Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influencing factors on students’ learning effectiveness of AI-based technology application: Mediation variable of the human-computer interaction experience

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigated 1,552 university students to explore the correlation between their learning effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) technology application and its influencing factors. The aim is to provide a reference for school planning and application of AI in information and communications technology (ICT) teaching. The results show that ICT self-efficacy (ICT-SE) has a significant direct effect, and human-computer interaction experience (HCIE) has a significant indirect effect on lLearning effectiveness of AI-based technology applications (LE-AITA). The impact model of university student ICT-SE and HCIE on LE-AITA exhibits a good fit. The recommendation is that Taiwan education improve the AI learning environment, provide a suitable platform for the use and development of educational technology, and create a seamless teaching and learning experience. We discuss influencing factors and provide suggestions for the development of AI education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, K., Qadir, J., Al-Fuqaha, A., Iqbal, W., El-Hassan, A., Benhaddou, D., & Ayyash, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A panoramic review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/zvu2n

  • Ahn, J., & Clegg, T. (2017). Human-Computer Interaction and Education: Designing for Technology-Enhanced Learning Experiences. In The Wiley Handbook of Human Computer Interaction Set (Vol. 2, pp. 821-830). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118976005.ch38

  • Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

  • Alahakoon, C. N. K., & Somaratne, S. (2020). Measuring the levels of sources of ICT self-efficacy among the humanities and social sciences undergraduates in Sri Lanka. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 23(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4038/jula.v23i2.8006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2020). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131

  • Al-Rahmi, A.M., Al-Rahmi, W.M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Almutairy, S., Al-Adwan, A.S. (2021). Exploring the factors affecting mobile learning for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability, 13(14), Article 7893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147893

  • Al-Said, N., & Al-Said, K. M. (2020). Assessment of acceptance and user experience of human-computer interaction with a computer interface. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(11), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardito, G. & Betül, C. (2021). The development of autonomous student learning networks: Patterns of interactions in an open world learning environment for teachers exploring teaching with and through computer science. Sustainability, 13(16). Article: 8696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168696

  • Ardito, L., Coccia, M., & Petruzzelli, A.M. (2021). Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID-19 outbreaks. R & D Management 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12455.

  • Asthana, P., & Hazela, B. (2020). Applications of machine learning in improving learning environment. Multimedia Big Data Computing for Iot Applications, 163, 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Role of cognitive absorption in building user trust and experience. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Lee, S., Wong, S. F., & Jeong, S. P. (2021). AI-powered learning application use and gratification: an integrative model. Information Technology & People. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2020-0632

  • Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note 2021. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z

  • Che, Y., Sivaparthipan, C. B., & Daniel, J. A. (2021). Human–computer interaction on IoT-based college physical education. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05895-y

  • Chen, H. R., Lin, W. S., & Lin Koong, H. C. (2021). Is it possible for young students to learn the AI-STEAM application with experiential learning? Sustainability, 13(19), 11114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Xie, H., Zor, D., & Hwang, G. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002

  • Criollo, C. S., Abad-Vásquez, D., Martic-Nieto, M., Velásquez-G, F. A., Pérez-Medina, J.-L., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Towards a new learning experience through a mobile spplication with augmented reality in engineering education. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 4921. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1111492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y.J. & Park, J.W. (2020). Investigating factors influencing the behavioral intention of online duty-free shop users. Sustainability, 12(17). Artice l7108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177108

  • Cox, A. M. (2021). Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00237-8

  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenbrink, P., & Möller, S. (2018). Development of a reactance scale for human–computer interaction. Quality and User Experience, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41233-018-0016-y

  • Epoch Times (2021). Taiwan's AI development is expected to catch up with the United States within three years (台AI發展 3年內有望追近美國). Retrieved December 30, 2021, form https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/21/3/24/n12832844.htm

  • Future City (2021). Rushing to catch up and cultivating AI talents to make Taiwan more competitive in the AI generation 急起直追培育AI人才 讓台灣在AI世代更具競爭力. Retrieved December 30, 2021, form https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/1209

  • Fahimirad, M., & Kotamjani, S. S. (2018). A review on application of Artificial Intelligence in teaching and learning in educational contexts. International Journal of Learning and Development, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v8i4.14057

  • González-Calatayud, V., Prendes-Espinosa, P., & Roig-Vila, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence for student assessment: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11, 5467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, C., Mou, J., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4, 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Martínez, S. J. R., & Camacho, X. G. O. (2020). Diagnosis of the attitudes towards ICT of education students according to gender and educational modality. Apertura, 12(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.32870/Ap.v12n1.1786

  • Gravett, S., & Kroon, R. (2021). Learning to become a teacher: Student teachers’ experiences and perceptions of a one-year initial teacher education programme. Educational Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1935216

  • Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Guðmundsdóttir, G. B. (2018). Students' ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computer & Education, 118, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornbæk, K., & Hertzum, M. (2017). Technology acceptance and user experience: A review of the experiential component in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 24, Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127358

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1/2), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junyi Educational Learning Platform (均一教育平台) (2021). Taipei cool cloud class (Junyi Academy). Retrieved December 12, 2021, from https://www.junyiacademy.org/partner/cooc

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOC, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Business Horizons, 59, 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008

  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Wang, S. (2020). The change of teachers’ role in teaching under the environment of “Artificial Intelligence +”. 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE50891.2020.00030

  • Lopatovska, I. (2019). Overview of the intelligent personal assistants. Ukrainian Journal on Library and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.3.2019.169669

  • Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International, 2020(4/5), 3816132. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. UCL Knowledge Lab: London, UK. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1475756/

  • Martin, A. M. (2021). Instructor qualities and student success in higher education online courses. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqableh, M., & Jaradat, M. (2021). Exploring the determinants of students’ academic performance at university level: The mediating role of internet usage continuance intention. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4003–4025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10453-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (2021). In material network (因材網). Retrieved December 12, 2021, form https://adl.edu.tw/HomePage/home/

  • Mlambo, S., Rambe, P., & Schlebusch, L. (2020). Effects of Gauteng province’s educators’ ICT self-efficacy on their pedagogical use of ICTS in classrooms. Heliyon, 4(6), e03730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozer, M. C., Wiseheart, M., & Novikoff, T. P. (2019). Artificial intelligence to support human instruction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900370116

  • MUhie, Y. A., & Woldie, A. B. (2020). Integration of artificial intelligence technologies in teaching and learning in higher education. Science and Technology, 10(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musharraf, S., Bauman, S., Anis-ul-Haque, M., & Malik, J. A. (2018). Development and validation of ICT self-efficacy scale: Exploring the relationship with cyberbullying and victimization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(12), 2867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayanajith, D. A. G., & Damunupola, K. A. (2021). Impact of perceived behavioral control on e-learning adoption. Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 5(1-2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3126/ire.v5i1-2.34728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Innovation Network in Taiwan (2020). Artificial Intelligence: an overview of policies and developments in Taiwan. Taipei: The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy. https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2020/04/AI-Developments-in-Taiwan.pdf

  • Oberländer, M., Beionicke, A., & Bipp, T. (2020). Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computer & Education, 146, 103752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudeyer, P.Y. (2019). Developmental autonomous learning: AI, cognitive sciences and educational technology. The 19th ACM International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Paris France. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308532.3337710

  • Owoc, M.L., Sawicka, A., & Weichbroth, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence technologies in education: Benefits, challenges and strategies of implementation, ArXiv, abs/2102.09365. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85001-2_4

  • Pan, X. (2020). Technology acceptance, technological self-efficacy, and attitude toward technology-based self-directed learning: Learning motivation as a mediator. Frontier in Psychology, (11), 564294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294

  • Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers Computer Science, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007

  • Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1666538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai, K. R., Upadhyaya, P., Prakash, A. V., Ramaprasad, B. S., Mukesh, H. V., & Pai, Y. (2021). End-user satisfaction of technology-enabled assessment in higher education: A coping theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3677–3698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10401-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podgorsek, S., Kacjan, B., & Starcic, A. I. (2019). The foreign language teacher’s role in ICT-supported instruction. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 70(36), 174–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahoo, L. A., Hasnain, P., Ahmed, T., Khan, M. A., & Asghar, A. (2021). Measuring the awareness and acceptance level innovative learning strategies of higher secondary school teachers of Sindh, Pakistan. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 6781–6788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2020). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2623–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reljić, V., Milenković, I., Dudić, S., Šulc, J., & Bajči, B. (2021). Augmented reality applications in Industry 4.0 environment. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5592. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students' ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computer & Education, 102, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, D. (2021). Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education. AI & Society, 36, 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, D. & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of augmented reality technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computer & Education, 144. Article 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710

  • Şendurur, P., & Yılıdrım, S. (2019). Teachers’ computer self-efficacy scale: Development and validation. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(2), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, A., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. Internation Journal of Education Technology in Higher Education, 18(54). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9

  • Sezer, B. & Yuilmaz, R. (2019). Learning management system acceptance scale (LMSAS): A validity and reliability study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 15–30. https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/3959

  • Shehzadi, S., Nisar, Q. A., Hussain, M. S., Basheer, M. F., Hameed, W. U., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2020). The role of digital learning toward students' satisfaction and university brand image at educational institutes of Pakistan: a post-effect of COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 276–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siswa, T. A. Y. (2020). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on education: learning during the pandemic and in the future. International Journal of Engineering & Computer Science, 3(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijecs.v3n1.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojsic, I., Ivkov-Dzigurski, A., Maricic, O., Stanisavljevic, J., Jovanov, J. M., & Visnic, T. (2020). Students' attitudes toward the application of mobile augmented reality in higher education. Journal for General Social Issues, 29(4), 535–554. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.29.4.02

  • Taiwan Bureau of Industry (2021). Taiwan AI new generation talent training program (AI人才培育計畫). Retrieved December 29, 2021, form http://140.92.87.33/zh-tw/info

  • Taiwan Executive Yuan (2021). Digital economy (數位經濟). Retrieved December 30, 2021, form https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/5B6F7E717F7BADCE

  • Taiwan Industrial Technology Research Institute (2021). Artificial intelligence co-creation platform. Retrieved December 2, 2021, form https://www.itri.org.tw/english/Artificial-intelligence-co-creation-platform?CRWP=1070633546353516140

  • Taiwan Ministry of Education Statistics (2021a). Number of students in colleges and universities-search by subject category (大專院校學生數). Retrieved December 2, 2021, form https://eds.moe.gov.tw/edust/webMain.aspx?sys=100&funid=eduout&funid2=B030300&cycle=4&outkind=1&outmode=8&defmk=1&outkind=1&fldlst=11111111111&codlst0=1111111111111111111111111111111&codlst1=1&dfknd=1212

  • Taiwan’s Ministry of Education Statistics (2021b). Number of students by colleges and universities (大專院校學生數). Retrieved December 2, 2021, form https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=596D9D77281BE257

  • Taiwan News (2021). Three industries in Taiwan to face talent shortages before 2023: Talent needed for AI, offshore wind energy, IC design over next three years. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4196350

  • Tang, L. P., & Austin, M. J. (2009). Students’ perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1241–1255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezer, M., & Soykan, F. (2017). Acceptance scale of tablet computers by secondary education students: Validity and reliability study. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(12), 1132–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomi, I. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education: Policies for the future. European Union: Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/12297

  • Tussyadiah, I., & Miller, G. (2019). Perceived impacts of artificial intelligence and responses to positive behaviour change intervention. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 28, 359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C., Cheng, Y. M., Tsai, Y. S., & Lou, S. J. (2021). Impacts of AIOT implementation course on the learning outcomes of senior high school students. Education Sciences, 11(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2005). Five psychometric scales for online measurement of the quality of human-computer interaction in web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. Y. K., Lew, S. L., Lau, S. H., & Leow, M. C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application., Heliyon, 5(6), e01788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788

  • Wang, Y., Liu, C., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of AI-based applications in higher education: An analysis of teachers' perspectives using structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 116–129.

  • Wang, Y. P., & Zheng, G. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence in college dance teaching and its performance analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.15939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. Y., Wang, Y. S. (2019). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: an initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887

  • Xu, W., Dainoff, M.J., Ge, L., & Gao, Z. (2021). From human-computer interaction to human-AI interaction: New challenges and opportunities for enabling human-centered AI. ArXiv, abs/2105.05424.

  • Yang, B., Wei, L., & Pu, Z. (2020). Measuring and improving user experience through artificial intelligence-aided design. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 595374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2021). The talent training mode of international service design using a human–computer interaction intelligent service robot from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 600218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.600218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: Comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141–2153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, T. K. (2007). A comparative study of the learning effectiveness of the technological media learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 39, 69–90. http://epbulletin.epc.ntnu.edu.tw/upload/journal/prog/8ca09628_20171213.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusop, F. D., Habibi, A., & Razak, R. A. (2021). Factors affecting Indonesian preservice teachers' use of ICT during teaching practices through theory of planned behavior. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211027572

  • Yunusa, A. A., & Umar, I. N. (2021). A scoping review of critical predictive factors (CPFs) of satisfaction and perceived learning outcomes in E-learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1223–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanzotto, F. M. (2019). Viewpoint: Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 64, 243–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Wu, X., Xu, H., & Wang, G. (2021). The college students' oral English education strategy using human-computer interaction simulation system from the perspective of educational psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 723981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723981

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was written while the authors were supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 109-2511-H-224-002-MY3)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each author listed above has made substantial contributions (data collection, data analysis and interpretation, draft, major revision of the article, and final approval of the version to be released) to the conception, design of the study, manuscript or substantively revised it. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Mei Chou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chou, CM., Shen, TC., Shen, TC. et al. Influencing factors on students’ learning effectiveness of AI-based technology application: Mediation variable of the human-computer interaction experience. Educ Inf Technol 27, 8723–8750 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10866-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10866-9

Keywords

Navigation