Skip to main content
Log in

A Rapid and Accurate Method to Detect Active Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Video Capsule Endoscopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is indicated to evaluate for suspected small bowel bleeding, but “standard view” (SV) evaluation is time-consuming. Rapid Reader 6.0 software (Given Imaging, Duluth GA) contains two computer algorithmic systems: (1) “Quickview” (QV) which automatically skips similar images and (2) a pixel analysis program that identifies suspected blood (SBI). Combining the two modalities (QV + SBI) may provide a faster modality to assess for active small bowel bleeding.

Aims

This study was designed to assess the accuracy of QV + SBI for small bowel bleeding compared to SV findings.

Methods

This is a retrospective, case–control study at a single tertiary care referral hospital including all patients with VCE performed for suspected small bowel bleeding from 4/2007 to 3/2011. All studies were previously read using SV by one of two experienced faculty (CS, DR). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of QV + SBI in assessing for active small bowel bleeding compared to SV.

Results

A total of 116 VCE were included, 28 with active small bowel bleeding identified by original SV. Using QV + SBI, all 28 VCEs with active small bowel bleeding were identified. The sensitivity of QV + SBI to detect active bleeding was 100 %, while the specificity was 93–94 %. The mean time to identify landmarks and read the entire study was 3 min 20 s.

Conclusions

The QV + SBI reading format of VCE is an efficient, highly sensitive modality to assess for potential small bowel bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Appleyard M, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless-capsule diagnostic endoscopy for recurrent small-bowel bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:232–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scapa E, Jacob H, Lewkowicz S, et al. Initial experience of wireless-capsule endoscopy for evaluating occult gastrointestinal bleeding and suspected small bowel pathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2776–2779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delvaux M, Gerard G. Capsule endoscopy in 2005: facts and perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20:23–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shiotani A, Honda K, Kawakami M, et al. Evaluation of RAPID((R)) 5 access software for examination of capsule endoscopies and reading of the capsule by an endoscopy nurse. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:138–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Westerhof J, Koornstra JJ, Weersma RK. Can we reduce capsule endoscopy reading times? Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:497–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saurin JC, Lapalus MG, Cholet F, et al. Can we shorten the small-bowel capsule reading time with the “Quick-view” image detection system? Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44:477–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kyriakos N, Karagiannis S, Galanis P, et al. Evaluation of four time-saving methods of reading capsule endoscopy videos. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:1276–1280.

  8. Koulaouzidis A, Smirnidis A, Douglas S, et al. QuickView in small-bowel capsule endoscopy is useful in certain clinical settings, but QuickView with Blue Mode is of no additional benefit. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:1099–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiotani A, Honda K, Kawakami M, et al. Analysis of small-bowel capsule endoscopy reading by using Quickview mode: training assistants for reading may produce a high diagnostic yield and save time for physicians. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:e92–e95.

  10. D’Halluin PN, Delvaux M, Lapalus MG, et al. Does the “Suspected Blood Indicator” improve the detection of bleeding lesions by capsule endoscopy? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:243–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hosoe N, Rey JF, Imaeda H, et al. Evaluations of capsule endoscopy software in reducing the reading time and the rate of false negatives by inexperienced endoscopists. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;36:66–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Carol E. Semrad—has received consulting fees from Given Imaging. David T. Rubin—has received consulting fees from Given Imaging. For the remaining authors none were declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David T. Rubin.

Additional information

Adam C. Stein and Anoop Appannagari are the co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stein, A.C., Appannagari, A., Habib, I. et al. A Rapid and Accurate Method to Detect Active Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Video Capsule Endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 59, 2503–2507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3327-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3327-8

Keywords

Navigation