Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrasting the migratory behavior and stranding risk of White Sturgeon and Chinook Salmon in a modified floodplain of California

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While navigating through the same migratory corridor, different species may experience differing reproductive success due the interaction of species-specific movement behavior with habitat configuration. We contrasted the migratory behavior of White Sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus and fall-run Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, two native fishes in Central Valley of California. These species co-occur in the region’s Yolo Bypass floodplain seasonally, but they represent disparate reproductive strategies: White Sturgeon are iteroparous, spawning multiple times throughout their lifespan, while Chinook Salmon are semelparous, spawning only once in their lifespan. Except for brief windows when the Yolo Bypass connected to the Sacramento River during flood conditions, migrating White Sturgeon and Chinook Salmon that entered the Bypass from 2012 to 2018 had to turn around and exit it in order to complete a successful spawning migration up the Sacramento River. This “exit behavior” was critical to migratory success when the Bypass was not flooded. Between March 2012 and May 2018, the median probability of acoustically-tagged fall-run Chinook Salmon exiting the Yolo Bypass at its southern extent was estimated to be 0.74 (0.58–0.87 95% credible interval), while an individual White Sturgeon had a median exit probability of 0.99 (0.96–1.00 95% credible interval). Our results suggest that White Sturgeon successfully exit the Yolo Bypass more consistently than fall-run Chinook Salmon, indicating that fall-run Chinook Salmon are at higher risk of stranding in the Yolo Bypass. The difference in probability of exit between these two species has implications for how to manage for migratory success in altered habitats. Floodplain · Fish passage · Bayesian · Telemetry · Behavioral ecology · Movement · Stranding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borski RJ, Hodson RG (2003) Fish research and the institutional animal care and use committee. ILAR J 44(4):286–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Water Resources (2020) Yolo bypass habitat restoration projects. Yolo Bypass Projects. https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Environmental-Services/Restoration-Mitigation-Compliance/Yolo-Bypass-Projects. Accessed 2 Dec 2020

  • Chapman E, Jacinto E, Singer G, Willmes M, Hobbs J, Moyle P (2018) Restoration on Putah Creek Provides Home for Chinook Salmon. Oral Presentation. Bay Delta Science Conference, Sacramento, California, September 12

  • Corbett SC, Moser ML, Dittman AH (2012) Experimental evaluation of adult spring Chinook salmon radio-tagged during the late stages of spawning migration. N Am J Fish Manag 32(5):853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H (2014) Migration: the biology of life on the move, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dittman A, Quinn T (1996) Homing in Pacific salmon: mechanisms and ecological basis. J Exp Biol 199(1):83–91

  • Feyrer F, Sommer T, Harrell W (2006) Managing floodplain inundation for native fish: production dynamics of age-0 splittail in California's Yolo bypass. Hydrobiologia 573:213–226

  • Freeman MC, Pringle CM, Greathouse EA, Freeman BJ (2003) Ecosystem-level consequences of migratory faunal depletion caused by dams. Am Fish Soc Symp 35:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot C, Simpson K, Todd I, Murray PD, Buxton GA (1975) Movements of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in the Skeena estuary as revealed by ultrasonic tracking. J. Fish Res Board Can 32:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell WC, Sommer TR (2003) Patterns of Adult Fish Use on California’s Yolo Bypass Floodplain. In: Faber PM (ed) California riparian systems: Processes and floodplain management, ecology, and restoration, 2001 Riparian habitat and floodplains conference proceedings. Riparian Habitat Joint Venture, Sacramento, pp 88–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Heublein JC, Kelly JT, Crocker CE, Klimley AP, Lindley ST (2009) Migration of green sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris, in the Sacramento River. Environ Biol Fishes 84(3):245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-008-9432-9

  • Heublein J, Bellmer R, Chase RD, Doukakis P, Gingras M, Hampton D, Israel JA, Jackson ZJ, Johnson RC, Langness OP, Luis S, Mora E, Moser ML, Rohrbach L, Seesholtz AM, Sommer T, Stuart JS (2017) Life history and current monitoring inventory of San Francisco estuary sturgeon. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA technical memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-008-9432-9

  • Jackson ZJ, Gruber JJ, Van Eenennaam JP (2016) White sturgeon spawning in the San Joaquin River, California, and effects of water management. J Fish Wildl Manag 7(1):171–180

  • Jeffres CA (2017) From Subduction to Salmon: Understanding Physical Process and Ecosystem Function in Aquatic Ecosystems. Diss. University of California, Davis

  • Jeffres C, Moyle P (2012) When good fish make bad decisions: coho salmon in an ecological trap. N Am J Fish Manag 32(1):87–92

  • Jeffres CA, Opperman JJ, Moyle PB (2008) Ephemeral floodplain habitats provide best growth conditions for juvenile Chinook Salmon in a California river. Environ Biol Fish 83(4):449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John G. Williams, (2006) Central Valley Salmon: A Perspective on Chinook and Steelhead in the Central Valley of California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 4 (3)

  • Johnston ME, Steel AE, Espe M, Sommer T, Klimley AP, Sandstrom P, Smith D (2018) Survival of juvenile Chinook salmon in the Yolo bypass and the lower Sacramento River, California. San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci 16(2)

  • Kjelson MA, Raquel PF, Fisher FW (1982) Life history of fall-run juvenile Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, California

  • Klimley AP, Chapman ED, Cech JJ Jr, Cocherell DE, Fangue NA, Gingras M, Jackson Z, Miller EA, Mora EA, Poletto JB, Schreier AM, Seesholtz A, Sulak KJ, Thomas MJ, Woodbury D, Wyman MT (2015) Sturgeon in the Sacramento–San Joaquin watershed: new insights to support conservation and management. San Franc Estuary Watershed Sci 13(4). https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2015v13iss4art1

  • Kohlhorst DW (1976) Sturgeon spawning in the Sacramento River in 1973, as determined by distribution of larvae. Calif Fish Game 62(1):32–40

  • Kohlhorst DW, Botsford LW, Brennan JS, Caillet GM (1991) Aspects of the structure and dynamics of an exploited Central California population of white sturgeon (Acispenser transmontanus). In: Williot P (ed) Acipenser. Cemagref Publishers, Bordeaux, pp 277–293

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin RL, Smyth ER, Castro-Santos T, Jones ML, Koops MA, Pratt TC, Vélez-Espino LA (2013) Unintended consequences and trade-offs of fish passage. Fish Fish 14(4):580–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller LW (1972) Migrations of sturgeon tagged in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary. Calif Fish Game 58(2):102–106

  • Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California. Univ of California Press

  • Moyle PB (2013) Novel aquatic ecosystems: the new reality for streams in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. River Res Appl

  • Moyle PB, Katz JV, Quiñones RM (2011) Rapid decline of California’s native inland fishes: a status assessment. Biol Conserv 144(10):2414–2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opperman J (2008). Floodplain conceptual model. Sacramento (CA). Delta Regional Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Plan. http://www.science.calwater.ca.gov/pdf/drerip/DRERIP_floodplain_conceptual_model_final_012208.pdf

  • Pelicice FM, Agostinho AA (2008) Fish-passage facilities as ecological traps in large neotropical rivers. Conserv Biol 22(1):180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP (2018) The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. University of Washington Press

  • Rideout RM, Rose GA, Burton MP (2005) Skipped spawning in female iteroparous fishes. Fish Fish 6(1):50–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffter RG (1997) White sturgeon spawning migrations and location of spawning habitat in the Sacramento River, California. Calif Fish Game 83:1–20

  • Smith IP, Johnstone ADF, Smith GW (1997) Upstream migration of adult Atlantic salmon past a fish counter weir in the Aberdeenshire Dee, Scotland. J Fish Biol 51(2):266–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer T, Baxter R, Herbold B (1997) Resilience of splittail the the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:961–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer TR, Harrell WC, Nobriga ML, Brown R, Moyle PB, Kimmerer WJ, Schemel L (2001a) California’s Yolo bypass: evidence that flood control can be compatible with fisheries, wetlands, wildlife, and agriculture. Fisheries 26:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer TR, Nobriga ML, Harrell WC, Batham W, Kimmerer WJ (2001b) Floodplain rearing of juvenile Chinook Salmon: evidence of enhanced growth and survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:325–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer TR, Harrell WC, Solger AM, Tom B, Kimmerer W (2004) Effects of flow variation on channel and floodplain biota and habitats of the Sacramento River, California, USA. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 14(3):247–261

  • Sommer T, Harrell B, Matica Z, Feyrer F (2008) Habitat associations and behavior of adult and juvenile splittail (Cyprinidae: Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in a managed floodplain wetland. San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci 6 (2), article 3. [online serial]

  • Sommer TR, Harrell WC, Feyrer F (2014) Large-bodied fish migration and residency in a flood basin of the Sacramento River, California, USA. Ecol Freshw Fish 23(3):414–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stan Development Team (2018) RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.19.2. http://mc-stan.org

  • Steel AE, Coates JH, Hearn AR, Klimley AP (2014) Performance of an ultrasonic telemetry positioning system under varied environmental conditions. Anim Biotelemetry 2(1):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.r-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MJ, Peterson ML, Friedenberg N, Van Eenennaam JP, Johnson JR, Hoover JJ, Klimley AP (2013) Stranding of spawning run green sturgeon in the Sacramento River: post-rescue movements and potential population-level effects. N Am J Fish Manag 33(2):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorstad EB, Rikardsen AH, Alp A, Økland F (2013) The use of electronic tags in fish research–an overview of fish telemetry methods. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 13(5):881–896

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehtari A, Gabry J, Magnusson M, Yao Y, Gelman A (2019) “loo: Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC for Bayesian models.” R package version 2.2.0, https://mc-stan.org/loo

  • Vincik RF (2013) Multi-year monitoring to facilitate adult salmon passage through a temperate tidal marsh. Environ Biol Fish 96(2–3):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincik RF, Johnson J (2013) A report on fish rescue operations at Sacramento and Delavan NWR areas April 24 through June 5, 2013 Colusa Basin Stranding Meeting, July 2013

  • Whipple AA, Grossinger RM, Rankin D, Stanford B, Askevold RA (2012) Sacramento-san Joaquin Delta historical ecology investigation: exploring pattern and process. San Francisco Estuary Institute-Aquatic Science Center, Richmond

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JG (2006) Central Valley Salmon: A perspective on Chinook and Steelhead in the Central Valley of California. San Franc Estuary Watershed Sci 4(3). https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2006v4iss3art2

  • Yoshiyama RM, Fisher FW, Moyle PB (1998) Historical abundance and decline of Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley region of California. N Am J Fish Manag 18(3):487–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all persons who generously offered their time, expertise, and resources assisting this study and analysis, especially Matthew Pagel, Naoaki Ikemiyagi, Lynn Takata, Lauren Miele, Sheena Holley, James Newcomb, Mike Thomas, John Brennan, Jacob Katz, Michelle Stone, Philip Sandstrom, and Ryan Battleson. The manuscript was greatly improved by the constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers. This work was originally funded by the Department of Fish and Wildlife Ecological Restoration Program and approved by the UC Davis Protocol for Animal Care and Use Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myfanwy Johnston.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnston, M., Frantzich, J., Espe, M.B. et al. Contrasting the migratory behavior and stranding risk of White Sturgeon and Chinook Salmon in a modified floodplain of California. Environ Biol Fish 103, 481–493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-020-00974-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-020-00974-9

Keywords

Navigation