Skip to main content
Log in

Bone appétit: DNA metabarcoding as a non-lethal alternative to morphological dietary assessment in Atlantic bonefish (Albula vulpes)

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional approaches to dietary assessment in fish necessitate the collection of stomach contents through either gastric lavage or lethal sampling. The Atlantic bonefish (Albula vulpes) is an economically important sportfish in the western central Atlantic region for which a minimally invasive, non-lethal alternative to morphological dietary assessment would be extremely useful. Here, we compare dietary DNA metabarcoding from cloacal swabs of 16 A. vulpes to dietary composition data obtained using traditional morphological classification techniques and metabarcoding of homogenized stomach contents. Further, we compare the performance of two commonly used barcoding genes (18S rRNA and COI) at inferring A. vulpes diet composition. We found that detection of taxa and the resolution of taxonomic annotation varied between markers, suggesting a multi-marker approach is likely to provide the most complete results. Importantly however, the number of dietary OTUs identified and the taxonomic composition of the core diet were not significantly different between molecular markers. Dietary compositions identified using metabarcoding approaches differed in both diversity and composition from matched dietary data obtained from morphologically analyzed stomach contents; however, the same core prey classes were identified using both methods, suggesting that metabarcoding does indeed offer a viable alternative to morphological dietary assessment. Importantly, dietary compositions identified by metabarcoding of cloacal swabs did not differ significantly from those identified by metabarcoding of stomach contents. Metabarcoding of minimally invasive cloacal swabs should be considered for dietary studies of bonefish and other fish species for which invasive or lethal sampling is problematic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw sequence data associated with this work are available from the sequencing read archive under BioProject PRJNA874874.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony L. Goldberg.

Ethics declarations

All bonefish handling and processing techniques follow the approved Florida International University protocol IACUC-21-058 and permit numbers: SAL-22-2100-SRP, BISC-2021-SCI-0010, EVER-2021-SCI-0025.

Competing interests

Aaron Adams is a Guest Editor of this special issue, but he was not involved in the peer review of this article and had no access to information regarding its peer review. The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Figure S1

Stacked bar chart of the percent abundance of dietary prey classes per fish for each molecular marker. (PNG 185 kb)

High Resolution Image (EPS 2016 kb)

Figure S2

Stacked bar chart of the percent abundance of dietary prey classes per fish for each sampling method. G = Homogenised gut contents, M = Morphological stomach contents analyses, S = Cloacal swabbing. (PNG 189 kb)

High Resolution Image (EPS 1968 kb)

ESM 1

(XLSX 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campbell, L.J., Castillo, N.A., Shenker, J. et al. Bone appétit: DNA metabarcoding as a non-lethal alternative to morphological dietary assessment in Atlantic bonefish (Albula vulpes). Environ Biol Fish 106, 337–348 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01328-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-022-01328-3

Keywords

Navigation