Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implementing the Strengths Model of Case Management: Assessing Practice Three Years After Initial Implementation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While strengths approaches are important to recovery-oriented practice, implementation can be challenging. This study implemented the strengths model of case management (SMCM) in 11 CM teams and assessed the fidelity of delivery and staff perceptions of the model after 36 months using the SMCM fidelity scale and the Readiness Monitoring Tool. Paired sample t-tests assessed change in fidelity from baseline to 36 months. Adjusted regression analyses compared survey responses of direct and management staff. While fidelity ratings significantly improved across all domains, at 36 months they remained suboptimal in supervision practices and use of model tools. Staff perceptions were generally positive but consistently lower for front-line than management staff. Implementing SMCM into existing case management practice with good fidelity is feasible. However, clear support from management may strengthen staff motivation and delivery. A review of practice later in implementation can flag challenges for sustainability and guide implementation support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While two of the three Quebec sites are funded and managed by the provincial government, they operate in different locations with different local management teams and so were considered separate organizations for this study.

References

  • Beidas, R. S., Stewart, R. E., Adams, D. R., Fernandez, T., Lustbader, S., Powell, B. J., Aarons, G. A., Hoagwood, K. E., Evans, A. C., Hurford, M. O., Rubin, R., Hadley, T., Mandell, D. S., & Barg, F. K. (2016). A multi-level examination of stakeholder perspectives of implementation of evidence-based practices in a large urban publicly-funded mental health system. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43(6), 893–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0705-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (2020). Assessing the fidelity of evidence-based practices: History and current status of a standardized measurement methodology. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47(6), 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-019-00991-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briand, C., & Menear, M. (2014). Implementing a continuum of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for people with severe mental illness: Part 2-review of critical implementation issues. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371405900403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Rounthwaite, J., & Barwick, M. (2011). Implementing evidence-based practices: A transformational organizational change process. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 10(7), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/cgp/v10i07/50010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L., Goscha, R., & Rapp, C. (2016). Field mentoring: An important strategy for evidence-based practice implementation. Best Practices in Mental Health, 12, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, F. P., Goff, R. O., Pullman, J., Sommer, J., & Lim, P. (2019). Changes in mental health providers’ recovery attitudes and strengths model implementation following training and supervision. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(6), 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9885-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domlyn, A. M., Scott, V., Livet, M., Lamont, A., Watson, A., Kenworthy, T., Talford, M., Yannayon, M., & Wandersman, A. (2021). R = MC2 readiness building process: A practical approach to support implementation in local, state, and national settings. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(5), 1228–1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, S., Goscha, R., & Rapp, C. (2012). Strengths model case management fidelity and outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 63(7), 708–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J., Andrew, F., & Cai, Li. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (no. 25). IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latimer, E., Aubry, T., Barrett, B., et al. (2022). Association between fidelity to the strengths model of case management and client outcomes: A quasi-experimental study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, in press

  • Latimer, E., & Rabouin, D. (2011). Soutien d’intensité variable (SIV) et rétablissement: Que nous apprennent les études expérimentales et quasi-expérimentales? (Case management for moderate need clienteles: What can we learn from experimental and quasi-experimental studies?). Santé Mentale Au Québec XXXV, I(1), 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livet, M., Yannayon, M., Richard, C., Sorge, L., & Scanlon, P. (2020). Ready, set, go: Exploring use of a readiness process to implement pharmacy services. Implementation Science Communications. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00036-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The quality implementation framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3–4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakis, M., Wilson, M., & Hamilton, B. (2013). Implementing the strengths model of case management: Group supervision fidelity outcomes. Community Mental Health Journal, 49(3), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-012-9546-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C., & Goscha, R. (2012). The strengths model: A recovery-oriented approach to mental health services (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck, M., Latimer, E., Bergeron-Leclerc, C., et al. Examining the working alliance as a mediator of the relationship between fidelity to the strengths model of case management and client outcomes, in a multiprovincial context. Psychiatric Services, in press

  • Salyers, M. P., McKasson, M., Bond, G. R., McGrew, J. H., Rollins, A. L., & Boyle, C. (2007). The role of technical assistance centers in implementing evidence-based practices: Lessons learned. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 10(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487760701345968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaccia, J. P., Cook, B. S., Lamont, A., Wandersman, A., Castellow, J., Katz, J., & Beidas, R. S. (2015). A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R = MC2. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21698

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, N., Mendenhall, A. N., & Grube, W. (2019). Strengths model for youth case management: Professionals’ perceptions of model impact on clients. Social Work in Mental Health, 17(4), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2018.1563024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, N., Mendenhall, A. N., & Grube, W. (2021). Strengths model for youth case management: Impact on the provider and agency. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00668-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, V. C., Kenworthy, T., Godly-Reynolds, E., Bastien, G., Scaccia, J., McMickens, C., Rachel, S., Cooper, S., Wrenn, G., & Wandersman, A. (2017). The readiness for integrated care questionnaire (RICQ): An instrument to assess readiness to integrate behavioral health and primary care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(5), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stirman, S., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teague, G. B., Mueser, K. T., & Rapp, C. A. (2012). Advances in fidelity measurement for mental health services research: Four measures. Psychiatric Services, 63(8), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, S., Tsoi, E. W. S., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Shepherd, G., Slade, M., Whitley, R., & Petrakis, M. (2016). Uses of strength-based interventions for people with serious mental illness: A critical review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 62(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764015623970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, S., Ng, S. M. C., Yuen, W. Y. W., Fukui, S., Goscha, R. J., & Lo, W. K. I. (2019). Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of strengths model case management (SMCM) with Chinese mental health service users in Hong Kong. British Medical Journal Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoi, E. W. S., Tse, S., Yu, C. H., Chan, S. K., Wan, E., Wong, S., & Liu, L. (2019). A nonrandomized controlled trial of strengths model case management in Hong Kong. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(5), 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731518772142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A., & Scaccia, J. P. (2017). Organizational readiness: Measurement & predictor of progress final report.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the people who participated in the study. We acknowledge the individuals who supported project implementation including Christian Méthot, Nhi Vu, Francois Neveu and staff at each of the study sites where the strengths model was implemented.

Funding

Funding was provided by Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (Grant No. 312666).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Durbin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose for this study.

Ethical Approval

Ethics approval was obtained individually for each participating site in Ontario and Newfoundland, and centrally, as prescribed by the government of Québec, for sites in that province. Participants provided informed consent prior to the baseline interview.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Durbin, J., Aubry, T., Barrett, B. et al. Implementing the Strengths Model of Case Management: Assessing Practice Three Years After Initial Implementation. Community Ment Health J 58, 1535–1543 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-022-00968-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-022-00968-0

Keywords

Navigation