Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Pretreatment Biliary Drainage for Pancreatic Head Ductal Adenocarcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the USA. Although management strategies have evolved, there are continued controversies about the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and pretreatment biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with resectable and potentially resectable disease.

Aims

We aimed to characterize the practice trends and outcomes for NAC and PBD.

Methods

A single-center cohort study was performed. Electronic medical records were reviewed between 2011 and 2019, and 140 patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC were included. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome data were captured.

Results

There were no statistically significant temporal trends relating to the use of chemotherapy and PBD. Overall, 41% of patients received NAC and had improved survival, independent of other factors. Of the 71% who received PBD, only 40% had appropriate indications; 30% experienced postprocedure complications, and 34% required reintervention. Factors associated with the application of PBD included preoperative jaundice (OR 70.5, 95% CI 21.4–306.6) and evaluation by non-tertiary therapeutic endoscopists (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.3–13.6). PBD was associated with a 12-day delay in surgery among those who did not receive NAC (p = 0.005), but there were no differences in surgical complications or mortality.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that (1) NAC may confer a survival benefit and (2) PBD should be reserved for individuals with jaundice requiring NAC. Implementation of guidelines by North American gastroenterology societies, multidisciplinary treatment models, and delivery of care at high-volume tertiary centers may help optimize management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Global Trends, Etiology and Risk Factors. World J Oncol. 2019;10:10–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:1576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;297:267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:1073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams RA et al. Fluorouracil vs gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299:1019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tempero MA, Reni M, Riess H, et al. APACT: phase III, multicenter, international, open-label, randomized trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) for surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37S: ASCO #4000.

  8. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M et al. FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Versteijne E, Suker M, Groothuis K et al. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1763–1773.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Motoi F, Kosuge T, Ueno H, Yamaue H, Satoi S, Sho M et al. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49:190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sohal D, Duong MT, Ahmad SA, et al: SWOG S1505: Results of perioperative chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. ASCO20 Virtual Scientific Program. Abstract 4504.

  12. Chawla A, Ferrone CR. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An Evolving Paradigm Shift. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J et al. Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2541–2556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:1028–1061.

  15. Shen Z, Zhang J, Zhao S, Zhou Y, Wang W, Shen B. Preoperative biliary drainage of severely obstructive jaundiced patients decreases overall postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis. Pancreatology. 2020;20:529–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Darnell EP, Wang TJ, Lumish MA, et al. Preoperative cholangitis is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 11]. Am J Surg. 2020;S0002–9610(20)30479–7.

  17. Pamecha V, Sadashiv Patil N, Kumar S et al. Upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy in severely jaundiced patients: is it safe? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019;26:524–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De Pastena M, Marchegiani G, Paiella S et al. Impact of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An analysis of 1500 consecutive cases. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:777–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee PJ, Podugu A, Wu D, Lee AC, Stevens T, Windsor JA. Preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20:477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. El Nakeeb A, Salem A, Mahdy Y et al. Value of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case-control study. Asian J Surg. 2018;41:155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cazauran JB, Perinel J, Kepenekian V et al. Unnecessary preoperative biliary drainage: impact on perioperative outcomes of resectable periampullary tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402:1187–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheufele F, Schorn S, Demir IE et al. Preoperative biliary stenting versus operation first in jaundiced patients due to malignant lesions in the pancreatic head: A meta-analysis of current literature. Surgery. 2017;161:939–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moole H, Bechtold M, Puli SR. Efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in malignant obstructive jaundice: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sahora K, Morales-Oyarvide V, Ferrone C et al. Preoperative biliary drainage does not increase major complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a large single center experience from the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Furukawa K, Shiba H, Shirai Y et al. Negative Impact of Preoperative Endoscopic Biliary Drainage on Prognosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:5079–5083.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Y, Ou G, Lian G, Luo H, Huang K, Huang Y. Effect of Preoperative Biliary Drainage on Complications Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Uemura K, Murakami Y, Satoi S et al. Impact of Preoperative Biliary Drainage on Long-Term Survival in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Observational Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:S1238–S1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu C, Lu JW, Du ZQ, Liu XM, Lv Y, Zhang XF. Association of Preoperative Biliary Drainage with Postoperative Morbidity after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:796893.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun C, Yan G, Li Z, Tzeng CM. A meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative biliary stenting on patients with obstructive jaundice. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93:e189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arkadopoulos N, Kyriazi MA, Papanikolaou IS, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage of severely jaundiced patients increases morbidity of pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a case-control study [published correction appears in World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39:554]. World J Surg. 2014;38:2967–2972.

  31. Kitahata Y, Kawai M, Tani M et al. Preoperative cholangitis during biliary drainage increases the incidence of postoperative severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2014;208:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. di Mola FF, Tavano F, Rago RR et al. Influence of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: single centre experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399:649–657.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang S, Wang X, Li L, Dai H, Han J. Association of preoperative obstructive jaundice with postoperative infectious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60:1274–1279.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ngu W, Jones M, Neal CP, Dennison AR, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G. Preoperative biliary drainage for distal biliary obstruction and post-operative infectious complications. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83:280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singhirunnusorn J, Roger L, Chopin-Laly X, Lepilliez V, Ponchon T, Adham M. Value of preoperative biliary drainage in a consecutive series of resectable periampullary lesions. From randomized studies to real medical practice. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398:295–302.

  36. Feng J, Huang ZQ, Chen YL et al. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;50:294–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mezhir JJ, Brennan MF, Baser RE et al. A matched case-control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:2163–2169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS, Blero D, Mangiavillano B, Schmidt A, Vanbiervliet G, Costamagna G, Devière J, García-Cano J, Gyökeres T, Hassan C, Prat F, Siersema PD, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017. Endoscopy. 2018;50:910–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bakens M, van Rijssen B, van Woerden V. Evaluation of Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy For Suspected Pancreatic or Periampullary Cancer. J Pancreas. 2018;19:24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lopez NE, Prendergast C, Lowy AM. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:10740–10751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Álvarez R, Carrato A, Adeva J et al. Management of hyperbilirubinaemia in pancreatic cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2018;94:26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Therneau T. A Package for Survival Analysis in S. R package version 2.38, 2015.

  44. Kassambara A, Kosinski M, Biecek P. survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using 'ggplot2'. R package version 0.4.8, 2020.

  45. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2016.

  46. Eshuis WJ, van der Gaag NA, Rauws EA et al. Therapeutic delay and survival after surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head with or without preoperative biliary drainage. Ann Surg. 2010;252:840–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Song TJ, Lee JH, Lee SS et al. Metal versus plastic stents for drainage of malignant biliary obstruction before primary surgical resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:814–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tol JA, van Hooft JE, Timmer R et al. Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2016;65:1981–1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bateni SB, Gingrich AA, Hoch JS, Canter RJ, Bold RJ. Defining Value for Pancreatic Surgery in Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:e193019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shannon AB, Mo J, Song Y, et al. Does multicenter care impact the outcomes of surgical patients with gastrointestinal malignancies requiring complex multimodality therapy? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 20]. J Surg Oncol. 2020;https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26075.

Download references

Funding

NIH T32 2T32DK007356-41.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saad Saffo.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saffo, S., Peng, C., Salem, R. et al. Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Pretreatment Biliary Drainage for Pancreatic Head Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 67, 1409–1416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06967-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06967-7

Keywords

Navigation