Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of unplugged and plugged-in activities on academic achievement and computational thinking (CT) skills of sixth-grade students. Mixed-method research was carried out to explore whether there were differences between the groups, and to learn the students' opinions and experiences regarding the practices. For the quantitative phase, a quasi-experimental design was used with two groups. For qualitative phase, 12 students were interviewed. The participants were 84 sixth-grade students (between the ages of 10 and 11). The intervention was designed on a selection/construction of activities from seven different basic programming web platforms for the plugged-in group and the proposed national curriculum unplugged activities for the unplugged group. The results showed that significant differences between groups in academic achievement favoring the unplugged activities, but not in CT skills. Development in CT skills contributed to the unplugged group's academic achievement. In addition, qualitative results showed that the plugged-in group perceived their activities as fun and entertaining, but not exactly like a lesson; in contrast, the unplugged group did not experience anxiety or boredom since they perceived the activities as educational. CT explained 27 percent of the variance in academic achievement, suggesting that this skill is important for academic achievement in basic programming. These results suggest that students can improve their academic achievement and maintain the level of CT acquisition across unplugged and plugged-in activities. This article contributes to the body of knowledge about the positive impact of unplugged activities on teaching CT and programming fundamentals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
Asbell-Clarke, J., Rowe, E., Almeda, V., Edwards, T., Bardar, E., Gasca, S., Baker, R. S., Scruggs, R. (2021). The development of students’ computational thinking practices in elementary- and middle-school classes using the learning game Zoombinis. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106587
Atiker, B. (2019). The effects of middle school students' computational thinking skills on success in programming teaching (Publication No. 561543) [Doctoral dissertation, İstanbul University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Atman Uslu, N., Mumcu, F., & Eğin, F. (2018). Görsel programlama etkinliklerinin ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgi-işlemsel düşünmebecerilerine etkisi. Ege Eğitim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(1), 19–31.
Atun, H., & Usta, E. (2019). The effects of programming education planned with TPACK framework on learning outcomes. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.10.6.2
Balanskat, A. & Engelhardt, K. (2015). Computing our future: Computer programming and coding - Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. Retrieved August 26, 2021, from http://www.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=3596b121-941c-4296-a760-0f4e4795d6fa&groupId=43887
Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., & Grimley, M. (2009). Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 13(1), 20–29.
Bell, T. C., Witten, I. H., & Fellows, M. (1998). Computer science unplugged: Off-line activities and games for all ages. Citeseer. Retrieved March 14, 2021, from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.308.6827&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Berry, M. (2014). Computational thinking and creativity. Retriewed April 11, 2021, from http://milesberry.net/2014/08/computational-thinking-and-creativity/
Bers, M. U. (2018). Coding and Computational Thinking in Early Childhood: The Impact of ScratchJr in Europe. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3868
Bitesize. (2021). Introduction to computational thinking. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from https://www.bbc.com/bitesize/guides/zp92mp3/revision/1
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education: Implications for policy and practice (No. JRC104188). In P. Kampylis, & Y. Punie (Eds.). Seville, Spain: European Commission Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2791/792158
Bougot-Robin, K., Paget, J., Atkins, S. C., & Edel, J. B. (2016). Optimization and design of an absorbance spectrometer controlled using a raspberry pi to improve analytical skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(7), 1232–1240. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b01006
Brackmann, C. P., Román-González, M., Robles, G., Moreno-León, J., Casali, A., & Barone, D. (2017, November 8–10). Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school [Conference session]. The 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 65–72.ACM, Nijmegen, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137069
Brackmann, C., Barone, D., Casali, A., Boucinha, R., & Muñoz-Hernandez, S. (2016, September 13–15). Computational thinking: Panorama of the Americas [Conference session]. The International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), Salamanca, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751839
Brooks, J. (2019). The creative power of computational thinking. Retrieved January 28, 2021, from https://medium.com/tech-based-teaching/the-creative-power-of-computational-thinking-24dae04bce93
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/2F0013189X018001032
BuitragoFlórez, F., Casallas, R., Hernández, M., Reyes, A., Restrepo, S., & Danies, G. (2017). Changing a generation’s way of thinking: teaching computational thinking through programming. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 834–860. https://doi.org/10.3102/2F0034654317710096
Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001
Computer Science Unplugged. (n.d.). Computer science unplugged. Retrieved May 25, 2021 from https://www.stem.org.uk/cx5u7
Conde, M. Á., Fernández-Llamas, C., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Guerrero-Higueras, Á. M., Matellán-Olivera, V., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017, October 18-20). Promoting computational thinking in K-12 students by applying unplugged methods and robotics [Conference session]. Cádiz Spain, TEEM 2017. Retrieved September 26, 2021, from https://repositorio.grial.eu/bitstream/grial/1070/1/a07-Conde.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage.
CS Fundamentals Curriculum Guide. (2021). Retrieved May 26, 2021, https://code.org/curriculum/docs/csf/CSF_Curriculum_Guide_2018_smaller.pdf
CS Unplugged. (2021). Computational Thinking and CS Unplugged. Retrieved July 15, 2021, from https://csunplugged.org/en/computational-thinking/
Çelik, A., & Özdener, N. (2019). Bilgisayarlı ve bilgisayarsız programlama etkinliklerinin güdülenme üzerindeki etkisi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 88, 651–669. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.14692
Davies, S. (2008). The effects of emphasizing computational thinking in an introductory programming course [Conference session]. Saratoga Springs, NY, 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2008.4720362
Del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of Primary Education. Computers & Education, 150, 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832
Delal, H., & Oner, D. (2020). Developing middle school students’ computational thinking skills using unplugged computing activities. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.01
Digital Promise. (2021, March). Powerful learning with computational thinking: Our why, what, and how of computational thinking. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/115
Djambong T., Freiman V., Gauvin S., Paquet M., Chiasson M. (2018). Measurement of Computational Thinking in K-12 Education: The Need for Innovative Practices. In: Sampson D., Ifenthaler D., Spector J., Isaías P. (eds) Digital Technologies: Sustainable Innovations for Improving Teaching and Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73417-0_12
Donley, K. S. (2018). Coding in the curriculum: learning computational practices and concepts, creative problem solving skills, and academic content in ten to fourteen year-old children [Doctoral dissertation, the Temple University Graduate Board]. ProQuest. Retrieved July 16, 2021, from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/coding-curriculum-learning-computational/docview/2100068134/se-2?accountid=13014
Draw.io (2021). About us. Retrieved September 06, 2021, from https://about.draw.io/about-us/
Duncan, C., Bell, T., & Tanimoto, S. (2014, November 5 - 7). Should your 8-year-old learn coding? [Conference session]. WiPSCE’14. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670757.2670774
Eight Reasons Why Every Child. (2021). Teachyourkidscode. Retrieved July 15, 2021, from https://teachyourkidscode.com/
Falkner, K., & Vivian, R. (2015). A review of computer science resources for learning and teaching with K12 computing curricula: An Australian case study. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 390–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1140410
Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
Futschek, G. (2006). Algorithmic thinking: the key for understanding computer science. In: Mittermeir, R.T. (Ed.), ISSEP 2006, LNCS, 4226, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/11915355_15
Gal-Ezer, J. (1995). Computer science teachers’ certification program. Computers and Education, 25(3), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(95)00040-2
Gal-Ezer, J., Vilner, T., & Zur, E. (2004). Teaching algorithm efficiency at CS1 Level: A different approach. Computer Science Education, 14(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0899340042000302736
Garneli, B., Giannakos, G. & Chorianopoulos, K. (2015). Computing education in K–12 schools. A review of the literature [Conference session]. The 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tallinn, Estonia. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096023
Grover, S., Jackiw, N., &Lundh, P. (2019). Concepts before coding: non-programming interactives to advance learning of introductory programming concepts in middle school. Computer Science Education, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1568955
Gülbahar, Y. (2017). Bilgi işlemsel düşünme ve programlama konusunda değişim ve dönüşümler. Y. Gülbahar (Ed.), Bilgiişlemsel düşünmeden programlamaya (1. Baskı, pp. 395–410). Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052411117
Gülbahar Güven, Y. (Ed.), Kalelioğlu, F., Kert, S. B., İliş, E. B., Kıdıman Demirhan, E., Yurdakök, E. A., & Karaosmanoğlu, G. (2018). 6. Sınıf Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Yazılım Dersi Öğretmen Rehberi [6th Grade Information Technologies and Software Lesson Teacher's Guide]. MEB Press. Retrieved October 16, 2021, from www.eba.gov.tr
Gülbahar, Y., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners’ perspective. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 33–50.
Gülbahar, Y. & Kalelioğlu, F. (2018). Bilişim teknolojileri ve bilgisayar bilimi: Öğretim programı güncelleme süreci. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 47(217), 5–23. Retrieved June 5, 2021, from https://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/217.pdf
Harris, C. (2018). Computational thinking unplugged: Comparing the impact on confidence and competence from analog and digital resources in computer science professional development for elementary teachers (Paper 374)[Doctoral dissertation, St. John Fisher College]. Fisher Digital Publications. Available at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/education_etd/374/
Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
Huang, W., & Looi, C.-K. (2020). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education, 1(29). https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411
Israel-Fishelson, R., & Hershkovitz, A. (2022). Studying interrelations of computational thinking and creativity: A scoping review (2011–2020). Computers & Education, 176, 104353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104353
ISTE (2021). Computational thinking competencies. Retrieved February 24, 2020, from https://www.iste.org/standards/computational-thinking
Jun, W. (2018). A study on development of evaluation standards for unplugged activity [Conference session]. ICTC 2018, Jeju, Korea (South). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC.2018.8539505
Kalelioğlu, F. (2018). Bilgisayarsız Bilgisayar Bilimi (B3) Öğretimi. In Y. Gülbahar (Ed.), Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünmeden Programlaya Kitabı (pp. 183–204). PEGEM Akademi.
Karaahmetoğlu, K., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2019). The effect of project-based arduino educational robot applications on students’ computational thinking skills and their perception of basic stem skill levels. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.8.6.2
Korkmaz, Ö. , Karaçaltı, C. & Çakır, R. (2018). Öğrencilerin Programlama Başarılarının Bilgisayarca-Eleştirel Düşünme ile Problem Çözme Becerileri Çerçevesinde İncelenmesi. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 343–370. Retrieved February 10, 2022 from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/amauefd/issue/41157/413487
Kirçali, A.Ç., Özdener, N. (2022). A Comparison of Plugged and Unplugged Tools in Teaching Algorithms at the K-12 Level for Computational Thinking Skills. Tech Know Learn (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09585-4
Kite, V., Park, S., Wiebe, E. (2021). The code-centric nature of computational thinking education: A review of trends and issues in computational thinking education research. SAGE Open, 11(2), 215824402110164. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016418
Kim, B., Kim, T., & Kim, J. (2013). Paper-and-pencil programming strategy toward computational thinking for non-majors: Design your solution. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(4), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.2190/2FEC.49.4.b
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2015a). Bilgisayarca Düşünme Beceri Düzeyleri Ölçeğinin (BDBD) ortaokul düzeyine uyarlanması. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 67–86.
Korkmaz, Ö.,Çakır, R., &Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the Computational Thinking Scales (CTS), Computers in Human Behavior, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., Özden, M. Y., Oluk, A., & Sarıoğlu, S. (2015b). Bireylerin bilgisayarca düşünme becerilerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.34.2.5
Korucu, A. T., Gençtürk, A. T., & Gündoğdu, M. M. (2017). Examination of the computational thinking skills of students. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 2(1), 11–19. Retrieved January 18, 2021, from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/joltida/issue/55466/760079
Kuo, W.-C., & Hsu, T.-C. (2019). Learning computational thinking without a computer: How computational participation happens in a computational thinking board game. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00479-9
Kutay, E., & Oner, D. (2022). Coding with Minecraft: The Development of Middle School Students’ Computational Thinking. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 22(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3471573
Lahtinen, E., Mutka, K., & Jarvinen, H. (2005). A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1151954.1067453
Lee, J., Joswick, C., & Pole, K. (2022). Classroom play and activities to support computational thinking development in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01319-0
Lin, S. (2018). Item Analysis of English Grammar Achievement Test. Mandalay University of Foreign Languages Research Journal 9(1). Retrieved July 2, 2021, from https://mufl.edu.mm/pdf/Vol9/Sandar%20Lin%20journal%202018.pdf
Lister, R. (2016). Toward a developmental epistemology of computer programming [Paper presentation]. 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 5–16). ACM. Münster, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/2978249.2978251
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
Marie, S. M., Sreekala, E. (2015). Relevance of Item Analysis in Standardizing an Achievement Test in Teaching of Physical Science in B.Ed Syllabus, Journal of Educational Technology 12(3). https://doi.org/10.26634/JET.12.3.3743
Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2013). Learning computer science concepts with Scratch. Computer Science Education, 23(3), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2013.832022
Merino-Armero, J. M., González-Calero, J. A., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & del Olmo-Muñoz, J. (2022). Unplugged Activities in Cross-Curricular Teaching: Effect on Sixth Graders’ Computational Thinking and Learning Outcomes. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6020013
Meyers, E. M. (2019). Guest editorial. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(5/6), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-05-2019-139
MoNE (2018a). Ministry of national education of Turkey 2023 Education Vision. MEB Yayınları. Retrieved February 10, 2022 from https://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/
MoNE (2018b). Ministry of national education - information technology and software (ITS) (6th grade) curriculum. MEB Yayınları. Retrieved February 10, 2022 from www.eba.gov.tr
Moreno-León, J.,& Robles, G. (2015). Analyze your scratch projects with Dr. Scratch and assess your computational thinking skills [Paper presentation]. Scratch2015AMS, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from http://jemole.me/replication/2015scratch/InferCT.pdf
Nishida, T., Idosaka, Y., Hofuku, Y., Kanemune, & S., Kuno, Y. (2008). New methodology of information education with “Computer science unplugged”. In: Mittermeir R.T., Sysło M.M. (eds) Informatics Education - Supporting Computational Thinking. ISSEP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5090. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_22
Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., &Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9.Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
OECD. (2020). OECD Skills Outlook 2019: Thriving in a Digital World. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en
Pala, F. K., & Mıhçı Türker, P. (2019). The effects of different programming trainings on the computational thinking skills. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1635495
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books Inc.
Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Bacelo, A., & Pizarro, C. (2018). Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and Scratch to teach computer programming to children? Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. (Trans A. Rosin). Viking.
Ramadhan, H. A. (2000). Programming by discovery. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00118.x
Resnick, M., & Siegel, D. (2015). A different approach to coding. Bright/Medium.
Rodriguez, B. (2015). Assessing computational thinking in computer science unplugged activities [Master’s thesis, Colorado School of Mines]. Mountain Scholar. Retrieved February 10, 2022 from https://mountainscholar.org/bitstream/handle/11124/169998/Rodriguez_mines_0052N_10899.pdf?sequence=1
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: An experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking Test. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004
Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2014). Computer-Based Creative Collaboration in Online Learning. New Horizons in Web Based Learning (pp. 330–336). Springer.
Sendurur, P. (2019). Investigation of pre-service computer science Teachers’ CS-unplugged design practices. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3823–3840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09964-6
Strnad, B. (2018). Introduction to the world of algorithmic thinking. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 6, 57–60. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2223/2018.01.009
Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2021). Improving 7th-graders’ computational thinking skills through unplugged programming activities: A study on the influence of multiple factors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100926
Szlávi, P., & Zsakó, L. (2006). Programming versus application. In: Mittermeir, R.T. (Ed.), ISSEP 2006, LNCS 4226, 48–58. Retrieved May 13, 2021, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.96.9408&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
Taylor, M., Harlow, A., & Forret, M. (2010). Using a computer programming environment and an interactive whiteboard to investigate some mathematical thinking. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 8, 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.078
Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., Pinkwart, N., Butz, M., Trautwein, U., & Ninaus, M. (2017). Training computational thinking: Game-based unplugged and plugged-in activities in primary school [Conference session]. 11th European Conference on Game-Based Learning ECGBL 2017, At Graz, Austria. Retrieved September 2, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320491120_Training_Computational_Thinking_Game-Based_Unplugged_and_Plugged-in_Activities_in_Primary_School
Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., Román-González, M., Golle, J., Leifheit, L., Butz, M. V., & Ninaus, M. (2022). A cognitive definition of computational thinking in primary education. Computers & Education, 179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104425.
Tsortanidou, X., Daradoumis, T., & Barberá-Gregori, E. (2022). Unplugged computational thinking at K-6 education: Evidence from a multiple-case study in Spain. Education, 3–13, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2029924
Turan, B. (2019). The effect of problem based learning on problem solving and computational thinking skills in robot and game projects developed by secondary school students (No. 545841) [Master’s thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Available at https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
Ung, L. L., Labadin, J., & Mohamad, F. S. (2022). Computational thinking for teachers: Development of a localised E-learning system. Computers & Education, 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104379
Unnikrishnan, R., Amrita, N., Muir, A., & Rao, B. (2016). Of Elephants and Nested Loops: How to Introduce Computing to Youth in Rural India. ACM Press, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930678
Waite, J. (2017). Pedagogy in teaching Computer Science in schools: A Literature Review. (After The Reboot: computing education in UK Schools). The Royal Society. Retrieved May 19, 2021, from https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/computing-education/literature-review-pedagogy-in-teaching.pdf
Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2019). Transitioning from introductory block-based and text-based environments to Professional programming languages in high school computer science classrooms. Computers & Education, 142, 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103646
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. Retrieved October 13, 2021, from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~15110-s13/Wing06-ct.pdf
Wing, J. M. (2008) Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why? Retrieved October 7, 2021, from https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf
Wing, J. M. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. Retrieved December 24, 2018, from http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/index.html%3Fp=279.html
Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in k-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7
Yallihep, M., & Kutlu, B. (2020). Mobile serious games: Effects on students’ understanding of programming concepts and attitudes towards information technology. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10008-2
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yıldız, H. D., Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2017). Examining the relationship between digital game preferences and computational thinking skills. Contremporary Educatıonal Technology, 8(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6205
Zeybek, G. (2019). Determination of level of 21st Century learner skills use of high school students. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.505263
Zhan, Z., He, W., Yi, X., & Ma, S. (2022). Effect of Unplugged Programming Teaching Aids on Children’s Computational Thinking and Classroom Interaction: with Respect to Piaget’s Four Stages Theory. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F07356331211057143
Acknowledgements
This study was carried out as part of the master thesis entitled “Effect of unplugged activities and computer applications used in secondary school basic programming education on academic achievement and computational thinking” (Thesis Number: 634096).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polat, E., Yilmaz, R.M. Unplugged versus plugged-in: examining basic programming achievement and computational thinking of 6th-grade students. Educ Inf Technol 27, 9145–9179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10992-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10992-y