Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

ViLLE – collaborative education tool: Designing and utilizing an exercise-based learning environment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automatically assessed exercises with immediate feedback can be a powerful tool for enhancing the effectiveness of education. In this article, we discuss the design and implementation of a collaborative learning tool called ViLLE. The design is based on experiences gathered from a previously developed and thoroughly researched visualization tool. Based on our earlier results and current educational theories, we developed four design principles upon which ViLLE is constructed. ViLLE includes various different exercise types which were designed to assist in the learning of computer science, mathematics and other subjects. It also supports different learning and teaching methods, such as pair programming and peer review. To justify the development of a new environment, we present four diverse case studies where ViLLE was utilized successfully: programming education, high school matriculation exam, elementary school mathematics and student counseling at university level. The results obtained from the studies seem to confirm that ViLLE can be used effectively to enhance student motivation and to improve student performance in various heterogeneous educational setups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Álvarez, A., Martín, M., Fernández-Castro, I., & Urretavizcaya, M. (2013). Blending traditional teaching methods with learning environments: Experience, cyclical evaluation process and impact with MAgAdI. Computers & Education, 68, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ari, M. (2001). Program visualization in theory and practice. Informatik/Informatique, 2, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, P., Porciello, M., Balkon, N., & Backus, D. (2006). The Blackboard Learning System: the be all and end all in educational instruction? Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1979). On knowing: essays for the left hand. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Cole, J., & Foster, H. (2008). Using Moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system (2nd ed.). Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. L., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. M. (2001). Immediate feedback during academic testing. Psychological Reports, 88(3), 889–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, M. (2014). The Book of Vaadin: Vaadin 7 Edition-4th Revision. Turku, Finland: Vaadin Ltd.

  • Hadjerrouit, S. (1998). Java as first programming language: a critical evaluation. SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(2), 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., & Standen, P. (1999). Moving from an instructivist to a constructivist multimedia learning environment. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (EDMEDIA) 1999, 19–24 June 1999, Seattle, U.S.A.

  • Holvitie, J., Rajala, T., Haavisto, R., Kaila, E., Laakso, M.-J., & Salakoski, T. (2012). Breaking the programming language barrier: Using program visualizations to transfer programming knowledge in one programming language to another. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 116–120, 2012 I.E. 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

  • Hundhausen, C. D., & Brown, J. L. (2002). A meta-study of algorithm visualization effectiveness. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 13, 259–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. (1991). Using software tools to automate the assessment of student programs. Computers & Education, 17(2), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (2003). Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others. Educational Studies, 29(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J., Kim, K., Shin, D., & Park, J. (2011). FlowWiki: A wiki based platform for ad hoc ollaborative workflows. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(1), 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila, E., Rajala, T., Laakso, M.-J., & Salakoski, T. (2009). Effects, experiences and feedback from studies of a program visualization tool. Informatics in Education, 8(1), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila, E., Rajala, T., Laakso, M. J., Linden, R., Kurvinen, E., Karavirta, V., & Salakoski, T. (2015). Comparing student performance between traditional and technologically enhanced programming course. In D. D’Souza & K. Falkner (Eds.), Proceedings 17th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE) (pp. 147–154). Sydney: ACS.

  • Kurvinen, E., Lindén, R., Rajala, T., Kaila, E., Laakso, M.-J., & Salakoski, T. (2012). Computer-assisted learning in primary school mathematics using ViLLE education tool. 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, November 15th to 18th, 2012, Tahko, Finland.

  • Laakso, M.-J. (2010). Promoting programming learning. engagement, automatic assessment with immediate feedback in visualizations. TUCS Dissertations no 131.

  • Lopez-Morteo, G., & López, G. (2007). Computer support for learning mathematics: A learning environment based on recreational learning objects. Computers & Education, 48(4), 618–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, M., & Tao, E. (2007). Blackboard vs. Moodle: Comparing user experience of learning management systems. 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference: global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports, Milwaukee, WI, USA, October 10–13, 2007.

  • Malmi, L., Karavirta, V., Korhonen, A., Nikander, J., Seppälä, O., & Silvasti, P. (2004). Visual algorithm simulation exercise system with automatic assessment: TRAKLA2. Informatics in Education, 3(2), 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIver, L., & Conway, D. (1996). Seven deadly sins of introductory programming language design, Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Software Engineering: Education and Practice (SE:EP '96), January 24–27, 1996.

  • Moons, J., & De Backer, C. (2013). The design and pilot evaluation of an interactive learning environment for introductory programming influenced by cognitive load theory and constructivism. Computers & Education, 60, 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naps, T. L., Rößling, G., Almstrum, V., Dann, W., Fleischer, R., Hundhausen, C., Korhonen, A., Malmi, L., McNally, M., Rodger, S., & Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á. (2002). Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education. Working Group Reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 35(2), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Raitman, R., Augar, N., Zhou, W. (2005) Employing Wikis for online collaboration in the e-learning environment: Case Study. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA’05), Sydney, Australia.

  • Rajala, T., Laakso, M.-J., Kaila, E., & Salakoski, T. (2008). Effectiveness of Program Visualization: A Case Study with the ViLLE Tool. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 7(IIP), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajala, T., Kaila, E., Laakso, M.-J., & Salakoski, T. (2009). Effects of collaboration in program visualization. Appeared in the Technology Enhanced Learning Conference 2009 (TELearn 2009), October 6 to 8, 2009, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(5), 357–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2009). Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1138–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. (2010). Students’ reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1202–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    Mikko-Jussi Laakso, Erkki Kaila & Teemu Rajala

Authors
  1. Mikko-Jussi Laakso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erkki Kaila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teemu Rajala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teemu Rajala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laakso, MJ., Kaila, E. & Rajala, T. ViLLE – collaborative education tool: Designing and utilizing an exercise-based learning environment. Educ Inf Technol 23, 1655–1676 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9659-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9659-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation