Abstract
This practice note uses over 20 years of experience as domestic violence advocates to argue that the domestic violence field is not adequately distinguishing escalated conflict from abuse. In spite of a long-standing domestic violence paradigm based on an analysis of power and control, there is an overemphasis on violent behaviors and an underemphasis on power and control dynamics, absent physical violence. The authors contend that abuse and escalated conflict are different, but often conflated. Furthering differential assessments would allow better responses to both the needs of abuse survivors, as well as those whose relationships are in escalated conflict. This practice note overviews the limitations, proposes a shift in thinking that highlights three possible power dynamics within relationships (power-sharing, power-struggling, or power-over), and offers implications for practice and research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.
Asheran, K. L. (n.d.). Some thoughts on the myth of mutual abuse. Retrieved May 22, 2017 from http://www.vawnet.org/Assoc_Files_VAWnet/ThoughtsonMutualAbuse.pdf.
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.
Boston Women’s Health Book Collective. (2011). Our bodies, ourselves. New York: Simon & Schuster.
DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scales. VAWnet Applied Research Forum.
Dutton, M. A., Goodman, L., & Schmidt, R. J. (2006). Development and validation of a coercive control measure for intimate partner violence: Final technical report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Fiebert, M. S. (2010). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality & Culture, 14(1), 49–91.
Glass, N., Laughon, K., Campbell, J., Wolf Chair, A. D., Block, C. R., Hanson, G., Sharps, P. W., & Taliaferro, E. (2009). Non-fatal strangulation is an important risk factor for homicide of women. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 35(3), 329–335.
Graham-Kevan, N. (2007). Domestic violence: Research and implications for batterer prgrammes in Europe. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13, 213–225.
Hartney, C., & Vuong, L. (2009). Created equal: Racial and ethnic disparities in the US criminal justice system. New York: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
Johnson, M. (2005). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 283–294.
Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance and situational couple violence. Lebanon, NH: Northeastern University Press.
Jordan, J. V. (1985). The meaning of mutuality. Paper presented at a Stone Center Colloquium on December 4.
Lehrner, A., & Allen, N. E. (2009). Still a movement after all these years? Current tensions in the domestic violence movement. Violence Against Women, 15(6), 656–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209332185.
Loseke, D. R., & Kurz, D. (2005). Men’s violence toward women is the serious social problem. In D. R. Loseke, R. J. Gelles & M. M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (79–95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Markowitz, L., & Tice, K. W. (2002). Paradoxes of professionalization: Parallel dilemmas in women’s organizations in the Americas. Gender & Society, 16(6), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124302237896.
Mennicke, A., & Kulkarni, S. (2016). Understanding gender symmetry within an expanded partner violence typology. Special Issue of Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9867-2.
Messing, J. T., Campbell, J., Sullivan Wilson, J., Brown, S., Patchell, B., & Shall, C. (2014). Police departments’ use of the lethality assessment program: A quasi-experimental evaluation. U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, D.C.
National Network to End Domestic Violence. (2012). Am I being abused? A checklist. Retrieved May 22, 2017 from http://www.womenslaw.org/simple.php?sitemap_id=38.
New York State LGBTQ Intimate Partner Violence Network. (2017). Power and control in relationships: An assessment tool. New York: The Network.
Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1992). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.
Powers, R. A., & Simpson, S. S. (2012). Self-protective behaviors and injury in domestic violence situations: Does it hurt to fight back? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(17), 3345–3365.
Richie, B. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. New York: Routledge.
Richie, B. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence and America’s prison nation. New York: NYU Press.
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Northwest Network of Bisexual, Trans, and Lesbian Survivors of Abuse. (2005). Assessment tool. Seattle, WA: NW Network.
Tierney, K. (1982). The battered women movement and the creation of the wife beating problem. Social Problems, 29(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/800155.
United States Department of Justice. (2015). What is domestic violence? Retrieved May 22, 2017 from https://www.justice.gov/ovw/domestic-violence.
Velonis, A. J. (2016). “He never did anything you typically think of as abuse”: Experiences with violence in controlling and non-controlling relationships in a non-agency sample of women. Violence Against Women, 22, 1031–1054.
White House. (2016). Factsheet: The violence against women act. Retrieved May 22, 2017 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/vawa_factsheet.pdf.
Wies, J. (2008). Professionalizing human services: A case of domestic violence shelter advocates. Human Organization, 67(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.67.2.l43m2v54221711l3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hodes, C., Mennicke, A. Is It Conflict or Abuse? A Practice Note for Furthering Differential Assessment and Response. Clin Soc Work J 47, 176–184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0655-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0655-8