Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Isolation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 22 August 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Clostridium difficile is the most commonly isolated stool pathogen in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Traditional risk factors for C. difficile may not exist in patients with IBD, and no prior studies have assessed the risk factors for the isolation of C. difficile in both symptomatic and asymptomatic IBD outpatients.

Methods

We prospectively recruited consecutive IBD patients presenting to our outpatient clinic between April 2015 and February 2016. We excluded patients with a diverting ostomy or ileoanal pouch. Demographics, healthcare exposures, medical therapies and disease activity were recorded from medical charts or surveys. A rectal swab was performed from which toxigenic culture and PCR analysis for the presence of toxin and fluorescent PCR ribotyping were performed. The primary outcome of interest was isolation of toxigenic C. difficile.

Results

A total of 190 patients were enrolled in this prospective study including 137 (72%) with Crohn’s disease and 53 (28%) with ulcerative colitis. At the time of enrollment, 69 (36%) had clinically active disease. Sixteen (8.4%) patients had toxigenic C. difficile isolated on rectal swab at enrollment and four (2.1%) patients had non-toxigenic C. difficile cultured. Mixed infection with more than one toxigenic isolate was present in 5/16 (33.3%) individuals. Patients with CD with a toxin positive isolate were more likely to have a history of CDI in the past 12 months (40 vs. 11.02%, p = 0.027) and an emergency department visit in the past 12 weeks (50 vs. 20.63%, p = 0.048). In UC, individuals with isolation of C. difficile were more likely to be hospitalized within the past 12 months (66.6 vs. 8.51%, p = 0.003). C. difficile isolation at the time of presentation was not associated with a subsequent disease relapse over a 6-month period in CD (p = 0.557) or UC (p = 0.131).

Conclusion

Healthcare exposures remain a significant risk factor for C. difficile isolation in the IBD population; however, this was not associated with relapse of disease. Further studies assessing the clinical significance of C. difficile isolation is warranted in IBD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 22 August 2018

    The original version of the article unfortunately contained an error in a percentage value in Results section of Abstract.

Abbreviations

CD:

Crohn’s disease

UC:

Ulcerative colitis

IBD:

Inflammatory bowel disease

References

  1. Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Saeian K, Binion DG. Temporal trends in disease outcomes related to Clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:976–983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett JG. Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1981;80:863–865.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenfield C, Aguilar Ramirez JR, Pounder RE, et al. Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1983;24:713–717.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gryboski JD. Clostridium difficile in inflammatory bowel disease relapse. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1991;13:39–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer AM, Ramzan NN, Loftus EV Jr., Heigh RI, Leighton JA. The diagnostic yield of stool pathogen studies during relapses of inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38:772–775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyers S, Mayer L, Bottone E, Desmond E, Janowitz HD. Occurrence of Clostridium difficile toxin during the course of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1981;80:697–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mylonaki M, Langmead L, Pantes A, Johnson F, Rampton DS. Enteric infection in relapse of inflammatory bowel disease: importance of microbiological examination of stool. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:775–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rolny P, Jarnerot G, Mollby R. Occurrence of Clostridium difficile toxin in inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1983;18:61–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trnka YM, LaMont JT. Association of Clostridium difficile toxin with symptomatic relapse of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1981;80:693–696.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer MP, Notermans DW, van Benthem BH, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey. Lancet (London, England). 2011;377:63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Issa M, Vijayapal A, Graham MB, et al. Impact of Clostridium difficile on inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:345–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodemann JF, Dubberke ER, Reske KA, da Seo H, Stone CD. Incidence of Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:339–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen GC, Kaplan GG, Harris ML, Brant SR. A national survey of the prevalence and impact of Clostridium difficile infection among hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1443–1450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Binion DG. Excess hospitalisation burden associated with Clostridium difficile in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 2008;57:205–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey RF, Bradshaw JM. A simple index of Crohn’s-disease activity. Lancet. 1980;315:514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walmsley RS, Ayres RCS, Pounder RE, Allan RN. A simple clinical colitis activity index. Gut. 1998;43:29–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sorg JA, Dineen SS. Laboratory maintenance of Clostridium difficile. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2009;Chapter 9:Unit9A-1.

  18. Walk ST, Micic D, Jain R, et al. Clostridium difficile ribotype does not predict severe infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:1661–1668.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Alasmari F, Seiler SM, Hink T, Burnham CA, Dubberke ER. Prevalence and risk factors for asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriage. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:216–222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller MA, Louie T, Mullane K, et al. Derivation and validation of a simple clinical bedside score (ATLAS) for Clostridium difficile infection which predicts response to therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shivashankar R, Khanna S, Kammer PP, et al. Clinical factors associated with development of severe-complicated Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1466–1471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rao K, Micic D, Chenoweth E, et al. Poor functional status as a risk factor for severe Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:1738–1742.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Axelrad JE, Joelson A, Nobel YR, et al. Enteric infection in relapse of inflammatory bowel disease: the utility of stool microbial PCR testing. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23:1034–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Das R, Feuerstadt P, Brandt LJ. Glucocorticoids are associated with increased risk of short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2040–2049.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bossuyt P, Verhaegen J, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S. Increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2009;3:4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clayton EM, Rea MC, Shanahan F, et al. The vexed relationship between Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: an assessment of carriage in an outpatient setting among patients in remission. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1162–1169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dorman SA, Liggoria E, Winn WC Jr., Beeken WL. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from patients with inactive Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1982;82:1348–1351.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh H, Nugent Z, Yu BN, Lix LM, Targownik LE, Bernstein CN. Higher incidence of Clostridium difficile infection among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:430–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Behroozian AA, Chludzinski JP, Lo ES, et al. Detection of mixed populations of Clostridium difficile from symptomatic patients using capillary-based polymerase chain reaction ribotyping. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34:961–966.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Crowther GS, Chilton CH, Todhunter SL, Nicholson S, Freeman J, Wilcox MH. Recurrence of dual-strain Clostridium difficile infection in an in vitro human gut model. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:2316–2321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gracie DJ, Williams CJ, Sood R, et al. Poor correlation between clinical disease activity and mucosal inflammation, and the role of psychological comorbidity, in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:541–551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rao K, Higgins PD. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1744–1754.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Shakir FA, Thompson D, Marlar R, Ali T. A novel use of rectal swab to test for Clostridium difficile infection by real-time PCR. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hughes M, Qazi T, Berg A, et al. Host immune response to Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:853–861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health [Grant Nos. T32DK007074, K08DK090152 (JP), P30DK42086]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David T. Rubin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No expressed conflicts of interest with respect to the submitted work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 103 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Micic, D., Yarur, A., Gonsalves, A. et al. Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Isolation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Study. Dig Dis Sci 63, 1016–1024 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-4941-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-4941-7

Keywords

Navigation