Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) of peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer: a descriptive cohort study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) represents a novel approach to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We report our experience with PIPAC in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). Data from GC patients (n = 20) included in the prospective PIPAC-OPC1 and PIPAC-OPC2 studies are reported. All patients had received prior systemic chemotherapy. The mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 10.5 (range 0–39) and nine patients had diffuse GC. PIPAC with cisplatin 7.5 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m2 were administered at 4–6-week intervals. Outcome criteria were objective tumour response, survival and adverse events. Twenty patients had 52 PIPAC procedures with a median follow-up of 10.4 months (3.3–26.5). Median survival from the time of PM diagnosis and after the first PIPAC procedure was 11.5 months and 4.7 months, respectively. Fourteen patients had repeated PIPAC (> 2), and the objective tumour response according to the histological peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) was observed in 36%, whereas 36% had stable disease. Ten patients completed the three prescheduled sessions (per protocol group) and 40% of those displayed an objective tumour response, while 20% had stable disease. Only minor postoperative complications were noted, and none were considered causally related to the PIPAC treatment. PIPAC with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin can induce a quantifiable objective tumour response in selected patients with PM from GC. Survival data are encouraging and warrant further clinical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International WCRF (2019) Worldwide cancer data https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/worldwide-cancer-data2018 [updated Jan. 2019; cited 2019 Jan]. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/worldwide-cancer-data.

  2. Yonemura Y, Endou Y, Sasaki T et al (2010) Surgical treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 36(12):1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2010.09.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glehen O, Gilly FN, Arvieux C et al (2010) Peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study of 159 patients treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 17(9):2370–2377. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1039-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Sedfy A, Brar SS, Coburn NG (2014) Current role of minimally invasive approaches in the treatment of early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(14):3880–3888. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3880

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugarbaker PH (2016) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of gastrointestinal cancers with peritoneal metastases: progress toward a new standard of care. Cancer Treat Rev 48:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitayama J, Ishigami H, Yamaguchi H et al (2018) Treatment of patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2(2):116–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12060

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishigami H, Fujiwara Y, Fukushima R et al (2018) Phase III Trial comparing intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 versus cisplatin plus S-1 in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: PHOENIX-GC Trial. J Clin Oncol 36(19):1922–1929. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyashiro I, Furukawa H, Sasako M et al (2011) Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with intraperitoneal and intravenous cisplatin followed by oral fluorouracil (UFT) in serosa-positive gastric cancer versus curative resection alone: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial JCOG9206-2. Gastric Cancer 14(3):212–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0027-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarela AI, Miner TJ, Karpeh MS et al (2006) Clinical outcomes with laparoscopic stage M1, unresected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 243(2):189–195. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000197382.43208.a5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Esquis P, Consolo D, Magnin G et al (2006) High intra-abdominal pressure enhances the penetration and antitumor effect of intraperitoneal cisplatin on experimental peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ann Surg 244(1):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000218089.61635.5f

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shinkai M, Imano M, Chiba Y et al (2018) Intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a Phase II Trial. Anticancer Res 38(10):5975–5981. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Solass W, Kerb R, Murdter T et al (2014) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol 21(2):553–559. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3213-

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nowacki M, Alyami M, Villeneuve L et al (2018) Multicenter comprehensive methodological and technical analysis of 832 pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) interventions performed in 349 patients for peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment: an international survey study. Eur J Surg Oncol 44(7):991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Bjerregaard JK et al (2018) Prospective, single-center implementation and response evaluation of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis. Ther Adv Med Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835918777036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Graversen M, Lundell L, Fristrup C, Pfeiffer P, Mortensen MB (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as an outpatient procedure. Pleura Peritoneum. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2018-0128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Garg PK, Jara M, Alberto M, Rau B (2019) The role of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in the management of gastric cancer: a systematic review. Pleura Peritoneum 4(1):20180127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Struller F, Horvath P, Solass W et al (2019) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis: a phase II study. Ther Adv Med Oncol 11:1758835919846402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835919846402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Solass W, Sempoux C, Detlefsen S et al (2016) Peritoneal sampling and histological assessment of therapeutic response in peritoneal metastasis: proposal of the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). Pleura Peritoneum 1(2):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2016-0011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Clavien PA, Strasberg SM (2009) Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250(2):197–198. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b6dcab

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Institutes of Health NCI (2009) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). 4.0 [published Online First: 28.05.2009]

  21. Solass W, Sempoux C, Carr N et al (2019) Reproducibility of the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) for assessment of response to therapy in peritoneal metastasis. Histopathology 74(7):1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lauren P (1965) The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64:31–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomassen I, van Gestel YR, van Ramshorst B et al (2014) Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: a population-based study on incidence, survival and risk factors. Int J Cancer 134(3):622–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang D, Hendifar A, Lenz C et al (2011) Survival of metastatic gastric cancer: significance of age, sex and race/ethnicity. J Gastrointest Oncol 2(2):77–84. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2010.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Coccolini F, Celotti A, Ceresoli M et al (2016) Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy as prophylaxis of peritoneal carcinosis from advanced gastric cancer-effects on overall and disease free survival. J Gastrointest Oncol 7(4):523–529. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2016.06.05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Khomyakov VRA, Ivanov A, Bolotina L, Utkina A et al (2016) Bidirectional chemotherapy in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis combining intravenous XELOX with intraperitoneal chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and Doxorubicin administered as a pressurized aerosol: an open-label, Phase-2 study (PIPAC-GA2). Pleura Peritoneum 1(3):159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gockel I, Jansen-Winkeln B, Haase L et al (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM): results of a single-center experience and register study. J Gastric Cancer 18(4):379–391. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Pfeiffer P et al (2018) Severe peritoneal sclerosis after repeated pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (PIPAC OX): report of two cases and literature survey. Clin Exp Metastasis 35(3):103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-018-9895-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tempfer CB, Hilal Z, Dogan A et al (2018) Concentrations of cisplatin and doxorubicin in ascites and peritoneal tumor nodules before and after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with peritoneal metastasis. Eur J Surg Oncol 44(7):1112–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bremholm Ellebæk.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ellebæk, S.B., Graversen, M., Detlefsen, S. et al. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) of peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer: a descriptive cohort study. Clin Exp Metastasis 37, 325–332 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-020-10023-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-020-10023-5

Keywords

Navigation