Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Doppler Ultrasound and Transient Elastography in Liver Transplant Patients for Noninvasive Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Comparison with Histology: A Prospective Observational Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aim

Accurate quantification of progressive liver disease is essential for therapeutic decisions and follow-up for patients who underwent liver transplantation. To evaluate the quality of noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in these patients, we compared Doppler ultrasound of the hepatic blood vessels as well as transient elastography (TE, FibroScan®) with liver biopsy following transplantation.

Methods

We performed Doppler ultrasound of the hepatic veins, hepatic artery, and portal vein as well as a TE in 48 patients who underwent liver transplantation 12 months ago. Hepatic venous flow was evaluated by determination of the resistance index (HVRI) of the right hepatic vein. Doppler and TE results were compared with histopathologic workup of a 12-month protocol liver biopsy after transplantation.

Results

HVRI showed a high reliability in predicting liver fibrosis stage FII or higher (AUROC of 0.99 ± 0.001 for FII or higher, the HVRI < 1.05 with a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 91.43 %) compared to histopathologic workup (Desmet’s score) and was comparable to TE analysis. Both HVRI and TE differed significantly in no or minimal fibrosis versus FII or higher (p < 0.001). In contrast, portal vein and hepatic artery did not show significant changes in blood flow in our study population.

Conclusions

Hepatic vein flow resistance index is a valuable tool in noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in liver transplantation follow-up predicting FII or higher and might help reducing the number of protocol biopsies needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Germani G, Hytiroglou P, Fotiadu A, Burroughs AK, Dhillon AP. Assessment of fibrosis and cirrhosis in liver biopsies: an update. Semin Liver Dis. 2011;31:82–90. Epub 02/24/2011.

  2. Banff Working G, Demetris AJ, Adeyi O, et al. Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction. Hepatology. 2006;44:489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Firpi RJ, Abdelmalek MF, Soldevila-Pico C, et al. One-year protocol liver biopsy can stratify fibrosis progression in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C infection. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:1240–1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka T, Therapondos G, Selzner N, Renner EL, Lilly LB. Serum aspartate aminotransferase levels and previous histopathological findings enable reduction of protocol liver biopsies after liver transplantation for hepatitis C. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27:131–136.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lang M, Neumann UP, Muller AR, Bechstein WO, Neuhaus R, Neuhaus P. Komplikationen der perkutanen Leberbiopsie bei Patienten nach Lebertransplantation (Complications of percutaneous liver biopsy in patients after liver transplantation). Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie. 1999;37:205–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, Le Bail B, Chanteloup E, Haaser M, et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:343–350. Epub 02/03/2005.

  7. Verveer C, Zondervan PE, Ten Kate FJ, Hansen BE, Janssen HL, de Knegt RJ. Evaluation of transient elastography for fibrosis assessment compared with large biopsies in chronic hepatitis B and C. Liver Int. 2012;32:622–628. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02663.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Myers RP, Pomier-Layrargues G, Kirsch R, Pollett A, Beaton M, Levstik M, et al. Discordance in fibrosis staging between liver biopsy and transient elastography using the fibroscan XL probe. J Hepatol. 2012;56:564–570. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaia S, Carenzi S, Barilli AL, Bugianesi E, Smedile A, Brunello F, et al. Reliability of transient elastography for the detection of fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic viral hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2011;54:64–71. Epub 10/12/2010.

  10. Harata M, Hashimoto S, Kawabe N, Nitta Y, Murao M, Nakano T, et al. Liver stiffness in extrahepatic cholestasis correlates positively with bilirubin and negatively with alanine aminotransferase. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:423–429. Epub 03/26/2011.

  11. Millonig G, Reimann FM, Friedrich S, Fonouni H, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW, et al. Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosis. Hepatology. 2008;48:1718–1723. Epub 10/07/2008.

  12. Crespo G, Lens S, Gambato M, et al. Liver stiffness 1 year after transplantation predicts clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent hepatitis C. Am J Transpl. 2014;14:375–383.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrault C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Tran Van Nhieu J, et al. Non-invasive assessment of liver graft fibrosis by transient elastography after liver transplantation. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37:347–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coulden RA, Lomas DJ, Farman P, Britton PD. Doppler ultrasound of the hepatic veins: normal appearances. Clin Radiol. 1992;45:223–227. Epub 04/01/1992.

  15. Lutz HH, Gassler N, Tischendorf FW, Trautwein C, Tischendorf JJ. Doppler ultrasound of hepatic blood flow for noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis compared with liver biopsy and transient elastography. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:2222–2230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. von Herbay A, Frieling T, Haussinger D. Association between duplex Doppler sonographic flow pattern in right hepatic vein and various liver diseases. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29:25–30. Epub 02/17/2001.

  17. Bolondi L, Li Bassi S, Gaiani S, Zironi G, Benzi G, Santi V, et al. Liver cirrhosis: changes of Doppler waveform of hepatic veins. Radiology. 1991;178:513–516. Epub 02/01/1991.

  18. Ohta M, Hashizume M, Kawanaka H, Akazawa K, Tomikawa M, Higashi H, et al. Prognostic significance of hepatic vein waveform by Doppler ultrasonography in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1853–1857. Epub 10/01/1995.

  19. Kim MY, Baik SK, Park DH, Lim DW, Kim JW, Kim HS, et al. Damping index of Doppler hepatic vein waveform to assess the severity of portal hypertension and response to propranolol in liver cirrhosis: a prospective nonrandomized study. Liver Int Off J Int Assoc Study Liver. 2007;27:1103–1110. Epub 09/12/2007.

  20. Sebastiani G, Halfon P, Castera L, Mangia A, Di Marco V, Pirisi M, et al. Comparison of three algorithms of non-invasive markers of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:92–104. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04897.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abu-Yousef MM. Duplex Doppler sonography of the hepatic vein in tricuspid regurgitation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156:79–83. Epub 01/01/1991.

  22. Scheinfeld MH, Bilali A, Koenigsberg M. Understanding the spectral Doppler waveform of the hepatic veins in health and disease. Radiographics. 2009;29:2081–2098. Epub 11/21/2009.

  23. Menghini G, Lauro G, Caraceni M. Some innovations in the technic of the one-second needle biopsy of the liver. Am J Gastroenterol. 1975;64:175–180. Epub 09/01/1975.

  24. Desmet VJ, Gerber M, Hoofnagle JH, Manns M, Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging. Hepatology. 1994;19:1513–1520. Epub 06/01/1994.

  25. Pedersen JF, Madsen LG, Larsen VA, Hamberg O, Horn T, Federspiel B, et al. A Doppler waveform index to characterize hepatic vein velocity pattern and evaluate hepatic fibrosis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36:208–211. Epub 03/13/2008.

  26. EASL. Clinical practice guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2011;55:245–264. Epub 03/05/2011.

  27. Beuers U, Kullak-Ublick GA, Pusl T, Rauws ER, Rust C. Medical treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a role for novel bile acids and other (post-) transcriptional modulators? Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009;36:52–61. Epub 08/30/2008.

  28. Canbay A, Feldstein A, Kronenberger B, Schulze-Osthoff K, Bantel H. Zytokeratin-18 als Marker zur nichtinvasiven Diagnostik und Prognose akuter und chronischer Lebererkrankungen (Cytokeratin 18 as marker for non-invasive diagnosis and prognosis of acute and chronic liver diseases). Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie. 2014;52:290–295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Waidmann O, Koberle V, Brunner F, Zeuzem S, Piiper A, Kronenberger B. Serum microRNA-122 predicts survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. PloS One. 2012;7:e45652.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Joka D, Wahl K, Moeller S, Schlue J, Vaske B, Bahr MJ, et al. Prospective biopsy-controlled evaluation of cell death biomarkers for prediction of liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2012;55:455–464. doi:10.1002/hep.24734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boursier J, de Ledinghen V, Zarski JP, Fouchard-Hubert I, Gallois Y, Oberti F, et al. Comparison of 8 diagnostic algorithms for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C: new algorithms are more precise and entirely non-invasive. Hepatology. 2011;55:58–67. doi:10.1002/hep.24654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bintintan A, Chira RI, Mircea PA. Non-invasive ultrasound-based diagnosis and staging of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis a systematic review of the literature published in the third millennium. Med Ultrason. 2013;15:116–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Department III (Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Metabolic Diseases), University Hospital Aachen (RWTH), Pauwelstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    H. H. Lutz, B. Schroeter, D. C. Kroy, C. Trautwein & J. J. W. Tischendorf

  2. Clinic for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen (RWTH), Aachen, Germany

    U. Neumann

Authors
  1. H. H. Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Schroeter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. C. Kroy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. U. Neumann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Trautwein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. J. W. Tischendorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. W. Tischendorf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lutz, H.H., Schroeter, B., Kroy, D.C. et al. Doppler Ultrasound and Transient Elastography in Liver Transplant Patients for Noninvasive Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Comparison with Histology: A Prospective Observational Study. Dig Dis Sci 60, 2825–2831 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3682-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3682-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation