Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Icotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage IIA-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (ICAPE)

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The survival benefit of icotinib (an oral epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced lung cancer has been confirmed in several studies. This study (ICAPE) evaluated the efficacy of icotinib as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage IIA-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with stage IIA-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. Eligible patients received oral icotinib 125 mg thrice daily for 1.5 years after complete surgical resection. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Between March 2014 and January 2018, 79 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 39.7 months with a median DFS and overall survival (OS) of 41.4 months (95% CI: 33.6–51.8) and 67.0 months (95% CI: 21.2-not reached [NR]), respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 83.3%, and 61.7%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the median DFS between patients with Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (BIM) mutant-type and wild-type (NR vs. 41.7 months; p = 0.75). No significant difference was found in the median DFS according to EGFR mutation types. Icotinib as adjuvant therapy demonstrated a favorable survival benefit in patients with stage IIA-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma, indicating that icotinib might be a promising treatment option for this patient population. The optimal adjuvant duration of icotinib is still not clear and needs more incoming data to answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Wang C, Wu Y, Shao J, Liu D, Li W (2020) Clinicopathological variables influencing overall survival, recurrence and post-recurrence survival in resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 20:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-6621-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rodak O, Peris-Díaz MD, Olbromski M, Podhorska-Okołów M, Dzięgiel P (2021) Current Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Histological Classification, Targeted Therapies, and Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184705

  3. Zhu X, Dong D, Chen Z, Fang M, Zhang L, Song J, Yu D, Zang Y, Liu Z, Shi J et al (2018) Radiomic signature as a diagnostic factor for histologic subtype classification of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Radiol 28:2772–2778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5221-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. He J, Su C, Liang W, Xu S, Wu L, Fu X, Zhang X, Ge D, Chen Q, Mao W et al (2021) Icotinib versus chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for stage II-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (EVIDENCE): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med 9:1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00134-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schrank Z, Chhabra G, Lin L, Iderzorig T, Osude C, Khan N, Kuckovic A, Singh S, Miller RJ, Puri N (2018) Current Molecular-Targeted Therapies in NSCLC and Their Mechanism of Resistance. Cancers (Basel) 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10070224

  6. Hirsch FR, Scagliotti GV, Mulshine JL, Kwon R, Curran WJ Jr, Wu YL, Paz-Ares L (2017) Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments. Lancet 389:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30958-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart EL, Tan SZ, Liu G, Tsao MS (2015) Known and putative mechanisms of resistance to EGFR targeted therapies in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations-a review. Transl Lung Cancer Res 4:67–81. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.11.06

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Maione P, Sacco PC, Sgambato A, Casaluce F, Rossi A, Gridelli C (2015) Overcoming resistance to targeted therapies in NSCLC: current approaches and clinical application. Ther Adv Med Oncol 7:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758834015595048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun D, Zhu Y, Zhu J, Tao J, Wei X, Wo Y, Hou H (2020) Primary resistance to first-generation EGFR-TKIs induced by MDM2 amplification in NSCLC. Mol Med 26:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-020-00193-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelatti ACZ, Drilon A, Santini FC (2019) Optimizing the sequencing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 137:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang F, Diao XY, Zhang X, Shao Q, Feng YF, An X, Wang HY (2019) Identification of genetic alterations associated with primary resistance to EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR sensitive mutations. Cancer Commun (Lond) 39:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0354-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zhao Q, Liu X, Chen L, Pan H, Li Y, Lu Y, Huang J, Zhang Z et al (2020) Long-term safety of icotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective, real-world study. J Thorac Dis 12:639–650. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.115

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi Y, Zhang L, Liu X, Zhou C, Zhang L, Zhang S, Wang D, Li Q, Qin S, Hu C et al (2013) Icotinib versus gefitinib in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ICOGEN): a randomised, double-blind phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 14:953–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70355-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi YK, Wang L, Han BH, Li W, Yu P, Liu YP, Ding CM, Song X, Ma ZY, Ren XL et al (2017) First-line icotinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed plus pemetrexed maintenance therapy for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (CONVINCE): a phase 3, open-label, randomized study. Ann Oncol 28:2443–2450. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu X, Han B, Gu A, Zhang Y, Jiao SC, Wang CL, He J, Jia X, Zhang L, Peng J et al (2014) A single-arm, multicenter, safety-monitoring, phase IV study of icotinib in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 86:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lyu C, Wang R, Li S, Yan S, Wang Y, Chen J, Wang L, Liu Y, Guo Z, Wang J et al (2021) Different exposure duration of adjuvant icotinib in stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients with positive EGFR mutation (ICOMPARE study): A randomized, open-label phase 2 study. J Clin Oncol 39:8521–8521. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rusch VW, Rice TW, Crowley J, Blackstone EH, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P (2010) The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Staging Manuals: the new era of data-driven revisions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:819–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Harrison PT, Vyse S, Huang PH (2020) Rare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 61:167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.09.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Remon J, Steuer CE, Ramalingam SS, Felip E (2018) Osimertinib and other third-generation EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Ann Oncol 29:i20–i27. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu YL, Tsuboi M, He J, John T, Grohe C, Majem M, Goldman JW, Laktionov K, Kim SW, Kato T et al (2020) Osimertinib in Resected EGFR-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 383:1711–1723. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2027071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhong WZ, Wang Q, Mao WM, Xu ST, Wu L, Shen Y, Liu YY, Chen C, Cheng Y, Xu L et al (2018) Gefitinib versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin as adjuvant treatment for stage II-IIIA (N1-N2) EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADJUVANT/CTONG1104): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 19:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30729-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tada H, Mitsudomi T, Yamanaka T, Sugio K, Tsuboi M, Okamoto I, Iwamoto Y, Sakakura N, Sugawara S, Atagi S et al (2021) Adjuvant gefitinib versus cisplatin/vinorelbine in Japanese patients with completely resected, EGFR-mutated, stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (IMPACT, WJOG6410L): A randomized phase 3 trial. J Clin Oncol 39:8501–8501. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor MD, Nagji AS, Bhamidipati CM, Theodosakis N, Kozower BD, Lau CL, Jones DR (2012) Tumor recurrence after complete resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 93:1813–1820 discussion 1820–1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ng KP, Hillmer AM, Chuah CT, Juan WC, Ko TK, Teo AS, Ariyaratne PN, Takahashi N, Sawada K, Fei Y et al (2012) A common BIM deletion polymorphism mediates intrinsic resistance and inferior responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer. Nat Med 18:521–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhong J, Li ZX, Zhao J, Duan JC, Bai H, An TT, Yang XD, Wang J (2014) Analysis of BIM (BCL-2 like 11 gene) deletion polymorphism in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients. Thorac Cancer 5:509–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shukla S, Saxena S, Singh BK, Kakkar P (2017) BH3-only protein BIM: An emerging target in chemotherapy. Eur J Cell Biol 96:728–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2017.09.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yin H, Zhu Q, Liu M, Tu G, Li Q, Yuan J, Wen S, Yang G (2017) GPER promotes tamoxifen-resistance in ER + breast cancer cells by reduced Bim proteins through MAPK/Erk-TRIM2 signaling axis. Int J Oncol 51:1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Akiyama T, Dass CR, Choong PF (2009) Bim-targeted cancer therapy: a link between drug action and underlying molecular changes. Mol Cancer Ther 8:3173–3180. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-0685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang ZF, Ren SX, Li W, Gao GH (2018) Frequency of the acquired resistant mutation T790 M in non-small cell lung cancer patients with active exon 19Del and exon 21 L858R: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 18:148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4075-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi YW, Jeon SY, Jeong GS, Lee HW, Jeong SH, Kang SY, Park JS, Choi JH, Koh YW, Han JH et al (2018) EGFR Exon 19 Deletion is Associated With Favorable Overall Survival After First-line Gefitinib Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Am J Clin Oncol 41:385–390. https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000000282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Sequist LV, Lindeman N, Holmes AJ, Joshi VA, Bell DW, Huberman MS, Halmos B, Rabin MS et al (2006) Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 12:3908–3914. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim DW, Lee SH, Lee JS, Lee MA, Kang JH, Kim SY, Shin SW, Kim HK, Heo DS (2011) A multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as first-line treatment for Korean patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. Lung Cancer 71:65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Won YW, Han JY, Lee GK, Park SY, Lim KY, Yoon KA, Yun T, Kim HT, Lee JS (2011) Comparison of clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations. J Clin Pathol 64:947–952. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Igawa S, Kasajima M, Ishihara M, Kimura M, Hiyoshi Y, Asakuma M, Otani S, Katono K, Sasaki J, Masuda N (2014) Comparison of the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer according to the type of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Oncology 87:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sugio K, Uramoto H, Onitsuka T, Mizukami M, Ichiki Y, Sugaya M, Yasuda M, Takenoyama M, Oyama T, Hanagiri T et al (2009) Prospective phase II study of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. Lung Cancer 64:314–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design, Y.Z., K.Q., and Q.C.; Provision of study materials or patients, K.Q., Q.C., M.H., Z.W., Y.L., H.L., Z.S., Y.C., and L.L.; Collection and assembly of data, K.Q., Q.C., M.H., Z.W., Y.L., H.L., Z.S., Y.C., and L.L.; Data analysis and interpretation, Y.Z., K.Q. and Q.C.; Drafting article, Y.Z., K.Q. and Q.C.; Administrative support, Y.Z. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This trial is conducted by the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and approved by the ethics committee institutional review board of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University (number: 2015002).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Informed consent

All patients have signed the informed consent.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Yes.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors have no potential interests to disclose.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kun Qian and Qi-Rui Chen these authors contributed equally to the manuscript and thus share the first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, K., Chen, QR., He, M. et al. Icotinib, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage IIA-IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study (ICAPE). Invest New Drugs 41, 44–52 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-022-01316-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-022-01316-5

Keywords

Navigation