Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II trial of ifosfamide in combination with the VEGFR inhibitor sorafenib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS) study

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background Sorafenib is a potent targeted-therapy that blockades angiogenesis and has demonstrated activity against some sarcoma subtypes. Preclinical studies suggested that treatment with sorafenib plus cytotoxic agents could result in additive efficacy. Methods Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with or without anthracycline pretreatment were included. Patients received oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily starting on Day +2, ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 iv infusion lasting 4 h on days 1, 2 and 3 with concurrent mesna 400 mg/m2 every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or up to a maximum of 6 cycles of ifosfamide (sorafenib could be continued until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity). Primary objective was progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 and 6 months; secondary objectives were overall response rate (ORR), Progression-free survival (PFS), Overall survival (OS) and safety. This article reports the phase II part of a phase I/II clinical trial. Results Thirty-five patients were enrolled. PFR at 3 and 6 months was 66% (95% CI 48–81) and 37% (95% CI 22–55). Six patients (17%) achieved partial response and 17 (49%) stable disease. Median PFS was 4.8 months (CI 95% 1.94–6.36) and overall survival 16.2 months (95% CI 8.75-NA). Conclusion Treatment with sorafenib plus ifosfamide achieved a significant clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma resistant to anthracyclines, which warrants a more detailed study in randomized clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gatta G et al (2011) Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer 47(17):2493–2511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sleijfer S, Seynaeve C, Verweij J (2005) Using single-agent therapy in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma can still be considered standard care. Oncologist 10(10):833–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. (2014) “Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(suppl 3): iii102-iii112

  4. Van Glabbeke M et al (1999) Prognostic factors for the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 2,185 patients treated with anthracycline-containing first-line regimens--a European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer soft tissue and bone sarcoma group study. J Clin Oncol 17(1):150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demetri GD, Elias AD (1995) Results of single-agent and combination chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Implications for decision making in the clinic. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 9(4):765–785

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Oosterom AT et al (2002) Results of randomised studies of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (STBSG) with two different ifosfamide regimens in first- and second-line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients. Eur J Cancer 38(18):2397–2406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ratain MJ et al (2004) Preliminary antitumor activity of BAY 43–9006 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and other advanced refractory solid tumors in a phase II randomized discontinuation trial (RDT). J Clin Oncol 22(14_suppl):4501–4501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin-Liberal J, Benson C, Judson I (2014) New drugs in sarcomas. Expert Opin Pharmacother 15(2):221–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sleijfer S et al (2009) Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043). J Clin Oncol 27(19):3126–3132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martín-Liberal J et al (2014) Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with ifosfamide in patients with advanced sarcoma: a Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS) study. Investig New Drugs 32(2):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Antman KH, Ryan L, Elias A, Sherman D, Grier HE (1989) Response to ifosfamide and mesna: 124 previously treated patients with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 7(1):126–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajendra R, Jones RL, Pollack SM (2013) Targeted treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma: profile of pazopanib. Onco Targets Ther 6:217–222

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Graaf WTA et al (2012) Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet (London, England) 379(9829):1879–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Adamo DR et al (2005) Phase II study of doxorubicin and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 23(28):7135–7142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Glabbeke M, Verweij J, Judson I, Nielsen OS, EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (2002) Progression-free rate as the principal end-point for phase II trials in soft-tissue sarcomas. Eur J Cancer 38(4):543–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nielsen OS et al (2000) Effect of high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A multicentre phase II study of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma group. Eur J Cancer 36(1):61–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Bayer HealthCare. Sonia Maciá and Daniela Morales (PIVOTAL S.L.) provided advice to properly handle and submit the paper.

Funding

This study was funded by Bayer España.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xavier García del Muro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Xavier García del Muro: XG has received research grants from Bayer and Astra Zeneca. XG has received a speaker honorarium from Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, Ipsen and BMS.

Javier Martín Broto: Consulting or Advisory Role from PharmaMar, GSK, Novartis, Amgen, Bayer, Lilly.

Rest of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvements with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García del Muro, X., Maurel, J., Martínez Trufero, J. et al. Phase II trial of ifosfamide in combination with the VEGFR inhibitor sorafenib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS) study. Invest New Drugs 36, 468–475 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0583-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0583-z

Keywords

Navigation