Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic Obesity Variants and Risk of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer. How genetically predicted BMI may be associated with colorectal cancer precursors is unknown.

Aims

Our objective was to quantify the association of genetically predicted and measured BMI with risk of colorectal cancer precursors.

Methods

We evaluated the association of genetically predicted and measured BMI with risk of conventional adenomas, serrated polyps, and synchronous polyps among 27,426 participants who had undergone at least one lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in the Nurses’ Health Study, Nurses’ Health Study II, and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Genetic risk score was derived from 97 BMI-related single nucleotide polymorphisms. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated each polyp subtype compared to non-polyps.

Results

For conventional adenomas, the OR per 2-kg/m2 increase was 1.03 (95% CI, 1.01–1.04) for measured BMI and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.88–1.10) for genetically predicted BMI; for serrated polyps, the OR was 1.06 (95% CI, 1.04–1.08) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90–1.20), respectively; for synchronous polyps, the OR was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.07–1.13) and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.89–1.34), respectively. Genetically predicted BMI was associated with synchronous polyps in women (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05–1.79).

Conclusion

Genetically predicted BMI was not associated with colorectal cancer precursor lesions. The confidence intervals were wide and encompassed those for measured BMI, indicating that null findings may be due to insufficient power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson CM, Wei C, Ensor JE et al. Meta-analyses of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors. Cancer Causes Control 2013;24:1207–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kobiela J, Wieszczy P, Reguła J et al. Association of obesity with colonic findings in screening colonoscopy in a large population-based study. United European Gastroenterology Journal 2018;6:1538–1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frezza EE, Wachtel MS, Chiriva-Internati M. Influence of obesity on the risk of developing colon cancer. Gut 2006;55:285–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. He X, Wu K, Ogino S et al. Association Between Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer and Risk of Serrated Polyps and Conventional Adenomas. Gastroenterology 2018;155:355-373.e18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmeister M, Blaker H, Kloor M et al. Body Mass Index and Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer: A Population-based Study. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2013;22:2303–2311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Song M, Zheng Y, Qi L et al. Longitudinal Analysis of Genetic Susceptibility and BMI Throughout Adult Life. Diabetes 2018;67:248–255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thrift AP, Gong J, Peters U et al. Mendelian Randomization Study of Body Mass Index and Colorectal Cancer Risk. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2015;24:1024–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Jacobs KB et al. A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer. Nat Genet 2007;39:870–874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 2015;518:197–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 2006;38:904–909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao C, Patel CJ, Michailidou K et al. Mendelian randomization study of adiposity-related traits and risk of breast, ovarian, prostate, lung and colorectal cancer. Int J Epidemiol 2016;45:896–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarvis D, Mitchell JS, Law PJ et al. Mendelian randomisation analysis strongly implicates adiposity with risk of developing colorectal cancer. British Journal of Cancer 2016;115:266–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben Q, An W, Jiang Y et al. Body Mass Index Increases Risk for Colorectal Adenomas Based on Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2012;142:762–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailie L, Loughrey MB, Coleman HG. Lifestyle Risk Factors for Serrated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2017;152:92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A et al. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis 2009;30:1073–1081.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmidt FM, Weschenfelder J, Sander C, et al. Inflammatory Cytokines in General and Central Obesity and Modulating Effects of Physical Activity. PLoS One; 10. Epub ahead of print 17 March 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121971.

  17. He X, Hang D, Wu K, et al. Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Removal of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps. Gastroenterology. Epub ahead of print July 2019. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.039.

  18. Garcia H, Song M. Early-life obesity and adulthood colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Rev Panam Salud Publica; 43. Epub ahead of print 4 January 2019. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2019.3.

  19. Zhang X, Wu K, Giovannucci EL, et al. Early Life Body Fatness and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in U.S. Women and Men--Results from Two Large Cohort Studies. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2015; 24: 690–697.

  20. Nock NL, Plummer SJ, Thompson CL et al. FTO polymorphisms are associated with adult body mass index (BMI) and colorectal adenomas in African-Americans. Carcinogenesis 2011;32:748–756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lenka G, Tsai M-H, Lin H-C, et al. Identification of Methylation-Driven, Differentially Expressed STXBP6 as a Novel Biomarker in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep; 7. Epub ahead of print 15 February 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42573.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.

Funding

This work was supported by the American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar. Grant (MRSG-17–220-01—NEC to M.S.); by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants. [UM1 CA186107; P01 CA87969 to M.J. Stampfer; U01 CA186107 to M.J. Stampfer; P01 CA55075 to W.C. Willett; U01 CA167552 to W.C. Willett; K24 DK098311, R01 CA137178, R01 CA202704, R01 CA176726, to A.T.C.; K99 CA215314 and R00 CA215314 to M.S.; R01 CA67262, R01 CA49449, U01 CA176726]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingyang Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All authors report no competing interests and/or relevant financial interests in this manuscript.

Ethics approval

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and those of participating registries as required.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bever, A.M., Hang, D., He, X. et al. Genetic Obesity Variants and Risk of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps. Dig Dis Sci 67, 4078–4085 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07193-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07193-x

Keywords

Navigation