Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of social media as an instructional tool in Japanese culture teaching

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how social media tools, in other words social network services (SNS), affects the success of Japanese language learners in learning Japanese culture in undergraduate programs. For this research, a mixed method approach was used with a quantitative, quasi-experimental research design including a pre-test-post-test control group experimental model for quantitative data and an open-ended follow-up questionnaire for qualitative data. The topic of Shintō was selected for the Japanese culture lesson to be taught to a control group (indoor and face to face) and three experimental groups with different SNS tools (Zoom, YouTube and Instagram). An achievement test was used to measure success, with 30 questions in a pilot test reduced to 27 after item analysis. Two-factor ANOVA was used for the analysis. After measurement four groups’ value was found insignificant, a Sample Pair Test was implemented for each groups’ pre-test-post-test results. The results revealed that all groups showed a statistically significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores. The traditional Group and the YouTube Group had the highest mean achievement score,. This suggests that the social media teaching environment is as effective for the learning process as the indoor and face to face environment and learning tools. Furthermore, the qualitative data collected in this study revealed both positive and limited aspects of SNS tools. Participants highlighted the inadequacies of using SNS as the main learning environment. In the light of these data, this paper concludes that traditional classroom training is still useful in teaching Japanese culture, and SNS can be used as a supportive instrument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

  • 07 December 2023

    Springer Nature’s version of this paper was updated to remove the degrees found in the online version of the author group as well as to include the missing ORCID for Tolga Özşen and Levent Çetinkaya.

References

  • Albahiri, M., & Aljah, A. A. (2020). Role of Visual Element in Spoken English Discourse: Implications for YouTube Technology in EFL Classrooms. The Electronic Library, 38, 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2019-0172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arteaga Sánchez, R., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asutay, H. (2003). Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde "Kültür Bağlamı" ve "Öteki" Dil ["Cultural Context" and "Other" Language in Foreign Language Teaching]. Ankara Üniversitesi (TÖMER) Dil Dergisi, 118, 26–29.

  • Atmojo, A. (2022). Teacher Made YouTube Videos in Online EFL Classes: Non-English Depertmant Students' Perception and Practices. Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature, and Culture, 7(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v7i2.2531

  • Bichi, A. A. (2015). Item Analysis using a Derived Science Achievement Test Data. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(5), 1655–1662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Allyn & Bacon.

  • Bowman, E. (2023, Jan. 9). A college student created an app that can tell whether AI wrote an essay. Retrieved Apr 24, 2023, from npr.org: https://www.npr.org/2023/01/09/1147549845/gptzero-ai-chatgpt-edward-tian-plagiarism

  • Burbules, N. C. (2016). How We Use and Are Used by Social Media in Education. Educational Theory, 66, 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burhanlı, S., & Bangir-Alpan, G. (2021). Why Do University Students Prefer YouTube to Learn and Study? Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 164–177. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2021.383.9

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Deneysel Desenler Öntest-Sontest Kontrol Grubu Desen ve Veri Analizi [Experimental Designs Pretest-Posttest Control Group Pattern and Data Analysis]. Pegem Yayınları.

  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Scientific Research Methods]. Pegem Yayınları.

  • Cain, J., & Policastri, A. (2011). Using Facebook as an informal learning environment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(10), 207. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7510207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çetinkaya, L., & Sütçü, S. S. (2018). The effects of Facebook and WhatsApp on success in English vocabulary instruction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ChatGPT. (2023). What is ChatGPT? Retrieved from https://chat.openai.com/.

  • Chen, Y., Li, M., Guo, F., & Wang, X. (2022). The effect of short-form video addiction on users’ attention. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2151512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  • Cohen, R., & Swerdlik, M. (2010). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

  • COMU UBYS. (2022). Retrieved from Eğitim Kataloğu (Education Catalog): https://ubys.comu.edu.tr/AIS/OutcomeBasedLearning/Home/Index?id=6173&culture=tr-TR

  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. C. (2007). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneme, S., Ada, S., & Uzun, K. (2011). Teaching A Foreign Language and Foreign Culture to Young Learners. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(1), 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewanty, V., Deandra, G., Alika, P., & Farisya, G. (2021). Japanese Language Learning Through Folklore Themed Instagram. Advance in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 595, 702–707. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211119.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, J. L. (2005). Conducting Research on CALL. In J. Egbert, & G. Petrie, CALL Research Perspective (pp. 3–9). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613578

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Culture, Language Learning and Technology. In F. Farr, & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 173–184).

  • Healey, D. (2016). Language learning and technology: Past, present and future. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 9–24). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel, E. (2014). Culture And Pragmatics in Language Teaching and Learning. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton, & M. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (4th ed., pp. 394–408). Heinle&Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in Computers-Assisted Language Learning Research and Practice. In F. Farr, & L. Murray, The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 24–38). Routledge.

  • Jiang, W. (2000). The Relationship Between Culture and Langugae. ELT Journal, 54(4), 328–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y. (2020). Research on Strategies for Introducing Japanese Culture in Collage Japanese Teaching. 2020 3rd International Conference on Education Technology and Information System (ETIS 2020) (pp. 298–302). Jinzhou: CSP.

  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kan, A. (2010). Ölçme Aracı Geliştirme [Measurement Tool Development]. In D. Alıcı , G. Başol, M. Çakan, A. Kan, E. Karaca, Ö. Y. Özbek, & M. Yaşar, Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme [Measurement and Evaluation in Education] (pp. 239–276).

  • Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi Kavramlar İlkeler Teknikler [Scientific Research Method Concepts Principles Techniques] (2nd ed.). Nobel Akademik.

  • KingChatGPT, M. R. (2023). A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1986). A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design. Methuen.

  • Kramsch, C. (2013). Culture in Foreign Language Teaching. Iraian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C., & Zhu, H. (2016). Language, Culture and Language Teaching. In G. Hall (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 38–50). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kyouko, H., & Uyetake, D. (1991). Techniques and Strategies for Teaching Culture in Japanese Classroom 世界の日本語教育, 201–209.

  • Lebra, T. S. (2013). Japonlar ve Davranış Biçimleri [Japanese Patterns of Behavior]. (O. Baykara, Trans.) Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.

  • Li, Y. (2014). Dicussion on Culture Education In Japanese Language Learning. International Conferance on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication, (pp. 377–380). https://doi.org/10.2991/icelaic-14.2014.95

  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: “It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.” Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, C. (2009). Teaching culture in Japanese language classroom: A NSW case study. New Voices, 3, 104–125. https://doi.org/10.21159/nv.03.06

  • Maijala, M. (2020). Culture Teaching Methods in Foreign Language Education: Pre-service Teachers’ Reported Beliefs and Practices. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1509981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin-Martinez, F., & Sanchez-Meca, J. (2010). Weighting by Inverse Variance or by Sample Size in Random-Effects Meta-Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, P., & Rucynski, J., Jr. (2013). Tasks for Integrating Language and Culture Teaching. English Teaching Forum, 2, 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, D. T., & Fussell, S. R. (2016). Effects of Conversational Involvement Cues on Understanding and Emotions in Instant Messaging Conversations. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 35(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15571538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özüdoğru, F., & Delen, İ. (2021). Teknoloji Destekli Öğretim Materyali Hazırlama [Preparation of Technology Supported Instructional Materials]. In İ. Yıldırım (Ed.), Teknoloji Destekli Öğretim Güncel Gelişmeler [Technology Supported Instruction Current Developments] (pp. 75–98).

  • Popescu, E., & Ghita, D. (2013). Using Social Networking Services to Support Learning. In Wang, J. F., Lau, R. (Eds.), Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2013. ICWL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8167. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5_19

  • Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data Management and Analysis Methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 769–802). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, F., & Ates, S. (2018). Adaptation of the Scientific Literacy Scale Developed for Middle School Students. GEFAD / GUJGEF, 38(3), 1173–1205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, R. A., Cortijo, V., & Javed, U. (2014). Students’ perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70, 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SimilarWeb. (2023). Most Visited social media networks websites. Retrieved from https://www.similarweb.com/

  • Statista. (2023). Statistics and Market Data on Mobile Internet & Apps. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan, A. E. (2001). İçerik Analizi ve Uygulama Örnekleri. (Content Analysis and Implementation samples) İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınları.

  • Thomas, K., & Park, S. (2020). Integrating Instagram into the Curriculum of a Japanese Freshmen English Communication Course for Reading and Writing Activities. Cele Journal, 28, 93–116.

  • Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. (2004). How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. (Qualitative Research Methods in Social Science) Ankara: Seckin Yayinlari.

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to Mr. Serhat Temel, an alumnus of the Department of Japanese Language Teaching at Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, for his assistance in the preparation process of the YouTube video for this project. We would also like to express our gratitude to Mrs. Sheila Christopher Gökkaya for her valuable assistance in proofreading the English language in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

In light of the workload types given below, authors’ contributions are as follow.

Work/contribution types:

1. managing the project

2. theoretical contribution and/or guidance

3. creating/establishing/designing the experimental framework

4. idea support

5. secretariat

6. data input

7. data interpretation

8. designing/developing images & graphs & tables

9. chapter/section writing

TK: 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

: 2, 3, 4, 7

LÇ: 3, 4, 7d

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuğçe Karapolat.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.

Competing interest

The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9 1 Workflow of research

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karapolat, T., Özşen, T. & Çetinkaya, L. The impact of social media as an instructional tool in Japanese culture teaching. Educ Inf Technol 29, 695–719 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12290-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12290-7

Keywords

Navigation