Abstract
Background
Incidence and risk factors for the development of extremity deep vein thrombosis (eDVT) in admitted patients of acute pancreatitis have been rarely explored.
Aims
To identify the incidence of eDVT and to explore role of clinical scores for predicting eDVT in admitted patients of acute pancreatitis.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled admitted patients of acute pancreatitis and performed a weekly eDVT screen for the duration of their admission. Well’s score and Padua’s score were also calculated weekly. The incidence of venous thrombosis (eDVT and splanchnic thrombosis based on contrast-enhanced CT scan abdomen) was noted, and the risk factors were determined using multivariate analysis. The correlation between Well’s score, Padua’s score, and development of DVT was calculated using Pearson’s correlation.
Results
Of the 102 patients of acute pancreatitis enrolled, 73.5% of patients had necrotizing pancreatitis. Total of 46 patients (45.1%) developed thrombosis: 43 patients had splanchnic vein thrombosis; 5 patients had eDVT; and 1 patient had pulmonary embolism. Patients with eDVT had higher BISAP score (2.6 ± 0.9 vs 1.7 ± 0.8; p = 0.039), requirement of mechanical ventilation (60% vs 8.2%; p = 0.008), and mortality (60% vs 12.4%; p = 0.022). Well’s score of ≥ 2 had sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 96.9% for prediction of eDVT and it had better correlation with the development of eDVT compared to Pauda’s score.
Conclusion
Incidence of DVT is 5% in patients with acute pancreatitis requiring admission. It is associated with higher disease severity and mortality. The Well’s score is useful to predict the development of eDVT in routine clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2013;144:1252–1261.
Maatman TK, McGuire SP, Lewellen KA et al. Prospective analysis of the mechanisms underlying ineffective deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in necrotizing pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;232:91–100.
Roch AM, Maatman TK, Carr RA et al. Venous thromboembolism in necrotizing pancreatitis: an underappreciated risk. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:2430–2438.
Ahmad DS, Mansoor E, Alikhan MM et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a large database study. Pancreas. 2021;50:71–76.
Trikudanathan G, Umapathy C, Munigala S et al. Venous thromboembolism is associated with adverse outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute pancreatitis: a population-based cohort study. Pancreas. 2017;46:1165–1172.
Gatot D, Mardia AI. Differences of wells scores accuracy, caprini scores and padua scores in deep vein thrombosis diagnosis. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2018;125:012131.
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62:102–111.
Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L et al. A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;5:15.
Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A et al. 2019 WSES guidelines for the management of severe acute pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:27.
Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA. American gastroenterological association clinical practice update: management of pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:67-75.e1.
Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB et al. American gastroenterological association institute clinical guidelines committee: American gastroenterological association institute guideline on initial management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2018;154:1096–1101.
Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau J-M, Albert J et al. Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 2018;50:524–546.
Karande GY, Hedgire SS, Sanchez Y et al. Advanced imaging in acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2016;6:493–507.
Bradbury MS, Kavanagh PV, Bechtold RE et al. Mesenteric venous thrombosis: diagnosis and noninvasive imaging. RadioGraphics 2002;22:527–541.
Easler J, Muddana V, Furlan A et al. Portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis is associated with pancreatic necrosis and usually has a benign course. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:854–862.
Junare PR, Udgirkar S, Nair S et al. Splanchnic venous thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: does anticoagulation affect outcome? Gastroenterol Res 2020;13:25–31.
Ahmed SU, Rana SS, Ahluwalia J et al. Role of thrombophilia in splanchnic venous thrombosis in acute pancreatitis. Ann Gastroenterol 2018;31:371–378.
Heil J, Miesbach W, Vogl T, Bechstein WO, Reinisch A. Deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017;114:244–249.
Modi S, Deisler R, Gozel K et al. Wells criteria for DVT is a reliable clinical tool to assess the risk of deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients. World J Emerg Surg 2016;11:24.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Yashwant Raj Sakaray, Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh for providing support in data collection during the present study.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TS, JS: Concept of study, data acquisition, critically revising the manuscript. HB, AKS: Interpretation of data, critically revising the manuscript. VJ, HSM, VS: Data acquisition, critically revising the manuscript. RG, SR, UD: Data acquisition, Interpretation of data. Final approval of manuscript: All authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Susngi, T., Shah, J., Bhujade, H. et al. Deep Venous Thrombosis in Acute Pancreatitis Is Associated with High Mortality: A Prospective Study. Dig Dis Sci 68, 988–994 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07617-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07617-2