Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relational Dimensions of Virtual Social Work Education: Mentoring Faculty in a Web-Based Learning Environment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing use of cyber technologies in graduate social work education mirrors the exponential growth of virtual educational strategies in education across fields. The social work emphasis on person-in-environment has led to intense questioning within the field regarding the impact of the virtual environment on teacher-student interactions and relationships in professional knowledge acquisition and development of practice skills. While some theorizing of faculty-student relationships in online education exists in the literature, there has as yet been little integration of a dynamic relational perspective, nor much attention to effects of the virtual environment on those who teach. This article discusses relational dimensions of teaching in a virtual environment in the context of an extensive virtual MSW program that is hybrid in design, and national and international in scope. An innovative program to provide instructional support and mentoring to faculty was created, combining pedagogical and clinical perspectives and techniques to meet the challenges of the new educational paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbaugh, J. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, R. (2012) The role of attachment in mentoring. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 705. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/705.

  • Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education, 54, 759–766.

  • Burton, A. (1977). The mentoring dynamic in the therapeutic transformation. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 37, 115–122.

  • Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  • Chadiha, L., Aranda, M., Biefel, D., & Chang, C. (2014). The importance of mentoring faculty members of color in schools of social work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(4), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C., Shen, H., & Liu, E. (2014). University faculty’s perspectives on the roles of e-instructors and their online instruction practice. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 72–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Macredie, R. (2010). Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors. International Journal of Information Management,. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipongian, L. (2006). What is “brain-based learning”? Scientific Learning Corporation. Retrieved February 19, 2013 from, http://www.brainconnection.com/topics/printindex.php3?main=fa/brain-based.

  • Cook, D. (2005). Learning and cognitive styles in web-based learning: Theory, evidence, and application. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 266–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cozolino, L. (2013). The social neuroscience of education: Optimizing attachment and learning in the classroom. New York, NY: W .W. Norton & Company.

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3, 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gagne, J., & McGill, B. (2010). Faculty development in online education. Journal of Online Higher Education, 1(7), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, E., & McCracken, H. (2012). Promoting continuous quality improvement in online teaching: The meta model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16(2). http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index/php/jaln/article/view/269.

  • Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Learning teaching practices: The role of critical mentoring conversations in teacher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M., Maiden, R. P., Smith, W., Wiley, J., & Wood, G. (2013). Launching the virtual academic center: Issues and challenges in innovation. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(4–5), 339–356.

  • Jung, J., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction, and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koole, M. (2010). The web of identity: Selfhood and belonging in online learning networks. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfled, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, pp. 241–248.

  • Lackey, K. (2011). Faculty development: An analysis of current and effective training strategies for preparing faculty to teach online. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(4). http://www.westga.edu/distance/ojdla/wnter144/lackey144.html.

  • Leszinske, I., Jolley, M., & Bryant, M. (2012). Contingent faculty: Exploring adjunct assessment in higher education environments. Retrieved March 1, 2014 from, http://cehs01.unl.edu:16080/edad/partnerships/facultyResearchDocs/Adjunct%20Faculty%20Assessment/pdf.

  • Olds, D. (2006). Identification: Psychoanalytic and biological perspectives. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54(1), 17–46.

  • Orr, R., Williams, M., & Pennington, K. (2009). Institutional efforts to support faculty in online teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 34, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlman, C. (2013). Adjuncts in social work programs: Good practice or unethical? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 22(2), 209–219.

  • Puzziferro-Schnitzer, M. (2005). Supporting online adjunct faculty: A virtual mentoring program. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(2), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A., & Jordan, H. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2). Retrieved April 20, 2013 from, http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/192/274.

  • Tipple, R. (2010). Effective leadership of online adjunct faculty. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(1). Retrieved April 10, 2013 from, http://www.westga.edu/distance/ojdla/wnter144/lackey144.html.

  • Wilson, P., Valentine, D., & Pereira, A. (2014). Perceptions of new social work faculty about mentoring experiences. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(2), 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author states that the author has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy B. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, W.B. Relational Dimensions of Virtual Social Work Education: Mentoring Faculty in a Web-Based Learning Environment. Clin Soc Work J 43, 236–245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0510-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-014-0510-5

Keywords

Navigation