Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An improved metacognitive competency framework to inculcate analytical thinking among university students

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhancing students' analytical thinking skills holds great promise for bolstering a nation's economic growth, fostering a dynamic learning culture, and nurturing human capital development. It is especially critical in today's rapidly changing landscape, where the demand for skilled, adaptable graduates is high. Achieving and sustaining these skills hinges on individuals' awareness of their own thinking processes. Thus, this study aims to investigate the relationship between metacognitive knowledge and analytical thinking among university students in Malaysia. Besides, it assesses the impact of metacognitive regulation and control on analytical thinking. Data was gathered by administering web-based questionnaires to students enrolled in two public universities and two private universities situated in Malaysia's central region. Employing convenience sampling, a total of 184 respondents participated in the survey, responding to 5-point Likert scale questionnaires designed to gauge metacognition (both knowledge and regulation) and analytical thinking. The data analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), a technique chosen for its suitability to handle complex relationships within the study variables. PLS-SEM, coupled with the bootstrapping method, was employed to ensure a robust examination of the interactions among metacognitive factors and analytical thinking. The use of the bootstrapping method enhances the reliability of the results by generating multiple resamples and assessing the stability and significance of the model parameters. The results revealed a significant relationship (p < 0.01) between metacognitive knowledge and analytical thinking, with knowledge of persons and knowledge of strategies proving to be influential in enhancing analytical thinking abilities with the correlation coefficients (R-values) of 3.528 and 3.815, respectively. In terms of metacognitive regulation, this study identified a noteworthy positive impact, highlighting the role of metacognitive regulation and control in bolstering analytical thinking with an R-value of 2.985. These findings have far-reaching implications for educators, offering valuable guidance on empowering university students to become more self-reliant and efficient learners by imparting skills in planning, monitoring, and self-assessment of their learning processes for improved academic performance within the university environment. This, in turn, has the potential to yield improved academic performance, particularly the development of analytic thinking and offers educators the opportunity to craft more effective instructional materials and activities tailored to harness the power of metacognition in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Anthonysamy, L. (2023). Being learners with mental resilience as outcomes of metacognitive strategies in an academic context. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2219497

  • Anthonysamy, L., Choo, K. A., & Hin, H. S. (2020). Self-regulated learning for smart learning in a university at Cyberjaya. In Understanding digital industry (pp. 108–111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367814557-27

  • Anthonysamy, L., Ah Choo, K., & Soon Hin, H. (2021). Investigating self-regulated learning strategies for digital learning relevancy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.1.2

  • Areesophonpichet, S. (2013). A development of analytical thinking skills of graduate students. In The Asian Conference on Education (pp. 1–5). The International Academic Forum.

  • Azmi, I. A. G., Hashim, R. C., & Yusoff, Y. M. (2018). The employability skills of Malaysian university students. International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences, 1(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38(1), 92–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Erlbaum.

  • Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (2013). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In Innovations in learning (pp. 289–325). Routledge.

  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart problem solving: How metacognition helps. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 47–68). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Davies, A. (2019). Carrying out systematic literature reviews: An introduction. British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 28(15), 1008–1014. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.15.1008

  • Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

  • Effeney, G., Carroll, A., & Bahr, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning and executive function: Exploring the relationships in a sample of adolescent males. Educational Psychology, 33(7), 773–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.785054

  • Efklides, A., & Vlachopoulos, S. P. (2012). Measurement of metacognitive knowledge of self, task, and strategies in mathematics. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a00014

  • Erlin, E., Rahmat, A., & Rejeki, S. (2020). Use of metacognitive regulation strategies to increase student academic achievement in microbiology course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4), 042016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042016

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive skills and problem-solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 7(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Jr., Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ku, K. Y., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Dean, J., & David. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. Tesol Quarterly, 52(4), 1085–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Yuan, R. (2022). Enhancing students’ metacognitive development in higher education: A classroom-based inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilian, A. (2021). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies for Smart Learning : A Case of a Malaysian University. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Science, 3(1), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilian, A. (2022). Formulation of self-regulated learning strategies framework for digital learning for lifelong learning. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Setiawan, D., Maghfiroh, H., & Muhaimin, F. G. (2022). Empowering college students’ problem-solving skills through RICOSRE. Education Sciences, 12(3), 196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molin, E., Adjenughwure, K., de Bruyn, M., Cats, O., & Warffemius, P. (2020). Does conducting activities while traveling reduce the value of time? Evidence from a within-subjects choice experiment. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 132, 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorthi, S. (2018). Problem solving skills among college students. International Journal of Innovative Research Explorer, 5(4), 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwosu, H. E., Obidike, P. C., Ugwu, J. N., Udeze, C. C., & Okolie, U. C. (2022). Applying social cognitive theory to placement learning in business firms and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(1), 100602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obasi, N. F. K., & Ibegwam, A. (2020). Recognition of information need indicators and graduate students’ research practices in university libraries of South East Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal).

  • Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan.

  • Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive strategies and development of critical thinking in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, S. (U.) K., & Dunlosky, J. (2016). A brief history of metamemory research and handbook overview. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 7–21). Oxford University Press.

  • Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 11(2), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2012). An attribution theory of motivation. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 135–155). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n8

  • West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, M. A., Ahmad, M. F., & Rahman, M. K. A. (2021). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTs): Acting method as approach of critical pedagogy in education culture. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 502–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). Routledge.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2023/SS02/MMU/02/3). This work was supported by Multimedia University, Malaysia under the Internal Research Funding (MMUI/220027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, 63100, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia

    Lilian Anthonysamy & Poovilashini Sugendran

  2. Global College, Heriot-Watt University Malaysia, 62200, Putrajaya, Selangor, Malaysia

    Lim Ooi Wei

  3. Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300, Bandar Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

    Teoh Sian Hoon

Authors
  1. Lilian Anthonysamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Poovilashini Sugendran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lim Ooi Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teoh Sian Hoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilian Anthonysamy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5

Table 5 Demographic profiling of respondents
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anthonysamy, L., Sugendran, P., Wei, L.O. et al. An improved metacognitive competency framework to inculcate analytical thinking among university students. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12678-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12678-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation