Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of Risk Factors for Postoperative Complication of Repair of Bile Duct Injury After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bile duct injury (BDI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC-BDI) is still a major problem. However, despite the many improvements in clinical management of patients undergoing repair, postoperative complications remain frequent and factors that increase the susceptibility to such adverse events remain unknown.

Aim

To report on a large experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy-associated bile duct injuries (LC-BDIs) and define predictive factors associated with postoperative complication.

Methods

A retrospective medical record review of 94 patients referred for the surgical management of major BDIs to our center during a 12-year period between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2010, was performed. Univariate statistical analysis and multivariate analysis were used to identify risk factors for postoperative complications. A nomogram was developed to predict postoperative complication, given associated risk factors, and bootstrap validation was performed.

Results

In univariate analysis, there is no factor significantly associated with short-term complication. There was a statistically significant relationship between type of repair and the risk of biliary strictures (p = 0.012). Other factors significantly associated with late biliary strictures were sepsis (p = 0.007) and bile leak (p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, bile leak (p = 0.005), sepsis (p = 0.03), and type of repair (p = 0.028) were independently and significantly associated with long-term complication. The resulting nomogram demonstrated good accuracy in predicting long-term complication, with a bootstrap-corrected concordance index 0.7905.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that missed injuries that result in sepsis or bile leak as well as high injuries that require hepaticojejunostomy will result in a higher stricture rate after repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mirza DF, Narsimhan KL, Ferras Neto BH, Mayer AD, McMaster P, Buckels JA. Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: referral pattern and management. Br J Surg. 1997;84:786–790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L. Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2003;290:2168–2173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, et al. Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis. Ann Surg. 2001;234:750–757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sicklick JK, Camp MS, Lillemoe KD, et al. Surgical management of bile duct injuries sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: perioperative results in 200 patients. Ann Surg. 2005;241:786–792.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll BJ, Birth M, Phillips EH. Common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that result in litigation. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:310–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olsen D. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:133–138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goykhman Y, Kory I, Small R, et al. Long-term outcome and risk factors of failure after bile duct injury repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1412–1417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy [see comment]. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:101–125.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, et al. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247:2543–2546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Melton GB, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, et al. Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life. Ann Surg. 2002;235:888–895.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, et al. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg. 2000;232:430–441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergman JJ, van den Brink GR, Rauws EA, et al. Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gut. 1996;38:141–147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang Q, Shao F, Qiu LJ, Wang C. Early vs. delayed repair of isolated segmental, sectoral and right hepatic bile duct injuries. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:725–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Ghnaniem R, Benjamin IS. Long-term outcome of hepaticojejunostomy with routine access loop formation following iatrogenic bile duct injury. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1118–1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murr MM, Gigot JF, Nagorney DM, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM, Farnell MB. Long-term results of biliary reconstruction after laparoscopic bile duct injuries. Arch Surg. 1999;134:604–609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt SC, Langrehr JM, Hintze RE, Neuhaus P. Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy [retraction in Br J Surg. 2006;93(12):1562]. Br J Surg. 2005;92:76–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarno G, Al-Sarira AA, Ghaneh P, Fenwick SW, Malik HZ, Poston GJ. Cholecystectomy-related bile duct and vasculobiliary injuries. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1129–1136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sahajpal AK, Chow SC, Dixon E, Greig PD, Gallinger S, Wei AC. Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing of repair and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg. 2010;145:757–763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanyuan Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Q., Yao, H.H., Shao, F. et al. Analysis of Risk Factors for Postoperative Complication of Repair of Bile Duct Injury After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 59, 3085–3091 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3255-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3255-7

Keywords

Navigation