Skip to main content
Log in

Markov chain random fields in the perspective of spatial Bayesian networks and optimal neighborhoods for simulation of categorical fields

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Markov chain random field (MCRF) model/theory provides a non-linear spatial Bayesian updating solution at the neighborhood nearest data level for simulating categorical spatial variables. In the MCRF solution, the spatial dependencies among nearest data and the central random variable can be described by a probabilistic directed acyclic graph that conforms to a neighborhood-based Bayesian network on spatial data. By selecting different neighborhood sizes and structures, applying the spatial conditional independence assumption to nearest neighbors, or incorporating ancillary information, one may construct specific MCRF models based on the MCRF general solution for various application purposes. Simplified MCRF models based on assuming the spatial conditional independence of nearest data involve only spatial transition probabilities, and one can implement them easily in sequential simulations. In this article, we prove the spatial Bayesian network characteristic of MCRFs, and test the optimal neighborhoods under the spatial conditional independence assumption. The testing results indicate that the quadrantal (i.e., one nearest datum per quadrant) neighborhood is generally the best choice for the simplified MCRF solution, performing better than other sectored neighborhoods and non-sectored neighborhoods with regard to simulation accuracy and pattern rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banerjee, S., Carlin, B.P., Gelfand, A.E.: Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayes, T.: An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. 53, 370–418 (1763)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Besag, J.: Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussions). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 36(2), 192–236 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Besag, J.: On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures (with discussions). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 48(3), 259–302 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carle, S.F., Fogg, G.E.: Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics. Math. Geol. 28(4), 453–476 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carle, S.F., Fogg, G.E.: Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-lag Markov chains. Math. Geol. 29(7), 891–918 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charness, G., Levin, D.: When optimal choices feel wrong: a laboratory study of Bayesian updating, complexity, and affect. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(4), 1300–1309 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Christakos, G.: A Bayesian/maximum-entropy view to the spatial estimation problem. Math. Geol. 22(7), 763–777 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dawid, A.P.: Conditional independence in statistical theory. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 41(1), 1–31 (1979) J Roy Stat Soc Ser B

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dimitrakopoulos, R., Mustapha, H., Gloaguen, E.: High-order statistics of spatial random fields: exploring spatial cumulants for modeling complex non-Gaussian and non-linear phenomena. Math. Geosci. 42, 65–99 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, vol. 1, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian network classifiers. Mach. Learn. 29(2–3), 131–163 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goovaerts, P.: Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford university press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haines-Young, R.: Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35(5), 681–699 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Isaaks, E.H., Sarivastava, R.: An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaffray, J.Y.: Bayesian updating and belief functions. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. 22(5), 1144–1152 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koltermann, E.C., Gorelick, S.M.: Heterogeneity in sedimentary deposits: a review of structure-imitating, process-imitating, and descriptive approaches. Water Resour. Res. 32, 2617–2658 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li, W.: Markov chain random fields for estimation of categorical variables. Math. Geol. 39, 321–335 (2007a)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, W.: Transiograms for characterizing spatial variability of soil classes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71, 881–893 (2007b)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, H., Reynolds, J.F.: A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology. 75(8), 2446–2455 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, W., Zhang, C.: A random-path Markov chain algorithm for simulating categorical soil variables from random point samples. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71, 656–668 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, W., Zhang, C.: A single-chain-based multidimensional Markov chain model for subsurface characterization. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 15(2), 157–174 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, W., Zhang, C.: Linear interpolation and joint model fitting of experimental transiograms for Markov chain simulation of categorical spatial variables. Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sci. 24(6), 821–839 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li, Y., Yang, S., Liu, T., Dong, X.: Comparative assessment of semantic-sensitive satellite image retrieval: simple and context-sensitive Bayesian networks. Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sci. 26(2), 247–263 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, W., Zhang, C., Willig, M.R., Dey, D.K., Wang, G., You, L.: Bayesian Markov chain random field cosimulation for improving land cover classification accuracy. Math. Geosci. 47(2), 123–148 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Luo, J.: Transition probability approach to statistical analysis of spatial qualitative variables in geology. In: Forster, A., Merriam, D.F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Meeting of the International Association for Mathematical Geology (October 10–14, 1993, Prague, Czech Republic) and Geologic modeling and mapping, pp. 281–299. Plenum Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Luo, J., Thomsen, A.: On direct estimation of the bivariate probability distribution of a regionalized variable from its spatial samples. In: Fabbri, A.G., Royer, J.J. (eds.) The 3rd CODATA conference on geomathematics and geostatistics, vol. 32, pp. 115–123. Sci. de la Terre, Ser. Inf., Nancy (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Matheron, G.: Principles of geostatistics. Econ. Geol. 58, 1246–1266 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Norberg, T., Rosen, L., Baran, A., Baran, S.: On modeling discrete geological structure as Markov random fields. Math. Geol. 34, 63–77 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Omre, H.: Bayesian kriging - merging observations and qualified guesses in kriging. Math. Geol. 19(1), 25–39 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pearl, J.: Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artif. Intell. 29(3), 241–288 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pickard, D.K.: Unilateral Markov fields. Adv. Appl. Probab. 12(3), 655–671 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ripley, B.D.: Gibbsian interaction models. In: Griffith, D.A. (ed.) Spatial Statistics: Past, Present, and Future, pp. 3–25. Institute of Mathematical Geography, Syracuse University, Syracuse (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rosholm, A. (1997) Statistical Methods for Segmentation and Classification of Images. Ph.D. dissertation, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby

  36. Schwarzacher, W.: The use of Markov chains in the study of sedimentary cycles. Math. Geol. 1, 17–39 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Strebelle, S.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math. Geol. 34, 1–21 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weissmann, G.S., Carle, S.F., Fogg, G.E.: Three-dimensional hydrofacies modeling based on soil surveys and transition probability geostatistics. Water Resour. Res. 35(6), 1761–1770 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Woodbury, A.D.: Bayesian updating revisited. Math. Geol. 21(3), 285–308 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, C., Li, W.: Regional-scale modeling of the spatial distribution of surface and subsurface textural classes in alluvial soils using Markov chain geostatistics. Soil Use Manag. 24(3), 263–272 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang, W., Li, W., Zhang, C.: Land cover post-classifications by Markov chain geostatistical cosimulation based on pre-classifications by different conventional classifiers. Int. J. Remote Sens. 37(4), 926–949 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, W., Li, W., Zhang, C., Li, X.: Incorporating spectral similarity into Markov chain geostatistical cosimulation for reducing smoothing effect in land cover post-classification. IEEE J. Selected Topics Appl. Earth Obser. Remote Sens. 10(3), 1082–1095 (2017a)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, W., Li, W., Zhang, C., Ouimet, W.B.: Detecting horizontal and vertical urban growth from medium resolution imagery and its relationships with major socioeconomic factors. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38(12), 3704–3734 (2017b)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was initially prepared in 2014. Partial support from U.S. NSF (Award numbers 1049017 and 1414108) is appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Li.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

Authors have the sole responsibility for all of the viewpoints presented in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 1114 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Zhang, C. Markov chain random fields in the perspective of spatial Bayesian networks and optimal neighborhoods for simulation of categorical fields. Comput Geosci 23, 1087–1106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09874-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09874-z

Keywords

Navigation