Abstract
Given the context, the overarching aim is to identify scientific publications on occupational therapy in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units. Specific objectives include: (a) Analyzing the historical development of this research area; (b) Synthesizing existing evidence on the nature of documentary sources on occupational therapy in in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units; (c) Detailing the volume of scientific literature on occupational therapy in these units; (e) Evaluating available evidence on occupational therapy interventions to improve functionality, quality of life, and recovery in individuals admitted to in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units. A scoping review method was employed to conduct a historical mapping of research on in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units. The review proceeded in five stages following PRISMA guidelines. After applying selection criteria, the search identified 446 references. Findings are presented under three headings: (a) Historical trends in the scientific literature on occupational therapy and in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units; (b) Nature and volume of articles included in the occupational therapy synthesis in Psychiatric Short-Term Hospitalization Units; (c) Data extraction on methodological variables in the research of occupational therapy articles in in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units; and (d) Data extraction on research outcome variables of occupational therapy articles in Psychiatric Short-Term Hospitalization Units. The growth of occupational therapy in in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units is emphasized, with an increase in qualitative studies. Occupational therapy is underscored as an integral part of care, supporting the diversity and effectiveness of interventions. Common diagnoses include schizophrenia and depressive disorders. Group interventions and the spiritual dimension positively influence the quality of care and meaningful routines for recovery in in Psychiatric-Short-Term-Hospitalization-Units.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Health, according to the Organización Mundial de la Saludn (OMS) (2014), is not merely the absence of disease but a comprehensive state of physical, mental, and social well-being, including factors like quality of life, bodily function, and emotional well-being. In fact, the significance of occupation, as emphasized by Harmer and Orrell (2008), plays a vital role in promoting well-being through purposeful activities such as work, leisure, and self-care, which vary for each individual. This close relationship between health and occupation underscores the significant impact activities have on both mental and physical health.
Hence, occupational therapy, as substantiated by research from Schuch et al. (2016) and Eakman (2014), acknowledges the beneficial effects of meaningful activities on health, well-being, and overall life satisfaction. It serves as a valuable discipline in improving individuals' health and well-being by tackling occupational challenges that hinder their engagement in meaningful activities. This approach is in harmony with the holistic view of health, considering it as encompassing physical, mental, and social well-being.
The Importance of Occupational Therapy in the Field of Mental Health
Occupational therapy, focusing on human occupation and well-being (AOTA, 2020; WFOT, 2017), is crucial in mental health, enhancing occupational competence and quality of life for individuals facing challenges. -Moruno-Miralles and Talavera-Valverde (2011) stress its role in fostering autonomy and independence for those with mental health issues, enabling active engagement and finding purpose in life. D'Amico et al. (2018) highlight its ability to enhance occupational performance and life satisfaction, while Gibson et al. (2011) affirm its effectiveness in addressing mental health challenges and improving daily functioning. In summary, occupational therapy is invaluable in maintaining competence, promoting health, enhancing well-being, and preventing relapses, directly impacting individuals' health (Moruno-Miralles & Talavera-Valverde, 2011).
Occupational Therapy in the Context of Psychiatric Short-Stay Hospitalisation Units
Occupational therapy holds a pivotal role within Psychiatric Short-Stay Hospitalisation Units (UHP), concentrating on enhancing well-being and optimizing occupational performance for overall health improvement. Moruno-Miralles and Talavera-Valverde (2011) stress its capacity to empower service users to develop occupational competence, facilitating autonomous and fulfilling engagement in daily activities, thus supporting their recovery and community reintegration.
Noyes and Griffin (2019) highlight how occupational therapy aids in reacquiring daily life skills, fostering independence, and bolstering patients' self-esteem within UHP settings.
Additionally, occupational therapy fosters participation skills and social engagement, particularly beneficial for those confronting social isolation or interpersonal challenges (Haracz & Ashby, 2019). Brown et al. (2019) affirm its role in assisting users to identify and cultivate meaningful interests and activities, positively influencing their psychological and emotional well-being. Furthermore, occupational therapy contributes significantly to discharge planning, aiding users in accessing community resources and devising transition plans (Holm & Mu, 2012).
Even from a more biomedical perspective, Rocamora-Montenegro et al. (2021) confirm that this discipline promotes the acquisition of skills to manage stress and anxiety, as well as learning relaxation techniques and emotional control.
Justification
In the current era, with a heightened focus on mental health, attention has expanded to encompass occupational therapy. However, despite its increasing relevance, a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge and research gaps in this area has yet to be undertaken. As a result, there is no precise definition of the scientific evidence supporting occupational therapy practice in UHP, unlike other disciplines such as nursing (Doedens et al., 2020), medicine (Gaynes et al., 2017), or psychology (Evlat et al., 2021; Jacobsen et al., 2018).
Consequently, conducting a review of occupational therapy in UHP is essential for improving the quality of psychiatric care. Such a review will pinpoint opportunities to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of occupational therapy, ultimately generating robust scientific evidence to inform decision-making processes.
Objectives
Given the above, the overarching objective is to identify scientific publications on occupational therapy in UHP. Specific objectives include: (a) Analyzing the historical development of this research area; (b) Synthesizing existing evidence on the nature of documentary sources on occupational therapy in UHP; (c) Detailing the volume of scientific literature on occupational therapy in these units; (e) Evaluating available evidence on occupational therapy interventions to improve functionality, quality of life, and recovery in individuals admitted to UHP.
Methodology
Study Type
A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-SCR guidelines (Tricco et al., 2018), utilizing the methodological framework established by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and further developed by Levac et al. (2010). This method aims to clarify the development of occupational therapy in UHP, capture and map a variety of evidence to illustrate the scope of the study area. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework before the start of the investigation.
Research Question and Identification of Relevant Studies
Two research questions were established to guide the scoping review: (a) What is the nature and scope of the scientific literature/evidence on occupational therapy in UHP? and (b) How has occupational therapy research in UHP evolved over time?
A search was conducted in various databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ProQuest ERIC, Web of Science -WOS-, CSIC, Dialnet, Pubmed Central, OTDBASE, and Scielo). Mesh terms (Hospitals, Psychiatric, Day Care, Medical, Mental Health, Occupational Therapy) were determined to facilitate/narrow the bibliographic search, and several keywords related to the review's topic were established (Psychiatric short-stay hospitalization units, Psychiatric short-stay units, Acute Mental units, short-stay crisis units, Short-stay mental health crisis units, Psychiatric inpatient units, Psychiatry, Occupational therapy, Ergotherapy, Occupational therapist, Ergotherapist, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Day Care, Medical, Mental Health).
Search strings were established using the primary matrix for the overall strategy: (occupational therap*) OR (ergotherap*) AND ((Psychiatric short-stay hospitalisation units) OR (Psychiatric short-stay units) OR (Acute Mental units) OR (short-stay crisis units) OR (Short-stay mental health crisis units) OR (psychiatric inpatient units)).
No year filter was applied, and the search for results was conducted until February 12, 2023.
Study Selection
The identification and selection of relevant studies were guided by the following selection criteria:
-
Inclusion Criteria: Peer-reviewed articles published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese addressing occupational therapy in UHP were included. There were no restrictions on the publication date.
-
Exclusion Criteria: Conferences, theses, or opinion articles were excluded. Studies that did not assess occupational therapy in UHP were eliminated, as well as those focusing solely on occupational therapy in outpatient settings, studies concentrating on interventions other than occupational therapy in UHP, and studies not involving users or staff of UHP.
Data Extraction
To facilitate the analysis of bibliographic references, search results from databases were stored in ZOTERO, a tool for organizing such references and documents. Duplicate articles were subsequently removed. Initially, documents were selected based on title relevance, excluding those lacking keywords or failing to meet inclusion criteria. A table was created for article selection, categorizing them by validity. Further selection rounds involved abstract review and, finally, full-text assessment, resulting in definitive documents meeting the established criteria.
The data from the definitive articles were extracted and incorporated into a data extraction table created using Excel v.16.26. The extraction process was independently performed by U.G.G. and A.I.S.G. Subsequently, M.A.T.V. reviewed the data extraction, with no disagreements identified during the review of titles, abstracts, and full texts. Furthermore, the mapping process was facilitated using Covidence Software to screen articles and conduct the full-text review.
Classification and Data Analysis
The fourth stage involved organizing the data through an interactive process using three categories for grouping: (a) Scientific production variables; (b) Methodological variables; (c) Occupational therapy practice variables (Table 1).
Our aim was to establish parameters for analyzing the literature to conduct a critical and comprehensive review. This stage involved a meticulous examination of the selected documentation, including reading and analyzing articles from indexed journals. Historical research trends were identified, commencing from the publication of the initial article in 1943 (Anonymous, 1943).
The results, or thematic variables, were categorized after theoretical saturation (Hernández-Sampieri & Mendoza, 2018) into four themes. Abductive reasoning, which combines deductive and inductive reasoning, was employed for this purpose, adapting the theoretical framework to empirical findings. Adjustments in the theoretical framework facilitated a conceptual interpretation of the data. This type of reasoning is common when exploring less-explored topics (Verd & Lozares, 2016).
Following Levac et al.'s (2010) qualitative content analysis approach, and aiming to (a) validate and enhance our understanding of findings, (b) seek feedback on coherence and direction of thematic analysis, and (c) facilitate knowledge transfer on occupational therapy's relevance in UHP, we conducted two consultations spaced approximately six months apart. The first involved experts—two professors and educators from Spanish universities, and two mental health professionals—recruited via snowball sampling. They were presented content blindly, unaware of each other's involvement. This initial consultation took place in July 2023, focusing on initial data and emerging categories. The second consultation occurred after completing data analysis.
Quantitative variables were expressed through frequency and percentage. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, utilizing the chi-square test, were conducted on different categories of scientific articles published between 1943 and 2023. Studies were grouped into 10-year periods for statistical comparison across phases.
We utilized the JBI Levels of Evidence developed by the Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Group of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI 2014) to assess the evidence (Effectiveness and Meaningfulness).
Results
The search strategies retrieved n = 446 references (n = 374 after removing duplicates). After applying the selection criteria, n = 24 references were identified (Fig. 1). Results are presented in 4 groups: (a) Historical trends in the scientific literature on UHP; (b) Nature and volume of publications on occupational therapy in UHP; (c) Data extraction on methodological variables in the research articles on occupational therapy in UHP; (d) Data extraction on outcome variables in research articles on occupational therapy in UHP.
Historical Trends in the Scientific Literature on Occupational Therapy and UHP
The initial publication surfaced in 1943, marking the onset of a consistent uptrend in article publications over time (Fig. 2). Among the n = 374 documents retrieved, the majority, n = 369 (98.6%), comprised articles from indexed journals, including original studies and reviews. The remaining documents included book chapters, n = 3 (0.8%), doctoral theses, and conferences with n = 1 (0.3%) each.
To gauge the statistical significance of article publications over time, we organized them into ten-year intervals for comparative analysis. From 1943–1952 and 1953–1962, n = 2 articles were published in each period (0.6%). This count increased to n = 7 (1.9%) from 1963–1972, remaining at n = 11 (3%) from 1973–1982. The period from 1983–1992 saw n = 19 articles (5.1%), almost doubling to n = 35 (9.4%) from 1993–2002. There was a notable surge in the decade from 2003–2012, with n = 63 articles (16.9%), and a peak in 2013–2023, with n = 234 (62.7%). Statistical significance (p = 0.001) was observed solely in the periods 2003–2012 and 2013–2023 compared to other decades.
English is the dominant language in publications, comprising n = 326 (87.2%). It is trailed by Spanish with n = 14 (3.7%) and German with n = 13 (3.5%). Other languages (French, Arabic, Danish, Portuguese, Swedish, Chinese, Korean, Hebrew, Italian, or Polish) each represent less than 1% of publications, respectively.
Nature and Volume of Articles Included in the Synthesis of Occupational Therapy in UHP
In the examination of the temporal distribution of publications, out of the total n = 446 papers on occupational therapy in UHP generated during the study duration, not all years meet the study's selection criteria. Among the n = 24 articles that did meet these criteria, the distribution was as follows: in 2014 and 2021, n = 3 (12.5%) articles were published each year. For the years 2006, 2016, 2017, and 2019, there were n = 2 (8.3%) articles each. Conversely, the years 1986, 1990, 1996, 2002, 2008, 2011, and 2020 each presented n = 1 (4.2%) article, respectively. It's noteworthy that when comparing the decades in which these n = 24 articles were published, no statistical significance (p = 0.001) was found to indicate one decade standing out from the others.
Taking into account the countries where the studies were conducted (Table 4), Spain has the highest representation with 29.2% (n = 7), followed by the United Kingdom with 20.8% (n = 5), the USA with 16.7% (n = 4), Australia with 12.5% (n = 3), and Canada with 8.3% (n = 2). Other countries (Iceland, Israel, and South Africa) each have figures of 4.1% (n = 1) respectively.
Regarding languages, the analysis reveals a significant difference (p = 0.004) in the distribution of languages used in articles on occupational therapy in UHP, with English predominating at 70.8% (n = 17) compared to Spanish at 29.2% (n = 7). It's worth noting that the Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy employs both English and French (Table 2).
Regarding journals and their impact factors, the 24 articles in this scoping review are distributed across 13 different peer-reviewed journals (Table 2). Among these, 53.8% (n = 7) are listed in both the Journal Citation Report and Scimago Journal Ranking. Notably, the latter includes one additional journal (Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy). The remaining journals are indexed in other databases with impact factors distinct from the aforementioned two. While there is a discernible contrast between journals included in JCR or SJR and those not, no statistical significance (p > 0.005) is evident when comparing them to journals absent from these indices. This discrepancy may arise by chance and might not signify a genuine association between impact factors and inclusion in JCR or SJR.
Similarly, in both JCR and SJR quartiles, Q3 journals prevail, constituting 23.1% (n = 3) each. Regarding author preferences for publication venues, two journals stand out: the British Journal of Occupational Therapy, with 25% (n = 6) of the articles, followed by the American Journal of Occupational Therapy, with 16% (n = 4). Other journals do not exceed 10% of the published articles.
Regarding authorship, a total of 24 articles were selected involving 56 authors. Notably, some authors made significant contributions. Specifically, authors Parkinson, S., Pastor-Montaño, M.G., Smith, S., and Souto, M.J. collaborated on two articles each, while others contributed to only one. Excluding the five authors who wrote two articles each, the final count of authors involved in the study is 51.
The study findings reveal that authors primarily hail from Spain, comprising the largest cohort at 33.3% (n = 17) of the total. British and Australian authors each represent 19.6% (n = 10). Conversely, Canadians and North Americans contribute 9.8% (n = 5) each, while South Africans make up 5.9% (n = 3). Icelanders and Israelis are involved at 3.9% (n = 2) each, with authors from Hong Kong contributing 2% (n = 1). Statistical analysis indicates a significant difference between Spanish authors and those from Iceland, Israel, South Africa, the United States, and Canada (p < 0.005), suggesting a noteworthy association between author nationality and their involvement in articles on occupational therapy in UHP in these specific countries. However, no statistically significant differences (p < 0.005) were found, suggesting insufficient evidence to establish significant associations between author nationality and their participation in articles in the other analyzed countries.
In terms of authorship collaboration, 37.5% (n = 9) of articles are authored by a single individual, while 62.5% (n = 15) involve at least two authors. The article with the highest number of authors, five, corresponds to two articles (Enguita-Flórez et al., 2021; Evatt et al., 2016).
Regarding authorship averages, with a total of n = 24 selected articles and n = 51 authors, the average number of authors per article is calculated at 2.3. The historical evolution of this average indicates a 270% increase (2.5 authors) from an average of n = 1 author in 1986 to an average of n = 3.7 authors in 2021. The years with the highest average authorship are 2008 and 2011 with n = 4 authors, compared to 1986, 1990, 1996, 1999, 2002, and 2006, which had the smallest average of n = 1.
Data Extraction on Methodological Variables in Occupational Therapy Research Articles in UHP
Regarding the study type, empirical studies demonstrate statistical significance (p = 0.001) compared to non-empirical ones (Table 3).
Regarding the study type, empirical studies demonstrate statistical significance (p = 0.001) compared to non-empirical ones (Table 3).
In terms of empirical studies, qualitative articles (45.8%, n = 11) outnumber quantitative and mixed-method articles in occupational therapy. However, there's no statistical significance (p = 0.086) between qualitative and quantitative studies. Conversely, there's significance (p = 0.001) when comparing qualitative to mixed-method studies. Further analysis by decades shows a rise in qualitative methodologies post-1995, though not significant (p = 0.011). Phenomenological approaches dominate (41.7%, n = 10), showing significance (p = 0.001) compared to narrative studies, not the same with action research (p = 0.010). Quantitative studies (25%, n = 6) span all decades except 2006–2015. Mixed-methods sporadically emerge in 2016–2023 (4.2%, n = 1).
Non-empirical studies account for 20.8% (n = 5) from 2006 onward, with 2006–2015 having 17.6% (n = 4). However, no statistical significance (p = 0.058) suggests the difference in non-empirical studies between decades lacks strength for significant association.
In terms of the study population, 87.5% (n = 21) of the articles focused on users of occupational therapy services in these facilities, while 8.3% (n = 2) targeted professionals, and 4.2% (n = 1) aimed at both professionals and users.
Considering that two out of the 24 selected articles did not provide data on the study population and that five were theoretical articles, the remaining 17 articles involved a total of 370 individuals studied. Regarding gender representation in the research, only 10 articles collected this information, totaling n = 209 individuals identified by sex.
Statistical analysis indicates significantly higher representation of female authors in published articles on occupational therapy in UHP, constituting 66% (n = 138) of the total compared to male participation. The statistical significance value (p = 0.001) suggests this difference in the proportion of female and male authors is not random, indicating a noteworthy association between sex and participation in research in this specific area.
Data Extraction on Research Outcome Variables in Occupational Therapy Articles in UHP
Regarding the diagnosis of individuals in the articles, they were classified according to DSM-V criteria (APA, 2013). The most prevalent diagnoses were schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders at 22.2% (n = 8), followed by depressive disorders at 16.7% (n = 6), substance-related and addictive disorders at 11.1% (n = 4), personality disorders and bipolar disorder at 8.3% (n = 3) each, and trauma and stressor-related disorders, and obsessive–compulsive disorder at 2.3% (n = 1) each. None of the analyzed articles mentioned an occupational diagnosis.
Regarding the devices, all 24 published articles used the UHP. However, a slight difference was detected among the articles: n = 23 (95.83%) belong to UHP, and n = 1 (4.17%) to UHP for adolescents.
Concerning occupational therapy interventions in the n = 24 selected articles, n = 8 did not specify any interventions carried out. Among the rest, a total of n = 21 interventions were compiled (Table 4), with some articles including multiple types of interventions, totaling n = 33. Group interventions significantly predominated (p = 0.001) at 75.8% (n = 25) compared to individual interventions (21.2%; n = 7) and family interventions (3%; n = 1). The interventions were categorized following those described by the "Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process (4th ed)" (AOTA, 2020) (Table 4), and significantly (p = 0.002), interventions involving occupation and activities prevailed over those supporting occupation (18.2%; n = 6), not the case for those related to education and training (27.3%; n = 9). Regarding group activities, those linked to occupation and activities were the most numerous (42.4%; n = 14) compared to those related to education and training (15.2%; n = 5). Conversely, in individual interventions, the most numerous were those related to education and training (12.1%; n = 4) compared to occupation and activities (6%; n = 2).
To evaluate content relevance, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of keywords present in the n = 24 articles under study. The most recurrent keyword is "terapia ocupacional" (occupational therapy), occurring in 10.9% (n = 10) of the articles. Following closely is "salud mental" (mental health), emerging in 7.6% (n = 7). Additionally, "investigación cualitativa" (qualitative research) appears in 4.4% (n = 4) of articles. Other keywords such as "unidad psiquiátrica aguda" (acute psychiatric unit), "pacientes hospitalizados" (hospitalized patients), and "psiquiatría" (psychiatry) each occur in 3.3% (n = 3) of articles. Expressions like "unidad de estancia corta" (short-stay unit), "hospitalización" (hospitalization), "enfermedad mental" (mental illness), "ocupaciones" (occupations), "recuperación" (recovery), "modelo de recuperación" (recovery model), and "espiritualidad" (spirituality) gather a 2.2% (n = 2) occurrence. Other identified keywords do not surpass the 1% threshold, providing additional and specific nuances to the investigated set.
After reviewing the 24 intervention studies on occupational therapy in UHP and categorizing the data through abductive reasoning, four categories emerged (Table 5). Experiences of Users and Professionals in UHP (37.5%; n = 9), Occupational Therapy Interventions to Improve Mental Health (33.3%; n = 8), and Importance of Occupational Therapy in UHP (20.8%; n = 5) are the most predominant categories in the study of occupational therapy in UHP. Most studies were at level four of evidence (JBI, 2014) for effectiveness (75%; n = 18) (Observational-Descriptive Studies), except for Lipskaya-Velikovsky et al. (2016), which was an experimental design (Randomized Controlled Trial), and Lloyd et al. (2017), which corresponds to a Systematic Review of Expert Opinion. At level three of significance (JBI, 2014), there were unique qualitative studies (Table 4), and only two in Oladottir and Palmadottir's (2017) study, which corresponded to a sequential explanatory design.
-
Importance of Occupational Therapy in UHP is evident from various studies. Bailliard et al. (2021) show how occupational reflection positively influences the recovery of individuals with bipolar, depressive, and addiction disorders. Synovec (2015) highlights how implementing the "recovery" model within occupational therapy enhances the quality of psychiatric care in UHP. Best (1996) demonstrates the effectiveness of occupational therapy in UHP by promoting routines and activities with profound meaning. Users themselves recognize the clear value and benefits of occupational therapy in UHP (Birken & Bryant, 2019). Additionally, group occupational therapy activities are acknowledged as useful and satisfying tools for individuals dealing with depressive disorder (Ramano et al., 2021).
-
The spiritual dimension in UHP becomes significantly relevant for users, exerting a influence on their recovery process (Smith & Suto, 2014). Professionals recognizing and understanding spirituality emerge as crucial aspects in providing holistic care in UHP environments (Suto & Smith, 2014). Moreover, incorporating spirituality training could enhance the quality of care provided in these settings, with recommendations for further exploration through methodologies like broader surveys (Suto & Smith, 2014).
-
Findings on User and Professional Experiences in UHP reveal the immense value of considering an occupational perspective in the recovery process, fostering user autonomy (Kennedy & Fortune, 2014). Psychoeducational model-based approaches, like creating specific groups, show promise in UHP contexts (Eaton, 2002). Occupational therapy activities consistently yield high satisfaction for both users and professionals in these environments (Enguita-Flórez et al., 2021). Identifying and analyzing user strengths and weaknesses is crucial for tailoring interventions to individual needs (Evatt et al., 2016). In line with this, Occupational therapists not only intervene at an individual level but also significantly influence mental health systems overall, emphasizing their broad impact (Castillo, 2006). Also, entering a UHP involves personal and social deconstruction, highlighting the importance of meticulous acclimatization to promote active user participation (Pastor-Montaño et al., 2019). In this context, the role of occupational therapists in UHPs encompasses their functions and fundamental aspects of occupational therapy (Sesé et al., 2011). Occupational therapists' unique perspectives enrich the understanding of challenges and opportunities in providing therapy in UHPs (Souto-Gómez & Talavera-Valverde, 2015a, b). Detailed specifications of occupational therapy services in UHP offer essential context for clinical practices and approaches (Méndez-Mena, 2006).
-
Results on Occupational Therapy Interventions to Enhance Mental Health highlight the effectiveness of interdisciplinary group programs in UHP, as demonstrated by Kaplan (1986). Assessment tools like the Activity Pattern Indicator and MOHOST prove invaluable for identifying patterns and improving users' quality of life (Larson, 1990; Parkinson et al., 2008). Additionally,Occupational therapy not only enhances quality of life but also improves emotional well-being and promotes participation in meaningful activities (Parkinson, 1999). Integration into therapeutic groups, such as the football group studied by Pascual (2020), enriches users' recovery process. Even, The "Occupational Connections" intervention is highly effective in improving mental health and quality of life (Lipskaya-Velikovsky et al., 2016). In fact, Occupational therapy emphasizes holistic aspects for optimal care (Lloyd et al., 2017). So, Client-centered practice and establishing a strong therapeutic relationship are essential for guiding intervention decisions (Óladóttir & Pálmadóttir, 2017). Thus, these elements converge to promote a personalized and effective approach to therapeutic care in UHP settings.
Discussion
The research results have successfully met the overarching goal of identifying scientific publications on occupational therapy in UHP. The cohesive integration of these findings in the discussion section offers clear and well-supported responses to the specific objectives outlined.
Historical Analysis of Occupational Therapy Research in Mental Health
The evolution of research in occupational therapy and mental health is notable, showcasing achievements and laying a robust foundation for future investigations. Understanding historical trends, diverse contributions, and research drivers is crucial for advancing in this critical field for mental health. A global, inclusive, and multidisciplinary approach is essential for sustainable development and ongoing effectiveness of occupational therapy in mental health care settings, especially in UHP.
Historical Trends and Temporal Development
The historical progression of scientific literature on occupational therapy in UHP offers valuable insights into the field's development, reflecting trends observed in other health sciences (O'Brien, 2001). Starting modestly in 1943 and peaking with 234 publications from 2013 to 2023, there's notable advancement (p = 0.001). This growth is attributed in part to evolving mental health understandings (Johnson, 2021) and wider recognition of occupational therapy's efficacy in these contexts (March, 2017; Whitley et al., 2011). This upward trend is also influenced by progress in health sciences disciplines, aiming to forge new research paths to deliver quality, efficient, multidisciplinary, holistic, and humane care (March, 2017).
Temporal Analysis and Contributing Factors
Decade-wise analysis reveals intriguing patterns, notably a substantial increase in the last two decades. There's a statistically significant rise (p = 0.001) in published articles during 2003–2012 and 2013–2023 compared to preceding decades, indicating an intensified research focus on occupational therapy in UHP.
The findings yield valuable insights into the evolution of occupational therapy research and its connection with UHP over time. This trend is influenced by several factors: (a) Changes in clinical care and mental health policies (Johnson, 2021), alongside improved understanding of mental health issues and increased acceptance of occupational therapy methods (Wainberg et al., 2017); (b) Embracing the digital age (Vessuri, 2014) and globalization, which offer new tools to expedite scientific literature production; (c) The rise in publications by organizations like Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) (1996) and WFOT (2019), advocating mental health care principles and less restrictive approaches, thus promoting occupational therapy and research (Mapanga et al., 2019); (d) Evolving clinical care and technological advancements stimulating research (Lau et al., 2020; Lau et al., 2021); (e) Lastly, the notable increase in occupational therapists with master's and doctoral degrees, starting in the US in 1997 with the master's degree becoming the basic level of education. This shift likely influenced subsequent research growth. A similar pattern emerged in the EU post-2005 with the introduction of university master's programs and doctoral degrees, facilitated by the European Higher Education Area and Bologna Process reforms (European Ministers of Education, 1999; Polonio, n.d.). These reforms transformed former diploma titles into bachelor's degrees, expanded access to postgraduate education, including master's programs and doctoral studies.
Document Typology and Diversity of Contributions
A high proportion of documents published in indexed journals (98.6%) indicates rigorous and high-quality research in this field, emphasizing the robustness of the analyzed scientific literature, primarily sourced from esteemed academic outlets (Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2019). Although most documents adhere to journal formats, the inclusion of other formats like book chapters and doctoral theses indicates diverse approaches, reflecting the richness of contributions shaping the advancement of knowledge in occupational therapy at this intervention level (Piedra & Martínez-Rodríguez, 2007).
Linguistic Dimension and Global Dissemination
The predominance of English as the primary publication language (87.2%), supported by statistical significance (p = 0.004), highlights the Anglophone community's sway in research. This ties to factors like journal internationalization, audience targeting, and occupational therapy research accessibility (Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2021, 2023). This underscores the significant impact of the Anglophone scientific community on UHP occupational therapy research (Brown et al., 2005). Franco-López et al. (2016) suggest that language choice significantly influences citation rates and article impact factors, given English's dominance in influential journals, promoting researchers' professional growth through publication in this language.
While English as the primary scientific communication medium aids global dissemination, concerns arise regarding global representation and the need for strategies promoting inclusion of diverse languages and cultural perspectives (Navarro, 2001). English's linguistic hegemony may impede effective communication and result in knowledge loss (Lopes et al., 2018). We acknowledge the importance of valuing studies in different languages to promote a global understanding of occupational therapy in UHP. Although the presence of articles in languages other than English (such as Spanish) is less frequent in our study, we believe we have reflected cultural and linguistic diversity in research at this level of intervention (Castillo, 2006; Méndez-Mena, 2006; Sesé et al., 2011; Souto-Gómez & Talavera-Valverde, 2015b; Pascual, 2020; Pastor-Montaño et al., 2019; Enguita-Flórez et al., 2021).
Synthesis of Evidence on Occupational Therapy Literature in UHP
An in-depth examination of articles on occupational therapy in UHP offers a comprehensive and contextualized perspective on research in this domain. The analysis underscores global interest continuity, geographical diversity, language preferences, and evolving collaboration and authorship patterns, indicating the expanding complexity and scope of research in occupational therapy within this clinical context. These insights provide a solid groundwork for future research and guide the trajectory of occupational therapy in UHP.
Increase in Scientific Production on UHP and Occupational Therapy
Research on occupational therapy in psychiatric UHP displays an upward trajectory, marking a significant milestone in this field's advancement (p = 0.001). This growth reflects an increasing acknowledgment of occupational therapy's efficacy in acute mental health interventions (Christie et al., 2021; Scheewe et al., 2013). Three key factors contribute to this rise: (a) growing recognition of occupational therapy's effectiveness in acute settings (Christie et al., 2021; Scheewe et al., 2013), (b) integration of occupational therapy programs into mental health university curricula (Arblaster et al., 2015; Scanlan et al., 2017), and (c) WFOT's (2019) advocacy for integrating occupational therapy into mental health care and promotion, potentially fostering researcher and professional interest in this domain.
Temporal Distribution of Publications
Analysis of research on occupational therapy in UHP across time demonstrates consistent presence without a clear trend towards increased or decreased interest (Gallagher et al., 2023). This suggests occupational therapy's enduring relevance in mental health settings, likely owing to its recognized positive impact on recovery (Gallagher et al., 2023; Zango-Martín et al., 2022). Amid 446 identified publications on occupational therapy in UHP during the study period, 24 articles met analysis criteria. Variable production over time indicates sustained interest in occupational therapy in UHP without a distinct temporal trend.
The lack of statistical significance in comparing publication decades reflects occupational therapy's adaptable nature, accommodating evolving needs and clinical approaches over time (Gallagher et al., 2023; Moruno-Miralles & Talavera-Valverde, 2011). This underscores occupational therapy's dynamism, capable of evolving to meet evolving demands in mental health care (Hyett et al., 2019).
Geographical Context of Publications
Spain leads in geographical distribution of studies with 29.2%, followed by the United Kingdom (20.8%), the U.S. (16.7%), Australia (12.5%), and Canada (8.3%). Iceland, Israel, and South Africa, each contribute 4.1%. Though not statistically significant, these variances emphasize the importance of cultural and contextual considerations when applying findings across diverse clinical settings (Hyett et al., 2019). Geographical diversity enriches understanding of successful interventions and best practices in occupational therapy within UHP (Gallagher et al., 2023; Hyett et al., 2019).
Nationality of Authors
Disparity in authors' nationalities underscores cultural influence on UHP occupational therapy research. Statistical significance between Spanish authors and those from specific countries emphasizes the importance of cultural contextualization in interpreting results. Collaboration among researchers of varied nationalities enhances research with unique perspectives and clinical experiences (Aceituno-Aceituno et al., 2015).
The prominence of Spanish authors in UHP occupational therapy publications is notable (Castillo, 2006; Méndez-Mena, 2006; Sesé et al., 2011; Souto-Gómez & Talavera-Valverde, 2015b; Pascual, 2020; Pastor-Montaño et al., 2019; Enguita-Flórez et al., 2021). This likely reflects the leadership and interest of the Spanish academic community in this area, raising questions about cultural and contextual influences on research. Factors explaining this include: (a) variations in UHP characteristics and approaches across countries possibly excluding some articles from this review (Moruno-Miralles & Talavera-Valverde, 2011); (b) Spain's mental health system and occupational therapy practices shaping research direction and focus, fostering unique leadership and perspectives (Ministerio de Sanidad, 2021; Zapata-Moya & Navarro-Yáñez, 2021); (c) lower author representation from other countries due to differing contexts and research concentration. This highlights the importance of cultural diversity (James & Prilleltensky, 2002) when generalizing international study results and the need to explore regional variations in occupational therapy program implementation.
Journals and Impact Factors
The 24 papers span 13 peer-reviewed journals. While 53.8% of these journals appear in both the Journal Citation Report (JCR) and Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR), no statistical significance (p > 0.005) is found in comparison to those not listed in these indices. However, it's noteworthy that Q3 quartile journals dominate in both JCR and SJR, indicating consistent publication quality. Despite no significant association (p > 0.005) between inclusion in JCR/SJR and journal quality, this difference may be due to chance rather than a true correlation between impact factors and inclusion (Brown & Gutman, 2019; Brown et al., 2018). This suggests that a journal's presence in these indices doesn't significantly affect analyzed characteristics or attributes (Johnson & Leising, 1986; Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2021), though other unanalyzed factors may contribute. Nevertheless, publication in peer-reviewed journals implies a standard of research quality and rigor (Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2021).
The diversity of journals and their inclusion in various impact indices underscores the necessity for comprehensive evaluation of publication quality, factoring in impact, clinical relevance, and innovation (Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2021). The preference for established journals like the British Journal of Occupational Therapy (25%) and the American Journal of Occupational Therapy (16%) among authors reflects the occupational therapy community's favor for recognized platforms (Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2021, 2023).
Authorship and Collaboration Characteristics (Multidisciplinary Collaboration and its Impact on Research Quality)
The 24 articles had 56 authors, some contributing to multiple articles. Spanish authors represented 33.3%, followed by British and Australian authors (19.6% each). A statistically significant correlation between authors' nationality and their participation in specific countries' articles (p < 0.005) highlights cultural and contextual influence (James & Prilleltensky, 2002) on UHP occupational therapy research.
Detailed analysis shows significant collaboration among authors in UHP occupational therapy research, with 62.5% of articles authored by at least two individuals, emphasizing the need for complementary skills and multidisciplinary perspectives (Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2023). The increase in average authors per article over time, from 2.5 in 1986 to 3.7 in 2021, suggests a trend towards collaborative authorship, in line with previous research (Sobrido-Prieto et al., 2023).
The prevalence of collaborative authorship raises questions about research dynamics and quality. The high rate of collaborations (62.5%; n = 15) underscores the preference for collaborative research in UHP occupational therapy (Comité Gestor del Consejo de Colegios de Terapia Ocupacional. Asociaciones Profesionales de Terapia Ocupacional, 2013). This trend, supported by studies like Sobrido-Prieto et al. (2023) and Wuchty et al. (2007), mirrors the broader shift towards larger research teams across disciplines. While multidisciplinary collaboration can foster innovation, it's crucial to scrutinize the assumption that more authors equate to higher scientific quality (Valderas et al., 2007). Establishing objective standards for evaluating collaborative research quality in occupational therapy is essential (Valderas et al., 2007) to ensure credible and actionable findings for clinical practice and mental health policy formulation.
The increasing trend towards collaboration over time suggests that the complex challenges of mental health care demand integrated approaches and specialized teams (Brown et al., 2018). This trend may be attributed to the growing need for diverse expertise in addressing mental health complexities and occupational interventions (Brown et al., 2018).
Detailed Volume of Scientific Literature on Occupational Therapy in UHP
Types of Studies
The analysis of occupational therapy articles in UHP reveals significant findings and areas of interest, with a preference for empirical approaches, emphasizing the importance of research-based evidence (Fusar-Poli et al., 2020; Tomlin & Borgetto, 2011).
Regarding non-empirical studies, though there's an upward trend, the lack of statistical significance (p = 0.058) suggests that observed variations between decades could be due to chance. Insufficient evidence exists to assert a significant association between decades and the quantity of non-empirical studies in occupational therapy (Aylott et al., 2019).
Within empirical studies, qualitative methodologies predominate (45.8%, n = 11), with phenomenology being the most common approach (41.7%, n = 10) from 1996 onwards (Borell et al., 2012). This emphasis on phenomenology likely reflects an interest in understanding subjective dimensions of occupational therapy in short-stay hospital environments, aligning with the holistic nature of the discipline (Jack, 2006).
Over time, there's a shift towards qualitative approaches, though statistical significance isn't consistently reached (p = 0.086). However, a significant difference is found between qualitative and mixed-method studies (p = 0.001), indicating a growing interest in qualitative approaches in recent decades (Palinkas, 2014).
The prevalence of qualitative studies (45.8%, n = 11) compared to quantitative and mixed-methods studies likely results from a heightened focus on in-depth exploration of experiences and perceptions (Palinkas, 2014). Quantitative studies have remained constant, with a notable increase in the last decade (2016–2023) (Luchins, 2012). The occasional appearance of mixed-methods studies reflects methodological diversification, aiming to balance qualitative depth with quantitative objectivity (Bennett et al., 2007).
However, the choice between qualitative or quantitative methods in UHP occupational therapy research likely depends on various factors and isn't significantly associated with any specific methodology (Hitch & Lhuede, 2015).
Detailed analysis by decades reveals a transition in methodological preferences. While the first decade (1986–1995) was marked by quantitative studies predominance (Luchins, 2012), subsequent decades saw a shift towards qualitative methodologies (Borell et al., 2012), though statistical significance isn't always reached (p = 0.011). This shift may reflect the complexity of addressed phenomena, where qualitative narratives offer a holistic and contextualized understanding (Borell et al., 2012). However, the significant increase in quantitative studies in the last decade (2016–2023), along with the occasional mixed-methods studies, highlights methodological diversification and reflects an attempt to bolster evidence supporting occupational therapy interventions and practices (Bennett et al., 2007).
Population Studied in Occupational Therapy Research in UHP
Occupational therapy research in UHP primarily focuses on service users (87.5%, n = 21), reflecting a patient-centered orientation (Ferreira & Artmann, 2018). However, limited attention to professionals (8.3%, n = 2) and a small proportion studying both professionals and users (4.2%, n = 1) suggest an opportunity to broaden perspectives and integrate experiences of intervention implementers. While emphasizing the importance of studying user experiences for therapy quality and effectiveness (Doyle et al., 2013), scant attention to professionals indicates potential knowledge gaps and suggests future research directions. Improving user health is crucial, but humanizing and recognizing professionals can also significantly impact outcomes (March, 2017). We propose expanding the studied population to include both user experiences and the vital role of professionals in intervention effectiveness.
Gender Representation
Research participation in occupational therapy in UHP shows a significant female prevalence (66%, n = 138), with a statistical association (p = 0.001) between sex and field participation. This gender imbalance prompts questions about research equity and highlights the need for greater diversity to ensure result validity and relevance in mental health contexts (Morton et al., 2022).
The focus on females in most articles, unusual in research due to historical gender bias (Manterola & Otzen, 2015), is notable. In mental health, social and cultural factors influence problem development, manifesting differently based on gender roles, potentially leading to underdiagnosis in men (Montero et al., 2004). Despite these factors, considering feminist theory/perspective in future research can elucidate reasons behind this issue and achieve a more balanced view.
Evaluating Evidence on Occupational Therapy Interventions in UHP Users' Functionality, Quality of Life, and Recovery
Thorough exploration of outcome variables in occupational therapy articles within UHP offers a detailed view, revealing complexities and essential dimensions of the discipline's application in these settings. These findings underscore areas for improvement, such as the need for detailed intervention descriptions and exploration of how occupational diagnosis influences therapeutic care.
Diagnoses
The prevalence of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders (22.2%, n = 8) highlights the clinical complexity of UHP patients, indicating a necessity for tailored therapeutic approaches (Maj et al., 2021). Notably, while medical diagnostic terms are commonly used, the absence of occupational diagnoses is striking. This gap underscores a need for professional reasoning in understanding how occupation affects mental health in these contexts (Moruno-Miralles, 2002; Talavera-Valverde, 2015a, b). The absence of occupational diagnoses raises questions about how occupational therapy integrates into assessment and intervention selection compared to diagnosis-based medical interventions (Talavera-Valverde, 2015a, b). Addressing this gap is crucial for advancing understanding of occupational therapy in mental health contexts.
Setting
Consistent use of UHP as a study environment demonstrates research focus coherence. However, differences in data between adult and adolescent unit studies underscore the need to address occupational practice specifics in adolescent and youth populations in future research and clinical settings. Evolving mental health plans, policies (Johnson, 2021), and care for vulnerable populations (Daniels et al., 2022) can facilitate adolescent UHP development, an area requiring more attention compared to adult units.
Content and Keywords
Keyword analysis reveals prevalent themes in occupational therapy literature within UHP. Common terms like "occupational therapy" and "mental health" underscore their central role, highlighting the intrinsic connection between occupational therapy and mental health care (Kleinman, 1992). Additionally, terms such as "qualitative research," "acute psychiatric unit," and "recovery" emphasize the relevance of qualitative approaches and specific settings (Best, 1996; Borell et al., 2012; Parkinson, 1999; Synovec, 2015).
The diversity of less common keywords offers nuanced insights, including spirituality, indicating a broad exploration of human experience in occupational therapy within these settings. This reflects person-centered practice theories and the integration of occupational therapy models (Chen et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2012; Synovec, 2015; Wallengren et al., 2022).
Categories Derived from Analysis of Empirical Studies
Analysis of 24 intervention studies in UHP reveals a diverse range of occupational therapy interventions, indicating a comprehensive approach to addressing individuals' needs in these settings (Castillo, 2006; Evatt et al., 2016; Lloyd et al., 2017; Ramano et al., 2021). This diversity highlights the importance and effectiveness of occupational therapy in this clinical context, contributing to holistic recovery.
The absence of intervention descriptions in six articles (Kennedy & Fortune, 2014; Óladóttir & Pálmadóttir, 2017; Pastor-Montaño et al., 2019; Smith & Suto, 2014; Souto-Gómez & Talavera-Valverde, 2015b; Suto & Smith, 2014) raises questions about investigation clarity and emphasizes the need for standardized practices in the literature to facilitate replicability and result comparison. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing research and innovative approaches in occupational therapy to optimize care in mental health settings. Continuous attention to users' unique experiences and constant intervention adaptation is essential to advance occupational therapy effectiveness in UHP (Moruno-Miralles & Talavera-Valverde, 2011).
Grouping interventions according to the "Occupational Therapy Practice Framework" (AOTA, 2020) highlights a significant volume of occupation- and activity-related interventions, emphasizing their importance in the therapeutic process. This prevalence likely stems from the foundational role of occupation and activities in occupational therapy (Moruno-Miralles & Talavera-Valverde, 2011).
The preference for group interventions in occupational therapy (p = 0.001), particularly those related to occupation and activities, suggests therapeutic value in collaborative and contextualized approaches, aligning with occupational therapy principles promoting inclusion and meaningful participation in daily life (Gallagher et al., 2015). This emphasis on group interventions may signal a focus on building inclusive environments, fostering social participation, and facilitating user connections (Díaz de Neira et al., 2021).
While group interventions prevail, the identification of successful individual interventions suggests room for personalized care in UHP. Balancing individualized approaches with interventions fostering social interaction and group cohesion is crucial to effectively address users' diverse needs (Radnitz et al., 2019).
Assessing methodological quality and study design is crucial. Classifying all studies according to the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) (2014) level of evidence offers a uniform basis for assessing robustness. Most studies fall into the effectiveness category, characterized by observational-descriptive designs (Thiese, 2014), essential for exploring phenomena in natural settings. Despite limited diversity, methodological consistency enhances the internal validity of our review, providing a solid foundation for drawing conclusions about occupational therapy application in UHP.
From the reviewed literature, four emerging categories provide comprehensive insight into occupational therapy's contribution in mental health environments:
-
(a)
Importance of Occupational Therapy in UHP: The results suggest that occupational therapy plays a crucial role in improving mental health in UHP. Occupational reflection (Bailliard et al., 2021) positively impacts the recovery of individuals affected by bipolar, depressive, and addiction disorders (Enguita-Flórez et al., 2021; Larson, 1990; Synovec, 2015). These disorders, characterized by marked impairment in daily functioning and quality of life, find valuable resources in occupational therapy to restore balance and stability. Implementing the "recovery" model in occupational therapy not only demonstrates its intervention effectiveness but also enhances mental health care quality in UHP. We believe that this approach demonstrates the effectiveness of occupational therapy in promoting performance patterns (routines) and meaningful activities. This approach, supported by studies like Lloyd et al. (2017) and Synovec (2015), focuses on purposeful activities, contributing to building identity and a sense of belonging (Parkinson, 1999; Pascual, 2020; Ramano et al., 2021). Actively integrating occupational approaches into intervention protocols positively impacts mental health care effectiveness (Moruno-Miralles & Talavera-Valverde, 2011). Users' positive perception, particularly in group activities, underscores the utility and satisfaction of occupational therapy in depressive disorder intervention (Larson, 1990; Ramano et al., 2021).
-
(b)
Spirituality and Meaning in UHP: The findings stress the significance of considering spirituality in UHP to provide comprehensive care. Recognizing spirituality as a crucial element in the recovery process suggests that occupational therapy should address deeper dimensions of human experience beyond physical and psychological aspects (Smith & Suto, 2014). Spirituality, often overlooked in conventional mental health care, emerges as a valuable resource for more meaningful recovery (Smith & Suto, 2014; Suto & Smith, 2014). Understanding and acknowledging spirituality highlight essential elements for comprehensive care in UHP, emphasizing the importance of spirituality training for occupational therapy professionals emphasizing it as a potential strengthening component that provides a foundation for addressing the holistic needs of users (Huang et al., 2022; Smith & Suto, 2014; Suto & Smith, 2014).
-
(c)
Experiences of Users and Professionals in UHP. Findings regarding the experiences of users and professionals in UHP underscore the significance of the occupational perspective in the recovery journey. Autonomy emerges as a valuable element, suggesting that occupational therapy empowers individuals by equipping them with tools and skills to make informed decisions and actively engage in their recovery (Pascual, 2020). Psychoeducational approaches, satisfaction with occupational therapy activities, and strengths and weaknesses analysis are highlighted as key aspects. Moreover, occupational therapists play an integral role not only at an individual level but also in influencing mental health systems. Creating specific groups shows promise in UHP contexts, offering practical insights into mental health issues and fostering communities of learning and support with lasting effects on recovery (Eaton, 2002).
High user and professional satisfaction with occupational therapy activities underscore the importance of integrating these interventions into healthcare programs. Positive user perception, especially in group activities, highlights the utility and satisfaction of occupational therapy in depressive disorder intervention, fostering expression, mutual understanding, and support networks among users. This social aspect of occupational therapy could be vital for addressing loneliness and isolation, common factors in mental health problems (Pascual, 2020; Synovec, 2015).
-
(d)
Occupational Therapy Interventions to Improve Mental Health. Results regarding occupational therapy interventions to enhance mental health demonstrate the effectiveness of occupational therapy in UHP environments. Participation and integration into therapeutic groups, such as the soccer group, suggest that recreational and sports activities can effectively improve mental health. This holistic approach, extending beyond traditional interventions, underscores the importance of considering a variety of meaningful activities in occupational therapy (Restall & Egan, 2021).
In this regard, client-centered practice and building strong therapeutic relationships emerge as essential guiding factors in the intervention process, emphasizing understanding individual user needs and adapting interventions accordingly (Restall & Egan, 2021). Occupational therapy, with its comprehensive approach (Restall & Egan, 2021), contributes not only to quality of life but also to well-being and participation in meaningful activities. The importance of client-centered practices (Óladóttir & Pálmadóttir, 2017) and strong therapeutic relationships highlights the need for a personalized and effective approach in UHP contexts. Additionally, recognizing occupational therapists as agents of change at both individual and mental health system levels emphasizes the breadth of their impact (Picotin et al., 2021).
Future Research Directions
To deepen our understanding of trends over time, we suggest exploring historical trends identified in the review, particularly regarding the evolution of occupational therapy practices in UHP. This could provide insights into shifts in care and therapeutic approaches across different periods. Additionally, conducting cross-cultural comparisons would allow for exploration of variations and commonalities in the implementation and outcomes of occupational therapy in diverse cultural contexts. Similarly, investigating how contextual factors such as mental health policies and healthcare system structures influence the implementation and outcomes of occupational therapy in UHP could provide significant insights. Furthermore, we propose studies examining the economic impact of occupational therapy interventions, offering valuable information for informing decision-making in mental health policies.
Limitations
The predominance of English-language publications may introduce a language bias, potentially limiting the representation of research in other languages. Furthermore, focusing solely on indexed journals could exclude relevant studies not published in these sources, potentially introducing publication bias. Acknowledging publication biases, there is a possibility that studies with negative or nonsignificant results were not published, which could skew the review towards more positive findings. Similarly, while efforts were made to conduct a comprehensive search across various databases, restricting inclusion to literature in English, Spanish, and Portuguese might have led to the omission of relevant research in other languages, potentially impacting the global representativeness of the review.
Conclusions
This study underscores the growth, methodological shifts, and specific focus on experiences and effectiveness in occupational therapy within UHP. The scoping review demonstrates a notable increase in occupational therapy research in UHP, particularly emphasizing qualitative studies, highlighting the essential role of occupational therapy in comprehensive care for UHP users. There's a clear trend towards more specialized and evidence-based interventions. The analysis of selected articles reaffirms the existing evidence supporting the diversity and effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions in this context. Moreover, there's a recognized need for interdisciplinary collaboration and active user involvement in their recovery journey. Empirical studies, especially those employing qualitative methods, are predominant. The most common diagnoses addressed in the literature include schizophrenia, depressive disorders, and substance-related disorders. Group interventions are prominent in these settings. The results delineate four categories, emphasizing the pivotal role of occupational therapy in UHP recovery, positively impacting care quality, and fostering performance patterns (meaningful routines). Additionally, the spiritual dimension emerges as significant in the recovery process.
References
Aceituno-Aceituno, P., Romero-Martínez, S. J., Victor-Ponce, P., & García-Núñez, J. (2015). An analysis of national collaboration with Spanish researchers abroad in the health sciences. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13, 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0055-2
American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (2020). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (4th ed). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(Suppl. 2)(7412410010), 1–87. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Anonymous. (1943). Discussion on atypical pneumonía. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 36(8), 385–90.
Arblaster, K., Mackenzie, L., & Willis, K. (2015). Mental health consumer participation in education: A structured literature review. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62(5), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12205
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Aylott, L. M. E., Tiffin, P. A., Saad, M., Llewellyn, A. R., & Finn, G. M. (2019). Defining professionalism for mental health services: A rapid systematic review. Journal of Mental Health (abingdon, England), 28(5), 546–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2018.1521933
Bailliard, A., Schafer, Z., & Hart, L. (2021). Occupational reflection as intervention in inpatient psychiatry. American Journal of Occupational Therapy Association, 75(5), 7505205080. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2021.043703
Birken, M., & Bryant, W. (2019). A Photovoice study of user experiences of an occupational therapy department within an acute inpatient mental health setting. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(9), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022619836954
Bennett, S., McKenna, K., McCluskey, A., Tooth, L., Hoffmann, T., & Strong, J. (2007). Evidence for occupational therapy interventions: Effectiveness research indexed in the OTseeker database. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(10), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260707001003
Best, D. (1996). The Developing role of occupational therapy in psychiatric intensive care. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(4), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269605900403
Borell, L., Nygård, L., Asaba, E., Gustavsson, A., & Hemmingsson, H. (2012). Qualitative approaches in occupational therapy research. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(6), 521–529. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.649782
Brown, G. T., Rodger, S., & Brown, A. (2005). Publication practices of English language occupational therapy journals. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260506800205
Brown, C., Stoffel, V. C., & Muñoz, J. (2019). Occupational therapy in mental health: A vision for participation (2º ed.). F.A. Davis Company.
Brown, T., & Gutman, S. A. (2019). Impact factor, eigen factor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(7), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2018.1473489
Brown, T., Gutman, S. A., Ho, Y. S., & Fong, K. N. K. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of occupational therapy publications. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1329344
Castillo, S. (2006). Terapia ocupacional en unidad de hospitalización breve. Indivisa: Boletín de Estudios e Investigación, 7(Núm. Extra 6), 63–70
Chen, S. P., Chang, W. P., & Stuart, H. (2020). Self-reflection and screening mental health on Canadian campuses: Validation of the mental health continuum model. BMC Psychology, 8(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00446-w
Comité Gestor del Consejo de Colegios de Terapia Ocupacional. Asociaciones Profesionales de Terapia Ocupacional. (2013). Informe técnico sobre terapia ocupacional. Comité Gestor del Consejo de Colegios de Terapia Ocupacional y Asociaciones Profesionales de Terapia Ocupacional.
Christie, L., Inman, J., Davys, D., & Cook, P. A. (2021). A systematic review into the effectiveness of occupational therapy for improving function and participation in activities of everyday life in adults with a diagnosis of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 282, 962–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.080
D'Amico, M. L., Jaffe, L. E., & Gardner, J. A. (2018). Evidence for interventions to improve and maintain occupational performance and participation for people with serious mental illness: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(5), 7205190020p1–7205190020p11. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.033332
Daniels, S. I., Cheng, H., Gray, C., Kim, B., Stave, C. D., & Midboe, A. M. (2022). A scoping review of implementation of health-focused interventions in vulnerable populations. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 12(9), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac025
Díaz de Neira, M., Marín Vila, M., & Martínez González, L. M. (2021). Intervención psicoterapéutica grupal en una Unidad de Hospitalización Breve de Adolescentes desde las terapias contextuales. Revista de la Asociación Española de Neuropsiquiatría, 41(139), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0211-57352021000100005
Doedens, P., Vermeulen, J., Boyette, L. L., Latour, C., & de Haan, L. (2020). Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services—A systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 27(4), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12586
Doyle, C., Lennox, L., & Bell, D. (2013). A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570
Eakman, A. M. (2014). A prospective longitudinal study testing relationships between meaningful activities, basic psychological needs fulfillment, and meaning in life. OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 34(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20140211-01
Eaton, P. (2002). Psychoeducation in acute mental health settings: Is there a role for occupational therapists? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(7), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260206500704
Enguita-Flórez, M.-P., Martínez-Soto, A., Andreu-Martí, V., Pastor-Montaño, M.- Ángeles, & López-García, R. (2021). Satisfacción con la terapia ocupacional en una unidad de hospitalización psiquiátrica aguda: un estudio descriptivo: Satisfaction with occupational therapy in an acute psychiatric inpatient unit: a descriptive study. TOG (A Coruña), 18(2), 101–109. https://www.revistatog.es/ojs/index.php/tog/article/view/120
Evatt, M., Scanlan, J. N., Benson, H., Pace, C., & Mouawad, A. (2016). Exploring consumer functioning in high dependency units and psychiatric intensive care units: Implications for mental health occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 63(5), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12290
European Ministers of Education. (1999). The bologna declaration of 19 June 1999. Retrieved from https://www.ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/Ministerial_conferences/02/8/1999_Bologna_Declaration_English_553028.pdf (accessed 07 April 2024).
Evlat, G., Wood, L., & Glover, N. (2021). A systematic review of the implementation of psychological therapies in acute mental health inpatient settings. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(6), 1574–1586. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2600
Ferreira, L. R., & Artmann, E. (2018). Pronouncements on humanization: professionals and users in a complex health institution. Discursos sobre humanização: profissionais e usuários em uma instituição complexa de saúde. Ciencia & saude coletiva, 23(5), 1437–1450. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018235.14162016
Franco-López, A., Sanz-Valero, J., & Culebras, J. M. (2016). Publicar en castellano, o en cualquier otro idioma que no sea inglés, negativo para el factor de impacto y citaciones. JONNPR, 1(2), 65–70. 1
Fusar-Poli, P., Salazar de Pablo, G., De Micheli, A., Nieman, D. H., Correll, C. U., Kessing, L. V., Pfennig, A., Bechdolf, A., Borgwardt, S., Arango, C., & van Amelsvoort, T. (2020). What is good mental health? A scoping review. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.105
Gallagher, M., Bagatell, N., Godwin, K., & Peters, D. (2023). Using practice-based inquiry to enact occupation-centered, justice-oriented practice in an acute mental health setting. American Journal Occupational Therapy, 77(1), 7701205060. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050046
Gallagher, M., Muldoon, O. T., & Pettigrew, J. (2015). An integrative review of social and occupational factors influencing health and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01281
Gaynes, B. N., Brown, C. L., Lux, L. J., Brownley, K. A., Van Dorn, R. A., Edlund, M. J., Coker-Schwimmer, E., Weber, R. P., Zarzar, T., Viswanathan, M., & Lohr, K. N. (2017). Preventing and de-escalating aggressive behavior among adult psychiatric patients: A systematic review of the evidence. Psychiatric Services, 68(8), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600314
Gibson, R. W., D’Amico, M. L., Jaffe, L. E., & Arbesman, M. (2011). Occupational therapy interventions for recovery in the areas of community integration and normative life roles for adults with serious mental illness: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.001297
Haracz, K., & Ashby, S. (2019). Social skills training shows comparable effectiveness with other interventions, including medications, for reducing negative symptoms in people with psychotic disorders. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 66(1), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12545
Harmer, B. J., & Orrell, M. (2008). What is meaningful activity for people with dementia living in care homes? A comparison of the views of older people with dementia, staff and family carers. Aging & Mental Health, 12(5), 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802343019
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Hitch, D., & Lhuede, K. (2015). Research priorities in mental health occupational therapy: A study of clinician perspectives. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 62(5), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12223
Holm, S. E., & Mu, K. (2012). Discharge planning for the Elderly in acute care: The perceptions of experienced occupational therapists. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 30(3), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.3109/02703181.2012.719601
Huang, Y. H., Nagao, C. A., Santos, K. M. B., & Werchowsky, M. I. (2022). Impact of culture, spirituality, and mental health attitudes on intergenerational asian-american caregivers: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy Association, 76(2), 7602205030. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2022.046912
Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2019). Re-imagining occupational therapy clients as communities: Presenting the community-centred practice framework. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 26(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1423374
Jack, S. M. (2006). Utility of qualitative research findings in evidence-based public health practice. Public Health Nursing, 23(3), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.230311.x
Jacobsen, P., Hodkinson, K., Peters, E., & Chadwick, P. (2018). A systematic scoping review of psychological therapies for psychosis within acute psychiatric in-patient settings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 213(2), 490–497. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.106
James, S., & Prilleltensky, I. (2002). Cultural diversity and mental health. Towards integrative practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(8), 1133–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00102-2
Joanna Briggs Institute -JBI-. (2014). The JBI approach: Levels of evidence. Retrieved from https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI-Levels-of-evidence_2014_0.pdf (accessed 20 September 2023).
Johnson, A. L. (2021). Changes in mental health and treatment, 1997–2017. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 62(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146520984136
Johnson, K. S., & Leising, D. J. (1986). The literature of occupational therapy: A citation analysis study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40(6), 390–396. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.6.390
Kaplan, K. L. (1986). The directive group: Short-term treatment for psychiatric patients with a minimal level of functioning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40(7), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.7.474
Kennedy, J. & Fortune, T. (2014). Women’s experiences of being in an acute psychiatric unit: An occupational perspective. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 77(6), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.4276/030802214X14018723138048
Kleinman, B. L. (1992). The challenge of providing occupational therapy in mental health. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(6), 555–557. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.6.555
Larson, K. B. (1990). Activity patterns and life changes in people with depression. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(10), 902–906. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.10.902
Lau, N., Colt, S. F., Waldbaum, S., O’Daffer, A., Fladeboe, K., Yi-Frazier, J. P., McCauley, E., & Rosenberg, A. R. (2021). Telemental health for youth with chronic illnesses: Systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 8(8), e30098. https://doi.org/10.2196/30098
Lau, N., Waldbaum, S., Parigoris, R., O’Daffer, A., Walsh, C., Colt, S. F., Yi-Frazier, J. P., Palermo, T. M., McCauley, E., & Rosenberg, A. R. (2020). eHealth and mHealth psychosocial interventions for youths with chronic illnesses: Systematic review. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 3(2), e22329. https://doi.org/10.2196/22329
Lee, S. W., Kielhofner, G., Morley, M., Heasman, D., Garnham, M., Willis, S., Parkinson, S., Forsyth, K., Melton, J., & Taylor, R. R. (2012). Impact of using the Model of Human Occupation: A survey of occupational therapy mental health practitioners’ perceptions. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(5), 450–456. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.645553
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Lipskaya-Velikovsky, L., Kotler, M., & Krupa, T. (2016). Description of and preliminary findings for occupational connections, an intervention for inpatient psychiatry settings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(6), 7006350010p1–7006350010p5. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.014688
Lloyd, C., Williams, P. L., Vilic, G., & Tse, S. (2017). Progressing recovery-oriented care in psychiatric inpatient units: Occupational therapy’s role in supporting a stronger peer workforce. Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-06-2017-0017
Lopes, R. E., Cruz, D. M. C., & Malfitano, A. P. S. (2018). Em tempos difíceis, compartilhando boas notícias em meio a muito trabalho. Cadernos Brasileiros De Terapia Ocupacional, 26(3), 509–510. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoED2632
Luchins, D. (2012). Two approaches to improving mental health care: Positivist/quantitative versus skill-based/qualitative. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 55(3), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2012.0024
Maj, M., van Os, J., De Hert, M., Gaebel, W., Galderisi, S., Green, M. F., Guloksuz, S., Harvey, P. D., Jones, P. B., Malaspina, D., McGorry, P., Miettunen, J., Murray, R. M., Nuechterlein, K. H., Peralta, V., Thornicroft, G., van Winkel, R., & Ventura, J. (2021). The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management. World Psychiatry, 20(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20809
Manterola, C., & Otzen, T. (2015). Los sesgos en investigación clínica. International Journal of Morphology., 33(3), 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000300056
Mapanga, W., Casteleijn, D., Ramiah, C., Odendaal, W., Metu, Z., Robertson, L., & Goudge, J. (2019). Strategies to strengthen the provision of mental health care at the primary care setting: An evidence map. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0222162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222162
March, J. C. (2017). Humanizar la sanidad para mejorar la calidad de sus servicios. Revista de Calidad Asistencial, 32(5), 245 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cali.2017.10.001
Méndez-Mena. L. (2006). Unidad de Hospitalización Breve de adolescentes. Indivisa: boletín de estudios e investigación, 7(Monografía VI), 71–78. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/68853
Ministerio de Sanidad. (2021). Estrategia de Salud Mental del Sistema Nacional de Salud Período 2022–2026. Ministerio de Sanidad
Montero, I., Aparicio, D., Góómez-Beneyto, M., Moreno-Küüstner, B., Reneses, B., Usall, J. & Váázquez-Barquero, J. L. (2004). Género y salud mental en un mundo cambiante. Gaceta Sanitaria, 18(Supl. 1), 175–181. http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213-91112004000400028&lng=es&tlng=es.
Morton, E. K., McKenzie, S. K., Cooper, A., Every-Palmer, S., & Jenkin, G. L. S. (2022). Gender and intersecting vulnerabilities on the mental health unit: Rethinking the dilemma. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 940130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.940130
Moruno-Miralles, P. (2002). Razonamiento clínico en Terapia ocupacional: un análisis del procedimiento diagnóstico. [Tesis Doctoral]. Departamento de Psicología Biológica y de la Salud. Madrid. http://hdl.handle.net/10486/5770
Moruno-Millares, P., & Talavera Valverde, M. Á. (2011). Terapia ocupacional en salud mental. Elsevier.
Navarro, F. A. (2001). El inglés, idioma internacional de la medicina: Causas y consecuencias de un fenómeno actual. Panace, 2(3), 35–51.
Noyes, S., & Griffin, E. (2019). Occupational therapy practice guidelines for adults living with serious mental illness. AOTA Press. https://doi.org/10.7139/2017.978-1-56900-594-1
O’Brien, A. J. (2001). The therapeutic relationship: Historical development and contemporary significance. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 8(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2001.00367.x
Óladóttir, S., & Pálmadóttir, G. (2017). The continuum of client-centred practice in an acute psychiatric unit: A mixed method study of clients’ perceptions. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616664909
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). (1996). Mental health care law: Ten basic principles : With annotations suggesting selected actions to promote their implementation. Organización Mundial da Saúde. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/63624
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). (2014). Constitución da organización mundial da saúde. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/es/about/governance/constitution
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 39(372), n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Palinkas L. A. (2014). Qualitative and mixed methods in mental health services and implementation research. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 53, 43(6), 851–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.910791
Parkinson, S. (1999). Audit of a group programme for inpatients in an acute mental health setting. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269906200606
Parkinson, S., Chester, A., Cratchley, S., & Rowbottom, J. (2008). Application of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool (MOHOST Assessment) in an acute psychiatric setting. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 22(2–3), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380570801989465
Pascual, G. (2020). Análisis del grupo terapéutico de fútbol, como herramienta de empoderamiento, dentro de la trayectoria deportiva en una unidad de hospitalización. Informaciones Psiquiátricas, 21(242), 37–45.
Pastor-Montaño, M. Ángeles, Márquez Álvarez, L. J., López Martín, O., & Asensio Manero, C. (2019). ¿Cómo viven las personas con un trastorno mental el ingreso en una unidad de corta estancia psiquiátrica? TOG (A Coruña), 16(30), 143–156. https://www.revistatog.es/ojs/index.php/tog/article/view/31
Picotin, J., Beaudoin, M., Hélie, S., Martin, A. É., & Carrier, A. (2021). Occupational therapists as social change agents: Exploring factors that influence their actions. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy., 88(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211022891
Piedra, Y. & Martínez-Rodríguez, A. (2007). Producción científica. Ciencias de la Información, 38(3), 33–38. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1814/181414861004.pdf
Polonio, B. (n.d.). Los inicios de la formación de los terapeutas ocupacionales en España: 1960–1990, 3 décadas de lucha por un legado más rico. Retrieved from https://www.urjc.es/images/cndeuto/archivos/LosIniciosDeLaFormacionDeLosTerapeutasOcupacionalesEnEspana.pdf (accessed 07 April 2024).
Radnitz, A., Chantal, C. & Thavanesi, G. (2019). Occupational therapy groups as a vehicle to address interpersonal relationship problems: mental health care users' perceptions. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2019/vol49n2a2
Ramano, E. M., de Beer, M., & Roos, J. L. (2021). The perceptions of adult psychiatric inpatients with major depressive disorder towards occupational therapy activity-based groups. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 27, 1612. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v27i0.1612
Restall, G. J., & Egan, M. Y. (2021). Collaborative relationship-focused occupational therapy: Evolving lexicon and practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 88(3), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211022889
Rocamora-Montenegro, M., Compañ-Gabucio, L. M., & Garcia de la Hera, M. (2021). Occupational therapy interventions for adults with severe mental illness: a scoping review. BMJ Open, 11(10), e047467. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047467
Scanlan, J. N., Meredith, P. J., Haracz, K., Ennals, P., Pépin, G., Webster, J. S., Arblaster, K., Wright, S., & Network, A. N. Z. O. T. M. H. A. (2017). Mental health education in occupational therapy professional preparation programs: Alignment between clinician priorities and coverage in university curricula. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 64(6), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12397
Scheewe, T. W., Backx, F. J., Takken, T., Jörg, F., van Strater, A. C., Kroes, A. G., Kahn, R. S., & Cahn, W. (2013). Exercise therapy improves mental and physical health in schizophrenia: A randomised controlled trial. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 127(6), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12029
Schuch, F. B., Vancampfort, D., Rosenbaum, S., Richards, J., Ward, P. B., Veronese, N., Solmi, M., Cadore, E. L., & Stubbs, B. (2016). Exercise for depression in older adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials adjusting for publication bias. Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatría, 38(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2016-1915
Sesé, E., Bellido, J. R., & Sanz Valer, P. (2011). Programa de terapia ocupacional en la unidad de agudos de psiquiatría. Terapia Ocupacional: Revista Informativa De La Asociación Profesional Española De Terapeutas Ocupacionales, 21(56), 2–9.
Smith, S., & Suto, M. J. (2014). Spirituality in bedlam: Exploring patient conversations on acute psychiatric units. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417413516932
Sobrido-Prieto, M., Talavera-Valverde, M. -Á., & Souto-Gómez, A.-I. (2021). A descriptive study of the presence, visibility and quality of occupational therapy journals. Cadernos Brasileiros De Terapia Ocupacional, 29, e2918. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoAO2205
Sobrido-Prieto, M., Talavera-Valverde, M. -Á., & Souto-Gómez, A.-I. (2023). Authorship in scientific manuscripts in occupational therapy: A descriptive study. Cadernos Brasileiros De Terapia Ocupacional, 31, e3443. https://doi.org/10.1590/2526-8910.ctoAO263834433
Souto-Gómez, A. I., & Talavera-Valverde, M. A. (2015a). La muerte conceptualizada desde el razonamiento narrativo: Relato biográfico en el final de la vida. Archivos de la Memoria, 12(2). https://www.index-f.com/memoria/12/12209r.php
Souto-Gómez, A. I., & Talavera-Valverde, M. Á. (2015b). Análisis del razonamiento narrativo de una terapeuta ocupacional en un dispositivo de salud mental. Archivos de la Memoria, 12(2). https://ciberindex.com/c/am/e12213
Suto, M. J., & Smith, S. (2014). Spirituality in bedlam: Exploring professional conversations on acute psychiatric units. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 81(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008417413516931
Synovec, C. E. (2015). Implementing Recovery Model Principles as Part of Occupational Therapy in Inpatient Psychiatric Settings. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2014.1001014
Talavera-Valverde, M. A. (2015a). Estudio del razonamiento clínico en estudiantes de terapia ocupacional. [Tesis Doctoral]. Departamento de Medicina. A Coruña. http://hdl.handle.net/2183/15747
Talavera-Valverde, M. A. (2015b). Razonamiento clínico y diagnóstico en terapia ocupacional. Síntesis.
Thiese, M. S. (2014). Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochemia Medica, 24(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.022
Tomlin, G., & Borgetto, B. (2011). Research Pyramid: A new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy Association, 65(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.000828
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Valderas, J. M., Bentley, R. A., Buckley, R., Wray, K. B., Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). Why do team-authored papers get cited more? Science, 317(5844), 1496–1498. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.317.5844.1496b
Verd, J., & Lozares, C. (2016). Introduccion a la investigacion cualitativa. Síntesis.
Vessuri, H. (2014). Cambios en las ciencias ante el impacto de la globalización. Revista De Estudios Sociales, 5, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.7440/res50.2014.16
Wainberg, M. L., Scorza, P., Shultz, J. M., Helpman, L., Mootz, J. J., Johnson, K. A., Neria, Y., Bradford, J. E., Oquendo, M. A., & Arbuckle, M. R. (2017). Challenges and opportunities in global mental health: A research-to-practice perspective. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(5), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0780-z
Wallengren, C., Billig, H., Björkman, I., Ekman, I., Feldthusen, C., Lindström Kjellberg, I., & Lundberg, M. (2022). Person-centered care content in medicine, occupational therapy, nursing, and physiotherapy education programs. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 492. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03502-8
Whitley, R., Rousseau, C., Carpenter-Song, E., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2011). Evidence-based medicine: Opportunities and challenges in a diverse society. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(9), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371105600902
World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT). (2017). Definition of occupational therapy. WFOT. https://www.wfot.org/resources/definitions-of-occupational-therapy-de-member-organisations
World Federation of Occupational Therapists (WFOT). (2019). Occupational Therapy and Mental Health. WFOT. https://wfot.org/resources/occupational-therapy-and-mental-health
Wuchty, S., Jhones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Zango-Martín, I., Nafai, S., El Ouazzani, S., Derkaoui, J., Stevens-Nafai, E., & Codern-Bové, N. (2022). Understanding the role and importance of occupational therapy in mental health services in Morocco: Perspectives from mental health professionals. Work (Reading, Mass.), 72(2), 775–784. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-213644
Zapata Moya, Á. R., & Navarro Yáñez, C. J. (2021). Urban regeneration policies and mental health in a context of economic crisis in Andalusia (Spain). Journal of Housing and the Built Environment : HBE, 36(2), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09774-0
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Funding for open access charge: Universidade da Coruña/Consorcio Interuniversitario do Sistema Universitario de Galicia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
UGG, MATV and AISG is the leadS and MATV is the corresponding author. All other au-thors are listed according to contributions as defined using the CRediT taxonomy. UGG, MATV and AISG: Writing –Original Draft, Writing –Review & Editing, Conceptualization, Methodology and Formal Analysis.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author(s) declare(s) that is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
García-Gestal, U., Talavera-Valverde, MÁ. & Souto-Gómez, AI. Occupational Therapy in Psychiatric Short-Term Hospitalization Units: Scoping Review. Community Ment Health J 60, 1283–1307 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01286-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01286-3