Abstract
In the context of the increasingly integrated development of information technology and classroom instruction, university students are engaging in a growing portion of their learning within online spaces. Against this backdrop, the investment in online learning engagement has become a topic of significant interest among numerous researchers. Prior studies have indicated that social presence is a crucial predictor of online learning engagement, However, the underlying psychological mechanisms are unclear. To bridge this research gap, we surveyed 722 Chinese university students (280 males and 442 females, mean age = 18.88 years, SD = 1.13), all of whom completed a self-report questionnaire. Drawing the social presence theory, this study employed Mplus 8.3 to develop and examine a multiple mediation model incorporating social presence, interpersonal interaction, flow experience, online learning engagement. The results revealed that: (1) social presence, interpersonal interaction, and flow experience were significantly and positively correlated with online learning engagement; (2) social presence can directly predict college students' online learning engagement, as well as indirectly influence their online learning engagement through three indirect paths: the independent mediation of interpersonal interaction, flow experience and the chain mediation of interpersonal interaction and flow experience. This study sheds light on the psychological mechanisms by which social presence promotes online learning engagement among college students, providing insights for addressing the "screen dilemma" in online learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology,42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education,62, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
Cai, L., & Jia, X. (2020). The effect of academic self-efficacy on online learning engagement: The chain mediating role of learning motivation and flow experience [In Chinese]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior,18(6), 805–811. https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V18/I6/805.
Chang, Y. P., & Zhu, D. H. (2012). The role of perceived social capital and flow experience in building users’ continuance intention to social networking sites in China. Computers in Human Behavior,28(3), 995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.001
Chen, P. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education,54(4), 1222–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E. (Eds.). (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. Harvard U Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Collins, R. (2005). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
Dai, B., & Liu, Y. (2015). Examining users’ intention to continue using Wechat based on the expectation-confirmation model, social presence and flow experience [In Chinese]. Journal of Modern Information,35(3), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2015.03.004
Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., & Dresel, M. (2023). Relevance of students’ goals for learning engagement and knowledge gains in an online learning course. Behavioral Sciences,13(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020161
Duan, C., & Hong, J. (2019). The relationship between internet teacher-student interaction and online learning performance: The mediating effect of internet learning self-efficacy and internet learning motivation [In Chinese]. Psychological Development and Education,35(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.02.07
Engeser, S. (Ed.). (2012). Advances in flow research. Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1
Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An Update. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education,14(2), 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12097
Fan, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Danmaku interaction, online product display and consumer impulsive buying—intermediary with perceived presence and flow [In Chinese]. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Social Science Edition),38(3), 78–89.
Fang, J., Wen, Z., Zhang, M., & Sun, P. (2014). The analyses of multiple mediation effects based on structural equation modeling [In Chinese]. Journal of Psychological Science,37(3), 735–741. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2014.03.001
Gao, J., Li, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The relationship between proactive personality and online learning engagement-From the perspective of self-determined theory. e-Education Research,36(8), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2015.08.003
Gao, Q., Chen, P., Wang, Y., & Luo, R. (2022). Instructors’ humor and college students’ academic engagement in online learning: A multilevel analysis. [In Chinese] Journal of Psychological Science,45(4), 879–887. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20220415
Goel, L., Johnson, N. A., Junglas, I. A., & Ives, B. (2013). Predicting users’ return to virtual worlds: A social perspective. Information Systems Journal,23(1), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00396.x
Gorsky, P., & Blau, I. (2009). Online teaching effectiveness: A tale of two instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,10(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V10I3.712
Heller, K., Bullerjahn, C., & von Georgi, R. (2015). The relationship between personality traits, flow-experience, and different aspects of practice behavior of amateur vocal students. Frontiers in Psychology,6, Article1901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01901
Ho, C., Zhang, H., Li, J., & Zhang, M. (2023). Development and application of interactive teaching systems for online design courses. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies,21(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.317365
Hollis, R. B., & Was, C. A. (2016). Mind wandering, control failures, and social media distractions in online learning. Learning and Instruction,42, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.007
Hosseini, S. M., & Fattahi, R. (2014). Databases’ interface interactivity and user self-efficacy: Two mediators for flow experience and scientific behavior improvement. Computers in Human Behavior,36(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.014
Hu, X., Xu, H., & Chen, Z. (2020). The relationship between information literacy, online learning engagement and learning performance [In Chinese]. China Educational Technology,41(3), 77–84.
Jiang, T., Chen, P., & Xu, Y. (2021). Research progress in the application of flow theory abroad [In Chinese]. Journal of Information Resources Management,11(5), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.13365/j.jirm.2021.05.004
Jiang, Y., Bai, X., Wu, W., & Luo, X. (2019). Research on the structural relationship of influencing factors of online learning experience [In Chinese]. Modern Distance Education,41(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.2019.0004
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education,57(2), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
Lang, Y., Gong, S., Cao, Y., & Wu, Y. (2022). The relationship between teacher-student interaction and college students’ learning engagement in online learning: Mediation of autonomous motivation and academic emotions [In Chinese]. Psychological Development and Education,38(4), 530–537. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.04.09
Li, J., Xue, C., & Song, H. (2023). Research on social presence in human-computer interaction: Taking short videos with bullet screen as a case [In Chinese]. Library Tribune,43(3), 141–150.
Li, L. (2021). Mixed-methods inquiry into interpersonal interaction in online teaching—The perspective of Shanghai university teachers [In Chinese]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences),39(7), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.07.005
Liu, B., Zhang, W., & Liu, J. (2017). Study on the effect of teacher support on online learners’ learning engagement [In Chinese]. e-Education Research,38(11), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2017.11.010
Liu, F., & Yi, X. (2021). Research on construction and application of analysis model of online learning engagement [In Chinese]. e-Education Research,42(9), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2021.09.010
Liu, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhou, J. (2022). Research on the influence of self-efficacy on learning outcomes in desktop virtual reality environment: The mediating based on flow experience. [In Chinese] Journal of Distance Education,40(4), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2022.04.005
Liu, Z., Zhou, J., & Zhou, J. (2022). The design of smart teaching activities to promote flow experience from the perspective educational neuroscience. Modern Educational Technology,32(7), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2022.07.002
Luan, L., Dong, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Research on influence of teachers’ support strategies on college students’ online English learning engagement [In Chinese]. Modern Educational Technology,32(3), 119–126.
Mahfouz, A. Y., Joonas, K., & Opara, E. U. (2020). An overview of and factor analytic approach to flow theory in online contexts. Technology in Society,61, 101228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101228
Maimaiti, G., Jia, C., & Hew, K. F. (2023). Student disengagement in web-based videoconferencing supported online learning: an activity theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments,31(8), 4883–4902. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1984949
Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education,123, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge. 1.
Moorhouse, B. L., Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2023). E-classroom interactional competencies: Mediating and assisting language learning during synchronous online lessons. RELC Journal,54(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220985274
Mulik, S., Srivastava, M., Yajnik, N., & Taras, V. (2019). Antecedents and outcomes of flow experience of MOOC users. Journal of International Education in Business,13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-10-2018-0049
Özhan, ŞÇ., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research,57(8), 2006–2031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118823159
Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., & Robin, B. R. (2016). Students′ patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Open Online Course. Computers, Education,95, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.015
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly,18(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
Song, Y., Wu, B., & Hao, T. (2021). Exploring the sequential pattern of classroom dialogue oriented to knowledge construction [In Chinese]. e-Education Research,42(3), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2021.03.016
Sousa, M. J., Marôco, A. L., Gonçalves, S. P., & de Machado, A. (2022). Digital learning is an educational format towards sustainable education. Sustainability,14(3), 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031140
Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology,43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
Sun, Y., Li, X., & Yang, Y. (2022). Towards a measurement model of social presence in massive online teaching of higher education [In Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Distance Education,42(6), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2022.06.004
Tang, D., & Wen, Z. (2020). Statistical approaches for testing common method bias: Problems and suggestions [In Chinese]. Journal of Psychological Science,43(1), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200130
Teng, Y. (2013). The review of social presence research [In Chinese]. Modern Educational Technology,23(3), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2013.03.013
Uzun, N. B., Aktaş, M., & Akay, C. (2023). Measurement and Evaluation Challenges in Distance Education: Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.4.19368
Wang, C., Xu, P., & Hu, Y. (2021). Impact of desktop VR learning environment on learning engagement and performance: Evidence based on multimodal data [In Chinese]. Open Education Research,27(3), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2021.03.012
Wang, S. (2021). An exploration of the relationships between interactive forms of online course teaching and students’ learning engagement [In Chinese]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences),39(7), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2021.07.004
Wu, X., & Chen, X. (2017). Research on online presence teaching model from the perspective of blended learning [In Chinese]. China Educational Technology,38(8), 66–73.
Wu, X., & Chen, X. (2018). Research status, hot topics and development trends of international online presence research—Based on analysis of knowledge map on documents from WOS during 2000–2017 [In Chinese]. China Educational Technology,39(2), 37–45.
Wu, Y., & Wen, Z. (2011). Item parceling strategies in structural equation modeling [In Chinese]. Advances in Psychological Science,19(12), 1859–1867. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01859
Yin, R., & Xu, H. (2017). Construction of online learning engagement structural model: An empirical study based on structural equation model [In Chinese]. Open Education Research,23(4), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2017.04.010
Yoo, J., & Kim, Y. (2018). Factors influencing nursing students’ flow experience during simulation-based learning. Clinical Simulation in Nursing,24, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.09.001
Zhang, J., Jiang, Q., & Zhao, W. (2019). A Study on the factors influencing social presence and academic warning in online learning: Based on the CoI theory perspective [In Chinese]. Modern Distance Education,41(4), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.2019.0038
Zhang, M., Gou, J., & Wang, L. (2022). Research on the presence of desktop virtual reality environment for learning process [In Chinese]. Modern Distance Education,44(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20220304.001
Zhang, S., He, J., Deng, L., Wu, L., & Yang, Y. (2020). The impact of teachers’ motivational belief on learning engagement in the online professional learning community [In Chinese]. China Educational Technology,41(4), 109–117.
Zhang, W., Xiao, H., & Xu, Y. (2022). Analysis on the influence mechanism of sense of presence and cybersickness experience in VR teaching—A case study of the virtual simulation experiment of psychological crisis group counseling [In Chinese]. Modern Distance Education,44(2), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.20220207.001
Zhang, Y., & Yuan, Q. (2020). The evolution and prospect of the application on field of social presence theory. Journal of Information Resources Management,10(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.13365/j.jirm.2020.01.082
Zhuge, D. (2021). Research on interactive ritual mechanism in online context [In Chinese]. Future Communication,28(6), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.13628/j.cnki.zjcmxb.2021.06.013
Acknowledgments
We would like to express special gratitude to all the participants for their generous contribution, which made this study possible.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Quanwei Shen and Bin Gao contributed to conception and design of the study. Bin Gao performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Quanwei Shen wrote the first draft of the manuscript, verified the statistical analysis, reviewed and edited the manuscript. Jiamei Lu contributed to supervision of the study. Qiong Ge, Xiaoqi Yan and Baige Chen assisted in collecting the data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was carried out without ethics issue.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study. There is no ethical or conflict of interest in this research. All the participants filled out consent forms.
Consent for publication
All authors gave their consent for publication.
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, Q., Gao, B., Lu, J. et al. Overcoming the "screen dilemma": The psychological mechanisms of social presence promoting college students' online learning engagement. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12706-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12706-y