Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MediBlocks: secure exchanging of electronic health records (EHRs) using trust-based blockchain network with privacy concerns

  • Published:
Cluster Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Healthcare is a sensitive domain, and it is necessary to design an efficient solution in the healthcare system. Electronic Medical Records often have high privacy-sensitive data; unauthorized access to these patient data could hurt patients' reputations and cause financial losses to the organization. Most of the existing healthcare systems are based on a centralized architecture, which is more vulnerable such as hacking the healthcare system, arbitrary modification attacks, and single-point-of-failure. Also, these systems increase the cost due to various factors like—establishing a trusted network, cost per transaction, and limited access to patient health data, which are the problems that remain open until now. The blockchain is a general-purpose technology that seems to be an innovative and interesting technology that can improve the Health care domain by solving the above issues with a secure architecture. This paper address addresses the challenging problems. (1) How to provide secure data exchange and anonymity. (2) How to preserve the personal data privacy of the patient health records. The proposed solution leverages the Hyperledger Fabric, a permissioned blockchain that establishes a secured and trusted network to all stakeholders, ensuring the integrity of protected health information and providing authenticity and health access control. Further, the entire supply chain can be traced, decreasing duplicate tests and unnecessary service, increasing accountability, preserving the crucial documents, limiting the unauthorized sharing of the EHRs documents, and offering lower costs across the care continuum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on the reasonable request from the first author (E Suresh Babu).

References

  1. Ackerman, A., Chang, A., Diakun-Thibault, N., Forni, L., Landa, F., Mayo, J., van Riezen, R.: Blockchain and health IT: algorithms, privacy and data. Project PharmOrchard of MIT's Experimental Learning "MIT FinTech: Future Commerce.", White Paper August (2016).

  2. Angraal, S., Krumholz, H.M., Schulz, W.L.: Blockchain technology: applications in health care. Circulation 10(9), e003800 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon, W., Wright, A., Landman, A.: Blockchain in health care: decoding the hype. NEJM Catal. 3(1) (2017).

  4. Kuo, T.T., Ohno-Machado, L.: Modelchain: decentralized privacy-preserving Healthcare predictive modeling framework on private blockchain networks (2018). arXiv:1802.01746.

  5. Srinivasu, P.N., SivaSai, J.G., Ijaz, M.F., Bhoi, A.K., Kim, W., Kang, J.J.: Classification of skin disease using deep learning neural networks with MobileNet V2 and LSTM. Sensors 21(8), 2852 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liang, X., Zhao, J., Shetty, S., Liu, J., Li, D.: Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications. In: 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2017)

  7. Rouhani, S., Butterworth, L., Simmons, A.D., Humphery, D.G., Deters, R.: MediChain TM: a secure decentralized medical data asset management system. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), pp. 1533–1538. IEEE (2018).

  8. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decent. Bus Rev 21260 (2008).

  9. Mandal, M., Singh, P.K., Ijaz, M.F., Shafi, J., Sarkar, R.: A tri-stage wrapper-filter feature selection framework for disease classification. Sensors 21(16), 5571 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ijaz, M.F., Attique, M., Son, Y.: Data-driven cervical cancer prediction model with outlier detection and over-sampling methods. Sensors 20(10), 2809 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Culver, K.: Blockchain Technologies: A Whitepaper Discussing How the Claims Process can be Improved. In: ONC/NIST Use of Blockchain for Healthcare and Research Workshop. ONC/NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goldwater, J.: The use of a blockchain to foster the development of patient-reported outcome measures. In: ONC/NIST Use of Blockchain for Healthcare and Research Workshop. Gaithersburg, MD: ONC/NIST (2016).

  13. Miliard, M.: Blockchain use case: electronic health records. Could distributed ledger technology offer the promise of real-time EHR updates, seamless interoperability and protection from ransomware? (2018) https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/qa-john-halamka-worldwide-trends-ai-blockchain-cloud-and-more.

  14. Milojkovic, M.: Privacy-preserving framework for access control and interoperability of electronic health records using blockchain technology (2018).

  15. Elmisery, A.M., Rho, S., Aborizka, M.: A new computing environment for collective privacy protection from constrained healthcare devices to IoT cloud services. Cluster Comput. 22(1), 1611–1638 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, D., Luo, Z., Cao, B.: Blockchain-based federated learning methodologies in smart environments. Cluster Comput (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03424-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liang, W., Ji, N.: Privacy challenges of IoT-based blockchain: a systematic review. Clust. Comput (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-021-03260-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanwal, T., Anjum, A., Khan, A.: Privacy preservation in e-health cloud: taxonomy, privacy requirements, feasibility analysis, and opportunities. Clust. Comput. 24(1), 293–317 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hölbl, M., Kompara, M., Kamišalić, A., Nemec Zlatolas, L.: A systematic review of the use of blockchain in Healthcare. Symmetry 10(10), 470 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. da Conceição, A.F., da Silva, F.S.C., Rocha, V., Locoro, A., Barguil, J.M.: Eletronic health records using blockchain technology (2018). arXiv:1804.10078.

  21. Theodouli, A., Arakliotis, S., Moschou, K., Votis, K., Tzovaras, D.: On the design of a blockchain-based system to facilitate healthcare data sharing. In: 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications/12th IEEE International Conference on Big Data Science and Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE), pp. 1374–1379. IEEE (2018).

  22. Alexaki, S., Alexandris, G., Katos, V., Petroulakis, N.E.: Blockchain-based electronic patient records for regulated circular healthcare jurisdictions. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2018).

  23. Dubovitskaya, A., Xu, Z., Ryu, S., Schumacher, M., Wang, F.: Secure and trustable electronic medical records sharing using blockchain. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2017, p. 650. American Medical Informatics Association (2017).

  24. Katuwal, G.J., Pandey, S., Hennessey, M., Lamichhane, B.: Applications of blockchain in Healthcare: current landscape & challenges (2018). arXiv:1812.02776.

  25. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., Lippman, A.: Medrec: using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. In: 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD), pp. 25–30. IEEE (2016).

  26. Official documentation of hyperledger fabric https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/fabric

  27. Goldreich, O. (2009). Foundations of Cryptography. Basic Applications, vol. 2. Cambridge university Press, Cambridge (2009).

  28. Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., Rivest, R.L.: A digital signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-message attacks. SIAM J. Comput. 17(2), 281–308 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Babu, E.S., Kavati, I., Nayak, S.R., Ghosh, U., Al Numay, W.: Secure and transparent pharmaceutical supply chain using permissioned blockchain network. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 1–28 (2022).

  30. Babu, E.S., Dadi, A.K., Singh, K.K., Nayak, S.R., Bhoi, A.K., Singh, A.: A distributed identity‐based authentication scheme for internet of things devices using permissioned blockchain system. Expert Syst. e12941 (2022).

  31. Babu, E.S., Srinivasarao, B.K.N., Kavati, I., Rao, M.S.: Verifiable authentication and issuance of academic certificates using permissioned blockchain network. Int. J. Inf. Secur. Privacy (IJISP) 16(1), 1–24 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hu, J., Liu, K. Raft consensus mechanism and the applications. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1544, no. 1, p. 012079. IOP Publishing (2020).

  33. Cachin, C.: Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In: Workshop on distributed cryptocurrencies and consensus ledgers, vol. 310, no. 4, pp. 1–4 (2016).

  34. Sukhwani, H., Wang, N., Trivedi, K.S., Rindos, A.: Performance modeling of hyperledger fabric (permissioned blockchain network). In: 2018 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) (pp. 1–8). IEEE (2018).

  35. Krawiec, R.J., Housman, D., White, M., Filipova, M., Quarre, F., Barr, D., et al.: Blockchain: opportunities for health care. In: Proceedings of NIST Workshop Blockchain Healthcare, pp. 1–16 .

  36. Qin, Q., Jin, B., Liu, Y.: A secure storage and sharing scheme of stroke electronic medical records based on consortium blockchain. BioMed Res. Int. (2021)

  37. Shahnaz, A., Qamar, U., Khalid, A.: Using blockchain for electronic health records. IEEE Access 7, 147782–147795 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Le Nguyen, B., Lydia, E.L., Elhoseny, M., Pustokhina, I., Pustokhin, D.A., Selim, M.M., Shankar, K.: Privacy preserving blockchain technique to achieve secure and reliable sharing of IoT data. Comput. Mater. Continua 65(1), 87–107 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mittal N., et al.: Using Blockchain to Address Interoperability Concerns in Healthcare. International Biopharmaceutical Industry (2018)

  40. Kim, H., Song, H., Lee, S., Kim, H., Song, I.: A simple approach to share users' own healthcare data with a mobile phone. In: 2016 Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) (pp. 453–455). IEEE (2016)

Download references

Funding

Waleed Al-Numay acknowledges financial support from the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/250), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have equally contributed to this work, read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumya Ranjan Nayak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this manuscript has no conflict of interest with any other published source and has not been published previously (partly or in full). No data have been fabricated or manipulated to support our conclusions.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babu, E.S., Yadav, B.V.R.N., Nikhath, A.K. et al. MediBlocks: secure exchanging of electronic health records (EHRs) using trust-based blockchain network with privacy concerns. Cluster Comput 26, 2217–2244 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03652-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-022-03652-w

Keywords

Navigation