Skip to main content
Log in

Closed-loop stochastic oilfield optimization for hedging against geologic, development, and operation uncertainty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Development and management of oilfields involve several sources of uncertainty that complicate an already challenging decision-making process. Two main sources of uncertainty are related to geologic description of reservoirs and future development and operation scenarios. While geologic uncertainty has been widely studied and robust optimization methods have been developed to account for it, the uncertainty in future development and operations has not been considered. Traditionally, future development strategies have been included as optimization decision variables. However, in practice, due to unpredictable factors, future plans tend to deviate from the solutions obtained in optimization problems. In a recent publication, we showed that a more prudent and realistic approach toward oilfield optimization is to consider future development plans as uncertain parameters to ensure that the obtained solutions remain robust when future plans change. Here, we develop a closed-loop stochastic field development optimization formulation to account for the uncertainty in geologic description and future development and operation scenarios. The proposed approach optimizes the decision variables for current stage of planning (e.g., well locations and operational settings) while accounting for geologic and future development and operation uncertainties. Geologic uncertainty is represented with several reservoir model realizations, while development uncertainty is incorporated through drilling scenario trees and stochastic well placement. To account for operation uncertainty, future well controls are also described probabilistically. Prior to each development decision-making stage, the reservoir is operated using a closed-loop control approach, including model calibration against dynamic data, subject to geologic and future development and operation uncertainties. After each data assimilation step, a new stochastic optimization is performed to adjust controllable decision variables for the current well configuration (e.g., well rates or BHPs) using the updated models and potentially revised future development scenarios. Using a multistage stochastic optimization workflow, this process is repeated after each decision stage. Several numerical experiments are presented to discuss various aspects of the proposed closed-loop stochastic optimization formulation and to evaluate its robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aanonsen, S.I., Nævdal, G., Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C., Vallès, B.: The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering—a review. SPE J. 14(03), 393–412 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Badru, O., & Kabir, C.S.: Well placement optimization in field development. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2003)

  3. Bangerth, W., Klie, H., Wheeler, M.F., Stoffa, P.L., Sen, M.K.: On optimization algorithms for the reservoir oil well placement problem. Comput. Geosci. 10(3), 303–319 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beckner, B.L., & Song, X.: Field development planning using simulated annealing-optimal economic well scheduling and placement. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1995)

  5. Brouwer, D.R., & Jansen, J.D.: Dynamic optimization of water flooding with smart wells using optimal control theory. In European Petroleum Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2002)

  6. Brouwer, D.R., Nævdal, G., Jansen, J.D., Vefring, E.H., & Van Kruijsdijk, C.P.J.W.: Improved reservoir management through optimal control and continuous model updating. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2004)

  7. Centilmen, A., Ertekin, T., & Grader, A.S.: Applications of neural networks in multiwell field development. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1999)

  8. Chen, Y., Oliver, D.S., Zhang, D.: Efficient ensemble-based closed-loop production optimization. SPE J. 14(04), 634–645 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, C., Wang, Y., Li, G., Reynolds, A.C.: Closed-loop reservoir management on the Brugge test case. Comput. Geosci. 14(4), 691–703 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. da Cruz, P.S., Horne, R.N., & Deutsch, C.V.: The quality map: a tool for reservoir uncertainty quantification and decision making. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1999)

  11. Emerick, A.A., Silva, E., Messer, B., Almeida, L.F., Szwarcman, D., Pacheco, M.A.C., & Vellasco, M.M.B.R.: Well placement optimization using a genetic algorithm with nonlinear constraints. In SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2009)

  12. Evensen, G.: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 99(C5), 10143–10162 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Evensen, G.: Sampling strategies and square root analysis schemes for the EnKF. Ocean Dyn. 54(6), 539–560 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Evensen, G.: Data Assimilation: the Ensemble Kalman Filter. Springer Science & Business Media (2009)

  15. Forouzanfar, F., Reynolds, A.C.: Joint optimization of number of wells, well locations and controls using a gradient-based algorithm. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92(7), 1315–1328 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyaguler, B., & Horne, R.N.: Uncertainty assessment of well placement optimization. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2001)

  17. Humphries, T.D., Haynes, R.D., James, L.A.: Simultaneous and sequential approaches to joint optimization of well placement and control. Comput. Geosci. 18(3-4), 433–448 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Isebor, O.J., Echeverría Ciaurri, D., Durlofsky, L.J.: Generalized field-development optimization with derivative-free procedures. SPE J. 19(05), 891–908 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jahandideh, A., Jafarpour, B.: Optimization of hydraulic fracturing design under spatially variable shale fracability. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 138, 174–188 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jahandideh, A., Jafarpour, B.: Hedging against uncertain future development plans in closed-loop field development optimization. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2018)

  21. Jahandideh, A., Jafarpour, B.: Stochastic oilfield optimization under uncertain future development plans. SPE J. (2019)

  22. Jansen, J.D., Brouwer, D.R., Naevdal, G., Van Kruijsdijk, C.P.J.W.: Closed-loop reservoir management. First Break. 23(1), 43–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, L., Jafarpour, B.: A variable-control well placement optimization for improved reservoir development. Comput. Geosci. 16(4), 871–889 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, L., Jafarpour, B., Mohammad-Khaninezhad, M.R.: A simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation algorithm for coupled well placement and control optimization under geologic uncertainty. Comput. Geosci. 17(1), 167–188 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Montes, G., Bartolome, P., & Udias, A.L.: The use of genetic algorithms in well placement optimization. In: SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2001)

  26. MRST: The MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox. www.sintef.no/MRST (2018)

  27. Naevdal G., Johnsen, L. M., Aanonsen, S.I., & Vefring, E.H.: Reservoir monitoring and continuous model updating using ensemble Kalman filter. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2003)

  28. Navabi, S., Khaninezhad, R., Jafarpour, B.: A unified formulation for generalized oilfield development optimization. Comput. Geosci. 21(1), 47–74 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peters, L., Arts, R., Brouwer, G., Geel, C., Cullick, S., Lorentzen, R. J., ... & Sarma, P.: Results of the Brugge benchmark study for flooding optimization and history matching. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 13(03), 391–405 (2010)

  30. Remy, N., Boucher, A., Wu, J.: Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: a User’s Guide. Cambridge University Press (2009)

  31. Sarma, P., Durlofsky, L.J., Aziz, K., Chen, W.H.: Efficient real-time reservoir management using adjoint-based optimal control and model updating. Comput. Geosci. 10(1), 3–36 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shapiro, A.: Topics in stochastic programming. CORE Lecture Series, Universite Catholique de Louvain (2011)

  33. Shirangi, M.G., Durlofsky, L.J.: Closed-loop field development under uncertainty by use of optimization with sample validation. SPE J. 20(05), 908–922 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Siraj, M.M., Van den Hof, P.M., & Jansen, J.D.: Risk management in oil reservoir water-flooding under economic uncertainty. In: 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 7542–7547. IEEE (2015)

  35. Siraj, M.M., Van den Hof, P.M., Jansen, J.D.: Robust optimization of water-flooding in oil reservoirs using risk management tools. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 49(7), 133–138 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Siraj, M.M., Van den Hof, P.M., Jansen, J.D.: Handling geological and economic uncertainties in balancing short-term and long-term objectives in waterflooding optimization. SPE J. 22(04), 1–313 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). 10th SPE comparative solution project: description of model 2. (2000). https://www.spe.org/web/csp/datasets/set02.htm

  38. Suman, A., Fernández-Martínez, J. L., & Mukerji, T.: Joint inversion of time-lapse seismic and production data for Norne field. In: 2011 SEG Annual Meeting. Society of Exploration Geophysicists (2011). Accessed Sept 2015

  39. van Essen, G., Zandvliet, M., Van den Hof, P., Bosgra, O., Jansen, J.D.: Robust waterflooding optimization of multiple geological scenarios. SPE J. 14(01), 202–210 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, C., Li, G., Reynolds, A.C.: Production optimization in closed-loop reservoir management. SPE J. 14(03), 506–523 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yeten, B., Durlofsky L.J., Aziz, K.: Optimization of nonconventional well type, location and trajectory. In: Proceedings of the 2002 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 29 September–2 October 2002, San Antonio, Texas (2002)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnam Jafarpour.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahandideh, A., Jafarpour, B. Closed-loop stochastic oilfield optimization for hedging against geologic, development, and operation uncertainty. Comput Geosci 24, 129–148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09902-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09902-y

Keywords

Navigation