Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing a set of indicators to identify, monitor, and track impacts and change in forests of the United States

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

United States forestland is an important ecosystem type, land cover, land use, and economic resource that is facing several drivers of change including climatic. Because of its significance, forestland was identified through the National Climate Assessment (NCA) as a key sector and system of concern to be included in a system of climate indicators as part of a sustained assessment effort. Here, we describe 11 informative core indicators of forests and climate change impacts with metrics available or nearly available for use in the NCA efforts. The recommended indicators are based on a comprehensive conceptual model which recognizes forests as a land use, an ecosystem, and an economic sector. The indicators cover major forest attributes such as extent, structural components such as biomass, functions such as growth and productivity, and ecosystem services such as biodiversity and outdoor recreation. Interactions between humans and forests are represented through indicators focused on the wildland-urban interface, cost to mitigate wildfire risk, and energy produced from forest-based biomass. Selected indicators also include drought and disturbance from both wildfires and biotic agents. The forest indicators presented are an initial set that will need further refinement in coordination with other NCA indicator teams. Our effort ideally will initiate the collection of critical measurements and observations and lead to additional research on forest-climate indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abatzoglou JT, Williams AP (2016) Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:11770–11775. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607171113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aber JD, Goodale CL, Ollinger SV et al (2003) Is nitrogen deposition altering the nitrogen status of northeastern forests? Bioscience 53:375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkama R, Cescatti A (2016) Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover. Science 351:600–604. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac8083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderegg WRL, Trugman AT, Badgley G et al (2020) Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7005

  • Bala G, Caldeira K, Wickett M et al (2007) Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:6550–6555. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608998104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N et al (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentz BJ, Régnière J, Fettig CJ et al (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the Western United States and Canada: Direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60:602–613. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, J. and D. S. Arndt, Eds., 2020: State of the climate in 2019. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 101 (8), Si–S429 https://doi.org/10.1175/2020BAMSStateoftheClimate.1

  • Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buizer JL, Fleming P, Hays SL, et al (2013) Report on preparing the nation for change: Building a sustained national climate assessment process. 1–73

  • Burton PJ, Bergeron Y, Bogdanski BEC, et al (2010) Sustainability of boreal forests and forestry in a changing environment. In: For. Soc. to Glob. Drivers Chang. http://agents.cirad.fr/pjjimg/bruno.locatelli@cirad.fr/Locatelli_atal_2010_Forests_and_Adaptation_CC_IUFRO.pdf.

  • Cai T, Flanagan LB, Syed KH (2010) Warmer and drier conditions stimulate respiration more than photosynthesis in a boreal peatland ecosystem: Analysis of automatic chambers and eddy covariance measurements. Plant Cell Environ 33:394–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02089.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins S, Larry E (2007) Caring for our natural assets: an ecosystem services perspective. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR:1–11

  • Cordell HK (2012) Outdoor recreation trends and futures: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment

  • Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S et al (2001) Climate change and forest disturbances. Bioscience 51:723–734. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0723:CCAFD]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson EA, David MB, Galloway JN, et al (2012) Excess nitrogen in the U.S. environment: Trends, risks, and solutions. Issues Ecol 1–16

  • Dennison PE, Brewer SC, Arnold JD, Moritz MA (2014) Geophysical research letters. Geophys Prospect 41:2928–2933. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery MR, Pierce AR (2005) Interrupting the telos: Locating subsistence in contemporary US forests. Environ Plan 37:981–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2016) EPA's report on the environment

  • Fargione JE, Bassett S, Boucher T, et al (2018) Natural climate solutions for the United States. Sci Adv 4:eaat1869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat1869

  • Fedkiw J (1998) Managing multiple uses on national forests, 1905–1995: A 90-year learning experience and it isn't finished yet, FS-628. US Department of Agriculture

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Marshall P, Camp A (2013) Disturbances in deciduous temperate forest ecosystems of the northern hemisphere: Their effects on both recent and future forest development. Biodivers Conserv 22:1863–1893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0525-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlingstein P, Jones MW, O'Sullivan M et al (2019) Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst Sci Data 11:1783–1838. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier S, Bernier P, Kuuluvainen T et al (2015) Boreal forest health and global change. Science 349:819–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier S, Lorente M, Kremsater L et al (2014) Tracking climate change effects: Potential indicators for Canada's forests and forest sector. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng A, Yang H, Chen J, Hong Y (2017) Review of carbon storage function of harvested wood products and the potential of wood substitution in greenhouse gas mitigation. For Policy Econ 85:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorte RW (2011) CRS report for Congress Federal Funding for Wildfire Control and Management

  • Hansen AJ, Piekielek N, Davis C et al (2014) Exposure of U.S. national parks to land use and climate change 1900-2100. Ecol Appl 24:484–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL, Antle J, Garrett KA et al (2018) Indicators of climate change in agricultural systems. Clim Chang:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2222-2

  • Heath LS, Anderson SM, Emery MR, et al (2015) Indicators of climate impacts for forests: Recommendations for the U.S. National Climate Assessment Indicators System Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-155. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, northern Research Station

  • Heath LS, Smith JE, Skog KE, et al (2011) Managed forest carbon estimates for the US greenhouse gas inventory, 1990-2008. J For April/May:167–173

  • Horton DE, Johnson NC, Singh D et al (2015) Contribution of changes in atmospheric circulation patterns to extreme temperature trends. Nature 522:465–469. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    Google Scholar 

  • ITTO (2016) Criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of tropical forests. ITTO Policy Development Series No. 21. Yokohama, Japan

  • Janetos AC, Chen RS, Arndt D, Kenney MA (2012) National climate assessment indicators: Background, development, & examples

  • Jones MO, Running SW, Kimball JS et al (2018) Terrestrial primary productivity indicators for inclusion in the National Climate Indicators System. Clim Chang:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2155-9

  • Kenney M, Janetos A, Al E (2014) National climate indicators system report. Natl Clim Assess Dev Advis Comm 157

  • Kenney MA, Janetos AC, Gerst MD (2018) A framework for national climate indicators. Clim Chang:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2307-y

  • Kenney MA, Janetos AC, Lough G (2016) Building an integrated U.S. national climate indicators system

  • LaBau VJ, Bones JT, Kingsley NP, et al (2007) A history of the forest survey in the United States: 1830–2004

  • Le Quéré C, Peters GP, Andres RJ et al (2014) Global carbon budget 2013. Earth Syst Sci Data 6:235–263. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-235-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SL, Edwards DP, Galbraith D (2015) Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science (80- ) 349:827–832

  • Liang J, Crowther TW, Picard N et al (2016) Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8957

  • Liknes GC, Nelson MD, Kaisershot DJ (2013) Net change in forest density, 1873–2001. Using historical maps to monitor long-term forest trends. Newtown Square, PA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linser S, Wolfslehner B, Asmar F et al (2018) 25 Years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: Why some intergovernmental C&I processes flourished while others faded. For. 9

  • Littell JS, Mckenzie D, Peterson DL, Westerling AL (2009) Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. ecoprovinces, 1916-2003. Ecol Appl 19:1003–1021. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1183.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell JS, Oneil EE, McKenzie D et al (2010) Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climate change in Washington state, USA. Clim Chang 102:129–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell JS, Peterson DL, Riley KL et al (2016) A review of the relationships between drought and forest fire in the United States. Glob Chang Biol 22:2353–2369. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorente M, Gauthier S, Bernier P, Ste-Marie C (2018) Tracking forest changes: Canadian Forest Service indicators of climate change. Clim Chang:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2154-x

  • Lugo AE (2015) Forestry in the Anthropocene. Science (80- ) 349:771

  • MacCleery DW (2011) American forests: A history of resilience and recovery

  • Melillo JM, Richmond T, Yohe GW (eds) (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar CI, Stephenson NL (2015) Temperate forest health in an era of emerging megadisturbance. Science 349:823–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montreal Process (1995) Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. The Montreal Process. 1995. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Headquarters, Policy, Planning and International Affairs Branch, Ottawa. 28 p

  • Montreal Process (2015) The Montréal process criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. Fifth Edition, September 2015

  • Natural Resources Canada CFS (2020) The state of Canada's forests: Annual report 2019

  • Norton-Smith K, Lynn K, Chief K, et al (2016) Climate change and indigenous peoples: A synthesis of current impacts and experiences

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Envinronmental Pollut 116:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRCS (2017) National resources inventory. In: USDA Nat. Resour. Conserv. Serv. https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/national-resources-inventory.

  • Ojima D, Reyes J, Aicher R, et al Development of climate change indicators for grasslands, shrublands, rangelands, and pasturelands of the United States

  • Oswalt SN, Smith WB, Miles PD, Pugh SA (coords) (2019) Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-97. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office 223 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/WO-GTR-97

  • Pardo LH, Fenn ME, Goodale CL et al (2011) Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States. Ecol Appl 21:3049–3082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder RW, Davidson EA, Goodale CL et al (2012) Climate change impacts of US reactive nitrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7671–7675. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114243109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter EM, Bowman WD, Clark CM et al (2013) Interactive effects of anthropogenic nitrogen enrichment and climate change on terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity. Biogeochemistry 114:93–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-012-9803-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter KM, Conkling BL (eds) (2020) Forest health monitoring: National status, trends, and analysis 2019. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-250. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Res Station 189 p

  • Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI et al (2005) The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger WH, Dietze MC, Jackson RB et al (2015) Forest biogeochemistry in response to drought. Glob Chang Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13105

  • Schoeneberger M, Bentrup G, de Gooijer H et al (2012) Branching out: Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture. J Soil Water Conserv 67:128A–136A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl R, Thom D, Kautz M, et al (2017) Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 395–402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3303

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al (2007) Technical summary. In: Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,

  • Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (2000) Precious heritage: The status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, USA

  • Stephenson NL (1990) Climatic control of vegetation distribution: The role of the water balance. Am Nat 135:649–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturrock RN, Frankel SJ, Brown AV et al (2011) Climate change and forest diseases. Plant Pathol 60:133–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02406.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administratrion (2013) Renewable energy sources—Energy explained, your guide to understanding energy. http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=renewable_home. Accessed 23 Aug 2013

  • U.S. Forest Service (2012) Future of America's forests and rangelands: Forest Service 2010 Resources Planning Act Assessment. Gen Tech Rep WO-87

  • U.S. Forest Service (2001) U.S. forest facts and historical trends. http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/brochures/docs/2000/ForestFactsMetric.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2016

  • U.S. Forest Service (2011) National report on sustainable forests-2010. FS-979

  • U.S. Forest Service (2016) Assessing the sustainability of agricultural and urban forests in the United States, FS-1067

  • USDA Forest Service (2016) Future of America's forests and rangelands: Update to the 2010 Resources Planning Act Assessment. Washington, DC

  • Vinyeta K, Lynn K (2013) Exploring the role of traditional ecological knowledge in climate change initiatives. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-879. Portland, OR

  • Wan Y, Fiery M (2013) The economic impact of privately-owned forests in the United States

  • Westfall JA, Patterson PL, Edgar CB (2018) Integrating urban and national forest inventory data in support of rural-urban assessments. Forestry 91:641–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpy023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson TB, Edwards JE (2014) Adapting sustainable forest management to climate change: Criteria and indicators in a changing climate

  • Winter P, Sánchez J, Olson D Effects of climate change on outdoor recreation in the Sierra Nevada. In: Halofsky JE, Peterson DL, Buluc L, Ko J (eds) (2018) Climate change vulnerability and adaptation for infrastructure and recreation in the Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station

  • Woodbury PB, Smith JE, Heath LS (2007) Carbon sequestration in the U.S. forest sector from 1990 to 2010. For Ecol Manag 241:14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi W, Peet RK (2011) The complexity of catastrophic wind impacts on temperate forests. In: Recent hurricane research—Climate, dynamics, and societal impacts, pp 503–534

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support provided by A.C. Janetos, chair of the Indicator Work Group under the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC), and M.A. Kenney, director of the Indicator Research Team. Kenney's research team provided research and coordination support to the technical team, which was supported by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration grant NA09NES4400006 and NA14NES4320003 (Cooperative Climate and Satellites-CICS) at the University of Maryland/ESSIC. Members of the Indicators Technical Teams, NCADAC Indicator Work Group, and Kenney's NCIS research team are included in Kenney et al. (2014). The authors also wish to recognize contributions to Heath et al. (2015), which formed the foundation for this article: Andrzej Bytnerowicz (USFS, Pacific Southwest Station), Sarah Jovan (USFS Pacific Northwest Research Station), Miranda Mockrin (USFS, Rocky Mountain Research Station), Robert Musselman (USFS, Rocky Mountain Research Station), Bethany K. Schulz (USFS Pacific Northwest Research Station), Robert J. Smith (Oregon State University), Susan I. Stewart (University of Wisconsin).

Funding

M.A. Kenney, director of the Indicator Research Team, provided research and coordination support to the technical team, which was supported by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration grant NA09NES4400006 and NA14NES4320003 (Cooperative Climate and Satellites-CICS) at the University of Maryland/ESSIC. S.M. Anderson was supported by National Science Foundation grant 0903714 for most of the time spent working on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to conceptualization, analysis of datasets, literature, writing, and critical review of the manuscript. Anderson was responsible for primary writing of the article, conceptualizing the conceptual model, and synthesizing input from all team members. Heath was responsible for conceptualization of the whole project and supervised design. Team members also contributed to specific indicators: Heath (Forestland Area and Extent, Forest Biomass and Density, Forest Growth and Productivity, Wildfire Effects, and Outdoor Recreation), Emery (indicators identified as research needs), Hicke (Forest Insect and Disease Damage), Littell (Water Balance Deficit), Lucier (Forestland Area and Extent), Masek (Forest Growth and Productivity), Peterson (Wildfire Effects), Pouyat (conceptual model, coordination with other technical teams), Potter (Diversity/Abundance of Forest-associated Floral Species), Robertson (Cost to Mitigate Wildfire Risk, Energy Produced from Forest-based Biomass), and Sperry (Diversity/Abundance of Forest-associated Faunal Species).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah M. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of a topical collection on “National Indicators of Climate Changes, Impacts, and Vulnerability” edited by Anthony C. Janetos and Melissa A. Kenney.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 28 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 15 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, S.M., Heath, L.S., Emery, M.R. et al. Developing a set of indicators to identify, monitor, and track impacts and change in forests of the United States. Climatic Change 165, 13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02993-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02993-6

Keywords

Navigation