Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase 1 study of nevanimibe HCl, a novel adrenal-specific sterol O-acyltransferase 1 (SOAT1) inhibitor, in adrenocortical carcinoma

  • PHASE I STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with very limited treatment options. Nevanimibe HCl (formerly ATR-101), a novel adrenal-specific sterol O-acyltransferase 1 (SOAT1) inhibitor, has been shown in nonclinical studies to decrease adrenal steroidogenesis at lower doses and to cause apoptosis of adrenocortical cells at higher doses. Methods This phase 1, multicenter, open-label study assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of nevanimibe in adults with metastatic ACC (NCT01898715). A “3 + 3” dose-escalation design was used. Adverse events (AEs), PK, and tumor response based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were evaluated every 2 months. Results 63 patients with metastatic ACC, all of whom had previously failed systemic chemotherapy and only 2 of whom were mitotane-naïve, were dosed with oral nevanimibe at doses ranging from 1.6 mg/kg/day to 158.5 mg/kg/day. Subjects who did not experience tumor progression or a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) could continue to receive additional cycles. No patients experienced a complete or partial response; however, 13 of the 48 (27%) patients who underwent imaging at 2 months had stable disease (SD), and 4 of these had SD > 4 months. In addition, drug-related adrenal insufficiency, considered a pharmacologic effect of nevanimibe, was observed in two patients. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were gastrointestinal disorders (76%), including diarrhea (44%) and vomiting (35%). A maximum tolerated dose (MTD) could not be defined, as very few dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred. Because the large number of tablets required at the highest dose (i.e., ~24 tablets/day) resulted in low-grade gastrointestinal adverse effects, a maximum feasible dose of 128.2 mg/kg/day was established as a dose that could be taken on a long-term basis. Conclusions This study demonstrated the safety of nevanimibe at doses of up to ~6000 mg BID. As the total number of tablets required to achieve an MTD exceeded practical administration limits, a maximum feasible dose was defined. Given that the expected exposure levels necessary for an apoptotic effect could not be achieved, the current formulation of nevanimibe had limited efficacy in patients with advanced ACC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fassnacht M, Libé R, Kroiss M, Allolio B (2011) Adrenocortical carcinoma: a clinician's update. Nat Rev Endocrinol 7(6):323–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.235 Epub 2011 Mar 8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Else T, Kim AC, Sabolch A, Raymond VM, Kandathil A, Caoili EM et al (2014) Adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Rev 35(2):282–326 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423978

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kebebew E, Reiff E, Duh Q-Y, Clark OH, McMillan A (2006) Extent of Disease at Presentation and Outcome for Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Have We Made Progress? World J Surg 30(5):872–878 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16680602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerkhofs TM, Verhoeven RH, Van der Zwan JM, Dieleman J, Kerstens MN, Links TP, Van de Poll-Franse LV, Haak HR (2013) Adrenocortical carcinoma: a population-based study on incidence and survival in the Netherlands since 1993. Eur J Cancer 49(11):2579–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fassnacht M, Johanssen S, Quinkler M, Bucsky P, Willenberg HS, Beuschlein F et al (2009) Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union Against Cancer staging classification for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal for a Revised TNM Classification. Cancer 115(2):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, Baudin E, Berruti A, de Krijger R, Haak HR, Mihai R, Assie G, Terzolo M (2018) European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 179(4):G1–G46. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0608 PMID: 30299884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allolio B, Hahner S, Weismann D, Fassnacht M (2004) Management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol 60(3):273–287 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15008991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammer GD, Else T. Adrenocortical carcinoma : basic science and clinical concepts. Springer; 2011. 546 p

  9. Reidy-Lagunes DL, Lung B, Untch BR, Raj N, Hrabovsky A, Kelly C et al (2017) Complete Responses to Mitotane in Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma—A New Look at an Old Drug. Oncologist 22(9):1102–1106 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Megerle F, Herrmann W, Schloetelburg W, Ronchi CL, Pulzer A, Quinkler M, Beuschlein F, Hahner S, Kroiss M, Fassnacht M, German ACC (2018) Study group. Mitotane Monotherapy in Patients with advanced Adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103(4):1686–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Managing Cancer-related Side Effects, Mitotane [Internet]. American Cancer Society. 2019. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/physical-side-effects.html

  12. Terzolo M, Pia A, Berruti A, Osella G, Alì A, Carbone V et al (2000) Low-Dose Monitored Mitotane Treatment Achieves the Therapeutic Range with Manageable Side Effects in Patients with Adrenocortical Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(6):2234–2238 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10852456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giordano TJ (2011) The argument for mitotic rate-based grading for the prognostication of adrenocortical carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 35(4):471–473 Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000478-201104000-00001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller BS, Gauger PG, Hammer GD, Giordano TJ, Doherty GM (2010) Proposal for modification of the ENSAT staging system for adrenocortical carcinoma using tumor grade. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 395(7):955–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0698-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fassnacht M, Kroiss M, Allolio B (2013) Update in adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(12):4551–4564. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fassnacht M, Terzolo M, Allolio B, Baudin E, Haak H, Berruti A et al (2012) Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 366(23):2189–2197. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1200966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sbiera S, Leich E, Liebisch G, Sbiera I, Schirbel A, Wiemer L, Matysik S, Eckhardt C, Gardill F, Gehl A, Kendl S, Weigand I, Bala M, Ronchi CL, Deutschbein T, Schmitz G, Rosenwald A, Allolio B, Fassnacht M, Kroiss M (2015) Mitotane inhibits sterol-O-acyl Transferase 1 triggering lipid-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in Adrenocortical carcinoma cells. Endocrinology. 156(11):3895–3908. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1367 Epub 2015 Aug 25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. LaPensee CR, Mann JE, Rainey WE, Crudo V, Hunt SW, Hammer GD (2016) ATR-101, a Selective and Potent Inhibitor of Acyl-CoA Acyltransferase 1, Induces Apoptosis in H295R Adrenocortical Cells and in the Adrenal Cortex of Dogs. Endocrinology 157(5):1775–1788 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26986192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19097774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Millendo Therapeutics, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PJN and VHL authored substantial sections of the manuscript and incorporated reviewer comments. DCS, MF, EK, MAH, MK, MMI, PM, and AN reviewed and edited the manuscript, and provided many helpful comments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aung Naing.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

David C. Smith received research funding for this project from Millendo Therapeutics, formerly Atterocor. David C. Smith received research funding from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb (Medarex), Eli Lilly, Genentech, Astellas, MedImmune, Seattle Genetics, Millenium, Incyte, Novartis, F. Hoffman-La Roche, ESSA, and OncoMed. Matthias Kroiss received research support from Ipsen. Electron Kebebew declares no conflict of interest. Mouhammed Amir Habra received research funding from Exelixis. Mouhammed Amir Habra is a consultant and on the advisory board of Corcept Therapeutics and HRA Pharma. Rashmi Chugh declares no conflict of interest. Bryan J. Schneider received institutional research funding from Incyte, Genentech and Bristol-Meyers Squibb. Martin Fassnacht declares no conflict of interest. Pegah Jafarinasabian is a former employee of Millendo Therapeutics. M. Marian Ijzerman is a current employee of Millendo Therapeutics. Vivian H. Lin is a current employee of Millendo Therapeutics. Pharis Mohideen is a former employee of Millendo Therapeutics and currently owns shares in Millendo Therapeutics. Aung Naing received research funding from NCI, EMD Serono, MedImmune, Healios Onc. Nutrition, Atterocor, Amplimmune, ARMO BioSciences, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Incyte, Novartis, Regeneron, Merck, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Pfizer, CytomX Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics, Calithera BioSciences, TopAlliance BioSciences, Eli Lilly, Kymab, PsiOxus, and Immune Deficiency Foundation (spouse). Aung Naing is on the advisory board for CytomX Therapeutics and Novartis and received reimbursement for travel and accommodation from ARMO BioSciences, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, D.C., Kroiss, M., Kebebew, E. et al. A phase 1 study of nevanimibe HCl, a novel adrenal-specific sterol O-acyltransferase 1 (SOAT1) inhibitor, in adrenocortical carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 38, 1421–1429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00899-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00899-1

Keywords

Navigation