Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on "The case for minimax‑TD"

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent papers, Darlington identifies minimax‑TD as the best single-winner voting method. He mentions two criteria allegedly met by minimax‑TD and violated by the Schulze method. In this comment, however, I will show that also minimax‑TD violates these criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

No relevant financial or other interests. Work was unfunded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All research and writing was by MS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Schulze.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schulze, M. Comment on "The case for minimax‑TD". Const Polit Econ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-023-09416-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-023-09416-x

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation