Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Withdrawal of Long-Term Maintenance Treatment with Azathioprine Tends to Increase Relapse Risk in Patients with Crohn’s Disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aim

Many patients with quiescent Crohn’s disease are maintained on long-term treatment with azathioprine (AZA), but controlled data are limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AZA therapy for more than 4 years to maintain clinical remission.

Methods

We performed a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled AZA withdrawal trial with a follow-up period of 24 months. Patients had to have continuous AZA therapy ≥4 years without exacerbation of disease during the 12 months before enrollment, and a Crohn’s disease activity index <150 at baseline. Patients were randomized to continue on AZA or switch to placebo. The primary endpoint was time to clinical relapse during follow-up.

Results

After inclusion of 52 patients, the trial was stopped prematurely due to slow recruitment. During the 2-year follow-up, clinical relapse occurred in 4 of 26 (15 %) patients on continued AZA and in 8 of 26 (31 %) patients on placebo. Time to clinical relapse averaged 22.3 months (95 % CI 20.6–24.0) on AZA and 19.2 months (95 % CI 16.4–22.1) on placebo (p = 0.20). According to life-table analysis, the proportion of patients in remission after 12 and 24 months was 96 ± 4 and 86 ± 7 % in patients receiving AZA versus 76 ± 8 and 68 ± 9 % in patients receiving placebo (month 12, p = 0.035; month 24, p = 0.30). A higher AZA dose at enrollment was an independent predictor for relapse (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

AZA withdrawal resulted in a significantly increased relapse risk after 1 year and a nonstatistically significant trend for relapse after 2 years. Our results are in line with previous observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, Cortot A. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1785–1794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Petritsch W, Fuchs S, Berghold A, et al. Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease in the province of Styria, Austria, from 1997 to 2007: a population-based study. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7:58–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012;491:119–124.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardizzone S, Cassinotti A, Manes G, Porro GB. Immunomodulators for all patients with inflammatory bowel disease? Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2010;3:31–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Candy S, Wright J, Gerber M, Adams G, Gerig M, Goodman R. A controlled double blind study of azathioprine in the management of Crohn’s disease. Gut. 1995;37:674–678.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearson DC, May GR, Fick GH, Sutherland LR. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in Crohn Disease. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:132–142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Prefontaine E, Sutherland LR, Macdonald JK, Cepoiu M. Azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine for maintenance of remission in Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000067. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000067.pub2.

  8. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Deltrenre P, Ardizzone S, et al. Azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine for the prevention of postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2089–2096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dignass A, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO, et al. The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: current management. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2010;4:28–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Present DH, Korelitz BI, Wisch N, Glass JL, Sachar DB, Pasternack BS. Treatment of Crohn’s disease with 6-mercaptopurine. A long-term, randomized, double-blind study. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:981–987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Korelitz BI, Adler DJ, Mendelsohn RA, Sacknoff A. Long-term experience with 6-mercaptopurine in the treatment of Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1198–1205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Reinisch W, et al. The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: special situations. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2010;4:63–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Donoghue DP, Dawson AM, Powel-Tuck K, Brown RL, Lennard-Jones JE. Double-blind withdrawal trial of azathioprine as maintenance treatment for Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 1978;2:955–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouhnik Y, Lémann M, Mary JY, et al. Long-term follow up of patients with Crohn’s disease treated with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine. Lancet. 1996;347:215–219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim PS, Zlatanic J, Korelitz BI, Gleim GW. Optimum duration of treatment with 6-mercaptopurine for Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3254–3257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vilien M, Dahlerup JF, Munck LK, Nørregaard P, Grønbaek K, Fallingborg J. Randomized controlled azathioprine withdrawal after more than two years treatment in Crohn’s disease: increased relapse rate the following year. Aliment Pharmacol Therap. 2004;19:1147–1152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sokol H, Seksik P, Nion-Larmurier I, Vienne A, Beaugerie L, Cosnes J. Current smoking, not duration of remission, delays Crohn’s disease relapse following azathioprine withdrawal. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16:362–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lémann M, Mary J-Y, Colombel J-F, et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled withdrawal trial in Crohn’s disease patients in long-term remission on azathioprine. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1812–1818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Treton X, Bouhnik Y, Mary JY, et al. Azathioprine withdrawal in patients with Crohn’s disease maintained on prolonged remission: a high risk of relapse. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:80–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fraser AG, Orchard TR, Jewell DP. The efficacy of azathioprine for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a 30 years review. Gut. 2002;50:485–489.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mantzaris GJ, Roussos A, Christidou A, et al. The long-term efficacy of azathioprine does not wane after four years of continuous treatment in patients with steroid-dependent luminal Crohn’s disease. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2007;1:28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. French H. Mark Dalzell A, Srinivasan R, El-Matary W. Relapse rate following azathioprine withdrawal in maintaining remission for Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:1929–1936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beaugerie L, Brousse N, Bouvier AM, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders in patients receiving thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet. 2009;374:1617–1625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sokol H, Beaugerie L, Maynadié M, et al. Excess primary intestinal lymphoproliferative disorders in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:2063–2071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peyrin-Biroulet L, Khosrotehrani K, Carrat F, et al. Increased risk for nonmelanoma skin cancers in patients who receive thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1621–1628.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Long MD, Martin CF, Pipkin CA, Herfarth HH, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD. Risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:390–399.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Connell WR, Kamm MA, Ritchie JK, Lennard-Jones JE. Bone marrow toxicity caused by azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease: 27 years of experience. Gut. 1993;34:1081–1085.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Toruner M, Loftus EV Jr, Harmsen WS, et al. Risk factors for opportunistic infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:929–936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Present DH, Meltzer SJ, Krumholz MP, Wolke A, Korelitz BI. 6-mercaptopurine in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: short- and long-term toxicity. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:641–649.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Higgins PD. Who wants to take a thiopurine holiday? Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:556–558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis JD, Schwartz JS, Lichtenstein GR. Azathioprine for maintenance of remission in Crohn’s disease: benefits outweigh the risk of lymphoma. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:1018–1024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Camus M, Seksik P, Bourrier A, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with Crohn’s disease who respond to azathioprine. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:389–394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Holtmann M, Krummenaeur F, Claas C, et al. Long-term effectiveness of azathioprine in IBD beyond 4 years: a European multicenter study in 1176 patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1516–1524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Best WR, Becktel JM, Singelton JW. Rederived values of the eight coefficients of the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Gastroenterology. 1979;77:843–846.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Irvine EJ. Usual therapy improves perianal Crohn’s disease as measured by a new disease activity index. McMaster IBD Study Group. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;20:27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guyatt G, Mitchell A, Irvine EJ, et al. A new measure of health status for clinical trials in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 1989;96:804–810.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al. Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:402–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. Br J Cancer. 1976;34:585–612.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nyman M, Hansson I, Eriksson S. Long-term immunosuppressive treatment in Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1985;20:1197–1203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Summers RW, Switz DM, Sessions JT, et al. National Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study: results of drug treatment. Gastroenterology. 1979;77:847–869.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dubinsky MC, Lamothe S, Yang HY, et al. Pharmacogenomics and metabolite measurement for 6-mercaptopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:705–713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chouchana L, Narjoz C, Beaune P, Loriot MA, Roblin X. Review article: the benefits of pharmacogenetics for improving thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:15–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dassopoulos T, Dubinsky MC, Bentsen JL, et al. Randomised clinical trial: individualised vs. weight-based dosing of azathioprine in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:163–175.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Reinisch W, Angelberger S, Petritsch W, et al. International AZT-2 Study Group. Azathioprine versus mesalazine for prevention of postoperative clinical recurrence in patients with Crohn’s disease with endoscopic recurrence: efficacy and safety results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre trial. Gut. 2010;59:752–759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith MA, Irving PM, Marinaki AM, Sanderson JD. Review article: malignancy on thiopurine treatment with special reference to inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:119–130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to GlaxoSmithKline, Vienna, Austria, for providing the study medication, case report forms, and patient diaries. Representatives of GlaxoSmithKline did not have any role in study design, protocol development, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to submit the manuscript. We thank Marieluise Harrer and Georgiana Prinz for their help in patient recruitment and data acquisition. There was no funding or other financial support for this work.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heimo H. Wenzl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wenzl, H.H., Primas, C., Novacek, G. et al. Withdrawal of Long-Term Maintenance Treatment with Azathioprine Tends to Increase Relapse Risk in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Dig Dis Sci 60, 1414–1423 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3419-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3419-5

Keywords

Navigation