Kim S-J (2019) Time varying correlations and causalities between stock and foreign exchange markets: evidence from China. Jpn Korea Invest Anal J 48(4):278–297
Pesaran M, Shin Y, Smith R (2001) Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. J Appl Econ 16:289–326
Phillips P, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Bioometrika 75(2):335–346
Phylaktis K, Ravazzolo F (2005) Stock prices and exchange rate dynamics. J Int Money Finance 24:1031–1053
Roll R (1992) Industrial structure and the comparative behavior of international stock market indices. J Finance 47(1):3–41
Rutledge R, Karim K, Li C (2014) A study of the relationship between renminbi exchange rates and chinese stock prices. Int Econ J 28(3):381–403
Salisu A, Ndako U (2018) Modelling stock price-exchange rate nexus in OECD countries: a new perspective. Econ Model 74:105–123
Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo MJ (2013) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Horrace W, Sickles R (eds) Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York
Soenen L, Hennigar E (1988) An analysis of exchange rates and stock prices e the US experience between 1980 and 1986. Akron Bus Econ Rev 19(4):7–16
Tang X, Yao X (2018) Do financial structures affect exchange rate and stock price interaction? Evidence from emerging markets. Emerg Mark Rev 34:64–76
Tian G, Ma S (2010) The relationship between stock returns and the foreign exchange rate: the ARDL approach. J Asia Pac Econ 15(4):490–508
Toda H, Yamamoto T (1995) Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econom 66(2):225–250
Tsai I-C (2012) The relationship between stock price index and exchange rate in Asian markets: a quantile regression approach. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 22:609–621
Wong H (2017) Real exchange rate returns and real stock price returns. Int Rev Econ Finance 49:340–352
Wu Y (2000) Stock prices and exchange rates in a VEC model: the case of Singapore in the 1990s. J Econ Finance 24(3):260–274
Xie Z, Chen S-W, Wu A-C (2020) The foreign exchange and stock market nexus: new international evidence. Int Rev Econ Finance 67:240–266
Yang S-P (2017) Exchange rate dynamics and stock prices in small open economies: evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. Pac Basin Finance J 46:337–354
Yang Z, Tu A, Zeng Y (2014) Dynamic linkages between Asian stock prices and exchange rates: new evidence from causality in quantiles. Appl Econ 46(11):1184–1201
Yau H, Nieh C (2006) Interrelationships among stock prices of Taiwan and Japan and NTD/Yen exchange rate. J Asian Econ 17(3):535–552
Zhao H (2010) Dynamic relationship between exchange rate and stock price: evidence from China. Res Int Bus Finance 24(2):103–112
Zhou J (2015) The good, the bad, and the ambiguous: the aggregate stock market dynamics around macroeconomic news (Jan 24, 2015). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2555050 or http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2555050
Acknowledgements
We are deeply grateful to two anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions and comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Data source
All data are monthly. Stock price indices are closing prices and are extracted from Thomson Reuters Datastream. Nominal effective exchange rates are extracted from the International Financial Statistics of the International Monetary Fund (https://data.imf.org/?sk=4C514D48-B6BA-49ED-8AB9-52B0C1A0179B&sId=1390030341854) and from the Bank of International Settlements (https://www.bis.org/statistics/eer.htm). The following table provides the range of the sample for each country and the name of the stock market price index:
Country | Sample | Stock market index name |
---|---|---|
China | 01/1991 to 12/2019 | SHANGHAI SE Composite |
Indonesia | 01/1994 to 12/2019 | IDX Composite |
Japan | 06/1973 to 12/2019 | NIKKEI 225 |
Korea | 12/1974 to 12/2019 | KOSPI Composite Index |
Malaysia | 01/1980 to 12/2019 | FTES BURSA MALAYSIA KLCI |
Philippines | 01/1986 to 12/2019 | PHILIPPINES SE (PSEi) |
Singapore | 03/1995 to 12/2019 | STRAITS TIMES Index (STI) |
Thailand | 01/1994 to 12/2019 | BANGKOK S.E.T |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nusair, S.A., Al-Khasawneh, J.A. On the relationship between Asian exchange rates and stock prices: a nonlinear analysis. Econ Change Restruct 55, 361–400 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-021-09318-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-021-09318-8