Skip to main content
Log in

Prior Beliefs About the Importance and Control of Thoughts are Predictive But Not Specific to Subsequent Intrusive Unwanted Thoughts and Neutralizing Behaviors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dysfunctional beliefs are the central element in cognitive-behavioral conceptualizations of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). The purpose of this study was to further elucidate the etiological role of preexisting dysfunctional beliefs in the occurrence of unwanted intrusive thoughts and neutralizing behaviors after a critical event by examining their predictive value and specificity in a prospective study with undergraduate students. The dysfunctional belief domains importance/control of thoughts (ICT), responsibility/threat (RT), and perfectionism/certainty (PC) were assessed at baseline 8 weeks prior to the critical event “exam situation” in N = 169 students. Exam-related unwanted intrusive thoughts and neutralizing behaviors, anxiety, and depression were assessed during the week immediately before the exam. Complete data for both baseline and follow-up were available for 79 participants (46%). After controlling for baseline obsessive–compulsive symptoms, anxiety, and depression, ICT but not RT or PC prospectively predicted exam-related intrusive thoughts and neutralizing behaviors, ICT also prospectively predicted depressive symptoms but not anxiety, and RT and PC both prospectively predicted anxiety but not depressive symptoms. Findings are partially consistent with cognitive models of OCD. They support the idea that ICT is a cognitive vulnerability factor for unwanted intrusive thoughts and neutralizing behaviors during a stressful event. Its predictive power was small and not specific to unwanted intrusive thoughts and neutralizing behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Results are available from the first author on request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Florence Allegro and Sven Degen for their help with the data collection.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft (FAG) Basel (Grant No. Gesuch vom 29.3.2016). The FAG was not involved in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, in writing the report or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina Wahl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Karina Wahl, Patrizia D. Hofer, Andrea H. Meyer and Roselind Lieb declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Ethics Committee of the University of Basel; 043-15-1a) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Development of the Stress-Related Thoughts and Behavior List (StressRTBL).

The StressRTBL was developed in two stages. To generate an item pool, 20 individuals with a university degree were provided with definitions of (a) unwanted intrusive thoughts and (b) neutralizing behaviors during a period of stressful exams at a university.

Participants were then asked to write down all unwanted intrusive thoughts and neutralizing behaviors that they had either experienced or heard of from other people. These answers were read by the first authors and items that were not clearly consistent with definitions, for example, because they were examples of longer ruminative processes rather than short intrusive thoughts (e.g., “I will never get through this. What if I never get a job?”), were excluded, resulting in a provisional item pool of 28 items. These items were presented to the first cohort of participants at baseline in 2016, n = 52. They were asked to rate whether they had ever experienced these thoughts or behaviors and to add their own unwanted intrusive thoughts and neutralizing behaviors related to previous exams. Their answers were again checked for appropriateness by the first author and sorted into three intrusive thought categories and five neutralizing behavior categories in the final list. The final category contained anticipated neutralizing behaviors on the day of the exam.

The thought categories were as follows:

  1. 1.

    Fear of forgetting something important (e.g., “Did I accidentally miss a chapter?”), 5 items

  2. 2.

    Fear of making a critical mistake (“Did I accidentally mix up the documents?”), 5 items

  3. 3.

    Superstitious exam-related thoughts (“If I guess the time right, I’ll pass.”), 8 items

The behavior categories were as follows:

  1. 1.

    Checking (e.g., “I have to flip through the documents repeatedly to make sure I have not missed anything.”), 5 items

  2. 2.

    Ordering (e.g., “I have to arrange my pens in a certain way.”), 6 items

  3. 3.

    Superstitious behavior (e.g., “I always have to wear the same sweater.”), 6 items

  4. 4.

    Rigid rules or rituals (“I have to review each subject for exactly the same amount of time each day.”), 10 items

  5. 5.

    Reassurance seeking (“I keep asking people if everything will be all right.”), 2 items; this category included anticipated neutralizing behaviors that the participant is likely to perform at the time of the exam (“I will kiss the exam before I hand it in.”), 16 items

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wahl, K., Hofer, P.D., Meyer, A.H. et al. Prior Beliefs About the Importance and Control of Thoughts are Predictive But Not Specific to Subsequent Intrusive Unwanted Thoughts and Neutralizing Behaviors. Cogn Ther Res 44, 360–375 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10046-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10046-7

Keywords

Navigation