Skip to main content
Log in

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of ombrabulin (AVE8062) combined with cisplatin/docetaxel or carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

  • PHASE I STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose Preclinical evidence supports synergy between the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin and various chemotherapy agents. Ombrabulin was combined with two standard taxane/platinum doublets in a phase I study to determine the recommended combination doses. Methods Ombrabulin (30-min infusion, day 1 every 3 weeks) was escalated from 15.5 to 35 mg/m2 with two chemotherapy doublets; OCD, 75 mg/m2 cisplatin (C), day 1 (cohort 1) or day 2 (cohort 2) with 60/75 mg/m2 docetaxel (D), day 2; and OCP, AUC5/6 carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) 175 mg/m2 (cohort 3) or 200 mg/m2 (cohort 4), day 2. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response were evaluated. Results Sixty-nine patients were treated (32 OCD, 37 OCP). Four had DLTs in cycle 1, two in cohort 1 (grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 pulmonary embolism) and one each in cohorts 2 (grade 3 ALT elevation) and 4 (grade 3 peripheral ischemia). Ombrabulin escalation in cohorts 2, 3 and 4 was halted at the highest planned dose (35 mg/m2). Asthenia, nausea, paresthesia, alopecia, vomiting, and stomatitis were common, as was grade 3–4 neutropenia. Ombrabulin clearance was high with a short terminal half-life and a medium volume of distribution. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no clinically relevant drug interactions between the taxane-platinum doublet and ombrabulin or its active metabolite RPR258063, however docetaxel and carboplatin pharmacokinetics were slightly altered. One complete and 15 partial responses (10 OCD, 5 OCP; median duration 5.5 and 4.4 months, respectively) were reported. Conclusions The addition of ombrabulin to standard doses of cisplatin/docetaxel or carboplatin/paclitaxel proved feasible with manageable overlapping toxicities but appears to have limited impact on the efficacy of these doublets. Recommended combination doses are 35 mg/m2 ombrabulin with 75 mg/m2 cisplatin/75 mg/m2 docetaxel or 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/AUC6 carboplatin, every 3 weeks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKeage MJ, Baguley BC (2010) Disrupting established tumor blood vessels: an emerging therapeutic strategy for cancer. Cancer 116:1859–1871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nihei Y, Suzuki M, Okano A, Tsuji T, Akiyama Y, Tsuruo T et al (1999) Evaluation of antivascular and antimitotic effects of tubulin binding agents in solid tumor therapy. Jpn J Cancer Res 90:1387–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hori K, Saito S, Kubota K (2002) A novel combretastatin A-4 derivative, AC7700, strongly stanches tumour blood flow and inhibits growth of tumours developing in various tissues and organs. Br J Cancer 86:1604–1614

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clemenson C, Jouannot E, Merino-Trigo A, Rubin-Carrez C, Deutsch E (2012) The vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin (AVE8062) enhances the efficacy of standard therapies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenograft models. Invest New Drugs 31:273–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sessa C, Lorusso P, Tolcher A, Farace F, Lassau N, Delmonte A et al (2013) Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin (AVE8062) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 19:4832–4842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soria J, Sessa C, Perotti A, Massard C, Armand J, Lassaud N et al. (2008) A comprehensive study of translational research and safety exploration of the vascular disrupting agent (VDA) AVE8062 in combination with cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research 99th Annual Meeting; Abstract LB-302.

  7. Eskens F, Tresca P, Tosi D, Van Doorn L, Fontaine H, Van der Gaast A et al (2014) A phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin (AVE8062) combined with docetaxel in advanced solid tumors. Br J Cancer 110:2170–2177

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruno R, Vivier N, Vergniol JC, De Phillips SL, Montay G, Sheiner LB (1996) A population pharmacokinetic model for docetaxel (taxotere): model building and validation. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 24:153–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bruno R, Hille D, Riva A, Vivier N, ten Bokkel Huinnink WW, van Oosterom AT et al (1998) Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of docetaxel in phase II studies in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:187–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harvey V, Mouridsen H, Semiglazov V, Jakobsen E, Voznyi E, Robinson BA et al (2006) Phase III trial comparing three doses of docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4963–4970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brahmer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A et al (2006) Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2542–2550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lara PN Jr, Douillard JY, Nakagawa K, von Pawel J, McKeage MJ, Albert I et al (2011) Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without the vascular disrupting agent vadimezan (ASA404) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:2965–2971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scagliotti GV, Vynnychenko I, Park K, Ichinose Y, Kubota K, Blackhall F et al (2012) International, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: MONET1. J Clin Oncol 30:2829–2836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. du Bois A, Huober J, Stopfer P, Pfisterer J, Wimberger P, Loibl S et al (2010) A phase I open-label dose-escalation study of oral BIBF 1120 combined with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies. Ann Oncol 21:370–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zweifel M, Jayson GC, Reed NS, Osborne R, Hassan B, Ledermann J et al (2011) Phase II trial of combretastatin A4 phosphate, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 22:2036–2041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J et al (2002) Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346:92–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Subbiah IM, Lenihan DJ, Tsimberidou AM (2011) Cardiovascular toxicity profiles of vascular-disrupting agents. Oncologist 16:1120–1130

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Felici A, Loos WJ, Verweij J, Cirillo I, de Bruijn P, Nooter K et al (2006) A pharmacokinetic interaction study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus or minus 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58:673–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vergote I, Amant F, Oskay-Oezcelik G, Musib L, Michel AL, Darstein C et al (2009) Carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with oral enzastaurin in advanced ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: results from a safety lead-in study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:1505–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oguri S, Sakakibara T, Mase H, Shimizu T, Ishikawa K, Kimura K et al (1988) Clinical pharmacokinetics of carboplatin. J Clin Pharmacol 28:208–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shea TC, Flaherty M, Elias A, Eder JP, Antman K, Begg C et al (1989) A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of carboplatin and autologous bone marrow support. J Clin Oncol 7:651–661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morinaga Y, Suga Y, Ehara S, Harada K, Nihei Y, Suzuki M (2003) Combination effect of AC-7700, a novel combretastatin A-4 derivative, and cisplatin against murine and human tumors in vivo. Cancer Sci 94:200–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rowinsky EK, Gilbert MR, McGuire WP, Noe DA, Grochow LB, Forastiere AA et al (1991) Sequences of taxol and cisplatin: a phase I and pharmacologic study. J Clin Oncol 9:1692–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinelli M, Bonezzi K, Riccardi E, Kuhn E, Frapolli R, Zucchetti M et al (2007) Sequence dependent antitumour efficacy of the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in combination with paclitaxel. Br J Cancer 97:888–894

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Florent Mazuir (Sanofi, France) for pharmacokinetics analyses, Essediq El-Yandouzi (Sanofi, France) for study management support, Jean-Christophe Quirot (Sanofi, France) for programming support, and Sarah MacKenzie (Medi-Axe, France, funded by Sanofi) for assistance writing the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Sanofi.

Disclosure

The institutes of CS, LG, and JCS received a study grant from Sanofi. CO, BD and MH are employees of Sanofi. All other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Charles Soria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahleda, R., Sessa, C., Del Conte, G. et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of ombrabulin (AVE8062) combined with cisplatin/docetaxel or carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 32, 1188–1196 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0119-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0119-0

Keywords

Navigation